|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 161
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 161 |
Hello,
I�m looking for some personal opinions on a receiver sight for one of my lever rifles. I have a Winchester Model 95 in .30-40, which was made in 1921. The rifle is not in original condition (rebarreled, Marbles rear sight, stock shortened). I am thinking very strongly of buying one of the Lyman 21 receiver sights from Providence Tool Co. to have installed. I see that Buffalo Arms is selling them (http://www.buffaloarms.com/browse.cfm/4,7197.html). My eyes aren�t what they used to be and I have fewer problems with receiver sights than I do with barrel sights. I know this repro sight from PTC is patterned after the old Lyman sight which was to popular on Model 95�s, but I�ve never seen one up close. Does this Lyman 21 have a simple �ghost ring� or does it take a threaded disk like most other Lyman sights? Also, I cannot tell if there is a windage adjustment to the sight. From the photos I�ve seen it is difficult to see if it has windage adjustments.
Lastly, are there any concerns about this sight as far as quality and finish? I�m assuming any competent gunsmith could do the install.
Thanks, Cliff
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 176
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 176 |
Sincerely,
Hobie
"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 161
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 161 |
Hobie, thank you very much for the large and clear photo. So it looks like it's an non-threaded peep. I appreciate it.
Cliff
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,734
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,734 |
Salish I have the Buffalo Arms Lyman 38 on my new model 95 in 405. I like it a great deal. However, in hindsight I would rather have the 21. The 38 has the windage adjustment wheel. A great idea, but the wheel on the reproduction is larger than on the original Lyman, causing me to have it adjusted a little high, thus causing me to install a taller front sight. The 21 would ride closer to the receiver.
From a shooting standpoint, it works great.
405wcf
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,275
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,275 |
If you notice that little bump on top of the sight in Hobies' picture? That is what flips the small aperature up or down. The Lyman sight has both a large and small app. Another option would be to replace the barrel sight with the One Ragged Hole sight. Its a nice ghost ring out where old eyes can focus on it, and before I put the 38 type sight on my 95 shot some very good groups with it.
the most expensive bullet there is isn't worth a plug nickel if it don't go where its supposed to. www.historicshooting.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 276
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 276 |
These ones work Ok to. Couldnt resist I'll sell it. Prob is,mint sight is attatched to mint orig gun. They all kinda go together
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 161
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 161 |
Thanks again, guys. There is some great information here. 405, thanks for your advice on the way the two sights ride on the receiver. I've got some decisions to make. I see an original Lyman sight was upwards of $300 the other day on Gunbroker.
Thanks again, Cliff
|
|
|
|
73 members (808outdoors, 10gaugemag, 444Matt, 44automag, 35sambar, 13 invisible),
2,203
guests, and
681
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,279
Posts18,467,668
Members73,928
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|