|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,038
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,038 |
Gents,
Anybody used both a Rem Model 7 and a Rem Mountain Rifle? Care to describe your opinion of each?
From the looks of Rem's offerings per their website, the Mountain Rifle is mostly for a long action (though 7-08 and 308 are offerings), and the Model 7 is only a short action. What's the difference between a Model 7 and a short action 700?
Do you think the Model 7's 20-inch barrel suits it better than the 22-inch barrel on the Mountain Rifle?
Is the length of pull the same for both rifles?
v/r Joel
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,794
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,794 |
I've had them both and the MR was in a long action .280 and the M7 was in a 7-08. You understand that the M7 action is shorter than the short action M700 don't you? I liked them both. I think it'd depend on what calibre you are wanting and what you intend to hunt. I'd suggest you go to a big box store and have the clerk lay one of each on the counter for you to handle and mount. One of them may speak to you.
Aim for the exit hole.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312 |
I have both.
I think they've upgraded the stock on the MR. That's a good thing as the laminate stocks are butt-heavy for both the M7 and MR.
At one point I had a M7 in 7-08 and a MR in 7-08. The primary difference us that the M7 action is 1/2" shorter in the bridge (the area behind the loading port). That makes it lighter and more compact-feeling. Where a 20" M7 really shines is in the thicker stuff, where the compact nature is really great. Mine is a .358 now but is still my main "thick stuff" rifle.
The M700 MR with a 22" barrel certainly won't suck in thick stuff, but, where the MR really shines IMHO is set up in a light 'glass stock as a more open-country rifle.
The M700 action has a TON of aftermarket options-- stocks, rings, etc- while the M7 is much more limited.
'Twer me I'd go MR in 7-08 (short action) or 30-06 (long) in the new glass stock. Or upgrade the stock myself. The exception being if you want a close-cover rifle; then I'd go M7 in .308.
The CENTER will hold.
Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two
FÜCK PUTIN!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,323
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,323 |
Have a 260 in a Model 7 and it is one handy little rifle. Really like the shorter action of the 7.
`Bring Enough Gun`
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,923
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,923 |
I have had a 7 and a 70 FWT which is very close to the MR, if I wanted another lightweight I would choose the MR knowing I could always lop off 2" later.
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147 |
I have multiples of both and prefer the 700 MR because the stock fits me better, I like raised cheekpieces and the ergs of the stock just fit me better than any factory specs 7 stock that I've owned. That said, the factory laminated stocks are a little on the heavy side, so I've bedded most of my 700 MRs in McM stocks, which has resulted in both a lighter and better balanced package. I'm not a fan of the factory specs 7 stocks, more for the negative esthetics of the big, ugly, schnable than for functionality of the stock. Actually, the only factory specs 7 stock that I do like is the laminated mannlicher.
Due to the short/light contour barrels, factory specs 7s are almost always butt-heavy. I have countered this problem by installing longer barrels on several of my 7s, bedding them into McM stocks, or both.
While the 7 action is a little shorter than the 700 SA, it has a larger loading/ejection port, but uses the same magazine box, so the COAL limits are the same.
The LOP for both is 13.5".
You really need to try both and see which works better for you.
Jeff
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,759
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,759 |
Due to the short/light contour barrels, factory specs 7s are almost always butt-heavy. Agreed. I just like the feel of the M700 better (and have had a few Model Sevens to compare with). I have countered this problem by installing longer barrels on several of my 7s,... If you're going to go through this, just get the M700 to start with, you'll be money ahead from the beginning. You really need to try both and see which works better for you. Of course, that is always your best option. Go to your local gunshop, handle a few, and see what you think. FWIW, my vote goes to the M700 Mountain Rifle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 |
I would never again pick a M7 action over a 700, never.
"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312 |
Scott, why? Aftermarket parts support or is it a fundamental issue in the M7 action that you don't like?
The CENTER will hold.
Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two
FÜCK PUTIN!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 |
M7's tend to be more problematic to get to feed at times and I've yet to see one out shoot a 700. The logistics is just lagniappe
"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147 |
I have lots of free time, lots of actions, barrels, and stocks, a mill and a lathe, so reworking rifles gives me something to do to fill my idle time. I wouldn't pay a professional 'smith to have most of this work done, but since I enjoy doing it, have the tools, and at least some of the skill/knowledge, I just tinker with it until it is right for me.
Jeff
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,185
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,185 |
Joel,
Having owned both, I will only buy a 700 from now on. To me, it just cycles and feels better than the 7. Not sure how else to explain it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,759
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,759 |
Jeff- When I said "you" in my post, it was a generalization, not you specifically . I know you do your own; that's different than somebody who has to pay a 'smith to do something that doesn't really need done. If I had to pay somebody every time I switched stocks, or swapped triggers, or bedded a stock, I'd either be broke or shooting bone stock factory guns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,294
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,294 |
700's work for everything......... Never could warm to the 7. Never felt balanced no matter what I did to it... A long action mountain rifle properly stocked feels like a rifle should... JMO
W
"I would build one again, if it were not for my 350RM (grin)."
MtnHtr
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491 |
Short action 700s are small in the port opening for those with larger fingers and/or hunt in the cold. As hunting tools, the M7 has it over the 700 in that department. I like the lam stock on the stainless MR 7-08 I have. I don't shoot offhand if I can use a rest anyway, or spend much time lingering over balance when shooting offhand, so 'butt-heavy' matters little to me. (The smaller port opening bothers me more when considering large, numb, and now arthritic thumbs.) (700 MR, front; Model Seven, rear; both 7mm-08...at that time anyway. )
Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20,379
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20,379 |
M7's tend to be more problematic to get to feed at times and I've yet to see one out shoot a 700. The logistics is just lagniappe I'll yield to your more extensive knowledge, but damned if I'm not running into the opposite experience presently.
I replace valve cover gaskets every 50K, if they don't need them sooner...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,165
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,165 |
I have had both and liked them both, but they are two different rifles to me. The MR was a 270 that was very accurate, had a stock that fit me very well and needed no work right out of the box. My son has it now and he's going to keep it. The Model 7 was a stainless 308 with a plastic stock. While I like 308's I already had a Montana in 308 and had plans for the Model 7 to be a thick woods rifle. It has now been converted to 338 Fed with a stainless Hart barrel that is a little heavier than the original Remington barrel. The plastic stock felt small and the fore end seemed to be warped to the right. I put an HS Precision stock on it and the Model 7 became a keeper. The Mountain Rifle I gave to my son was a product of Remington's custom shop and needed no further work. The Model 7 was just a rifle off the production line that needed a replacement stock just to get groups down to 2" at 100yds. I bought the Model 7 for the purpose of making a short, light, handy, powerhouse for close in hunting and I couldn't be happier with it, but it is not anything like it was when I bought it. Model 7
Harry
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,918
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,918 |
I have 5 model sevens and 11 model 700s, it is just like a car.....everyone has their make and model that fit them better.although I love my 700s, I would give up all 11 700s before I parted with any ofmy model sevens. I am 5 9 and 205 with a stocky build and short arms, the model seven fits me much better and all of my sevens have a half inch shorter length of pull than my 700s, just enough to make them fit me better. Jmo, lenny
guns to me are like legal crack
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,991
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,991 |
One of the guys here has a Model Seven in 358 Win.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,347
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,347 |
I've yet to see one out shoot a 700. Me either........
1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983 919th Special Operations Wing 1983-1985 1993-1994
"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~
|
|
|
|
606 members (12344mag, 007FJ, 1beaver_shooter, 10gaugemag, 02bfishn, 160user, 62 invisible),
2,922
guests, and
1,239
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,347
Posts18,468,794
Members73,928
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|