Well, flying an Apache under night systems viewed in a green1-in square monocle, low-level in [bleep] weather at IR crossover will make most airplane pilots opt for a carrier deck instead, I assure you. And these days most have or soon will have fully-coupled approach to landing.
I appreciate everything helo guys do and the ability to get down in nap of the earth and an incredible weapons system. But…… if you have a fuel or engine problem you have a few options. . At the boat you have fly your head through a window about 2’ tall and 3’wide. It’s a skill that we start to develop in flight students as soon as they start training in jets.
In bad weather the sky is gray, the water is gray and guess what color the boat is….. Usually the first thing you see is the ramp (the tail end of the flight deck which is white). At night, in the F-4, we were “trick or treat” on our first pass, Meaning you had one shot at it and if you “boltered” you went right up to the tanker, took some gas and went right back to try again. In many cases there was no divert; land it or eject. The Tomcat was a little more forgiving with fuel consumption.
Search “pitching deck operations” on Google. If you find “Carrier” on the History Channe (?)l it’ll give you an idea about how it is to get aboard with a pitching deck. I know about 2/3 of the guys they show.
We could couple-up even in the F-4 and F-14 as early as the mid-late ‘70’s but the systems were really hard to keep up and few, if any, of them were certified to fly it all the way to touchdown. When it was working we’d usually kick it off and about 3/4 mile. Nowadays aircraft have much more sophisticated data link and it’s “put the thing on the thing”