|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,950
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,950 |
I have two ARs, one with a 1/8.5 twist and one with a 1/9 twist.
Which bullet would be best for hunting deer? I have a boat load of 40-64 powder. Is that a decent powder for these?
Thanks for replies. Just wanted to know if anyone has and results of either.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,238 |
I bought some extra 55 gr TSX's and loaded up a hundred more with CFE-223 powder, they are only running a little over 3K in my 7 twist 16" barreled carbine, hoping they will work on deer sized game, haven't used to other bullets you speak of.
Gunner
Trump Won!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,445
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,445 |
The only reason to use a 53 gr TSX over the 62 gr. version is if your rifle won't stabilize the 62 gr. Version. Your AR's should. .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,474 |
I shot 4064 with 80s many years ago. Accurate, low SD and ES. But slow. Could not get a ton of speed from em.
Barnes theory is go one lighter than you normally would, I've had good luck with other 75ish... and I load 62 tsx, but alas I've yet to shoot anything with them. I've always had 75 bthps in the mags so far when something is around that needs shooting.
Perosnaly I wouldn't hesitate either way. There isn't enough weight difference there to make much difference.
Now in my 6.8 spc necked to 6mm, I run 85 tsx because the heavier ones would be to slow for my taste in that round.
We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,200
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,200 |
I would go with a 55's (or the 50's if you can find them). The research I have done suggests that you do not need to go heavy with the TSX, especially at the sacrifice of velocity. There is no real harm in it, but no real need. The 50's (might be available only from Black Hills, I'm not sure) and 55's expand and penetrate in gel and through barriers as good as anything. Also, they are longer than an equivalent weight cup and core, so you may run into stabilization issues sooner than you would with a conventional projectile.
Last edited by K1500; 11/15/12.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,950
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,950 |
I reload, but I have a lot of 4064 powder I use with 308 and 3006. So 55 or 53 TSX going fast would kill better than a heavier one going slower.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,395
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,395 |
Lighter is better with Barnes. I would use a 40gr TTSX if they made one.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,950
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,950 |
40 TSX for deer? Kind of light, unless it is so fast it penetrates and explodes deep.
|
|
|
|
239 members (348srfun, 300_savage, 338reddog, 1_deuce, 260Remguy, 10gaugemag, 28 invisible),
2,244
guests, and
1,110
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,190,599
Posts18,454,479
Members73,908
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|