24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 911
A
angv350 Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 911
How does these compare to a Zeiss victory or a Swaro EL non HD. I'm wanting to pull the trigger on a set but don't want to make a thousand dollar mistake.

BP-B2

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
I'll give you my 2 cents worth FWIW.

I've had the Razor HD for a year. At the gun show we had here before Christmas one of the booths is a Vortex dealer and he had one of the new Razor HD's. You will get some opinion from some quarters that Vortex is too crappy a company to expect anybody to pay that kind of money for anything Vortex. I had a couple of issues with the Razor HD I have. First I had some trouble with the focus/diopter ring, one day it just came apart in my hand. Vortex fixed it. I eventually reached the conclusion that the binocular was a bit off spec in a couple of collimation parameters and sent a detailed note with the binocular back to Vortex. Vortex does indeed stand up to their warranty, and they fixed the collimation issues and I have a better binocular. The OPTICS are first rate and do indeed stand up without any embarrassment to much more expensive optics stuff.

Looking at the two Razor HD's side by side I was struck by a couple of points. The first is that the original HD Razor I have is not as well built, nor does it have the more refined sense of "panache" (for lack of a better term) possessed by the new RAZOR HD. The new Razor HD is a hell of a lot more compact in nature, it feels smaller than the old on more than the degree that it should simply based on the physical size differences. The new one looks like the product of a lesson learned on the part of Vortex...if you are going to sell $1.000+ binoculars, they should look the part.

The optics on each are exceptionally nice. The older one has a wider fov, the newer one has sharper edges, so the sweet spot is about a wash. The newer on is the one I'd pick it just looks better built than the original one. As far as "stand up to the alphas" goes, I'll say this. If you cant see what you need with the Razor HD, the optics are NOT the issue.

Now, however I'll throw another monkey wrench into the deal here. I got a good look at a Zeiss Conquest HD the other day. The new Razor HD is $1,279.00. The new Conquest is $969.00. I like the Conquest HD better than either of the Razor HD's. I like the Conquest HD as well as the Victory FL. The Zeiss does not have any better view than the Razor, but I can say it is more of a "whole package presentation" to me. That new Conquest HD was the first $1,000 strata binocular that maybe says to me it might be worth it to me. The rest of the higher end stuff, including the Victory FL have always said to me they cost way too much for the gain. I had purposely avoided reading anything about the new Conquest until I had the chance to look at one, and I was sort of surprised to see $969 on the tag. I would have figured closer to $1,400 from what I felt and saw.


Last edited by SteveC99; 01/01/13.

Steve

Theodore Roosevelt: "Do what you can where you are with what you have"
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,258
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,258
Just noticed Doug has the Conquest HD 10X42 demo for $800.


Ed

A person who asks a question is a fool for 5 minutes the person who never asks is a fool forever.

The worst slaves are those that put the chains on themselves.
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,179
(No offense intended, and not being argumentative) SteveC....that is exactly Vortex's problem with a $1250 Razor, a problem we have discussed before. When faced with a choice of spending $1250 on a Razor, SLCNeu demo, Zeiss FL demo, evidently the Conquest HD, and probably a couple I'm missing, close to nobody will ever choose a Razor. I know it wouldn't even enter the equation if it were my choice.


It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
JG, I agree with you, which is one reason I posted about the Zeiss. If the Razor was the same price, we'd have a whole different game, but as nice as the Razor is, not many are going to buy one when several hundred less buys just as much.

Wait for the SHOT show and we'll see some more stiff competition on the $1,000 range.







Last edited by SteveC99; 01/01/13.

Steve

Theodore Roosevelt: "Do what you can where you are with what you have"
IC B2

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,179
Rodger that SteveC. Do you have any scoop on a new Gold Ring HD by any chance?


It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,051
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,051
I have to agree on the perceived value of any Vortex as compared to high end optics names we've known for decades. The same problem exists for the Kowa Genesis, Brunton Epoch, and Alpen Ranier binoculars. I particularly liked the Alpen Raniers on closeout when a sporting goods store changed hands but couldn't justify that purchase while starting my own business. I've looked through the Kowa Genesis at a well stocked optics shop and they're second to none but the sales guy said he doesn't sell too many compared to Zeiss or Swarovski's at nearly the same price point.

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,045
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,045
vortex is a great company with good optics, however they do change and refine models frequently, so that means blow out prices of the old models at some point. when you are spending that much money does it makes sense to buy something that might be blow out priced a couple years from now, this can and does effect resale value. if you stick with the big 3 you will always get your money back when its time to upgrade. I personally would stay at or below the viper lineup with vortex, the razor line is just too close in price to the big 3. plus when you pull out your binoculars its nice feeling a bit snobbish with them saying zeiss, leica, or swaro on them. if I had $1200 to spend on binoculars, you can bet they would be a big 3 name brand.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 226
A
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 226
I bought a pair of Conquest HD 10x42 from Scott's Outdoors for $779. He had 12 left at the time so he may be out of stock now but worth a call. Also you get $100 rebate from Zeiss.

http://www.gunsamerica.com/909076057/ZEISS_CONQUEST_10X42_HD_BINOCULAR_NEW_IN_BOX.htm


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
YB23

Who's Online Now
188 members (257 mag, 10Glocks, 300_savage, 2UP, 300jimmy, 01Foreman400, 15 invisible), 1,508 guests, and 846 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,187,592
Posts18,397,909
Members73,815
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.139s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.8306 MB (Peak: 0.9144 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-03-28 09:59:07 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS