24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
EricM Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
I'd like to hear from anyone with first hand experience with the Kowa's.

They seem to be very similar to the Leupold Yosemites. Same FOV (420'), Exit pupil (5 mm), prism material (BaK4), eye relief (20 mm), close focus (16.4'), roughly the same weight and size, etc. I've heard the Yo's have a warmer view compared to the Kowa's which are more natural.

Which is better?

Kowa: http://www.optics4birding.com/kowa-yf-6x30-porro-prism-binoculars.html
Yo's: http://www.optics4birding.com/leupold-bx-1-yosemite-6x30-binoculars-natural.html

Thanks,
Eric

BP-B2

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
EricM Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
I had a great conversation with optics4birding, and they said buy the Kowas over the Leupolds. I guess the new YO's have had some quality control issues, stiff focusing, etc.

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,865
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,865
Eric:

I own the Yosemite 6x30 original version, and I like it and the
build is good. The stiff focusing that you may hear about is
the seal drag that aids with waterproofing. No big deal, and
it seems the Kowa is very similar and may be a clone of the Yosemite.
I would not rate one over the other, but one thing that is
well known, is that Leupold is ranked near the very top with
any warranty issues, and that for me means a lot. With Kowa
I just don't know. Maybe someone could tell us about that.

These small porros are very nice and small, good for younger
users. I have given one Yose. to my nephew, and am thinking about getting another, or 2, as I am starting to have grandchildren, as they will be need to be trained in the great
outdoors.

Jerry



Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
EricM Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
Thanks, Jerry. I owned a pair of Yosemite 6x30's, original version, but sold them here on the 'fire.. I should have kept them. In any case I decided to give the Kowa's a try. I was told it's basically the same thing as the original Yosemites.

Cheers,
Eric

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,201
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,201
I have the 8x30 Kowa's and really like them. Good size and weight and work well for my kids too. Have not directly compared them to the Yo's but have used them before and feel like the Kowa may be slightly better but that is going on memory (and money spent) not a direct comparison.

Lee

IC B2

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
EricM Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
Thanks, Lee. For $99 it's worth a try! smile

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
EricM Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,513
I received the 6x30 Kowa's in the mail today and have to say, I like what I see. They seem to be sharper than the Yosemites. Great FOV, depth of field, ER, clarity... the porro prisms display a nice 3D view. Hopefully they hold up in the field.

Eric


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
713 members (222Sako, 007FJ, 09wingates, 10gaugemag, 12344mag, 204guy, 79 invisible), 2,925 guests, and 1,254 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,778
Posts18,401,620
Members73,823
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.097s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8163 MB (Peak: 0.8729 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-29 16:04:22 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS