Home
Posted By: conrad101st Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-car...biden-documents-it-got-lost-mail-1543084

Well I’m convinced now! NOT!!!
What a fugging dipshit.


Shame with a name like that.
I agree tucker is a dipshit. What serious journalist says he mails election blowing evidence but didn’t take the time to scan it or xerox it. You have got to be kidding me.
No,no....I see where you might have become confused.


I meant YOU are a dipshit.


You. Not Tucker.


I understand if it was an easy mistake to make.
Posted By: Bristoe Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
The FOX network is full of subversives. Somebody there heard what the plan was and put the word out.

Somebody in the line between point "A" and point "B" made some money.
Posted By: T_Inman Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Fake news at its best, and if Conrad honestly believes it...I am dumbfounded.
Hey! Which Conrad????
Posted By: g5m Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Reminds me of a friend shipping some full auto weapons to a defense show in D.C. They didn't show up. He called ATF and they found them hidden in an area of the shipping company's hub. Convenient for someone to remove them.

Tucker said the package was traced until 3:44 am when the package was reported by an employee to have been seen as having been opened and empty. Company investigated and couldn't explain. Tucker said they "seemed to be concerned".
The producer didn’t copy prior to sending.

Hopefully the source did copy?
Originally Posted by conrad101st
I agree tucker is a dipshit. What serious journalist says he mails election blowing evidence but didn’t take the time to scan it or xerox it. You have got to be kidding me.


Turns out you are the dipshit. And linking Newsweek is laughable on it's face.

"Tucker Carlson revealed this evening that someone intercepted an envelope containing documents of evidence supporting the claims by Tony Bobulinski. The documents were mailed by a “well known overnight transport” company and mysteriously were removed in transit from New York to LA.

The package, likely a Fed-X delivery, was intercepted by FBI agents using mechanisms for tracking and surveillance that open targeting through portals connected to DHS.

As an outcome of the U.S. Patriot Act, the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security has an agreement in place with mail shipping companies, public/private services, that essentially allows them a portal to track all in-state and interstate mail deliveries.


The FBI has access to this data network in the same way the FBI has access to federal transportation records. Just like when you book a flight and DHS portals are open that allow FBI to track your movements domestically. This type of portal is also accessed in private company transportation like Uber, Lyft etc. DHS, and as a consequence the FBI, can easily track your whereabouts.

Without much hesitation I will bet the FBI was monitoring the communication of Bobulinski, and by extension the entire Tucker Carlson production network. Once the shipment was known to be taking place, the DHS portals are opened; the package is tracked; and the FBI moves in to intercept the delivery.

The transport company doesn’t need to be participating because they are essentially unneeded. Their system network is connected to the FBI."

Link - Conservative Treehouse
Posted By: Steve Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
No,no....I see where you might have become confused.


I meant YOU are a dipshit.




Well, he's a dipshit. So....
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
No,no....I see where you might have become confused.


I meant YOU are a dipshit.




Well, he's a dipshit. So....


Do you suppose he wears khakis?
Posted By: ribka Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by conrad101st


lmao
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
No,no....I see where you might have become confused.


I meant YOU are a dipshit.




Well, he's a dipshit. So....


Do you suppose he wears khakis?

Yes
Posted By: T_Inman Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Hey! Which Conrad????


That's for me to know and you to wonder.
Posted By: Steve Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
No,no....I see where you might have become confused.


I meant YOU are a dipshit.




Well, he's a dipshit. So....


Do you suppose he wears khakis?

Yes



Probably not wearing pants at all.
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
No,no....I see where you might have become confused.


I meant YOU are a dipshit.




Well, he's a dipshit. So....


Do you suppose he wears khakis?

Yes



Probably not wearing pants at all.



Feather boa and some nylons.
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
No,no....I see where you might have become confused.


I meant YOU are a dipshit.




Well, he's a dipshit. So....


Do you suppose he wears khakis?

Yes



Probably not wearing pants at all.

You are probably right.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Hey! Which Conrad????


That's for me to know and you to wonder.


Buy you a beer if you tell me.....

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Originally Posted by ribka
Originally Posted by conrad101st


lmao

OP changed his post so he doesn't look like such a dipshit.

Too late.
Posted By: Steve Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
No,no....I see where you might have become confused.


I meant YOU are a dipshit.




Well, he's a dipshit. So....


Do you suppose he wears khakis?

Yes





Probably not wearing pants at all.

You are probably right.



..?

https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/9221879/re-25#Post9221879
Posted By: T_Inman Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
OK, OK, OK!!!! I was referring to the 101st Conrad dipshit.

Where's my brewha? I want it and I want it NOW!!!!!!!

[Linked Image from images.ctfassets.net]
Frogsnacks!
Posted By: Valsdad Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Somedays I'm not glad I no longer drink.

For some reason a 6.5% ABV Scotch Ale holds some appeal.

But, I'd not like the results a month from now.
Well....I will buy you a whole bunch of them fancy beers if you come over here and hunt my place for free.
Originally Posted by Valsdad
Somedays I'm not glad I no longer drink.

For some reason a 6.5% ABV Scotch Ale holds some appeal.

But, I'd not like the results a month from now.


You think thats bad....Montanner is trying to legalize pot.
Posted By: T_Inman Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Do it Geno!
It's like a sign from above.....a gift from the GODS.

