Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#5508292 - 08/10/11 .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,054
Calif. Hunter Offline
Campfire Guide
Calif. Hunter  Offline
Campfire Guide

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,054
OC, CA
A friend seems to be enamored of the .20 Practical, which is, I believe, a .223 simply necked down to .20 caliber with no other changes. He feels that it will allow him to see the hits on prairie dogs better than the .204 and certainly better than his .22-250. I don't think there is much difference between the .204 and the .20 Practical, other than one is a factory load. Am I missing something? Does the .204 allow you to see prairie dogs hits? I would think you can load either to a lower level is that is your goal....


“That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.” George Orwell
RV 728 BP
#5508299 - 08/10/11 Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger [Re: Calif. Hunter]  
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,778
GuyM Offline
Campfire Guide
GuyM  Offline
Campfire Guide

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,778
Washington - dry side
Haven't ever tried the .20 Practical, but can see my hits just fine with the .204 Ruger. Great little cartridge - and no need to load it down...

#5508355 - 08/10/11 Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger [Re: GuyM]  
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,053
GreatWaputi Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
GreatWaputi  Offline
Campfire 'Bwana

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,053
Land of liberals, hippies, and...

#5508697 - 08/10/11 Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger [Re: GreatWaputi]  
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 432
ipopum Offline
Campfire Regular
ipopum  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 432
The draw to the 20 Practical is the issue of abundant 223 brass as opposed to buying factory 204 brass. From what I can find Ballistics are for all practical purposes the same. As for seeing your bullet strike you can do that with the 223.

#5508700 - 08/10/11 Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger [Re: ipopum]  
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,713
mjbgalt Offline
Campfire Outfitter
mjbgalt  Offline
Campfire Outfitter

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,713
ohio
yeah and i don't think brass is any different in price either way if you're not buying the cheapo stuff


I put Varget on my cornflakes...

#5508727 - 08/10/11 Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger [Re: mjbgalt]  
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 41,624
Mule Deer Offline
Campfire Oracle
Mule Deer  Offline
Campfire Oracle

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 41,624
Banana Belt, Montana
My experience is that a heavy-barreled .223 will come down out of recoil enough to see bullet hits at 150-200 yards or more--sort of, depending on where the bullet hits. But I couldn't see the bullet strikes consistenly with a heavy-barreled .223 a month or so ago on a PD shoot, even when using 40-grain bullets

A sporter-weight .204 allows you to do the same thing, often even better. With a heavy-barreled .204 you can look through the scope the entire time, especially with 32-grain bullets. Of course a .221 or .17 Fireball, .22 Hornet, or anything like that upsets the view through the scope even less--but they don't have the range of a .204.


John

"Gunwriters, as you know, aren't as informed as their readers are and if it wasn't for the readers, there would be no need for writers..."--Shrapnel, May 2015
#5529142 - 08/16/11 Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger [Re: Mule Deer]  
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 432
ipopum Offline
Campfire Regular
ipopum  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 432
MD Does stock design play a role in seeing the hit or not? I have ran more than 15000 rounds through a Herters 223 regular barrel and have no problem seeing my hits or misses at 400 yards. But with a Savage comp. stock of recent vintage it is a little harder to see. Both are sporter weight barrels and I shoot mostly 55 gr. bullets.
I think than most high volume shooters who reload shoot more Military brass than commercial. At least that is the case with the ones that I know. That would be the draw to me to go to the 20 Practical. For those that do not reload the cost would be much the same.


Moderated by  RickBin, SYSOP 

RV 180 2
OX 160 1
RBCN 160 3
Who's Online Now
449 registered members (17Hunter, 19rabbit52, 21, 1234, 17_wizzer, 10gaugemag, 49 invisible), 984 guests, and 414 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
NMX 160









Copyright © 2000-2017 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.068s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9438 MB (Peak: 1.1130 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-23 12:47:58 UTC