Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#3495455 - 11/19/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: VonGruff]  
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,170
prm Offline
Campfire Tracker
prm  Offline
Campfire Tracker

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,170
I have had good success with the 210 Scirocco II and the 225 Accubond on my 338-06. Both have demonstrated consistent groups in the .6-.8 range. Not a lot of data points, but enough to feel confident either way. No experience on game yet.

RV 728 BP
#3495833 - 11/19/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: prm]  
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 41,657
Mule Deer Offline
Campfire Oracle
Mule Deer  Offline
Campfire Oracle

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 41,657
Banana Belt, Montana
Thanks to everybody who has provided info!


John

"Gunwriters, as you know, aren't as informed as their readers are and if it wasn't for the readers, there would be no need for writers..."--Shrapnel, May 2015
#3495844 - 11/19/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: Mule Deer]  
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 85,832
Steelhead Offline
Campfire Oracle
Steelhead  Offline
Campfire Oracle

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 85,832
Azerbaijan
Both have shot just fine for me. I've killed more critters with the Swift, newer and older version. I do believe the Swifts like a little faster twist, which I generally run in aftermarket tubes, but that's just a 'guess'


"When I was a kid I thought that quicksand was going to be a much bigger problem than it is."
#3495904 - 11/19/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: Steelhead]  
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 894
65X54 Offline
Campfire Regular
65X54  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 894
South Central Kansas
Steelhead, have you tried the 90 gr 6mm on game yet? That one has been the gold standard in my 6mm Rem. Gotten really spoiled on that one. I have some of the nosler e-tips and some bergers to try yet but that's just experimenting. It would be real hard to beat the 90 gr swift. This is all in regards to the whitetails we have around here, havn't shot anything heavier.

#3495909 - 11/19/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: 65X54]  
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 85,832
Steelhead Offline
Campfire Oracle
Steelhead  Offline
Campfire Oracle

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 85,832
Azerbaijan
Negative but I have them loaded up and will be going hunting with me next week. Still have a 9.3x57 and a 6.5x54 I need to get bloody also.


"When I was a kid I thought that quicksand was going to be a much bigger problem than it is."
#3495932 - 11/19/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: Steelhead]  
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 894
65X54 Offline
Campfire Regular
65X54  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 894
South Central Kansas
Sounds like a tough job...No rest for the wicked I guess.

Good Luck to Ya!

edit to add, reminds me, got a 9X57 here that needs some blood.

Last edited by 65X54; 11/19/09.
#3496058 - 11/19/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: 65X54]  
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,779
Shag Online content
Campfire Tracker
Shag  Online Content
Campfire Tracker

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,779
Nez Perce County
I feel the Accubond performs flawless at non-magnum velocitys.

180's in my -06 were extremely accurate and I never recoverd a single one. Meat loss was minimal. The AB's wound channel,entrance and exit's were very similiar to a Partition.

I've seen enough meat damanage with AB's at magnum velocitys that I'd just stick with a partition. Just my 2 cents.


Get Outside...
#3496079 - 11/19/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: VonGruff]  
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 712
woods Offline
Campfire Regular
woods  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 712
Houston
Originally Posted by VonGruff
I have posted this before as well but this is the reason I will not go to the Swift again. emailed them but they wern't interested. Use the GS Custom bullet now for the "important" stuff.
[Linked Image]

This was a bullet picked at random to complement a wall display.

Von Gruff.


Good reason to weight sort bullets


"The beauty of the 2nd amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it" - Thomas Jefferson

Criminals prefer unarmed victims and dictators prefer unarmed citizens
#3496140 - 11/19/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: VonGruff]  
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,226
magnumb Offline
Campfire Tracker
magnumb  Offline
Campfire Tracker

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,226
Thanks for the response.

I also had my one and only horrible experience with the S1's, specifically their 180gr. in my 300RUM on a bull when Swift first put them out. I called Swift to check if they thought the bullet was adequate for elk prior to load development and they said "yes", especially in that weight and cartridge.

Not good........not at all.

Thanks for sharin' your results as well.........

Last edited by magnumb; 11/20/09.
#3497270 - 11/20/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: magnumb]  
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,979
Delta Hunter Offline
Campfire Ranger
Delta Hunter  Offline
Campfire Ranger

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,979
Olive Branch, MS
I wish I had a picture of a first generation Scirocco I recovered a few years ago from a whitetail. I put the bullet down while skinning the deer and forgot about it. Came back later and it was gone.

