24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,281
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,281
Yoder409,

I asked myself the same question regarding the performance of the STW and RUM from a 26" barrel. Took two rem 7 mag takeoffs and rechambered them. The 7 RUM beat the 7 STW by 50 fps using RL-22 and a 140 nos bt. IMO the 7 RUM needs at least a 28" or longer tube or you might as well stay with a STW.


GB1

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,066
7
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
7
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,066
I am looking at the big 7s myself.I think that I need to start a 7mm mashburn vs. stw thread.

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 407
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 407
Imagine what a great round you'd have if you necked a 7mm STW up to 8mm. wink


I like it here. They let me swear.
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,069
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,069
Might as well weigh in here...

I've had a 7RUM. I still have a 7STW....

Shooting 160's in both, the 7RUM got about 100fps more mv.....3300 with the 7RUM vs 3200 with the 7STW. That is without leaning on either.

Was very accurate, easy to load for...was a hungry SOB though.

To be honest, for the extra 100FPS with a 160, I didn't think it was worth the extra recoil and powder, so I tripped it.

For me, the 7RUM was more of a play toy thing, never hunted with it.

I suspect shooting 168 or 180 Bergers would make the 7RUM really shine. Like shooting 160s out of the 7STW gives it a big advantage over the 7mag.

Nothing wrong with the 7RUM. Since I had already had an 7STW, it became expendable.

Tony

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,210
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,210
I have loaded for both, still prefer the rum even with 160s, not by a wide margin. Now if lapua would just make some brass for it.

IC B2

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,506
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,506
Originally Posted by Azshooter
Yoder409,

I asked myself the same question regarding the performance of the STW and RUM from a 26" barrel. Took two rem 7 mag takeoffs and rechambered them. The 7 RUM beat the 7 STW by 50 fps using RL-22 and a 140 nos bt. IMO the 7 RUM needs at least a 28" or longer tube or you might as well stay with a STW.



Thank you !!! Answers my question to a T .

BTW....... did you ever experience any temperature sensitivity with the R-22 ?? I developed and loaded a batch of 120 SMK's in the fall a couple years back. They shot very well. The following summer they were COMPLETELY off the wall..... blowing primers, nearly locking the bolt up.....


Wollen nicht krank dein feind. Planen es.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,506
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,506
Originally Posted by EddyBo
I have loaded for both, still prefer the rum even with 160s, not by a wide margin. Now if lapua would just make some brass for it.


....... and Winchester would re-run their STW brass.........even if only seasonally frown


Wollen nicht krank dein feind. Planen es.
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,630
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,630
Anyone try Nosler 7 STW brass? I perfer W/W over R/P easy.

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

109 members (44automag, 338reddog, 4xbear, 673, 444Matt, 257robertsimp, 17 invisible), 1,657 guests, and 951 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,190,492
Posts18,452,187
Members73,901
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.073s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8321 MB (Peak: 0.9064 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-18 06:41:25 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS