Home
Posted By: Rodell Reels and Reel Technology - 01/02/19
I'm getting back into fly fishing after a 30+ year absence. Is there somewhere I can learn (on-line) about what would make a fly reel worth $850+? Clearly, technology has advanced quite a bit over the years but I'm at a loss to figure out what I need (or want)>

Posted By: pal Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/02/19
Use your head and do your own due diligence. Checkout
https://www.theflyfishingforum.com/forums/

You can buy an excellent fly reel for ~$150.
Posted By: VaHunter Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/02/19
I have a lot of expensive reels, 3wt thru 11wt, and in hind sight I could have saved a lot of money buy purchasing mid priced reels. The high end Tibor, Nautilus, Abel, Hatch, etc. reels are wonderful pieces of equipment, and their better anodizing and higher grade aluminum that is forged vs cast, along with sealed bearings/bushings, show there worth for salt water and salmon/steelhead guides who spend 200 days a year on the water. I fish 50+ days a year for various species from bluegills to tarpon, which I would bet is more that the average fly fisherman, and have some reels who see use once every two years.

Buy yourself $150 to $250 reels, with the high end of that reserved for larger reels for steelhead and salt water, and save yourself a lot of money you can spend on fishing trips.

On a positive note, my grandson who loves to fly fish will get some of the best available and some of it used very little.
Posted By: 1minute Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/02/19
Unless one is angling for serious reel stripping species, which is almost exclusively a saltwater endeavor, just pick up something that will hold the line and about twice it's length in backing. Kings, and large steelhead are probably the only freshwater exceptions.

My major gripe with even high end fly reels is their freezing up when one is out in icing conditions.
Lots of old school reels are no longer worth the money, but Lamson has reels to do about everything and all have the same sealed bearings and rarely fail. Ross has completely failed to keep up.

I have many high end makes and models... Lampson or TFO BVK reels is what I buy for serious fish. I know a guide (Ron Hyde) with tons of time guiding king salmon fishermen that swears by the TFOs.
Posted By: gnoahhh Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/03/19
My 35 year old Hardy Perfect and 100 year old Hardy St. George are working as sweetly as they always have. But then again brookies and browns don't present the same challenge for a reel that a lot of "big water" fish do. Regardless, they suit me just fine and are the ideal mates to my split cane rods.
Originally Posted by gnoahhh
My 35 year old Hardy Perfect and 100 year old Hardy St. George are working as sweetly as they always have. But then again brookies and browns don't present the same challenge for a reel that a lot of "big water" fish do. Regardless, they suit me just fine and are the ideal mates to my split cane rods.

Where balancing is an issue old school rules! I have a pretty big drawer full of Hardys. My son considered it child abuse when I made him use them! Too loud on the click and pawl... I have ruined more than several big Hardys on salmon.
Posted By: GuideGun Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/05/19
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Lots of old school reels are no longer worth the money, but Lamson has reels to do about everything and all have the same sealed bearings and rarely fail. Ross has completely failed to keep up.


Have you had a chance to use the Ross Evolution R, Evolution R Salt, and Evolution LTX? All are wonderful sealed drag units with stacked carbon elements in them that perform wonderfully. Then there is some wonderful click pawl reels in the reintroduced Gunnison and award winning Colorado LT. Ross is ahead of the game right now, not behind. Their merger with Abel has certainly influenced their designs on current reels for the better. Abel/Ross has won more reel awards the last couple of years than anyone else.
Posted By: Pugs Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/06/19
Originally Posted by Rodell
I'm getting back into fly fishing after a 30+ year absence. Is there somewhere I can learn (on-line) about what would make a fly reel worth $850+? Clearly, technology has advanced quite a bit over the years but I'm at a loss to figure out what I need (or want)


Not much. If you're on the wet side of WA I assume you're interested in Salmon/Steelhead level of gear and I caught quite a few up there (88-95) using a single action Ross on an 8 weight Powell. I would not hesitate to look for something of that era on E-Bay. I would part with mine as I inherited my Grandfather's Fin Nor but other than a trip for stripers on the bay here I have little use for the Ross.
Originally Posted by GuideGun
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Lots of old school reels are no longer worth the money, but Lamson has reels to do about everything and all have the same sealed bearings and rarely fail. Ross has completely failed to keep up.


