I'm looking for some feedback on the image below of the flattened primers fired in the new-to-me (was bought used)
Angelo Zoli (not "Antonio") 12 gauge over .222 Rem combination gun. The receiver is nicely engraved and the gun is in excellent condition, and as it came with the very expensive Valmet quick-detach rail-mount scope mount along with a decent 1.5-4X scope mounted on it (all for a really nice price!) -- I'd really like to solve this issue and get the gun working well.
The (3) fired brass shown in the image all shot well -- grouping into 1/2" at 50 yards when using an informal rest.
The image shows (1) Hornady "Super Varmint" factory loading unfired brass, followed by (2) fired brass to the right. The bottom row shows (1) Remington factory load unfired, followed by (1) fired brass to the right. The primers of the fired Hornady brass look more flattened than the Rem brass, as you can see the rounded edges of the primer cups are more like sharp corners after firing; and the the primers cups on both makes of brass don't show the typical dimples that you'd see on once-fired brass -- and it appears the dimple has flowed back against the firing pin.
Since they're both factory loadings, I'd suspect this Bockbuschflinte has excessive headspace and it might become a "reloads only" project for me so I can adjust the brass to fit the chamber. (Luckily, I do load for the .222 Rem.) I could send the unfired & fired brass back to both Hornady and Remington for evaluation (as was suggested by a shooter at the range), but I don't think it's over-pressure -- and I'm more inclined to look at the lower .222 rifle's chamber first.
* Any other thoughts on the likely cause of this appearance of the fired brass?
* Should I also check the condition of the rifle's firing pin tip, or return spring?
(As it does drag on the fired brass and one shot was hard to open after firing.)
* Or, could the hammer spring be weak?
Thanks!
Old No7