I'm half expecting that Bitch to screw up my daughters wedding AGAIN, at the end of this month!

Well, if I'm laying in a bed dying from Covid19, I'm gettin' me some.

I'm not, however, getting ventilated. The data on that is pretty clear.

I carefully read the newspaper article provided by Jaguartx and came across the following quote:

“But Zervos cautioned against extrapolating the results for treatment outside hospital settings and without further study.”

The rest of the story discusses many other studies that are less successful. Still controversial IMHO.

Well, if I'm laying in a bed dying from Covid19, I'm gettin' me some.

I'm not, however, getting ventilated. The data on that is pretty clear.

I carefully read the newspaper article provided by Jaguartx and came across the following quote:

“But Zervos cautioned against extrapolating the results for treatment outside hospital settings and without further study.”

The rest of the story discusses many other studies that are less successful. Still controversial IMHO.

I carefully read the newspaper article provided by Jaguartx and came across the following quote:

“But Zervos cautioned against extrapolating the results for treatment outside hospital settings and without further study.”

The rest of the story discusses many other studies that are less successful. Still controversial IMHO.

I'm half expecting that Bitch to screw up my daughters wedding AGAIN, at the end of this month!

I hope the wedding happens as planned and without a hitch. Wedding plan snafu's can be exceptionally stressful on some folks.

If they do shut your wedding down again though, perhaps plan a destination wedding @ Mt Rushmore for the 3rd swing.

I've read (don't recall when/where) that whichever .gov agency gets the say so, no longer allows it to be given for Covid-19. Don't know if a Doc would do it anyway, but he'd be opening himself up to a real problem.

I carefully read the newspaper article provided by Jaguartx and came across the following quote:

“But Zervos cautioned against extrapolating the results for treatment outside hospital settings and without further study.”

The rest of the story discusses many other studies that are less successful. Still controversial IMHO.

spoilsport!

Here's the plan. Well, we got a vaccine but covid has mutated and we need more work done on it so we better have mail in ballots and close the polling booths to save peoples lives.

Here's the plan. Well, we got a vaccine but covid has mutated and we need more work done on it so we better have mail in ballots and close the polling booths to save peoples lives.

My very good college friend is a doctor in SE MI. He told me two months ago that his peers were using it for themselves and their families.

This medicine had to fail ever since Trump said it could work.

Don’t forget. A political party that celebrates the deaths of millions of unborn babies has no issue killing thousands more if it moves the political needle just a little in their direction.

I have absolutely zero doubt that many of them would be willing to sacrifice millions of lives to ensure their perpetual power. If you doubt me, pick up an honest history book on leftist movements.

Check mail jaguartx.

The so called party of the people doesn’t give a cshit if you die, cause you can vote after you die.

Good post, thank you.

Spoilsport for you though, huh Suckermore.

Hahaha. Fo sho bro.

Suckermore is too stupid to realize Hydroxychloroquine will even treat the Covid mutations while a vaccination wont without being revamped for each mutation.

Freaking brainwashed bastids are plenty hard headed, like bots. Stupid bastids abound only by the grace of GOD and modern civilization, and they long for the simplicity of Afrekan and ancient American Indian life.

A recent poll I heard of indicates only about 3-5 % of respondents are willing to take a Gates vaccine.

you should start taking it right now, before it is too late.

What the hell do you have to lose?

Remdesivir costs something like $6200 for a course of treatment whereas Hydroxy/Zinc/Z Pack costs are negligible. Guess which one big .gov/big pharma/big med is gonna push?

Sickermores Zionist buds running those big pharma cos wouldnt steer us wrong. Just ask him.

His bud Fauci, whose wife is on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, is a proven expert, first saying there was no need for Trump to shut off flights from China and first telling us that covid 19 wouldnt amount to much and then telling those stricken with it to stay home and only go to hospitals after you got to where you could barely breathe.

Bump for Suckadick or Suckamore or whatever that dickhead wants to be called.

Haha Suckadick only wants to rag on Jag. You liberal piece of shiet, nothing to say about RAS's post? Of course not because you are wrong as usual.

"Actually Suckmoredick you're not even sort of right"

I've been taking it, along with Trump and probably more than half the worlds leaders for a few months, thank you.

. But what happens when we treat patients 3-6 weeks earlier, when they first develop symptoms?
BRIAN C. PROCTER MD