Have you had a chance to use the Ross Evolution R, Evolution R Salt, and Evolution LTX? All are wonderful sealed drag units with stacked carbon elements in them that perform wonderfully. Then there is some wonderful click pawl reels in the reintroduced Gunnison and award winning Colorado LT. Ross is ahead of the game right now, not behind. Their merger with Abel has certainly influenced their designs on current reels for the better. Abel/Ross has won more reel awards the last couple of years than anyone else.


Sorry, too many new Ross reels have been toasted around me and in my hands to accept anything they make now. Click and pawl reels of yore were well-made and solid, but lack serious bearings (and drags obviously) and were fine for light duty fishing. That would never include salmon and steelhead. I believe the Vexsis was the real laugher proving the point. The instant switch from RH to LH and vice versa often happened as soon as one put a little tension on the reel. It would then pop into free-spool and knot everything up in incredible fashion. It did not last long but is indicative of much of their current production. I was being encouraged for several years to use them and got a lot of hands-on time to develop my opinion.

Ross is struggling to see industry taillights, IMO&E.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by GuideGun
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Lots of old school reels are no longer worth the money, but Lamson has reels to do about everything and all have the same sealed bearings and rarely fail. Ross has completely failed to keep up.


Have you had a chance to use the Ross Evolution R, Evolution R Salt, and Evolution LTX? All are wonderful sealed drag units with stacked carbon elements in them that perform wonderfully. Then there is some wonderful click pawl reels in the reintroduced Gunnison and award winning Colorado LT. Ross is ahead of the game right now, not behind. Their merger with Abel has certainly influenced their designs on current reels for the better. Abel/Ross has won more reel awards the last couple of years than anyone else.


Sorry, too many new Ross reels have been toasted around me and in my hands to accept anything they make now. Click and pawl reels of yore were well-made and solid, but lack serious bearings (and drags obviously) and were fine for light duty fishing. That would never include salmon and steelhead. I believe the Vexsis was the real laugher proving the point. The instant switch from RH to LH and vice versa often happened as soon as one put a little tension on the reel. It would then pop into free-spool and knot everything up in incredible fashion. It did not last long but is indicative of much of their current production. I was being encouraged for several years to use them and got a lot of hands-on time to develop my opinion.

Ross is struggling to see industry taillights, IMO&E.

HAHA don't ever try to enlighten Sitka with FACTS. He already knows it all. Just ask him...
Posted By: 1minute Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/06/19
If one faces periods when a drag is seriously needed to sustain a fight with huge fish, then likely he should spend the big bucks for something like a Fin Nor. My extremes are salmon and steelhead where, with an exposed rim, I pretty much use a drag or pawl to prevent overrun that might happen if I'm inattentive and get a reel stripping strike. For salmon and steelhead, I do want 175 to 200 yds of backing capacity and that can require a larger reel if one is using a double taper or maybe a long belly line on a Spey rod. With exposed rims and tippets in the 8 to 20 lb range, I can easily hold fish or break them off with friction on the rim.

If I ever go after tarpon or billfish, I will step way up, with most of the concern being hundreds of yards of backing capacity.

In near 40 years of fly angling, I've been cleaned out once, and I suspect it was a king or Idaho steelhead I snagged in the tail. Simply a down stream run I could not stop, and it made the rapids before I could reach the bank for pursuit on land. Did not truly clean me out, as I grabbed the reel with about 5 turns left and snapped the leader.

With trout and such, I will still venture forth with an old Pflueger or Hardy on a glass Fennwick and may spend a week without ever giving the reel a thought.

Regardless of ones choice, the real goal is to have fun, and it doesn't take $800 to do that. Thinking back, some of the best were childhood days with kite string, a bent (straight?) pin, willow stick, and 4 inch sunfish in a warm water creek. Now those were good days, and I got there on a bike with a band aide box of worms in a shirt pocket.

Much like hunting, it's easy to go overboard when one sees $2,500 handmade reels at a clave. I've certainly done it with some rifles like my 1960's 600 Rem that cost $99.95. It's wearing a $400 Leupold.

I still treasure days in/on the water, but it takes a Ford 350 crew cab to get me and all my gear there now.

Have a good one.
Originally Posted by nemotheangler
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by GuideGun
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Lots of old school reels are no longer worth the money, but Lamson has reels to do about everything and all have the same sealed bearings and rarely fail. Ross has completely failed to keep up.


Have you had a chance to use the Ross Evolution R, Evolution R Salt, and Evolution LTX? All are wonderful sealed drag units with stacked carbon elements in them that perform wonderfully. Then there is some wonderful click pawl reels in the reintroduced Gunnison and award winning Colorado LT. Ross is ahead of the game right now, not behind. Their merger with Abel has certainly influenced their designs on current reels for the better. Abel/Ross has won more reel awards the last couple of years than anyone else.


Sorry, too many new Ross reels have been toasted around me and in my hands to accept anything they make now. Click and pawl reels of yore were well-made and solid, but lack serious bearings (and drags obviously) and were fine for light duty fishing. That would never include salmon and steelhead. I believe the Vexsis was the real laugher proving the point. The instant switch from RH to LH and vice versa often happened as soon as one put a little tension on the reel. It would then pop into free-spool and knot everything up in incredible fashion. It did not last long but is indicative of much of their current production. I was being encouraged for several years to use them and got a lot of hands-on time to develop my opinion.

Ross is struggling to see industry taillights, IMO&E.

HAHA don't ever try to enlighten Sitka with FACTS. He already knows it all. Just ask him...

If you have nothing of value to add to a discussion go ahead and attack the person, classy!

Having guided fly fishermen for many years in both salt and freshwater and having fished with many folks from the fire I honestly think my experience is worth adding. Very few Ross reels get sold in Alaska. Echo reels are another tough inexpensive reel. They outsell Ross. The only guide I personally know here that uses any Ross reels has retired. She specialized in teaching women to catch graying.

I know the Ross representative in AK and know even better the fellow he replaced. I have been hands-on with Ross plenty.
Posted By: pal Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/06/19
My fly reels are mostly Hardy's, along with an Orvis CFO. The most expensive is not worth more than $200-$300. Some of my salt water, lever drag reels cost much more.

Have caught 32-1/2 lb and 34-1/2 lb salmon on a steelhead rod with 16 lb line. And have caught 100+ lb marlin on 20 lb line.
Posted By: GuideGun Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/07/19
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Ross is struggling to see industry taillights, IMO&E.


Then you're not paying attention to the world outside of AK.

The Mayfly group (Ross/Abel) is doing more than most in the last 2-3 years. Ross was indeed going downhill before the merger with Abel. But since the merger they are turning out quality reels as well as winning awards and anglers. Almost a 180 degree turn around of the company they were before. It's sad that you are writing them off due to past experiences instead of evaluating current offerings in present time.

In full disclosure I don't work for Ross either, but I have used their innovative current designs with much success for the angling that I do. Albeit not against the mighty salmon/steelhead of the AK rivers. But I'm willing to wager Ross Evolution R would handle that angling just fine.
Posted By: Tejano Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/08/19
Ross has two lines. Ross America and Ross international. I agree on the Pacific rim Ross's but the American made ones I have owned were excellent, a true value. Several have stood up to 100s of bonefish being run, wet & dry, clean & dirty. The anodizing was so much better than other entry reels of that era 1980-90s. Have not bought a new one recently and I only wish I had stocked up on extra spools. I have also taken fish up to large Kings with a Pflueger medalists. The early tarpon fisherman such as Lee Wolff, Lefty Kriegh, Flip Pallot and many others used them on big Tarpon and even Marlin successfully.

I would look for type II anodizing first and then for a cork or synthetic drag for salt water fishing. For typical trout fishing the reel is just a place to store the line and not critical.
Originally Posted by Tejano
Ross has two lines. Ross America and Ross international. I agree on the Pacific rim Ross's but the American made ones I have owned were excellent, a true value. Several have stood up to 100s of bonefish being run, wet & dry, clean & dirty. The anodizing was so much better than other entry reels of that era 1980-90s. Have not bought a new one recently and I only wish I had stocked up on extra spools. I have also taken fish up to large Kings with a Pflueger medalists. The early tarpon fisherman such as Lee Wolff, Lefty Kriegh, Flip Pallot and many others used them on big Tarpon and even Marlin successfully.

I would look for type II anodizing first and then for a cork or synthetic drag for salt water fishing. For typical trout fishing the reel is just a place to store the line and not critical.

I have toasted a number of the reels you are touting...

I agree the agonizing is good, but so are many others with much better records for toughness. Salmon are not really that tough compared to many warmwater saltwater fish, but numbers can be such that reels get serious workouts, quickly and long term. An ordinary salmon day count would be an unreal bonefish day.

Sierra Trading Post currently has a half-dozen choices on Lamson reels. All of them have the exact same drag components which have proven themselves for a long time. STP sometimes gets Bauer reels, an extremely tough reel for absolutely any application.
Posted By: 1minute Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/08/19
Quote
I agree the agonizing is good


What?

Sorry, couldn't help it.

Have a good one,
Posted By: ribka Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/09/19
I’m a big Lamson reel fan I have a 27 year old reel still going strong and have spent 100’s of hours fishing salt catching tarpon , snook, striped bass, shark, bone fish, dorado rooster fish salmon. Great reel for the money


Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by Tejano
Ross has two lines. Ross America and Ross international. I agree on the Pacific rim Ross's but the American made ones I have owned were excellent, a true value. Several have stood up to 100s of bonefish being run, wet & dry, clean & dirty. The anodizing was so much better than other entry reels of that era 1980-90s. Have not bought a new one recently and I only wish I had stocked up on extra spools. I have also taken fish up to large Kings with a Pflueger medalists. The early tarpon fisherman such as Lee Wolff, Lefty Kriegh, Flip Pallot and many others used them on big Tarpon and even Marlin successfully.

I would look for type II anodizing first and then for a cork or synthetic drag for salt water fishing. For typical trout fishing the reel is just a place to store the line and not critical.

I have toasted a number of the reels you are touting...

I agree the agonizing is good, but so are many others with much better records for toughness. Salmon are not really that tough compared to many warmwater saltwater fish, but numbers can be such that reels get serious workouts, quickly and long term. An ordinary salmon day count would be an unreal bonefish day.

Sierra Trading Post currently has a half-dozen choices on Lamson reels. All of them have the exact same drag components which have proven themselves for a long time. STP sometimes gets Bauer reels, an extremely tough reel for absolutely any application.
Originally Posted by 1minute
Quote
I agree the agonizing is good


What?

Sorry, couldn't help it.

Have a good one,


Friggin' autocorrect!!! LOL!

I deserve that one!
Looked at STP earlier today and found a Bauer and more Lamson options than I would have guessed... both are great, really tough reels for the money in tough situations.
Posted By: S99VG Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/15/19
I'm still partial to the old USA made Pflueger Medalist reels. There used to be a company called One Pfoot that sold upgrades for these reels but they don't seem to be too active anymore. Too bad as I never finished fixing up the set I have. To me, the reel is the least of my concerns. In order of importance I say first comes good line, then comes a good rod, and then after those two items have been satisfied comes the reel (which really only is a reservoir for your line).
Originally Posted by S99VG
I'm still partial to the old USA made Pflueger Medalist reels. There used to be a company called One Pfoot that sold upgrades for these reels but they don't seem to be too active anymore. Too bad as I never finished fixing up the set I have. To me, the reel is the least of my concerns. In order of importance I say first comes good line, then comes a good rod, and then after those two items have been satisfied comes the reel (which really only is a reservoir for your line).

Unless you like both big fish and your knuckles... wink
Posted By: S99VG Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/16/19
The old Pfluegers hang fine on my older glass and bamboo rods so I guess that does make me a big knuckle, big fish kind of guy. I never heard so much complaining about a few ounces until I got into fly fishing. But regardless of what you use it’s all fun.
Posted By: rudyc Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/17/19
One Pfoot is still going well. Get in touch with Dan Hill and tell him Rudy says hi...

https://onepfoot.com/
Posted By: S99VG Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 01/22/19
Originally Posted by rudyc
One Pfoot is still going well. Get in touch with Dan Hill and tell him Rudy says hi...

https://onepfoot.com/


Will do and thanks
Posted By: rost495 Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 05/19/19
Originally Posted by GuideGun
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Ross is struggling to see industry taillights, IMO&E.


Then you're not paying attention to the world outside of AK.

The Mayfly group (Ross/Abel) is doing more than most in the last 2-3 years. Ross was indeed going downhill before the merger with Abel. But since the merger they are turning out quality reels as well as winning awards and anglers. Almost a 180 degree turn around of the company they were before. It's sad that you are writing them off due to past experiences instead of evaluating current offerings in present time.

In full disclosure I don't work for Ross either, but I have used their innovative current designs with much success for the angling that I do. Albeit not against the mighty salmon/steelhead of the AK rivers. But I'm willing to wager Ross Evolution R would handle that angling just fine.


No dog in this fight but had to Canadians in the boat today that commented of all the places they have fished the bows were unbelievably stronger than any other they had seen
Posted By: Tejano Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 05/23/19
.[/quote]
I have toasted a number of the reels you are touting...

I agree the agonizing is good, but so are many others with much better records for toughness. Salmon are not really that tough compared to many warmwater saltwater fish, but numbers can be such that reels get serious workouts, quickly and long term. An ordinary salmon day count would be an unreal bonefish day.
. [/quote]

I have guided in Alaska, not counting Humpies the number count for bones and silvers and reds is similar, not so for Kings If you tied a ten pound steelhead to a ten pound bonefish the steelhead would win if the first couple 100 yards of going backwards didn't kill it.
Posted By: Blu_Cs Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 08/27/19
Y'know, I asked myself the same question, more than once. Bought a bunch of newer stuff, yet keep coming to the same conclusion: the old reels I've had for many decades still work....well.

For most applications the reels serve only two functions: 1) hold line and 2) balance the rod. The rest is ….IMO...fluff. Or the stuff of talk at the bar at the end of the day.

The one exception in this e=mc2 analysis is when you have to fight a big saltwater fish from the reel. Here, the modern larger arbor spools, drag systems and sealed bearings come into play. But for 80% of freshwater fly fishing at least, its all marketing.

Ohh my heaviest SW fly reel is an older Alvey - handles the big ones just fine.

JMO
Posted By: Blu_Cs Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 08/27/19
Originally Posted by S99VG
I'm still partial to the old USA made Pflueger Medalist reels. There used to be a company called One Pfoot that sold upgrades for these reels but they don't seem to be too active anymore. Too bad as I never finished fixing up the set I have. To me, the reel is the least of my concerns. In order of importance I say first comes good line, then comes a good rod, and then after those two items have been satisfied comes the reel (which really only is a reservoir for your line).


Well put.

I still regularly use several of the old Medalists, including a fave 1498 on a nine ft for 10wt for bass bugging here in the south. The heavyweight setup learned from Homer Circle's writings years ago - still applicable.
Posted By: WestMont Re: Reels and Reel Technology - 08/29/19
Originally Posted by Rodell
I'm getting back into fly fishing after a 30+ year absence. Is there somewhere I can learn (on-line) about what would make a fly reel worth $850+? Clearly, technology has advanced quite a bit over the years but I'm at a loss to figure out what I need (or want)>



I wished I could offer advice but I'm in the same boat as yourself. I'll be fly fishing for silvers here in a month or so and I chose to try the TFO BVK Fly Rod Outfit (8wt, 9'0", 4pc) w/Lamson Remix Fly Reel. If I fly fished more often I may have chose a different set up but because not only have I not fly fished in a very long time I might only get to make an annual trip so this setup will only see a weeks worth of use a year and nearly half the cost of a $850 reel.
© 24hourcampfire