Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#7172521 - 12/11/12 Load Manual Velocities  
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 158
snuzem Offline
Member
snuzem  Offline
Member

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 158
MS Gulf Coast
Hi
I'm trying to work up some loads for a couple of rifles and can't reach my load manuals(Nosler) velocities. My barrel length is the same and the components are the same. However, I am not using one of the more expensive chronographs,just an entry level Chrony. I don't know if that can make a difference or not. My 6.5-284 is reading about 100 fps slower than the manuals velocities. My 30-06 is about the same. Am I chasing my tail trying to reach these velocities?
Thanks
Scott

RV 728 BP
#7172641 - 12/11/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: snuzem]  
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,614
tikkanut Offline
Campfire Outfitter
tikkanut  Offline
Campfire Outfitter

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,614
Podunk Utah....
Every barrel is an individual...none the same....

Nosler or Hornady's test barrel is different than yours...

Loads listed are for reference only....your results may differ...

you may be able to increase max charge a grain or so over...

you may not...twist/groove/bbl length/bullet style/elevation/air

temp/components all play a role...Chrony accurate ?

#7172661 - 12/11/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: snuzem]  
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 22,466
Ringman Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Ringman  Offline
Campfire Kahuna

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 22,466
Grants Pass,OR
snuzem,

My .454 runs about 100 feet per second behind others I read about. Like the man says, barrels vary.


"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation."
Everyday Hunter
#7172681 - 12/11/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: snuzem]  
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,593
jwall Online content
Campfire Outfitter
jwall  Online Content
Campfire Outfitter

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,593
Southern Arkansas
FIRST - I am NO authority.

Many have experienced what you are now. It's frustrating and there possible reasons for the differences between book published vels & real time vel.

Personally, I ONLY believe what the chrono says.

I'm old dog & old school enough to be very skeptical of published loads.

I use them as a "guideline" not the gospel of reloading.

Good Luck
Jerry


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

Slow bullets don't impress me.

I'm more likely to listen if you don't shove it down my ear canal.


#7172765 - 12/11/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: jwall]  
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,436
antelope_sniper Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
antelope_sniper  Offline
Campfire 'Bwana

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 14,436
Colorado
Snuzem, that's why the Chronograph is called the "de-liar". It takes the fiction out of all the published velocities. As you are already discovering, the books are not all correct. If they were, you wouldn't need a chronograph. Back when we started chronographing in the 80's some of the published loads were off by 300 FPS. Now that chrony's are common the published data has significantly improved, but often your results will still be different.


Nobody spends somebody else’s money as carefully as he spends his own.
The U.S Government has a unique capacity for getting things upside down.
Milton Friedman.

Go quiet or full tilt, just don't get caught in the middle of the stupids. DD
#7172820 - 12/11/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: snuzem]  
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,529
bigsqueeze Offline
Campfire Tracker
bigsqueeze  Offline
Campfire Tracker

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,529
So Cal
Originally Posted by snuzem
Hi
I'm trying to work up some loads for a couple of rifles and can't reach my load manuals(Nosler) velocities. My barrel length is the same and the components are the same. However, I am not using one of the more expensive chronographs,just an entry level Chrony. I don't know if that can make a difference or not. My 6.5-284 is reading about 100 fps slower than the manuals velocities. My 30-06 is about the same. Am I chasing my tail trying to reach these velocities?
Thanks
Scott
..............Yes! 100 fps slower than the Nosler manual is nothing to lose any sleep or "chasing your tail" over.

If your 30-06 is chronying right on or about on par with the book velocities, then it stands to reason that maybe your 6.5-284 bore might be a little slower than were the barrel or barrels chrony`d in the Nosler manual.

It is very likely with probable certainty, that if the same components are used, there will be some 6.5-284 bores out there running even a little slower than yours. If you have any doubts about the chrony you`re using, then for collaboration, borrow a friend`s chrony if possible and see what that one says using the same loads.

You`re always going to have slower bores and faster bores in identical rifles, coming from the same manufacturer, chambered in the same round and when using the identical componentry and powder charges.

Besides the Nosler manual, I`d look around in other manuals to see if they are using the same components and Nosler bullet and look at what book velocities they are running and then average them all out.

Will losing 100 fps from the muzzle make the final result any different when hunting any game you could ever hunt using your 6.5-284 given the same shooting distances?.......Nope!

Most teens and maybe even younger, young adults and adults can throw a major league baseball faster than 100 fps or 68.181 mph.

In the world of 1800, 2000, 2200 mph and greater rifle bullet speeds from the muzzle, losing just over 68 mph is really nothing.

Rather than be concerned with losing 100 fps, concentrate on your accuracy instead. If you`re grouping well then why worry!


300WSM,,,,338-378 Wby,,,,375 Ruger


#7172897 - 12/11/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: bigsqueeze]  
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,308
bellydeep Offline
Campfire Guide
bellydeep  Offline
Campfire Guide

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,308
E of the Rockies, W of the res...
In my experience, sometimes you eat the bar, sometimes the bar eats you.

Trust your chrono. Don't sweat it if your load is a little slower than book. Sometimes I match the load books, sometimes I don't, thats just how it goes.


Originally Posted by shrapnel
I probably hit more elk with a pickup than you have with a rifle.


Originally Posted by George Costanza
I base my whole life on knowing that the D is the biggest.
#7173132 - 12/12/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: bellydeep]  
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,489
baldhunter Offline
Campfire Regular
baldhunter  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,489
Corpus Christi,Texas
I've always felt Nosler velocities ran a little high for the amount of powder called for in their loads.I trust my chronograph and don't worry too much what the book says.It's only a guide,every rifle is different and powders can vary from lot to lot too.

#7173246 - 12/12/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: baldhunter]  
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
BobinNH Offline
Campfire Oracle
BobinNH  Offline
Campfire Oracle

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Originally Posted by baldhunter
.....every rifle is different and powders can vary from lot to lot too.


Bingo!




The 280 Remington is overbore.

The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
#7173317 - 12/12/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: BobinNH]  
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,077
1OntarioJim Online content
Campfire Guide
1OntarioJim  Online Content
Campfire Guide

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,077
N. Shore, L. Ontario
An inexpensive way to check your chronograph is to buy 2 or 3 boxes of .22 rimfire ammo that gives their velocity on the box and check these against your chrono readings.

Jim

#7175105 - 12/12/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: snuzem]  
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,702
SAUMHUNTER79 Offline
Campfire Ranger
SAUMHUNTER79  Offline
Campfire Ranger

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,702
WI
That's pretty normal, also, don't sweat velocity too much, velocity and trajectory aren't the same thing, a lot of times one has to add a significant amount of powder to gain much trajectory over a "slower" load.

#7175312 - 12/12/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: SAUMHUNTER79]  
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17,397
RockyRaab Online content
Campfire Kahuna
RockyRaab  Online Content
Campfire Kahuna

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17,397
Ogden, Utah
First, the manual IS correct. What they print is exactly what they got.

Second, the major difference between what they got and what you can get is what they shot it in. If they used an instrumented test barrel (to get pressure readings as well as velocity) then that barrel was cut to absolute minimum dimensions. Because it is tighter in all respects, it delivered higher pressures AND higher velocities than a looser sporting barrel will. That's for obvious safety reasons.

So a chronograph reading from your rifle and using your components that registers 100 fps or so less than the "book" number is probably dead smack on.


Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.

#7175317 - 12/12/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: baldhunter]  
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 619
dingo Online content
Campfire Regular
dingo  Online Content
Campfire Regular

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 619
Qld Australia
Originally Posted by baldhunter
I've always felt Nosler velocities ran a little high for the amount of powder called for in their loads.I trust my chronograph and don't worry too much what the book says.It's only a guide,every rifle is different and powders can vary from lot to lot too.


When using 50gn bullets and Varget in my Rem 700VLS 22/250 I get velocity around 200fps less than the Nosler manuel despite my rifle having a barrel 2" longer than the test barrel.

Some of the velocities in the Nosler manual are "out of this world" in terms of achievability.

#7175660 - 12/12/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: dingo]  
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 439
8nbait Offline
Campfire Regular
8nbait  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 439
ID
My 6.5 is right on book velocities but my 25-06 is much faster than book velocities. I just trust the chrono. I assume this is normal.

gary

#7175700 - 12/12/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: 1OntarioJim]  
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,491
boomtube Offline
Campfire Regular
boomtube  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,491
If we loaded the book maker's components in the book maker's fire arms I bet we'd get the book's speeds. Alas, mine are different. wink

#7176381 - 12/12/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: boomtube]  
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 158
snuzem Offline
Member
snuzem  Offline
Member

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 158
MS Gulf Coast
Thanks for all the replies. It makes me feel a lot better knowing its not something I'm doing wrong( this time, anyway).
Thanks again
Scott

#7176878 - 12/12/12 Re: Load Manual Velocities [Re: snuzem]  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,502
bobnob17 Offline
Campfire Ranger
bobnob17  Offline
Campfire Ranger

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,502
NSW Australia
I load Hodgdon/ADI powders usually from the Hodgdon/ADI data. Most of my results are pretty close to the book with the exception of my old 308 which has a barrel that's shot over 10 000 rounds. It gives me about 200fps less than what the books say I should. Probably not surprising. Still groups well though.


Moderated by  RickBin, SYSOP 

RV 180 2
OX 160 1
RBCN 160 3
Who's Online Now
493 registered members (1beaver_shooter, 10gaugemag, 12344mag, 01Foreman400, 1234, 1911a1, 56 invisible), 1,104 guests, and 418 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
NMX 160









Copyright © 2000-2017 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.055s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 1.0303 MB (Peak: 1.2902 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-24 15:34:49 UTC