Home
Posted By: ironbender Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
They got to him.
Posted By: Daveinjax Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Damn it ! Sure wished he’d waited until after the midterm elections and a possible rino majority that could possibly maybe might be able to prevent another full blown communist being confirmed to the court.
Posted By: TheBigSky Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Originally Posted by Daveinjax
Damn it ! Sure wished he’d waited until after the midterm elections and a possible rino majority that could possibly maybe might be able to prevent another full blown communist being confirmed to the court.

I agree; but, that was never going to happen. They learned their lesson with Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Originally Posted by Daveinjax
Damn it ! Sure wished he’d waited until after the midterm elections and a possible rino majority that could possibly maybe might be able to prevent another full blown communist being confirmed to the court.

Even if the Republicans have a majority after the mid terms, enough of them will rubber stamp whoever Biden picks.
Whomever is picked will make Breyer look moderate at a minimum.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/su...rt-paving-way-biden-appointment-n1288042
Posted By: Mike78 Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Trans, at the very least.
Posted By: Kenneth66 Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
coffee seems to be brewing ,
Kenneth
Posted By: acy Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Originally Posted by ironbender
Whomever is picked will make Breyer look moderate at a minimum.

Originally Posted by Mike78
Trans, at the very least.


For sure biden's handlers will be looking to check a whole bunch of boxes with the nomination. Having a solid belief in the Constitution will be an unchecked box. Nominee likely won't have read the Constitution since law school, if then.
Posted By: Mike78 Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Maybe not trans but I'd give $10 to St. Jude's if it isn't a Muslim.
Can you say "Here comes Cumala?"

MM
Biden's been saying bleck female for a while.

You can bet it will be some socialist.
Posted By: Scout308 Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Biden or should I say Obama will appoint some angry Black female activist who hates White people.
Originally Posted by MontanaMan
Can you say "Here comes Cumala?"

MM

That would be a way to sack her.
And open an exit window for The Demented One.

MM
Posted By: rte Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
They have most of the bases covered.The SC has a token Latina but also an arrogant ass-hole in Sotomayor. They certainly have a dyke in that mannish looking Kagan.They got a two-for-one in Kagan as she is a Bolshevik and a descendant of Russian Jews.

Since the Demonrat/Commie/homo/pedo Party places symbolism over substance and a fealty to their Commie cause, the next pick could be anyone's guess.A tranny would as good of a guess as any.
The “wise Latina”…the racist, sexist, uninformed, justice.
I hear the news referring to the “6-3” court.

It’s 5-4 at best.
I was sexually molested by whoever PedoBiden nominates and I demand the opportunity to blow up his/her nomination in a full Senate hearing....
It takes 60% of the senate to seat a SCOTUS judge. The question is, will the R's block a nutcase leftist? They'll almost have to seat a moderate or a mild leftist, but what if someone like Harris or Hillary, or maybe Michelle, got the nomination? Would the R's block that?
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
It takes 60% of the senate to seat a SCOTUS judge. The question is, will the R's block a nutcase leftist? They'll almost have to seat a moderate or a mild leftist, but what if someone like Harris or Hillary, or maybe Michelle, got the nomination? Would the R's block that?


I say the R's will fully support anybody PedoBiden nominates after they get to meekly complain about him/her.
Posted By: 45_100 Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Would not be surprised if they nominate cameltoe. It gets her out of the succession for resident of the white house and will keep her from running for any other office in the future. Solves a lot of problems.
Posted By: efw Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Biden's been saying bleck female for a while.

You can bet it will be some socialist.



Well at least he ain’t racis…
I hear that Biteme has said he wants a black woman to fill the spot. I have no idea why being either a black or a woman gives anyone an automatic qualification for the position over anyone else on the planet. I suppose that a knowledge of Constitutional law and a history and tendency to make sound judgements based on such is no longer a requirement or desirable trait. So, who is on the top of Biteme's list? The Ho? Be a good way to get rid of her. Maybe Stacey Abrams, the idiot black lesbian woman from Georgia who claims to have won the last governor election there? How about Chicago mayor Lightfoot? She being black, a lesbian, and with her astounding record as mayor, she would be an excellent Democratic candidate for the position. How about this: How about a candidate chosen not for his or her race, but for their knowledge and respect for our Constitution as written? How about one that has a proven track record of sound legal decisions, within the provisions, protections, and restraints of the Constitution? How about someone fair and competent? What a novel concept!
Originally Posted by 45_100
Would not be surprised if they nominate cameltoe. It gets her out of the succession for resident of the white house and will keep her from running for any other office in the future. Solves a lot of problems.
It solves that problem but creates a whole world of new ones.
Posted By: poboy Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Justice Breyer the billionaire?
Posted By: TimZ Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Got a suggestion for Biden, how about Condoleeza Rice?
This is an off ramp for VP Harris . As far as the court goes, not a big change.
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
It takes 60% of the senate to seat a SCOTUS judge. The question is, will the R's block a nutcase leftist? They'll almost have to seat a moderate or a mild leftist, but what if someone like Harris or Hillary, or maybe Michelle, got the nomination? Would the R's block that?

Nope. People got this wrong with Kavanaugh and Coney.

60 for cloture.

Simple majority to confirm.
Posted By: Steve Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
It takes 60% of the senate to seat a SCOTUS judge. The question is, will the R's block a nutcase leftist? They'll almost have to seat a moderate or a mild leftist, but what if someone like Harris or Hillary, or maybe Michelle, got the nomination? Would the R's block that?

Nope. People got this wrong with Kavanaugh and Coney.

60 for cloture.

Simple majority to confirm.




Nope. Reid ended the filibuster for all appointments except SCOTUS. McConnell ended it for SCOTUS.
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
It takes 60% of the senate to seat a SCOTUS judge. The question is, will the R's block a nutcase leftist? They'll almost have to seat a moderate or a mild leftist, but what if someone like Harris or Hillary, or maybe Michelle, got the nomination? Would the R's block that?

Nope. People got this wrong with Kavanaugh and Coney.

60 for cloture.

Simple majority to confirm.

Nope. Reid ended the filibuster for all appointments except SCOTUS. McConnell ended it for SCOTUS.

Oops. That’s right.
Posted By: Sheister Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Originally Posted by TimZ
Got a suggestion for Biden, how about Condoleeza Rice?


I could get behind this appointment... but not sure if she has a law degree?

Whatever happens you can bet there is going to be a bruiser of a battle pushing the nomination and the confirmation through. Hopefully, the R's will figure out how to stall the nomination process past the midterms and stymie Biden in possibly his most important decision in office- but the R's haven't shown the ability to do that for the most part...
Originally Posted by Sheister
Originally Posted by TimZ
Got a suggestion for Biden, how about Condoleeza Rice?


I could get behind this appointment... but not sure if she has a law degree?

Whatever happens you can bet there is going to be a bruiser of a battle pushing the nomination and the confirmation through. Hopefully, the R's will figure out how to stall the nomination process past the midterms and stymie Biden in possibly his most important decision in office- but the R's haven't shown the ability to do that for the most part...


I bet there won't be a battle at all. The R's will roll over as usual.
Posted By: Anaconda Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Wouldn’t it be fun if the republicans did to Bidens nominee what the democrats did to Trumps last two nominees ?

Trot out a professional liar to claim sexual misconduct ?

Several experts to claim he/she/it would put the constitution in jeopardy !

Find someone who went to grade school with it to claim they once flicked a bugger.

Days on end of a continues hearing with wild derogatory claims and no evidence ?
Every time some democrat or reporter challenges the process, just point to the hearings of Kavanaugh and Barrett.
Yall know it will be Moochelle
Originally Posted by ready_on_the_right
Yall know it will be Moochelle


Doubt he wants any job. Why start now?
Posted By: rainshot Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Garland...
Originally Posted by ready_on_the_right
Yall know it will be Moochelle


I think it'll be the other Obama. Lord Help Us.
Law degree is not required.
Originally Posted by Sheister
Originally Posted by TimZ
Got a suggestion for Biden, how about Condoleeza Rice?


I could get behind this appointment... but not sure if she has a law degree?

Whatever happens you can bet there is going to be a bruiser of a battle pushing the nomination and the confirmation through. Hopefully, the R's will figure out how to stall the nomination process past the midterms and stymie Biden in possibly his most important decision in office- but the R's haven't shown the ability to do that for the most part...
Posted By: CCCC Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Has Breyer actually announced this , or is it a "leak" from some left side source?

For those who think that Camel-ah would be nominated - where do her legal credentials begin?
Posted By: Steve Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Originally Posted by CCCC
Has Breyer actually announced this , or is it a "leak" from some left side source?

For those who think that Camel-ah would be nominated - where do her legal credentials begin?


Does she have to resign to be nominated? If so that's back to a 50-50 spilt in the Senate. If not, then they still have a 50-50 split to fill the vacant VP office.
Posted By: RockyRaab Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
It will almost have to be a woman - or risk that the nominee is on the Lolita Island guest list.
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by CCCC
Has Breyer actually announced this , or is it a "leak" from some left side source?

For those who think that Camel-ah would be nominated - where do her legal credentials begin?


Does she have to resign to be nominated? If so that's back to a 50-50 spilt in the Senate. If not, then they still have a 50-50 split to fill the vacant VP office.

Liiisa, Mittsy, and Collins will vote for whomever Joey’s controllers nominate.
Posted By: deer1 Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
He will be replaced by another liberal. Nothing will change.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
They are trying to replace him before the incoming R into the WH. Humm, whats the rush? Dont they have 3 more years?
What could they possibly be worried about? whistle
I can already hear the cries from the left come this fall.

"We've put a black female on the court. If you vote us out, we won't the opportunity to do that again, which makes you racist."
Ironbender: Good riddance to that liberal prick - only trouble is he will be replaced by a negro mammy with a HUGE fuhckin chip on her shoulder.
Mark my words.
Sad state of affairs here in the once great United States of America.
The drug addled entity known as china joe will fuhck this up just like has with EVERYTHING he has ever touched.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...irst-black-female-supreme-court-justice/
The Squad is going to hold Biden accountable. Apparently he promised that his 1st appointment would be a black woman. They're preparing a list of what they call 'eligible' candidates. This should be entertaining but very scary.
I think if I where Manchin or Sinema, it would be time for some revenge.

At the least it would be like here are our top three recommendations. If you want to seat a replacement, it had better be one of these.
Posted By: jdunham Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Originally Posted by jaguartx
They are trying to replace him before the incoming R into the WH. Humm, whats the rush? Dont they have 3 more years?
What could they possibly be worried about? whistle


They also need the votes in the Senate, which they are about to lose in 9 months.
Posted By: hanco Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
We gotta get us a negro woman. Ain’t that racist to qualify a candidate on the color of their skin????


I thought that’s what we were trying to get away from???
Posted By: Sheister Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Originally Posted by ironbender
Law degree is not required.
Originally Posted by Sheister
Originally Posted by TimZ
Got a suggestion for Biden, how about Condoleeza Rice?


I could get behind this appointment... but not sure if she has a law degree?

Whatever happens you can bet there is going to be a bruiser of a battle pushing the nomination and the confirmation through. Hopefully, the R's will figure out how to stall the nomination process past the midterms and stymie Biden in possibly his most important decision in office- but the R's haven't shown the ability to do that for the most part...



That may be true but it would be foolish to nominate someone without a law degree to this particular position- especially given the political climate at the moment...
Posted By: Sheister Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Here is the absurd part of this announcement for his nomination- if the opposition to his pick wanted to take this to SCOTUS for relief, Slow Joe would lose as he has already announced his intentions based on race and wouldn't consider any other race. Pretty clear cut case of discrimination . Not a good omen for a nomination for a position to the most powerful court in the land...
Posted By: MadMooner Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
He’s an 83 year old democrat. He should of been forced out a while ago.

Life appointments are nearly as retarded as Biden.
Originally Posted by Daveinjax
Damn it ! Sure wished he’d waited until after the midterm elections and a possible rino majority that could possibly maybe might be able to prevent another full blown communist being confirmed to the court.

A three-fifths supermajority is needed, so if Republicans are worth a damn, they can stop a Marxist radical from replacing him.
Originally Posted by Sheister
Originally Posted by ironbender
Law degree is not required.
Originally Posted by Sheister
Originally Posted by TimZ
Got a suggestion for Biden, how about Condoleeza Rice?


I could get behind this appointment... but not sure if she has a law degree?

Whatever happens you can bet there is going to be a bruiser of a battle pushing the nomination and the confirmation through. Hopefully, the R's will figure out how to stall the nomination process past the midterms and stymie Biden in possibly his most important decision in office- but the R's haven't shown the ability to do that for the most part...



That may be true but it would be foolish to nominate someone without a law degree to this particular position- especially given the political climate at the moment...

I agree. It’s just that there are no minimum requirements of age, background, education, etc.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Daveinjax
Damn it ! Sure wished he’d waited until after the midterm elections and a possible rino majority that could possibly maybe might be able to prevent another full blown communist being confirmed to the court.

A three-fifths supermajority is needed, so if Republicans are worth a damn, they can stop a Marxist radical from replacing him.

3/5 for what?
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Biden's been saying bleck female for a while.

You can bet it will be some socialist.


It's practically guaranteed to be a black woman, and she'll sail through conformation because few republicans will dare to vote against her.
Posted By: Steve Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/26/22
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Daveinjax
Damn it ! Sure wished he’d waited until after the midterm elections and a possible rino majority that could possibly maybe might be able to prevent another full blown communist being confirmed to the court.

A three-fifths supermajority is needed, so if Republicans are worth a damn, they can stop a Marxist radical from replacing him.



It's a simple majority.
Originally Posted by deer1
He will be replaced by another liberal. Nothing will change.

That’s right and most of the republicans won’t vote against a black women and be called racist.
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Daveinjax
Damn it ! Sure wished he’d waited until after the midterm elections and a possible rino majority that could possibly maybe might be able to prevent another full blown communist being confirmed to the court.

A three-fifths supermajority is needed, so if Republicans are worth a damn, they can stop a Marxist radical from replacing him.

3/5 for what?

Cloture, i.e., the decision to begin the voting.
Originally Posted by Crow hunter
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Biden's been saying bleck female for a while.

You can bet it will be some socialist.


It's practically guaranteed to be a black woman, and she'll sail through conformation because few republicans will dare to vote against her.




The Rinos couldn't find two stones among all of them.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Daveinjax
Damn it ! Sure wished he’d waited until after the midterm elections and a possible rino majority that could possibly maybe might be able to prevent another full blown communist being confirmed to the court.

A three-fifths supermajority is needed, so if Republicans are worth a damn, they can stop a Marxist radical from replacing him.

3/5 for what?

Cloture, i.e., the decision to begin the voting.

I believe Steve corrected me on that above.
😉
Originally Posted by Steve
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
It takes 60% of the senate to seat a SCOTUS judge. The question is, will the R's block a nutcase leftist? They'll almost have to seat a moderate or a mild leftist, but what if someone like Harris or Hillary, or maybe Michelle, got the nomination? Would the R's block that?

Nope. People got this wrong with Kavanaugh and Coney.

60 for cloture.

Simple majority to confirm.

Nope. Reid ended the filibuster for all appointments except SCOTUS. McConnell ended it for SCOTUS.
Posted By: Cruiser1 Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/27/22
Originally Posted by hanco
We gotta get us a negro woman. Ain’t that racist to qualify a candidate on the color of their skin????


I thought that’s what we were trying to get away from???


It's not just racist; it's illegal.
"The federal anti-discrimination law entitled Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (or just “Title VII") prohibits qualifying employers from discriminating on the basis of race, skin color, or characteristics associated with a given race."
Posted By: DMc Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/27/22
This is planned to get Hillary into the White House. Kamala is selected as the nominee. Hillary replaces Kamala as VP. Not long after, the 25th Amendment is used to oust Joe. Hillary is President.

You heard it here first.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/27/22
Gl
Originally Posted by DMc
This is planned to get Hillary into the White House. Kamala is selected as the nominee. Hillary replaces Kamala as VP. Not long after, the 25th Amendment is used to oust Joe. Hillary is President.

You heard it here first.


As Que said, "How do you try to slip one in?"

whistle
Posted By: steve4102 Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/27/22
Originally Posted by ironbender
Whomever is picked will make Breyer look moderate at a minimum.

Not hardly, Breyer has voted lock-step with the other hard core leftest each and every time. His Black Female replacement will be just as if he never left.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/27/22
Originally Posted by JohnnyMac007
I think if I where Manchin or Sinema, it would be time for some revenge.

At the least it would be like here are our top three recommendations. If you want to seat a replacement, it had better be one of these.

Nonsense, you assume all 50 Republicans will unite as they uncharacteristically did with BBB and the Filibuster rule.

NO WAY will all 50 Republican Senators unit against a Black Female nominee, so that put both Manchin and Sinema back on the bench with no power in this fight.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/27/22
Originally Posted by DMc
This is planned to get Hillary into the White House. Kamala is selected as the nominee. Hillary replaces Kamala as VP. Not long after, the 25th Amendment is used to oust Joe. Hillary is President.

You heard it here first.

This scenario has been floating around for months.

Cum-All-ya is hated by everyone, from the man on the street to the entire population of the DC Beltway. She will never be allowed to become President, her approval ratings are the lowest in history, even the Democrats know she cannot occupy the WH.

But she is a loyal foot soldier, so “they” need to get rid of her and at the same time find a place for her. A SC appointment would kill several birds with one stone.

She would be gone from politics forever,
This would allow her to save face, her reward for being a good foot soldier.
Biden would actually fulfill a campaign promise.
Her VP replacement WILL be someone that is “Presidential” and seen as the Savior the Democrat Party.
This will make it much easier for Biden to step down and hand the reigns iver to someone other that Cum-All-Ya.

A lot of issues could be solved by putting her in the bench, that said, I still don’t think that will happen,
Posted By: steve4102 Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/27/22
I heard on the radio today, that if Cum-All-Ya is nominated, she will be the First Nominee in history that has FAILED the BAR exam.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/27/22
So when does Breyer retire? Aug, Sept?

And the election is in Nov. Humm.

And after the way the leftists attacked Manchin and Sinema things may not go as the puppetmasters plan.
Posted By: Steve Re: Justice Breyer To Retire - 01/27/22
Interesting analysis by Laurence Tribe after Ginsberg died that's poised to come back and bite them. Full blown constitutional crisis in the Summer?

No hiding behind Pence’s skirt on the Supreme Court nomination


Quote


You don’t have to take my word for it. Alexander Hamilton said the same thing way back in 1788, in Federalist No. 69: “In the national government, if the Senate should be divided, no appointment could be made.” Hamilton contrasted that rule with how appointments worked back then in his home state of New York, where the governor actually did have the power to break ties to confirm nominations to New York state offices.

Consistent with Hamilton’s understanding, as two thoughtful recent scholarly analyses have pointed out, no vice president in our history has ever cast a tiebreaking vote to confirm an appointment to the Supreme Court. If Pence tried to cast the deciding vote to confirm Trump’s nomination to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died last week at age 87, it would be the first time that has ever happened. That should matter to everyone — it certainly matters (or used to matter) to “originalists,” who emphasize the importance of history when interpreting our Constitution.

In fact, from our founding until 2018, no vice president had even cast a tiebreaking vote to confirm an appointment to a lower federal court. That nearly 230 years of unbroken historical practice ended when Pence cast the tiebreaking vote to confirm Jonathan Kobes to a seat on a lower federal court in December 2018. (Some may point to a tiebreaking vote that then-Vice President George H.W. Bush cast in July 1986, relating to the confirmation of Daniel Manion to a lower federal court, but Manion had already been confirmed by a previous 48-46 vote, without Bush participating. The tie that Bush broke was a later vote on a “motion to reconsider,” asking the Senate to undo its earlier vote confirming Manion. A vice president could arguably be permitted to break ties on votes concerning Senate procedure, even in the judicial nomination context, as long as he or she does not break ties on the ultimate confirmation vote — which Bush did not do.)

But there is much more to this than historical practice. Giving the vice president tiebreaking power over judicial appointments would also break the Framers' careful constitutional structure.

When it comes to legislation, the vice president’s tiebreaking power affects only half of the lawmaking process: the vice president can break a tie in the Senate, but has zero say in the House of Representatives. Breaking a tie on judicial appointments, though, would give the vice president power over the entire appointments process, since it is only the Senate that weighs in on such matters. A thumb on part of the scale in the legislative process is hugely different from single-handedly tipping the entire scale when it comes to confirming justices — justices who will sit in judgment over the work of the other two branches, potentially including disputes over the upcoming election itself, in which Pence obviously has the most direct interest imaginable.

For those who care about the details, Hamilton’s view and the historical practice (up until this administration) is confirmed by the structure and drafting history of our Constitution. As a structural matter, the provision granting the vice president the power to break ties in the Senate is located in Article I, which addresses Legislative Power. By contrast, the Senate’s “Advice and Consent” power over judicial appointments appears in Article II, making it a form of power wielded by the Senate that is executive, not legislative, in nature. The vice president has some power to influence legislation, by casting a tiebreaking vote in the Senate, while the Senate has some power to influence executive appointments, by granting or withholding consent. Structurally, the vice president cannot smuggle his Article I legislative tiebreaking power into Article II to undermine the Senate’s unique Article II executive power of advice and consent.

As for the drafting history of the “Advice and Consent” clause, the Framers first considered a provision that "Judges shall be nominated by the Executive, and such nomination shall become an appointment if not disagreed to by the [Senate].” But they rejected that language in favor of the provision that ultimately made its way into our Constitution: “[t]he President . . . shall nominate and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate appoint . . . Judges of the Supreme Court.”

That shift in language matters a lot — but only in the context of a tie. Under the first formulation, a tie favors the president, because the Senate cannot muster a majority to “disagree” with the appointment, while under the second — which became our constitutional law — a tie works against the president, because the Senate cannot muster a majority to “consent” to the appointment, leaving the nominee unconfirmed. But if the vice president is able to cast a tiebreaking vote, the difference is meaningless: The vice president decides whether the appointment goes through regardless of whether the standard is “if not disagreed to” or is “with the … consent.” Surely the Founders would not have spent their time and effort changing this language, which matters only when such votes are tied, if they understood the vice president had the power to break those ties.

The bottom line is this: Don’t let Senators Cory Gardner of Colorado, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, or any others hide behind Pence’s skirt on this issue. Every single one of them has the power, standing alone, to defeat this nomination and hold Senate Republicans to the same “rule” they applied in 2016.

© 24hourcampfire