Off of FB

This is from a Dr. in McKinney, TX so I am reposting it to let all my local friends know his treatment plan for COVID in case you get this virus and want to know your treatment options.
You want a cure?
My name is Brian C. Procter MD and I am a Board-Certified Family Physician in McKinney, Texas. I am a colleague of Dr. Ivette Lozano that you interviewed a few weeks ago. I understand that you are trying to get the truth out about hydroxychloroquine.
I respectfully suggest that there is a much bigger issue/story here. Most commentators are discussing inpatient treatment only. If patients are admitted to the ICU then their chances of survival are dismal. But what happens when we treat patients 3-6 weeks earlier, when they first develop symptoms? I have been treating COVID-19 patients in the outpatient trenches for over 2 months now just like Dr. Lozano. I like her, I am using Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, losartan, aspirin, and zinc (all for less than $50 at my local pharmacy). We have identified, diagnosed, and successfully treated these patients at a relatively early point in the course of the disease.
It is these statistics that are amazing. I have treated over 50 patients without a single death, ventilator, or hospitalization. Dr. Lozano has treated twice that many with the same success. I even treated one patient that was discharged from a hospital the day before who was treated with IV fluids only for 4 days and released, still feeling terrible! We are two community docs using EARLY AGGRESSIVE OUTPATIENT TREATMENT to handle the disease with a 100% success rate (ZERO Admissions, ZERO).
Therefore, If we can treat patients EARLY for $50, we seem to be successful at preventing hospitalizations, ICUs, and death as well as saving tens of thousands of healthcare dollars per sick patient. My local ICU doctors have pleaded with me to keep doing what I am doing. The answer seems to be EARLY AGGRESSIVE OUTPATIENT TREATMENT and NOT contact tracing (which is communism and ! cannot even get the Public Health Dept on the phone), quarantine (which destroys millions of lives), wearing masks (which is ridiculous as a long term solution w/o proven data), a vaccine (by the time we get it, likely won't need it), social distancing (which won't sustain or GDP with 25% occupancy), testing (ALL tests have a high false negative rate up around 20-30%), or watchful waiting (a tactic that has needlessly resulted in 100,000 deaths).
We could also place all Nursing home patients on HCQ prophylaxis for 180 days on a voluntary basis of course. This could theoretically prevent thousands of needless hospitalizations and deaths.
In conclusion, if we treat COVID-19 just like anything else we treat (ie, the flu, pneumonia, a sinus infection, hypertension, and diabetes) early and aggressively with a regimen that costs $50 out of pocket or less with 100% success (which is a far better stat than treating all those other conditions), then why is the country shut down and doing social distancing? This political sham must stop.
The American people deserve to know they can go to their regular doctor and get treated early with a regimen that is completely safe and extremely effective, and they do not need to worry about ending up in the hospital and dying. The public is UNAWARE of this, please educate them with the truth. The country needs to return to normal NOW.
This is the REAL story. Please feel free to contact me with questions. My heart goes out to all those who have needlessly suffered and continue to suffer during this sham crisis and a disease that is extremely treatable if treated EARLY!!!
BRIAN C. PROCTER MD



Off of FB

In the end though, feel free to indulge yourself in whatever ineffective or dangerous quackery to "own the libs".

Cover Up: Fauci Approved Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine 15 Years Ago to Cure Coronaviruses; “Nobody Needed to Die”

By True Pundit
Global Research, May 21, 2020
True Pundit 7 May 2020
Region: USA
Theme: Intelligence, Media Disinformation, Science and Medicine
print 11.5K 1255 229 13.8K

Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose “expert” advice to President Trump has resulted in the complete shutdown of the greatest economic engine in world history, has known since 2005 that chloroquine is an effective inhibitor of coronaviruses.

How did he know this? Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director. In connection with the SARS outbreak – caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS- CoV – the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks. The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2. While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related to it, and shares 79% of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies. They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.

The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”

This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci (pictured at right) has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it’s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”). So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus. Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005, “concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”

Dr. Didier Raoult, the Anthony Fauci of France, had such spectacular success using HCQ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 that he said way back on February 25 that “it’s game over” for coronavirus.

According to Dr. Anthony Fauci the Reopening of the US Economy Would Endanger People’s Heath
He and a team of researchers reported that the use of HCQ administered with both azithromycin and zinc cured 79 of 80 patients with only “rare and minor” adverse events.

“In conclusion,” these researchers write, “we confirm the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early impairment of contagiousness.”

The highly-publicized VA study that purported to show HCQ was ineffective showed nothing of the sort. HCQ wasn’t administered until the patients were virtually on their deathbeds when research indicates it should be prescribed as soon as symptoms are apparent. Plus, HCQ was administered without azithromycin and zinc, which form the cocktail that makes it supremely effective. At-risk individuals need to receive the HCQ cocktail at the first sign of symptoms.

But Governor Andrew Cuomo banned the use of HCQ in the entire state of New York on March 6, the Democrat governors of Nevada and Michigan soon followed suit, and by March 28 the whole country was under incarceration-in-place fatwas.

Nothing happened with regard to the use of HCQ in the U.S. until March 20, when President Trump put his foot down and insisted that the FDA consider authorizing HCQ for off-label use to treat SARS-CoV-2.

[color:#990000]On March 23, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko reported that he had treated around 500 coronavirus patients with HCQ and had seen an astonishing 100% success rate. That’s not the “anecdotal” evidence Dr. Fauci sneers at, but actual results with real patients in clinical settings.

“Since last Thursday, my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel and another 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen. Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams, we have had ZERO deaths, ZERO hospitalizations, and ZERO intu[/color]bations. In addition, I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10% of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea.”

Said Dr. Zelenko:

“If you scale this nationally, the economy will rebound much quicker. The country will open again. And let me tell you a very important point. This treatment costs about $20. That’s very important because you can scale that nationally. If every treatment costs $20,000, that’s not so good.

All I’m doing is repurposing old, available drugs which we know their safety profiles, and using them in a unique combination in an outpatient setting.”

The questions are disturbing to a spectacular degree. If Dr. Fauci has known since 2005 of the effectiveness of HCQ, why hasn’t it been administered immediately after people show symptoms, as Dr. Zelenko has done? Maybe then nobody would have died and nobody would have been incarcerated in place except the sick, which is who a quarantine is for in the first place. To paraphrase Jesus, it’s not the symptom-free who need HCQ but the sick. And they need it at the first sign of symptoms.

While the regressive health care establishment wants the HCQ cocktail to only be administered late in the course of the infection, from a medical standpoint, this is stupid. Said one doctor, “As a physician, this baffles me. I can’t think of a single infectious condition — bacterial, fungal, or viral — where the best medical treatment is to delay the use of an anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, or anti-viral until the infection is far advanced.”

So why has Dr. Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump street? He didn’t even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9, by which time 33,000 people had died.

In the end though, feel free to indulge yourself in whatever ineffective or dangerous quackery to "own the libs".

And, the death of faith in "experts" is a HUGE nail in the coffin of progressivism. Bring a bigger hammer.