Home
I've had great luck with Trijicon products in the past so this has potential to be a really useful tool for general hunting use. I look forward to trying them out.

https://www.trijicon.com/products/subcategory/trijicon-huron-hunting-riflescope
The issue I have with Trijicon is with their short eye relief. They think everyone shoots a .223 Rem. Try shooting a Light 300 Win Mag up hill with a scope set on top power and 3" or less eye relief.
Where is the scope made?
Interesting they're offering both 1" and 30mm in the same lineup (Huron).
There won't be any confusion there. whistle laugh

Thanks for posting.
1x4-24 heavier than 3x9-40 . . . . .........
Originally Posted by cumminscowboy
Where is the scope made?


Looking at this scope on their website I think it says Made in Japan on the bottom of the scope.
looks like I saw about $700 they better be made in japan for that kind of money. years ago I grabbed one of the early tridge scopes that had a turret. to this day one of the worst feeling turrets I have ever seen. probably long discontinued. made in japan should mean a decent level of qauility all by itself. hopefully some stores carry them and we all can get a look at them.
Is it just me or does the picture of the 1-4 have a higher ring in front?

I'm a fan of their 1-4 Accupoint but this one doesn't have any reticle options that I can see.
comparing the accupoint to the steiner px4i, I bought the steiner 1-4. Its a very good scope.
Is this some kind of damn joke?

Eye Relief
2.2 in. - 3.2 in. (55.88mm - 81.28mm)
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Is this some kind of damn joke?

Eye Relief
2.2 in. - 3.2 in. (55.88mm - 81.28mm)



Lol, you mean every deer hunter in America doesn’t shoot an AR-15 nose-to-charging handle during whitetail season?

It’s pretty clear the slow firearms market in the past few years is making companies desperate.
Originally Posted by TWR
Is it just me or does the picture of the 1-4 have a higher ring in front?


I believe it’s just a horrible photoshop attempt.
Originally Posted by Jwood1284
Originally Posted by TWR
Is it just me or does the picture of the 1-4 have a higher ring in front?


I believe it’s just a horrible photoshop attempt.


Don't you two know anything - that's how you mount a scope for longrange shooting . smile
The other photo - scope on the R-700 - needs much higher mounts also .
I hope the eye relief numbers are not correct?
What Paul said X10. powdr
The front ring isn't seated in one of the rail grooves.
Originally Posted by Oldelkhunter
I hope the eye relief numbers are not correct?


Hope not, that’s shorter than the 14x SHV and it’s pretty damn short.
© 24hourcampfire