24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
C
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
Have any gunwriters used this one before? Any thoughts/comments on it?

It supposedly gets 3200+fps with 140 gr. bullets out of a 23.62" barrel.

---------------------------------------------------------------
The 6.5 x 63 Messner Magnum

The 9.3 x 64 Brenneke case has functioned as the parent case for the 6.5 x 63 Messner Magnum, which's essentially a 6.5 mm (.264 in) necked-down version of the 9.3 x 64. The wildcat status of the 6.5 x 63 Messner Magnum ended in 2002 when it got C.I.P. certified and became an officially registered and sanctioned member of the German 64 mm "family" of magnum rifle cartridges.
The 6.5 x 63 Messner Magnum has 5.42 ml (83.5 grains) water cartridge case capacity. 6.5 x 63 Messner Magnum maximum C.I.P. cartridge dimensions. All sizes in millimetres (mm).
Americans would define the shoulder angle at alpha/2 = 29 degrees. The common rifling twist rate for this cartridge's 200 mm (1 in 7.87 in), 6 grooves, � lands = 6.45 mm, � grooves = 6.70 mm, land width = 3.50 mm and the primer type's large rifle magnum.
According to the official C.I.P. guidelines the 6.5 x 63 Messner Magnum case can handle up to 440 MPa (63,816 psi) piezo pressure.
The idea behind the 6.5 x 63 Messner Magnum was to develop a very powerful 6.5 mm long range hunting cartridge that achieves very high muzzle velocities out of relatively short 600 mm (23.62 in) long rifle barrels. The developer, Mr. Joseph Messner from France, chose the 9.3 x 64 Brenneke as parent case, since it offers enough case capacity and a competent gunsmith can relatively easy rechamber a standard Mauser 98 or any other bolt action rifle to accept 9.3 x 64 Brenneke based cartridges. Beside the 6.5 x 63 Messner Magnum rimless rifle cartridge Mr. Messner also designed a rimmed version for break action rifles of the cartridge called the 6.5 x 63 R Messner Magnum.

BP-B2

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,016
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,016
This cartridge has maybe a 1.5 grain advantage over the .264 win mag. Performance would have to be very close. What advantages would this round possess over the Win Mag?


Democracy is not freedom. Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to eat for lunch. Freedom comes from the recognition of certain rights which may not be taken, not even by a 99% vote.
*Marvin Simkin* L.A. Times (1992)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
C
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
I don't know; hence my question. The 6.5 x 63 Messner Magnum has 83.5 grains water capacity, is the water capacity of the 264 Win. Mag only 82 grains?

The other thing we know is that it doesn't have a belt smirk

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,016
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,016
Published water capacity of the .264 Win Mag is 82 grains of water. From my understanding it takes about a 5% increase in case capacity to realize a 1% gain in velocity.


Democracy is not freedom. Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to eat for lunch. Freedom comes from the recognition of certain rights which may not be taken, not even by a 99% vote.
*Marvin Simkin* L.A. Times (1992)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,849
W
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
W
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,849
Just looked at my reloading notes. My average measured water capacity to the neck-shoulder junction for Win 264 WM cases is 84.1 grains. FWIW practically however, max charges I can get into a 264WM case with powders like H50BMG is 75 grains, with a long drop tube, loading 140 grain bullets to OAL 3.34".


Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty of give me death! P. Henry

Deus vult!

Rhodesians all now

IC B2

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,467
S
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,467
Interesting cartridge, but nothing really new. Von Hoff, RWS, and the 7mm Sahrpe & Hart necked down as well as the 264 Winchester are pretty close to the same thing. All 61mm to 65mm. I really like the 6.5's will have to what is different about this one.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,586
bcp Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,586
6.5x68 for comparison:

"Extremely thick brass results in 'only' 5.584 ml (86.0 grains) H2O cartridge case capacity for the 6.5 x 68"

http://www.tripatlas.com/6.5_x_68

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,935
H
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
H
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,935
I would ask the Jeff Cooper question: "What's it for?"

