More proof of the "double standard" justice system in the United States of America!
Sad and pathetic.
"liberal felons" NOT prosecuted!
Link:
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/in...283-002f01d2-3217-4b12-8725-3fda2cad119fSheesh.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
Several groups are almost completely above the law in America
Just say I am a democrat, you go free.
Lady Justice lost her blindfold......fuggin bs
I remember Reginald Denny's perps going free after they ripped him out of his semi truck, beat him, and hit him in head with a brick. Fugging turds were playing the victim card as a reason that they attacked him. Prosecutors and judges need to be held accountable!
If you are a liberal, you are apparently untouchable.
Esox357: I remember that incident and many others from the past - it is NOW becoming common-place for negro's and liberals to escape justice just because of their political status!
This type thing is unacceptable to me - but it seems I and like minded law abiding citizens will just have to keep our mouths shut regarding these "political preferential treatment" situations?
Sad.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
Definitely being treated differently than Jan 6.
Large parts of St.Louis was destroyed. And the DA there let all but maybe 1-2 people go completely free. The McCloskeys make up 50% of the criminal charges for the city.
"In a recent interview with KGW, Williams explained the cases were dismissed in instances where prosecutors didn’t believe they could prove a case beyond a reasonable doubt.
“Each case was analyzed for the evidence that we had at the time," said Williams. "Careful decisions were made on whether or not someone should be charged based on the evidence."
Williams explained decisions are made on a case-by-case basis."
I guess courts still require proof to convict someone.
Sure. All that is required for this to occur is to change the definition of "evidence" to suit the desired outcome.
On a case-by-case basis, of course.
"In a recent interview with KGW, Williams explained the cases were dismissed in instances where prosecutors didn’t believe they could prove a case beyond a reasonable doubt.
“Each case was analyzed for the evidence that we had at the time," said Williams. "Careful decisions were made on whether or not someone should be charged based on the evidence."
Williams explained decisions are made on a case-by-case basis."
I guess courts still require proof to convict someone.
And yet another large liberal brush of generality.