Anyway, and I know it's not all that relevant to discussing the second generation bullet, that thing was flat as a pancake with virtually no bullet shank remaining and was about as wide as a half dollar. I shot this deer from about 15 yards and was in a tripod stand at the time. The shot was right behind the shoulder and I expected to find an exit wound on the other side lower than the entrance considering I was shooting down at it. Instead the bullet didn't exit, but veered almost 90 degrees to the left and upward, ending up under the skin of the deer's right shoulder. It must have flattened out within the first 2 or 3 inches and then, for lack of a better word, it "hydroplaned" up and to the left. I guess shooting them that close with a .300 Wby will do that. What's astonishing to me is that a deer can take a hit like that and still run 50 yards, which this one did.


Weiners are health food - My dad
#3497430 - 11/20/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: Delta Hunter]  
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,226
magnumb Offline
Campfire Tracker
magnumb  Offline
Campfire Tracker

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,226
I couldn't find any pieces big enough to show that I took from that bull with the S1's..........

About as a complete fragmentation of a bullet that I've ever seen.

Bad....very bad.

I gave several hundred of those bullets to a buddy free of charge 'cuz they left me with such a bad experience. He uses them on deer out of his 300RUM.

Makes a guy pretty wary, even though the S11's might be the bullet of a lifetime. I won't be finding out...........


#3498323 - 11/20/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: magnumb]  
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,309
BradArnett Offline
Campfire Ranger
BradArnett  Offline
Campfire Ranger

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,309
Northern Mi.
This a 6mm 90gr SSII I pulled out of a whitetail shoulder just this afternoon. This shot entered in front of the rear leg and stopped in the off side shoulder. Muzzle velocity was 3220 and that shot was 160yds. It measures about .510" at its widest point and weighs 81.6gr. Shot 6 whitetails and this was the only one that didn't exit. I (personally) like the SSII.

[Linked Image]


[Linked Image]

#3498377 - 11/20/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: Mule Deer]  
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565
2muchgun Offline
Campfire Kahuna
2muchgun  Offline
Campfire Kahuna

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565
Michigun
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
I predict they will kill an elk!

I'd like to hear from anybody else who has shot both AB's and Scirocco's as far as accuracy results. I've had my own experiences with both but am interested in other's results.


I have not tried the SSIIs, but I could not get a single one of the original Sciroccos to fly worth a damm in 6mm, .277, or .308. The only Accubonds I've used are 150 gr. .308 and they shoot exceptionally well......

#3498380 - 11/20/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: BradArnett]  
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565
2muchgun Offline
Campfire Kahuna
2muchgun  Offline
Campfire Kahuna

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565
Michigun
Where you postin' those buck pics at Brad?

#3498592 - 11/20/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: 2muchgun]  
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 894
65X54 Offline
Campfire Regular
65X54  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 894
South Central Kansas
Brad, good to see what SSII looks like. I've used my 6mm on 14 of them and havn't got to see one until your post.

#3505041 - 11/23/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: kyreloader]  
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,168
StrayDog Offline
Campfire Tracker
StrayDog  Offline
Campfire Tracker

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,168
Texas
kyteloader,
From your water jug tests, it looks like the Scirocco may have a slight edge in both a larger mushroom, and weight retention.

My rifle likes Accubonds, but I may need to try out the accuracy in some Scirocco's.

#3505968 - 11/23/09 Re: Nosler Accubond's vs Swift Scirocco II [Re: StrayDog]  
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,447
hicountry Offline
Campfire Guide
hicountry  Offline
Campfire Guide

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,447
Northern Virginia
Pretty much a consistent theme in all of the recovery pics I have seen with ABs and SSs is that the SS seems to have a larger frontal area than the AB.

That would seem to imply that the AB would (theoretically anyway) penetrate further than the SS.

Frankly I wouldn't hesitate (and haven't) to point them at anything without the utmost confidence in the outcome.

Tony

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin, SYSOP 

RV 180 2
RV 160 1 2
RV 160 2 2
Who's Online Now
241 registered members (10generation, 204guy, 30Gibbs, 44automag, 280shooter, 43 invisible), 828 guests, and 380 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
RBCN 160 3









Copyright © 2000-2017 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.063s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 1.0357 MB (Peak: 1.2941 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-30 05:26:30 UTC