Have two both on 700's with Douglas barrels, both I believe are 27 inches long..one on a std. rem. stock is my everyday coyote rifle..the other is on a thumbhole stock..my long range prairie dog, gr. squirrel, and rockchuck rifle..both are very accurate..had I known I could put a swift barrel on a 700 35 years ago, I would have never spent those years shooting a .22-250...
Agreed completely. Admittedly, I've never owned either, but have hunted a lot with borrowed rifles in both and I like the Swift better. Couple of my buddies with many, many decades more experience than myself have used both over the years and also agree. They've both also built and shot a LOT of different wildcats as well, but of their all-time favorites, the Swift is either first or second. That tells you something.
If you don't let the barrel get too hot and make even a small effort towards regular cleaning, the Swift barrels those guys had/have were/are surprisingly long-lived with great accuracy, and I'm talking about thousands of rounds & still shooting small groups.
Having used and also watched slow twist with light bullets and fast twist with the heavier stuff (for groundhogs), both setups are devastating, but when the range starts to get long and/or it's windy, the Swift really shines in a fast twist and heavy ball. I think this is where you can harness the full potential of the Swift.
It still has a lot going for it, but not without some downsides too. Seems like that brass needs trimming more than any other cartridge I've seen and the loaded ammo/brass is not as readily available and can be a bit more expensive too.
Not trying to start some type of angry debate (not my intention - nothing wrong with a good .22-.250 - a great cartridge and ammo's cheaper - & now you can even get Lapua brass), but I'll just say that from what I have observed, the folks shooting the .22-.250's have never tried the Swift.
Great looking rifles, by the way.