|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,908
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,908 |
Quite awhile back someone posted some favorite loads for their 350 RM and TAC powder was listed. Looking to load 200 gr Hornady SP with TAC powder. Help.......please Thanks
Ask for forgiveness......instead of permission
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540 |
Here is a QL powder progression table for a generic .350 RM, 200 Hornady Sp, TAC, standard OAL, 24" tube. If you find it hard to understand just ask and I'll take you through it.
Cartridge : .350 Rem. Mag. Bullet : .358, 200, Hornady SPSP 3510 Useable Case Capaci: 60.605 grain H2O = 3.935 cm� Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm Powder : Ramshot TAC
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge, incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge. CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time % % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
-20.0 80 47.86 2351 2454 32284 5871 91.8 1.412 -18.0 82 49.05 2407 2572 34490 6040 92.9 1.373 -16.0 84 50.25 2462 2693 36852 6202 93.9 1.335 -14.0 86 51.45 2518 2816 39379 6358 94.8 1.296 -12.0 88 52.64 2574 2941 42066 6506 95.7 1.259 -10.0 90 53.84 2629 3069 44917 6646 96.5 1.222 -08.0 92 55.03 2684 3199 47962 6777 97.2 1.187 -06.0 94 56.23 2739 3332 51222 6900 97.8 1.154 -04.0 96 57.43 2794 3467 54713 7013 98.4 1.121 ! Near Maximum ! -02.0 98 58.62 2849 3603 58457 7115 98.8 1.090 ! Near Maximum ! +00.0 100 59.82 2903 3742 62475 7207 99.2 1.060 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! +02.0 102 61.02 2957 3883 66792 7288 99.5 1.031 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! +04.0 104 62.21 3011 4026 71436 7357 99.8 1.003 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! +06.0 106 63.41 3064 4170 76440 7414 99.9 0.976 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! +08.0 108 64.61 3118 4316 81839 7459 100.0 0.950 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! +10.0 110 65.80 3171 4464 87675 7492 100.0 0.924 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Results caused by � 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value: +Ba 100 59.82 3015 4038 74359 6944 100.0 0.991 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value: -Ba 100 59.82 2744 3343 50938 7144 94.6 1.152
Last edited by nsaqam; 08/31/12.
The Chosin Few November to December 1950, Korea. I'm not one of the Chosin Few but no more remarkable group of Americans ever existed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,908
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,908 |
Ask for forgiveness......instead of permission
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,263
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,263 |
Mistem,
Please share any results you work up. I have recent 350 Rem Mag purchase but my gun range has a ban on calibers over 7mm (long story). Needless to say, I haven't done much reloading for it except for 200 TTSX and TAC. I am looking for a less expensive deer load with the 200 Interlock.
Scott
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,664
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,664 |
I contacted Ramshot powders and asked for data by email for 350mag data with TAC powder. I got a quick reply. I lost the data when I had to reload software.
The Karma bus always has an empty seat when it comes around.- High Brass
There's battle lines being drawn Nobody's right if everybody's wrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,079
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,079 |
Here's some data I got from shooting a 700 Classic. The 225 load was straight from Barnes manual, the 250-grain load was a scientific guesstimate:
225 Barnes TSX/62.0 TAC/Rem. case/CCI 200 primer--2660 fps 250 Nosler Part/59.0 TAC/ " /Rem. 9-1/2------2561 fps
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,908
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,908 |
Thanks for all the information....I sent an e-mail off to Keith at Ramshot for current data.
Ask for forgiveness......instead of permission
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,908
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,908 |
Mistem,
Please share any results you work up. I have recent 350 Rem Mag purchase but my gun range has a ban on calibers over 7mm (long story). Needless to say, I haven't done much reloading for it except for 200 TTSX and TAC. I am looking for a less expensive deer load with the 200 Interlock.
I was able to play some the last couple of days with my 350 RM and 200 gr SP and Flex Hornadys. Here's the data from my Ruger with a 20" factory barrel chopped and sights installed: 200 gr Hornady SP,R-P Brass, 215 Primer, Lee Factory Crimped, OAL 2.855" Grains of TAC FPS Energy SD Group 55.0 2611 3027 56.0 2631 3074 57.0 2702 3242 2 21.7 58.0 Flex-tip 2721 3288 3 34.4 .75" 58.0 2737 3326 3 18.8 .75" 59.0 2758 3378 2 18.8 60.0 2778 3427 2 2.3 61.0 2844 3592 2 5.6 62.0 2862 3637 2 11.3 None of these loads showed any signs of excessive pressure in my rifle. I plan on loading more with 60,61 and 62 grs and shoot more groups...they looked promising even using a 4X scope.
Ask for forgiveness......instead of permission
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 713
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 713 |
I would try 60.5 61.0 and 61.5. At 62 it looks like the velocity is not gaining much and the deviation is increasing.
|
|
|
|
613 members (17CalFan, 10gaugeman, 12344mag, 10ring1, 1337Fungi, 16penny, 53 invisible),
2,645
guests, and
1,111
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,312
Posts18,468,225
Members73,928
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|