ED Glass vs HD Glass in Binoculars

I understand the difference and looked over some reports but what is yalls opinion? This is for adorable binoculars under $500.

Thanks

Tracy

Originally Posted by nimrodtracy

I understand the difference and looked over some reports but what is yalls opinion? This is for adorable binoculars under $500.

Thanks

Tracy

Do you have an adorable binocular in mind?

Originally Posted by SKane

Originally Posted by nimrodtracy

I understand the difference and looked over some reports but what is yalls opinion? This is for adorable binoculars under $500.

Thanks

Tracy

Do you have an adorable binocular in mind?

I am think of geting these

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07N27N6D2/ref=twister_B0BCQQPY3S?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

Originally Posted by nimrodtracy

Originally Posted by SKane

Originally Posted by nimrodtracy

I understand the difference and looked over some reports but what is yalls opinion? This is for adorable binoculars under $500.

Thanks

Tracy

Do you have an adorable binocular in mind?

I am think of geting these

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07N27N6D2/ref=twister_B0BCQQPY3S?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

Those are endearing, maybe charming, but I wouldn't say adorable.

Hahaha!

The Celestron TrailSeaker ED was the best rated mid range binocular of the 15 models tested by a birdwatching group. They rated them better than higher priced binos under $500. Those would be my choice, especially at that price.

I wish there was standardized resolution, brightness, aberration, and light transmission percentages required to advertise glass as HD, ED, super ED, etc.

Originally Posted by kolofardos

Originally Posted by nimrodtracy

Originally Posted by SKane

Originally Posted by nimrodtracy

I understand the difference and looked over some reports but what is yalls opinion? This is for adorable binoculars under $500.

Thanks

Tracy

Do you have an adorable binocular in mind?

I am think of geting these

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07N27N6D2/ref=twister_B0BCQQPY3S?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

Those are endearing, maybe charming, but I wouldn't say adorable.

I'm sure Doug could hook him with something a bit more precious.

Originally Posted by SKane

Originally Posted by kolofardos

Originally Posted by nimrodtracy

Originally Posted by SKane

Originally Posted by nimrodtracy

I understand the difference and looked over some reports but what is yalls opinion? This is for adorable binoculars under $500.

Thanks

Tracy

Do you have an adorable binocular in mind?

I am think of geting these

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07N27N6D2/ref=twister_B0BCQQPY3S?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

Those are endearing, maybe charming, but I wouldn't say adorable.

I'm sure Doug could hook him with something a bit more precious.

Maybe then no one would worry about ED 😳

I want the 8x42 in the Celestron TrailSeaker ED but they want over $100 more so the 10x42 will be my choice

Originally Posted by horse1

I wish there was standardized resolution, brightness, aberration, and light transmission percentages required to advertise glass as HD, ED, super ED, etc.

I want the 8x42 in the Celestron TrailSeaker ED but they want over $100 more so the 10x42 will be my choice.

I don't think Doug carry's Celestron.