[Linked Image from thesun.co.uk]
Posted By: T_Inman Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Montana has been trying to legalize that shït for years. It's pretty much already there....really doesn't make much difference to me other than all the stoners driving 20 MPH under...
Posted By: Valsdad Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Do it Geno!
It's like a sign from above.....a gift from the GODS.

[Linked Image from thesun.co.uk]



Apparently you don't understand.

perhaps you've never met the guy that drinks all his beer, then whatever you have left, then drives 30 miles to get more drinks that, comes into work still mostly drunk, and does it all over again the next day.

I REALLY like beer. I just don't like where it takes me.
Posted By: T_Inman Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
I thing you and I are long lost brothers....Come give me a HUG!!!!!!!!!
Originally Posted by conrad101st


I was thinking the same. Sounded like BS.
Hmmmm....Geno seems to think he is the only one who likes beer......



Penis cloud........I learned long ago not to ignore obvious signs like that.....


JK of course. Maybe.


You keep doing you Geno....even if the old woman wont.....
Originally Posted by T_Inman
OK, OK, OK!!!! I was referring to the 101st Conrad dipshit.

Where's my brewha? I want it and I want it NOW!!!!!!!

Just run down to Hoodoo!
Originally Posted by conrad101st


Of course, they didnt make copies of these invaluable documents and niether did the pukes who collected and sent them to him. whistle
I do appreciate a good derail.

I dont appreciate some liberal with the same last name.
Posted By: 1911a1 Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Hey! Which Conrad????


That's for me to know and you to wonder.


Buy you a beer if you tell me.....

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]



Does Jeremiah Johnson beer taste like Liver?
It tastes like liberal liver.
Posted By: T_Inman Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Big Jim's down at the HooDoo? Shït ya....We're gonna PARTAY!

[Linked Image from i.makeagif.com]
Posted By: Valsdad Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
I do appreciate a good derail.

I dont appreciate some liberal with the same last name.





For all we know...............it might be his first name?
Originally Posted by Valsdad
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
I do appreciate a good derail.

I dont appreciate some liberal with the same last name.





For all we know...............it might be his first name?


Hopefully.


A bunch of Conrads left Indiana and ended up in Oklahoma.

The smart, conservative ones went to Montana.


Late 1800's or so.

Hope this 101 retard aint related.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Big Jim's down at the HooDoo? Shït ya....We're gonna PARTAY!

[Linked Image from i.makeagif.com]



I appreciate a good break away Adidas track suit.
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Big Jim's down at the HooDoo? Shït ya....We're gonna PARTAY!

[Linked Image from i.makeagif.com]

Party on, Garth!
Posted By: GeoW Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Who is the latest dipshit?
Originally Posted by GeoW
Who is the latest dipshit?



Hahaha!

Three pages already. Nice.
Posted By: Valsdad Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Big Jim's down at the HooDoo? Shït ya....We're gonna PARTAY!

[Linked Image from i.makeagif.com]



I appreciate a good break away Adidas track suit.



Dude,

they work great when one is lootin' an scheidt. Mofos try to grab yo ass and zippity do dah, off and runnin' ya go.
Posted By: 700LH Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by conrad101st
I agree tucker is a dipshit. What serious journalist says he mails election blowing evidence but didn’t take the time to scan it or xerox it. You have got to be kidding me.

I don't recall hearing it wasn't copied
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Hey! Which Conrad????




The Dumb One.

Lol.
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by conrad101st


I was thinking the same. Sounded like BS.


One step above finding out that Tucker's dog at it....... wink
Originally Posted by T_Inman
Fake news at its best, and if Conrad honestly believes it...I am dumbfounded.



Don't be, Comrad101st is a huge Never Trumper.
Tucker Carlson Tells Viewers a Package with Biden Documents Sent By His Producer from NY to LA Went Missing in the Mail — Says They Kept Copies

Posted By: Redneck Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by ironbender
The producer didn’t copy prior to sending.

Hopefully the source did copy?
Nobody faxes any more???
Posted By: viking Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Not much.
Originally Posted by Redneck
Originally Posted by ironbender
The producer didn’t copy prior to sending.

Hopefully the source did copy?
Nobody faxes any more???

Yes, most of the medical community. It looks more like email but they can still call it a fax. HIPAA is the reason fax is still around.
Posted By: OSU_Sig Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Good that they kept copies. Scanning and email is the preferred way to send things "right now". The originals remain safe.
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
Good that they kept copies. Scanning and email is the preferred way to send things "right now". The originals remain safe.


No schit, somebody call Tucker and tell him the 80's called and have his mail.
Posted By: efw Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
Originally Posted by conrad101st


So you’ve voted for Biden.

Check.
Posted By: las Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
I would look real hard at the guy who "discovered" the open envelope. But not as hard as I would look at the local or nearest FBI.
They sent a copy of the documents via mail and still have the originals. The fact that the progressive fascists are going thru Fox’s mail shows how desperate they are.
Originally Posted by ConradCA
They sent a copy of the documents via mail and still have the originals. The fact that the progressive fascists are going thru Fox’s mail shows how desperate they are.


Yep!
Posted By: 2ndwind Re: Tucker explains it finally - 10/29/20
I really really want to know when Tucker is going to reveal those copies....
© 24hourcampfire