Dr, someone gave me good advice years ago. If you intend to use the scope for spotting bullet holes at 100 or 200 yards, there are many low-end scopes on the market that will do that well. If you intent to hunt sheep, or count points on a deer or elk at 600 yards, only then it makes sense to buy a quality spotter.
My thoughts exactly
The big question however is how much is the cost of a quality spotter?
Meaning one with which you can count points on an animal at 600 yards and further, even much further?
And even more than that, when conditions are bad, will the very expensive ones perform better so as to allow for things like counting points?
And the answer to that question is no they wont.
The old cliche regarding optics (always) applies, that being that on a good day most optics will look pretty good.
On a less than good day the better ones will be a bit better.
And on a bad day none of them, regardless of cost will be any good, especially for things like counting points.
And you can take that to any bank and cash it.
But thankfully it still is at least for the time being a free country, and we can spend our money any way we wish.
Ive been long range hunting exclusivly for more than 50 years now.
I currently own 6 different sets of twin spotting scopes in machined brackets, including Kowa 77 mms.
I have at least 10 close friends using 80 mm Swarovskis.
On a bad day you wont be counting points with any of them, same as you wont with the lower cost ones.
And when the conditions change to where you can, so will you be able to count them with a set of clean 50 year old B&L Balscopes, or a set of old Bushnell Spacemasters.
But again, it is your money.