My 6.5-'06 is a 6.5X63, but built on a narrower case (same head size as the 9.3X62 or 9.3X66).

The .376 Steyr was also developed from the 9.3X64 case, here going from 9.3mm to 9.5mm and shortening the case from 64 to 60 mm.

There is some wildcat interest in the 6.5 on the wide, short case so short actions can be used. My current idea for a "fave" is a 6.5 RCM. I have not tried one of these, so my theory might not survive the reality test.

I like 6.5s too.

jim


LCDR Jim Dodd, USN (Ret.)
"If you're too busy to hunt, you're too busy."
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
D
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
I'm sure it works, but sounds pretty much like a whole bunch of other options that have at least some modicum of popularity. I can't see it taking off much.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,810
D
djs Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,810
With commercially available cartridges that do the same thing, why go through the pain of an obscure cartridge? If you wildcat a new cartridge, at least you get some satisfaction and fun. But an obscure cartridge is difficult to obtain nad just (generally) a PITA.

IC B3

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,540
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,540
For my purposes with the rigs I shoot, if I wildcat in 6.5, I would use the 270WSM Norma brass and neck it down to 6.5, hence 6.5WSM.


Ernie "The Un-Tactical"

[Linked Image]
http://sebrests-usa.com/
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,169
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,169
Yup!!!


Its all right to be white!!
Stupidity left unattended will run rampant
Don't argue with stupid people, They will drag you down to their level and then win by experience
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
C
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
Any new news or updates on these European 6.5 magnums given the 6.5mm craze these days?

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,262
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,262
Weatherby’s 6.5 RPM is the way to go, here.


What could be a sadder way to end a life than to die having never hunted with great dogs, good friends and your family?
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
C
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
Originally Posted by seattlesetters
Weatherby’s 6.5 RPM is the way to go, here.


Components aren't widely available and isn't the rebated rim potentially problematic depending on field conditions and extractor type? I think you're spot on as to case capacity and being more available than the 6.5 x 63 Messner Magnum.

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,910
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,910
Canadian Lefty,

Aside from the microscopic loony examination of every tiny difference in various cartridges, why keep obsessing after more than a decade? Today there's a 6.5mm rifle cartridge for any obsession, whether tiny or huge, belted or beltless or rebated. Why not just pick one and be done with it?


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
C
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Canadian Lefty,

Aside from the microscopic loony examination of every tiny difference in various cartridges, why keep obsessing after more than a decade? Today there's a 6.5mm rifle cartridge for any obsession, whether tiny or huge, belted or beltless or rebated. Why not just pick one and be done with it?


You're right and I agree with you. I need to stick a fork in it. If I put a stake in the ground today, I'd get a 264 Win Mag. with a 25-26" barrel and be done. I just might ask a rifle maker to do that in the next few months.

My decade+ obsession with the 6.5mm caliber had been solved (all this time, at least) and for all practical purposes with the 270 Win. cartridge (or when needed/wanted, with my 300 Win Mag). I just keep revisiting and thinking the grass might be green enough on the 6.5mm side to justify another rifle in the Coues Deer, Pronghorn and Mule Deer class...Then, I'd just rebuild my 270 Win with a shorter 22" barrel (currently 24") and have a .264 Win Mag (or similar) with the same length barrel as my 300 Win Mag and have an all-round pair.

Math tells me that I should be shooting a little flatter and more importantly with slightly less wind drift, all else being equal if shooting, say a .264 Win Mag. vs my 270 Win, Plus, I can have a .264 Win Mag built to the same weight, just slightly longer, heavier barrel. The .264 (6.5mm) has some classic panache I do know that the .264 Win Mag won't do anything that I can't already do at least as well as my .300 Win Mag. so...back to square one or as Brad puts it, cartridges are more alike than different.

What is perplexing is that in reality? after having shot someone else's 264 Win Mag Model 70 at the range, it seems to have more bark than would appear on paper...maybe because I was shooting a right-handed rifle left-handed but...On paper, it would appear as though the 264 Win mag, even if handloaded to it's full potential ( (I removed a bunch of ballistic data for comparison here)) doesn't seem to gain much on the 270 Win other than maybe 1-2" less wind drift at 500 yards or if consistently shooting past 600 yards...yet it burns more powder, has a better B.C. bullet (comparing near equal sectional densities), all else being equal. I like your idea of a 6.5-.270 Improved or even a 6.5-280AI but would like having more velocity (to, at a min. better differentiate from a .270 Win) so I've been looking at alternatives between the 6.5-06 and the 26 Nosler (which looks great on paper but Norma discontinuing Brass and some describing how finicky it is to handload and get to shoot accurately?). I could also be convinced to go with a 270 Weatherby (another classic) or the new 27 Nosler...

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,910
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,910
If you think the .264 has more "bark," you probably wouldn't like the 26's bark (or the 6.5-.300 Weatherby's, since they get basically the same ballistics, with similar powder charges.)

I have only been around two 26 Nosler rifles, and neither was finicky: my Nosler Liberty model, and a friend's Browning X-Bolt. I'd had my Nosler rifle for several years, and any bullet in the 140-grain range shot VERY well with a maximum charge of US869. Lighter bullets shot well too, but don't remember the details, though could look them up.

My friend asked me about loading the 26, and I told him the above. He tried US869 with 140-grain Ballistic Tips, and the Browning shot little bitty groups. He used it last fall to take a big mule deer buck at around 450 yards.



“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369
CanadianLefty, you and I must be twins separated at birth... I sold my M38 Mauser more than 15 years ago and have been staring at my 6.5x55 dies ever since... For the last two months i have been pondering another Swede, or 260, or 6.5-284, or 6.5 PRC, or 26 Nosler, or 6.5-300 ... and for the last month looking hard at the 264 WinMag and twice had the bid ready to launch on Gunbroker... and didn't do it.

In the end I pulled the trigger on the Weatherby Weathermark in 6.5 RPM. I am looking forward to putting it through its paces.

My diagnosis: you havent yet settled on the cartridge waiting for you... it ain't a 270.

For math, run some numbers with the 127 LRX at 6.5 RPM velocities on Hornady's ballistic calculator, then play around with even slippier bullets. Ok, so the differences are small... we ain't in this for exercise. WE ARE splitting hairs and loving the nuanced gains provided by the 6.5...

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
C
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,067
Originally Posted by Dogger
CanadianLefty, you and I must be twins separated at birth... I sold my M38 Mauser more than 15 years ago and have been staring at my 6.5x55 dies ever since... For the last two months i have been pondering another Swede, or 260, or 6.5-284, or 6.5 PRC, or 26 Nosler, or 6.5-300 ... and for the last month looking hard at the 264 WinMag and twice had the bid ready to launch on Gunbroker... and didn't do it.

In the end I pulled the trigger on the Weatherby Weathermark in 6.5 RPM. I am looking forward to putting it through its paces.

My diagnosis: you havent yet settled on the cartridge waiting for you... it ain't a 270.

For math, run some numbers with the 127 LRX at 6.5 RPM velocities on Hornady's ballistic calculator, then play around with even slippier bullets. Ok, so the differences are small... we ain't in this for exercise. WE ARE splitting hairs and loving the nuanced gains provided by the 6.5...


Funny and thank you for your candor. Yes, I suspect that my 270 Win might take a backseat in the near future, not only to my 300 Win Mag, but to a sleeker .264 (~6.5mm) cartridge.


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
388 members (204guy, 280shooter, 10gaugemag, 1beaver_shooter, 16penny, 1_deuce, 46 invisible), 2,266 guests, and 1,133 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,723
Posts18,400,590
Members73,820
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.119s Queries: 14 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8906 MB (Peak: 1.0278 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-29 04:45:11 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS