|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,267
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,267 |
FWIW, I was glancing through my newly-arrived Jan 2010 copy ( No.248) of RIFLE Magazine, and I spotted a pictoral ad for a new levergun ! The pic was a little dark, but the new levergun appeared to be a blued/walnut Winchester Model 92/clone, with a pistol grip/curved lever and a top-mounted peep that looked suspiciously like a Williams WGRS. The gun is the "Model 89", and is said to be available in either rifle or carbine form - chambered to the powerful .500 S&W Magnum ! The offering/ad is from an outfit called "Big Horn Armory" of Cody, Wy - but when I tried their website, all I could find besides a trophy pic of an Elk was a "site under construction" notice. http://www.bighornarmory.com/products/.
It ain't no fun, when the rabbit's got the gun
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 781
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 781 |
I wonder how big the receiver ring is, to be able to withstand the pressures that the 500 generates. It will be interesting to see...especially if the receiver has NOT been beefed up beyond that of a standard 92.
ken@the river
GO DUCKS!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 422
Campfire Member
|
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 422 |
It appears to be a Win '86 clone. They were originally made in .50 cal., but it would have to be pretty special to take the rated pressure of the .500 S&W. If it really can, Cool!!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,267
Campfire Regular
|
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,267 |
The rifle pictured in the Rifle Magazine ad didn't appear to have the 2-piece loading gate of the Model 1886/86, so I don't think it's a clone.
From a remark/reply from someone who lives nearby to the makers, made elsewhere, it "may" be a specially-made, slightly oversize Model 92.
.
It ain't no fun, when the rabbit's got the gun
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,488
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,488 |
So does anybody know what the cost of this model 89 is? This sure will replace a lot of 45-70 Marlins. To bad it wasn't done as a Marlin flat top so a guy could hang a scope on it and not scare your kids to death with a case of the uglies.
Thus saith thr lord; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeh from the lord. Jeremiah 17:5 KJV
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 347
Campfire Member
|
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 347 |
I'll stick with the 45-70. It has all the power I'll ever need, and ammo is everywhere, from softball cowboy loads to the Garret loads that would shoot through an elephant.
Can't deny the 'cool factor' of the .500, but since I'm entering the Grouchy Old Fart part of my life, cool don't matter much to me anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,864
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,864 |
I'll stick with the 45-70. It has all the power I'll ever need, and ammo is everywhere, from softball cowboy loads to the Garret loads that would shoot through an elephant.
Can't deny the 'cool factor' of the .500, but since I'm entering the Grouchy Old Fart part of my life, cool don't matter much to me anymore.
Another GOF and I agree, I don't think the 500 S&W can match the 45-70.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,075
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,075 |
This rifle will be very popular in some states such as Indiana, that will not permit rifles for deer hunting unless chambered for a handgun cartridge. You cannot use a Marlin .45/70 but you can use a model 89 in .500 S&W.
Saw the same government logic in Australia years ago, when you could not have big game rifles in the Northern Territory to hunt buffalo but you could carry a Marlin .45/70 because it was considered a low powered cartridge.
Only the faces change.
JW
When truth is ignored, it does not change an untruth from remaining a lie.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2
New Member
|
|
New Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2 |
Also saw the ad for the Big Horn Model 89 .500 S&W in RIFLE and have tried the listed website with no luck. Concur with Rangr44 that the advertised rifle is not an 1886/86/71 clone - believe it might be a reworked 'Puma' 92 clone which started life as a .454 Casull. If that is indeed the case, I'd have to compare the pressures for the .454 and .500 before I'd squeeze the trigger on one but the Puma .454 that I had shot very well when it would feed. I'm intrigued with this new offering from Big Horn Armory as a hog gun - I like the handling of a 92 but prefer to have something a bit heavier than .44 Mag or .45 Colt for big pigs. Won't be giving up my 1895 45/70 anytime soon, but a 92 in the same power class sure would be hard to resist...
D
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,867
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,867 |
Too many ifs. I'll stick with my 1895 Marlin Cowboy 45-70.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,295
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,295 |
Like the 454 casull in the Puma '92,the old reliable 45-70 matches or beats,by a large margin with a couple loads,the 500 Smith and Wesson. Shot in a 22" Handi-Rifle in 500 Smith and Wesson. ![[Linked Image]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v652/jaycocreek/500Smith.jpg) Jayco
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,488
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,488 |
You folks that think the .45-70 is the last word in power have never actually shot moose with one. Regardless of what you may think or heard the .500 S&W is hands down more powerful than a .45-70, which without a doubt is one of the poorest choices many people make here in Alaska.
I have heard this same BS here in Alaska for years, to bad there's no truth in it.
I have a new .454 Puma in a 92 clone and this model 89 looks nothing like a model 92 clone, it looks like a 94 action and nothing else.
Thus saith thr lord; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeh from the lord. Jeremiah 17:5 KJV
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,978
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,978 |
Yeah, the fact that the 45-70 pushes the same weight bullets as fast as the .500 does at lower presssures is a real bummer. What a schitty round! So is the fact that the .45 slugs penetrate better since they have better sectional densities..And finally, the 45-70 is a real poor choice because you can get it in an realaively inexpensive factory lever rifle like the Marlin and brass ,bullets and load data a easy to come by.. I'm sure 400 grain 45-70 slugs freaking BOUNCE OFF Bull moose and Bears.. 
Last edited by jim62; 12/15/09.
To all gunmaker critics-
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.."- Teddy Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,295
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,295 |
.45-70, which without a doubt is one of the poorest choices many people make here in Alaska. Well,there are atleast two Master Guides in Alaska that disagree with you and one is Phil Shoemaker where as he has written that both he and his wife packs one fishing for Bears.. The other Jerry Jacques a Master Guide in Alaska and a Licensed Professional Hunter in Africa. ![[Linked Image]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v652/jaycocreek/12.jpg) The end result is that 9 year old Jason shot a beautiful 8' 7" Grizzly with your 45-70 ammo. From 45 yards the 540 gr. bullet struck the bear broadside in the left shoulder. Breaking the shoulder, going through the rib cage on both sides and breaking the right shoulder, then exiting the bear. This was a devastating blow to a tough animal. The bear made one jump when hit then collapsed dead 18 feet from where he was standing. You can buy 3 if not 4 Marlin 45-70 to the price on this new .500 S&W levergun. Jayco 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,075
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,075 |
I own both Marlin .45/70 and S&W 500 revolver and would rate them reasonably equal in power. The ballistics are not too dissimilar and although I obviously don't have a high kill tally with the .500, I have killed a few hundred head with various .45/70's to know what 400 grain bullets can do in the high teens for velocity.
Let me explain it by saying that I do not believe you would pick one over the other for any particular hunting chore. You simply carry what please you. I know I would.
JW
When truth is ignored, it does not change an untruth from remaining a lie.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,295
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,295 |
The 45-70 achieves the same or better velocities with a Max pressure of 40,000 CUP or 43,500 PSI while the Smith and Wesson uses 60,000 PSI and the cost of beefing up a lever action to take 60,000 PSI in a .500 will be astronomic..My Guess is this particular new .500 Lever action will run over $1500 and probably closer to $2000.
I could be wrong but we will see.
Jayco
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 347
Campfire Member
|
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 347 |
I guess the track record of the 45-70 since 1873 just don't count, 3sixbits? All those buffalo aren't really dead, they're just pretending...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 518
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 518 |
Personally, I find this interesting.
My analysis of the photos concurs with the text, the receiver is neither from an 1886 nor an 1892, but more like a 92 stretched, with a little bit of Marlin 336 thrown in.
I think this 500 will do little to challenge the supremacy of the 45-70/450. However, assuming that this company can overcome the challenges of making a high end niche gun in our failing economy, it certainly achieves where others have failed. Did WWG ever get their 500 S&W levergun out of the experimental stage?
Ultimately, the appeal of .50 cal guns is strong. In my opinion, this gun has a good chance of securing "market share", mostly due to the strong S&W name.
In terms of the 1/2" bore, it was discovered way back in the 1870's that the 45 cal was superior in most real world scenarios to the 50 cal. The testing that went into the creation of the 45-70 was more extensive than words here can relate. Thus the 45-70 replaced the 50-70.
Still, the 500 is an impressive cartridge. In many ways it is far more sensible as a levergun cartridge than it is as a handgun round.
I wish them success.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,488
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,488 |
Personally, I find this interesting.
My analysis of the photos concurs with the text, the receiver is neither from an 1886 nor an 1892, but more like a 92 stretched, with a little bit of Marlin 336 thrown in.
I think this 500 will do little to challenge the supremacy of the 45-70/450. However, assuming that this company can overcome the challenges of making a high end niche gun in our failing economy, it certainly achieves where others have failed. Did WWG ever get their 500 S&W levergun out of the experimental stage?
Ultimately, the appeal of .50 cal guns is strong. In my opinion, this gun has a good chance of securing "market share", mostly due to the strong S&W name.
In terms of the 1/2" bore, it was discovered way back in the 1870's that the 45 cal was superior in most real world scenarios to the 50 cal. The testing that went into the creation of the 45-70 was more extensive than words here can relate. Thus the 45-70 replaced the 50-70.
Still, the 500 is an impressive cartridge. In many ways it is far more sensible as a levergun cartridge than it is as a handgun round.
I wish them success. The two prototypes still set in the rack in the back of the shop, they look well thought out and are a kind of clone of the Marlin, I don't know why the owner gave up on them, I can have the receivers and bolts reproduced loss wax for him, I just do not like the arrogant SOB to talk to, he does get under my skin.
Thus saith thr lord; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeh from the lord. Jeremiah 17:5 KJV
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,153
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,153 |
The website is working and the price is just under $1900
|
|
|
|
|
683 members (007FJ, 10ring1, 10gaugemag, 12344mag, 160user, 10gaugeman, 70 invisible),
2,996
guests, and
1,320
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,481
Posts18,451,879
Members73,901
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
