I don't know much about Alex Jones other than that he is bombastic and claimed that a school shooting was some sort of fraud, but I look at people who do a lot worse than he's done, like pretty much every member of the media and Congress, alleging white supremacy this, insurrection that, stolen election in 2000 and 2016 (but attacking anyone who says the same about 2020) and don't see how this was fair in any manner.
When the likes of the c9unts on the View and every MSNBC host, as well as almost all members of Congress, and fraudsters in film like Michael Moore and Oliver Stone, are subjected to defamation trials for the crap they've peddled in the last 20 years+, then we can talk about Alex Jones.
Forget where I seen this or heard this at different symbols that are a sign of white supremacy organizations. But don't tread on me flag with so popular is one of them according to the FBI..
I don't know much about Alex Jones other than that he is bombastic and claimed that a school shooting was some sort of fraud, but I look at people who do a lot worse than he's done, like pretty much every member of the media and Congress, alleging white supremacy this, insurrection that, stolen election in 2000 and 2016 (but attacking anyone who says the same about 2020) and don't see how this was fair in any manner.
When the likes of the c9unts on the View and every MSNBC host, as well as almost all members of Congress, and fraudsters in film like Michael Moore and Oliver Stone, are subjected to defamation trials for the crap they've peddled in the last 20 years+, then we can talk about Alex Jones.
Yep. And the Traitorous Hillary, The FBI, DOJ, and all the Fuqking Commie Socialist Fake News Media Talking Heads that pushed and repeated all of the Russian Collusion Scam BULLSCHITT 😡
Forget where I seen this or heard this at different symbols that are a sign of white supremacy organizations. But don't tread on me flag with so popular is one of them according to the FBI..
I would love to see a con-gressman ask the FBI director "Is it the position of the FBI that American citizens do not have the right to resist tyranny?"...... I'm not gonna hold my breath for that one, though.
Forget where I seen this or heard this at different symbols that are a sign of white supremacy organizations. But don't tread on me flag with so popular is one of them according to the FBI..
just throw this next label in there somewhere between old, used up, outta shape, redneck, hillbilly, hick, guntoter, flagwaver, hunter, etc, etc, etc.
ain’t looking to start no fight, but will stand for what is right, I’d like to be left alone, and let to each, be their own, y’all come for me if you must, my tools and training I will trust, at days end ya might get my ass, but I’ll die in a pile of brass.
Conspiracy theory is just that. Theories about conspiracies.
Don't mean squat, until proven or refuted. An awful lot of those theories have proven to be prophetic and true.
I remember thinking The New World Order was kooky.
But watching every move be one that's detrimental to my country. Watching almost every free nation in the world doing the same bizarre, suicidal, stuff.
A higher power pulling the strings, with the demise of modern society as we have known it, is the only conclusion that makes sense and accounts for everything.
They came for Forest Anon as well. Suspicion was aroused when he recommended people read The Israel Lobby (excellent book) and Jacque Ellul, and Ted Kaczynski.
One thing for sure, when the feds come for you, there isn't much you can do about it despite how innocent you are and how dishonest they are. The power they wield is actually terrifying if you think about it. My latest interaction with federal LE has left me wanting to stay waaaay under the radar.
They came for Forest Anon as well. Suspicion was aroused when he recommended people read The Israel Lobby (excellent book) and Jacque Ellul, and Ted Kaczynski.
The bar is pretty low.
Said he's anti-war, not anti-jew.... holy crap, what would they do if you were anti-jew???
Not sure, but I bet your credit score would take a serious hit.
Maybe someone can help me here but there is actually a plan to replace credit score as a means of determining financial eligibility with another rating that includes your environmental score and government score. There is a third element I can't remember. I think it has to do with your social score in some way. They determine your score by monitoring social media posts and purchasing habits among other things. Has anyone else heard of this?
Not sure, but I bet your credit score would take a serious hit.
Maybe someone can help me here but there is actually a plan to replace credit score as a means of determining financial eligibility with another rating that includes your environmental score and government score. There is a third element I can't remember. I think it has to do with your social score in some way. They determine your score by monitoring social media posts and purchasing habits among other things. Has anyone else heard of this?
well, of course. All part of the WEF/Oligarch's Great Reset. "Alternative Credit Scoring". The new and improved version of the ChiCom's social credit score.
If any of this is new to you, you're not only naïve, but you've been living under a rock. This stuff was all over in the 90s, then again around 2009 there was the MIAC leak, and through the end of the Zero administration.
Forget where I seen this or heard this at different symbols that are a sign of white supremacy organizations. But don't tread on me flag with so popular is one of them according to the FBI..
Cruz, Redpilling millions of Americans (with Wrays help?).
And here is the real reason for the dog and pony Wray show. Wray "reluctantly" admits the same POS that ran the Whitmore crap is now the puke investigating for the Jan 6 Persimmon Commission.
Well, who woulda thunkit. Of course, Wray (the actor) didnt really want to have to admit that schiett, did he?
If any of this is new to you, you're not only naïve, but you've been living under a rock. This stuff was all over in the 90s, then again around 2009 there was the MIAC leak, and through the end of the Zero administration.
Sorry, dumb schit. But you did not have proof that Mike Glover and his company are deemed domestic terrorists.
Project Veritas found the information and dumped it online.
There's a big difference between having a theory and having the documents in hand.
Forget where I seen this or heard this at different symbols that are a sign of white supremacy organizations. But don't tread on me flag with so popular is one of them according to the FBI..
Cruz, Redpilling millions of Americans (with Wrays help?).
Forget where I seen this or heard this at different symbols that are a sign of white supremacy organizations. But don't tread on me flag with so popular is one of them according to the FBI..
And here is the real reason for the dog and pony Wray show. Wray "reluctantly" admits the same POS that ran the Whitmore crap is now the puke investigating for the Jan 6 Persimmon Commission.
Well, who woulda thunkit. Of course, Wray (the actor) didnt really want to have to admit that schiett, did he?
Quick question for my feeble mind. What is the difference in what has happened to Mr. Glover than has happened to Mr. Jones???? ( That in all likelihood will happen to the rest of us).
I had never heard of Mr. Glover until Flave’s post. And I was impressed with his rhetoric. I knew who Mr. Jones was as he used to come in the shop and was pointed out to me by a fellow employee years ago. To which I responded Alex who? Anyway, I was not a follower of his program.
If any of this is new to you, you're not only naïve, but you've been living under a rock. This stuff was all over in the 90s, then again around 2009 there was the MIAC leak, and through the end of the Zero administration.
Sorry, dumb schit. But you did not have proof that Mike Glover and his company are deemed domestic terrorists.
Project Veritas found the information and dumped it online.
There's a big difference between having a theory and having the documents in hand.
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Yes, there is proof if you open your eyes and seek it. Go [bleep] yourself.
Quick question for my feeble mind. What is the difference in what has happened to Mr. Glover than has happened to Mr. Jones???? ( That in all likelihood will happen to the rest of us).
I had never heard of Mr. Glover until Flave’s post. And I was impressed with his rhetoric. I knew who Mr. Jones was as he used to come in the shop and was pointed out to me by a fellow employee years ago. To which I responded Alex who? Anyway, I was not a follower of his program.
Mike Glover is a former Green Beret with multiple tours in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as multiple deployments as a contractor. His company trains civilians, military, as well as many, many, LE agencies to include feds. He does put out content giving opinion but the political stuff is only cursory and nothing like what Alex Jones does. He more or less just supports the Constitution and principles of our country. He does not preach conspiracy, etc.
The majority of his content is how to survive in bad situations and he will evaluate combat footage based on his real world experience.
It's akin to discovering the FBI has determined Chris Kyle is a terrorist, if Chris Kyle were alive.
Quick question for my feeble mind. What is the difference in what has happened to Mr. Glover than has happened to Mr. Jones???? ( That in all likelihood will happen to the rest of us).
I had never heard of Mr. Glover until Flave’s post. And I was impressed with his rhetoric. I knew who Mr. Jones was as he used to come in the shop and was pointed out to me by a fellow employee years ago. To which I responded Alex who? Anyway, I was not a follower of his program.
Mike Glover is a former Green Beret with multiple tours in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as multiple deployments as a contractor. His company trains civilians, military, as well as many, many, LE agencies to include feds. He does put out content giving opinion but the political stuff is only cursory and nothing like what Alex Jones does. He more or less just supports the Constitution and principles of our country. He does not preach conspiracy, etc.
The majority of his content is how to survive in bad situations and he will evaluate combat footage based on his real world experience.
It's akin to discovering the FBI has determined Chris Kyle is a terrorist, if Chris Kyle were alive.
Thank you! That’s basically the same conclusion I came to listening to him. A honorable man!
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Representative Dick Durbin pointed that out during a hearing when Ted Cruz grilled Wray..... Durbin was defending the FBI .... maybe you should watch the video. Cruz roasted Wray and proved he was either incompetent or lying.... Dick Durbin is a progressive liberal Figures you would take the FBI's side
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Representative Dick Durbin pointed that out during a hearing when Ted Cruz grilled Wray..... Durbin was defending the FBI .... maybe you should watch the video. Cruz roasted Wray and proved he was either incompetent or lying.... Dick Durbin is a progressive liberal Figures you would take the FBI's side
Dumbfuck, I didn't "take the FBI's side". Maybe you should go read the document. It says what it says.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Representative Dick Durbin pointed that out during a hearing when Ted Cruz grilled Wray..... Durbin was defending the FBI .... maybe you should watch the video. Cruz roasted Wray and proved he was either incompetent or lying.... Dick Durbin is a progressive liberal Figures you would take the FBI's side
Quad boosted and understands the happenings of Robb Elementary at a level we don't.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Yeah, you're too [bleep] stupid to read. Its almost the same [bleep] word for word as the last "leak".
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Representative Dick Durbin pointed that out during a hearing when Ted Cruz grilled Wray..... Durbin was defending the FBI .... maybe you should watch the video. Cruz roasted Wray and proved he was either incompetent or lying.... Dick Durbin is a progressive liberal Figures you would take the FBI's side
Dumbfuck, I didn't "take the FBI's side". Maybe you should go read the document. It says what it says.
The point Cruz was making at the hearing was the FBI was abusing it's power and acting political.... yeah sure they had a little "disclaimer" in the document but they are acting upon the document unconstitutionally... and you claim I am the dumbfuuck? lmao
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Representative Dick Durbin pointed that out during a hearing when Ted Cruz grilled Wray..... Durbin was defending the FBI .... maybe you should watch the video. Cruz roasted Wray and proved he was either incompetent or lying.... Dick Durbin is a progressive liberal Figures you would take the FBI's side
Dumbfuck, I didn't "take the FBI's side". Maybe you should go read the document. It says what it says.
The point Cruz was making at the hearing was the FBI was abusing it's power and acting political.... yeah sure they had a little "disclaimer" in the document but they are acting upon the document unconstitutionally... and you claim I am the dumbfuuck? lmao
The point is DeCocksucker said the report called Mike Glover a domestic terrorist. It did not. Maybe go read it. The FBI is a corrupt, partisan tool used by those that want to destroy this country. But if he's going to get his little girl panties bunched up because I said, "this is nothing new", he needs to have his facts straight. Truth matters.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Yeah, you're too [bleep] stupid to read. Its almost the same [bleep] word for word as the last "leak".
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Yeah, you're too [bleep] stupid to read. Its almost the same [bleep] word for word as the last "leak".
Go tell the progressives in the FBI how to interpret that document.....
They can interpret it as toilet paper for all I care. That's exactly what it is. Its a small variation from the same document they have been using for thirty years.
Ok now that we have settled that we all know the FBI has called us domestic terrorists and that White Nationalists are the worst of the bunch. White being a race and nationalist meaning we revere our country, our rights and our constitution. Is that clear enough?
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Representative Dick Durbin pointed that out during a hearing when Ted Cruz grilled Wray..... Durbin was defending the FBI .... maybe you should watch the video. Cruz roasted Wray and proved he was either incompetent or lying.... Dick Durbin is a progressive liberal Figures you would take the FBI's side
Dumbfuck, I didn't "take the FBI's side". Maybe you should go read the document. It says what it says.
The point Cruz was making at the hearing was the FBI was abusing it's power and acting political.... yeah sure they had a little "disclaimer" in the document but they are acting upon the document unconstitutionally... and you claim I am the dumbfuuck? lmao
The point is DeCocksucker said the report called Mike Glover a domestic terrorist. It did not. Maybe go read it. The FBI is a corrupt, partisan tool used by those that want to destroy this country. But if he's going to get his little girl panties bunched up because I said, "this is nothing new", he needs to have his facts straight. Truth matters.
Did you miss the part where Glover disclosed he knows how the government operates and this document is a reason to appoint resources and personnel to investigate any group that promotes freedom and the constitution and conservative values? But hey you can hang your hat on that little "disclaimer" ..... can't see the forest through the tree's can you?
Did you miss the part where Glover disclosed he knows how the government operates and this document is a reason to appoint resources and personnel to investigate any group that promotes freedom and the constitution and conservative values? But hey you can hang your hat on that little "disclaimer" ..... can't see the forest through the tree's can you?
Same idiot that hid in his house for two years because of COVID.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Yeah, you're too [bleep] stupid to read. Its almost the same [bleep] word for word as the last "leak".
Go tell the progressives in the FBI how to interpret that document.....
They can interpret it as toilet paper for all I care. That's exactly what it is. Its a small variation from the same document they have been using for thirty years.
The progressives running the FBI will use their interpretation of that document to target their political enemies.
Did you miss the part where Glover disclosed he knows how the government operates and this document is a reason to appoint resources and personnel to investigate any group that promotes freedom and the constitution and conservative values? But hey you can hang your hat on that little "disclaimer" ..... can't see the forest through the tree's can you?
Same idiot that hid in his house for two years because of COVID.
What more need be said?
Always wrong, but never in doubt... hahahahahhahaha
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Representative Dick Durbin pointed that out during a hearing when Ted Cruz grilled Wray..... Durbin was defending the FBI .... maybe you should watch the video. Cruz roasted Wray and proved he was either incompetent or lying.... Dick Durbin is a progressive liberal Figures you would take the FBI's side
Dumbfuck, I didn't "take the FBI's side". Maybe you should go read the document. It says what it says.
The point Cruz was making at the hearing was the FBI was abusing it's power and acting political.... yeah sure they had a little "disclaimer" in the document but they are acting upon the document unconstitutionally... and you claim I am the dumbfuuck? lmao
The point is DeCocksucker said the report called Mike Glover a domestic terrorist. It did not. Maybe go read it. The FBI is a corrupt, partisan tool used by those that want to destroy this country. But if he's going to get his little girl panties bunched up because I said, "this is nothing new", he needs to have his facts straight. Truth matters.
Did you miss the part where Glover disclosed he knows how the government operates and this document is a reason to appoint resources and personnel to investigate any group that promotes freedom and the constitution and conservative values? But hey you can hang your hat on that little "disclaimer" ..... can't see the forest through the tree's can you?
What you don't get is that this is nothing new. This has been how they operate for decades. This little document doesn't mean [bleep] and if it surprises you that this exists, you're naïve at best. If you were them, do you think this little leak would be the directive for operations? Do you think they aren't smart enough to pick people out without it? More importantly, if you joined American Contingency, did you really think that wouldn't make you a target?
You're probably the same type of guy that puts Glock or Sig stickers on your truck and act surprised somebody broke in and stole your "glove box gun".
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
Yeah, you're too [bleep] stupid to read. Its almost the same [bleep] word for word as the last "leak".
Go tell the progressives in the FBI how to interpret that document.....
They can interpret it as toilet paper for all I care. That's exactly what it is. Its a small variation from the same document they have been using for thirty years.
The progressives running the FBI will use their interpretation of that document to target their political enemies.
They were already doing it, pal. As I said, its just a variation of the same [bleep] that have been passing out since the 90s.
Did you miss the part where Glover disclosed he knows how the government operates and this document is a reason to appoint resources and personnel to investigate any group that promotes freedom and the constitution and conservative values? But hey you can hang your hat on that little "disclaimer" ..... can't see the forest through the tree's can you?
Same idiot that hid in his house for two years because of COVID.
What more need be said?
Coming from the idiot that has used this forum from his basement for 103,000+ posts since 2007. I know you're too broke-dick to actually get out in the real world, but for [bleep]'s sake, you need to at least fake it.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
You fail to comprehend that which you think you understand. WHY did they use the word MAY and attach it SPECIFICALLY to American Contingency?
When you answer that question honestly (seriously, answer it) you'll understand that Flave was dead nuts accurate.
The we have their use of the word LOW when the word should be NO.
Then we have them essentially ignoring the actual violence that has been carried out under the banner/direction of BLM and ANTIFA.
What you don't get is that this is nothing new. This has been how they operate for decades. This little document doesn't mean [bleep] and if it surprises you that this exists, you're naïve at best. If you were them, do you think this little leak would be the directive for operations? Do you think they aren't smart enough to pick people out without it? More importantly, if you joined American Contingency, did you really think that wouldn't make you a target?
You're probably the same type of guy that puts Glock or Sig stickers on your truck and act surprised somebody broke in and stole your "glove box gun".
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
You fail to comprehend that which you think you understand. WHY did they use the word MAY and attach it SPECIFICALLY to American Contingency?
When you answer that question honestly (seriously, answer it) you'll understand that Flave was dead nuts accurate.
The we have their use of the word LOW when the word should be NO.
Then we have them essentially ignoring the actual violence that has been carried out under the banner/direction of BLM and ANTIFA.
Comprehension. Context has meaning.
Its all an intimidation gimmick. Sending the message "we know what you're up to" to try to get people scared. Exactly why I called it a "leak" in quotations. Its literally a copy/paste of previous "leaked" documents with a few updates like AC, Ashley Babbitt, etc. Anybody with half a brain knew that joining AC puts a target on your back.
Its all an intimidation gimmick. Sending the message "we know what you're up to" to try to get people scared. Exactly why I called it a "leak" in quotations. Its literally a copy/paste of previous "leaked" documents with a few updates like AC, Ashley Babbitt, etc. Anybody with half a brain knew that joining AC puts a target on your back.
Mike Glover is a former Green Beret with multiple tours in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as multiple deployments as a contractor. His company trains civilians, military, as well as many, many, LE agencies to include feds.
You've got to wonder why and if he will continue to do so.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
You fail to comprehend that which you think you understand. WHY did they use the word MAY and attach it SPECIFICALLY to American Contingency?
When you answer that question honestly (seriously, answer it) you'll understand that Flave was dead nuts accurate.
The we have their use of the word LOW when the word should be NO.
Then we have them essentially ignoring the actual violence that has been carried out under the banner/direction of BLM and ANTIFA.
Comprehension. Context has meaning.
Its all an intimidation gimmick. Sending the message "we know what you're up to" to try to get people scared. Exactly why I called it a "leak" in quotations. Its literally a copy/paste of previous "leaked" documents with a few updates like AC, Ashley Babbitt, etc. Anybody with half a brain knew that joining AC puts a target on your back.
That "intimidation gimmick" sure worked on the Jan. 6 protesters.... and Paul Manafort, General Flynn, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro etc.....
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
I haven't been following this but the image of the document refers to several organizations as militia networks. To me, the key is what the term "militia network" means within the FBI. If they use that as shorthand for domestic terrorists, then it's clear that they've included Glover's organization as alleged domestic terrorists. It's obviously not the same as when the State Department designates a group as a foreign terrorist organization or when the Treasury Department labels someone or something an SDN, as those designations give rise to a host of government action, like sanctions or criminal charges.
If you go back about 20 years, you'll find a document from the FBI labeled "Project Megiddo" (https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps3578/www.fbi.gov/library/megiddo/megiddo.pdf), where the FBI started to prepare for domestic unrest in connection with Y2K. The title page states that it is an assessment of domestic terror groups and includes, in its listing of such groups, militias.
So while the FBI didn't explicitly name Glover's organization as a domestic terror group in the image that was posted, it pretty clearly implied the same, based on how it appears to use the term militia network internally.
Would I go to court with this kind of evidence on its own? No, but if I thought that there were internal FBI documents and discussions behind that one image that would show that the use of the "militia network" label is tantamount to designation as a domestic terror organization, I'd definitely go to court to get to discovery and depositions that could confirm the theory and then sue for all sorts of things like defamation, violation of First Amendment rights, etc.
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
I haven't been following this but the image of the document refers to several organizations as militia networks. To me, the key is what the term "militia network" means within the FBI. If they use that as shorthand for domestic terrorists, then it's clear that they've included Glover's organization as alleged domestic terrorists. It's obviously not the same as when the State Department designates a group as a foreign terrorist organization or when the Treasury Department labels someone or something an SDN, as those designations give rise to a host of government action, like sanctions or criminal charges.
If you go back about 20 years, you'll find a document from the FBI labeled "Project Megiddo" (https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps3578/www.fbi.gov/library/megiddo/megiddo.pdf), where the FBI started to prepare for domestic unrest in connection with Y2K. The title page states that it is an assessment of domestic terror groups and includes, in its listing of such groups, militias.
So while the FBI didn't explicitly name Glover's organization as a domestic terror group in the image that was posted, it pretty clearly implied the same, based on how it appears to use the term militia network internally.
Would I go to court with this kind of evidence on its own? No, but if I thought that there were internal FBI documents and discussions behind that one image that would show that the use of the "militia network" label is tantamount to designation as a domestic terror organization, I'd definitely go to court to get to discovery and depositions that could confirm the theory and then sue for all sorts of things like defamation, violation of First Amendment rights, etc.
Yes, the same sort of documents have made it public time and time again, which was my original post in this thread. Nobody should be surprised by any of this at this point. Its been going on since the '90s. The real crux of the matter is that if they were to actually call Mike Glover or AC a militia or domestic terror organization, some heads would likely roll as the Federal LE and military have repeatedly hired his company for training.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
You fail to comprehend that which you think you understand. WHY did they use the word MAY and attach it SPECIFICALLY to American Contingency?
When you answer that question honestly (seriously, answer it) you'll understand that Flave was dead nuts accurate.
The we have their use of the word LOW when the word should be NO.
Then we have them essentially ignoring the actual violence that has been carried out under the banner/direction of BLM and ANTIFA.
Comprehension. Context has meaning.
It's ok Paul... according to Twyla this has been going on for decades... therefore nothing to see here... move on
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
You fail to comprehend that which you think you understand. WHY did they use the word MAY and attach it SPECIFICALLY to American Contingency?
When you answer that question honestly (seriously, answer it) you'll understand that Flave was dead nuts accurate.
The we have their use of the word LOW when the word should be NO.
Then we have them essentially ignoring the actual violence that has been carried out under the banner/direction of BLM and ANTIFA.
Comprehension. Context has meaning.
Its all an intimidation gimmick. Sending the message "we know what you're up to" to try to get people scared. Exactly why I called it a "leak" in quotations. Its literally a copy/paste of previous "leaked" documents with a few updates like AC, Ashley Babbitt, etc. Anybody with half a brain knew that joining AC puts a target on your back.
You think they did it solely for the purpose of intimidation?
And here is the real reason for the dog and pony Wray show. Wray "reluctantly" admits the same POS that ran the Whitmore crap is now the puke investigating for the Jan 6 Persimmon Commission.
Well, who woulda thunkit. Of course, Wray (the actor) didnt really want to have to admit that schiett, did he?
TRUST WRAY Jaguartx
Finally starting to connect the dots. Sheesh. About time.
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
I haven't been following this but the image of the document refers to several organizations as militia networks. To me, the key is what the term "militia network" means within the FBI. If they use that as shorthand for domestic terrorists, then it's clear that they've included Glover's organization as alleged domestic terrorists. It's obviously not the same as when the State Department designates a group as a foreign terrorist organization or when the Treasury Department labels someone or something an SDN, as those designations give rise to a host of government action, like sanctions or criminal charges.
If you go back about 20 years, you'll find a document from the FBI labeled "Project Megiddo" (https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps3578/www.fbi.gov/library/megiddo/megiddo.pdf), where the FBI started to prepare for domestic unrest in connection with Y2K. The title page states that it is an assessment of domestic terror groups and includes, in its listing of such groups, militias.
So while the FBI didn't explicitly name Glover's organization as a domestic terror group in the image that was posted, it pretty clearly implied the same, based on how it appears to use the term militia network internally.
Would I go to court with this kind of evidence on its own? No, but if I thought that there were internal FBI documents and discussions behind that one image that would show that the use of the "militia network" label is tantamount to designation as a domestic terror organization, I'd definitely go to court to get to discovery and depositions that could confirm the theory and then sue for all sorts of things like defamation, violation of First Amendment rights, etc.
Yes, the same sort of documents have made it public time and time again, which was my original post in this thread. Nobody should be surprised by any of this at this point. Its been going on since the '90s. The real crux of the matter is that if they were to actually call Mike Glover or AC a militia or domestic terror organization, some heads would likely roll as the Federal LE and military have repeatedly hired his company for training.
In the image you posted a link to (https://images.ctfassets.net/syq3sn...79295f5e70a2c5eedd85f91e5/fbi2.jpg?w=800), there are four organizations that are referred to as militia networks that the so-called "MVEs" may self-identify with. Isn't that the FBI calling Glover's organization, which is one of the four identified as militia networks, a militia network, and doesn't the FBI consider militia networks domestic terror organizations? I'm only going off of the Project Megiddo report I linked to, so perhaps they have other labels for Glover's organization, but it sure does look to me like they are engaging in a two step process of labeling the Glover group a domestic terror organizaiton.
Marsha helps Wray cover his tracks and makes the blind Stevie Wonders pull out their hair by asking Wray to Redpill more people by asking if he woukd call the multimillion dumbassed dimocrap Russia/Trump collusion boondoggle a Hoax.
Wray answers honestly, pissing millions off, that he wouldnt call it a Hoax. She says thank you.
Why. She got her point across about the Dimocrap boondoggle that took a year to uncover.
Wray doesnt call it a hoax because it wasnt. It was a sting set up by Mueller and team Trump.
Mueller and Trump both knew when he went to see Trump privately he couldnt be the new hire. He had the job before.
Now think. What did the sting do to the FBY traitors? Got a pretty good house cleaning of the FBY and what else. It got Mueller to clear Trump and revealed the POS Comey, Lisa, McCabe, Stzork, Bruce Ohrr....
And what else?
It opened the door to the Ukraine thing and pulled in crooked Hill, Vindeman, and Vankovitch
And the Ukraine can of worms. Hunters business deals with Illegal US Bioweapons Labs.
And Mueller exposing the POS Dimocrap investigators on his team.
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
I haven't been following this but the image of the document refers to several organizations as militia networks. To me, the key is what the term "militia network" means within the FBI. If they use that as shorthand for domestic terrorists, then it's clear that they've included Glover's organization as alleged domestic terrorists. It's obviously not the same as when the State Department designates a group as a foreign terrorist organization or when the Treasury Department labels someone or something an SDN, as those designations give rise to a host of government action, like sanctions or criminal charges.
If you go back about 20 years, you'll find a document from the FBI labeled "Project Megiddo" (https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps3578/www.fbi.gov/library/megiddo/megiddo.pdf), where the FBI started to prepare for domestic unrest in connection with Y2K. The title page states that it is an assessment of domestic terror groups and includes, in its listing of such groups, militias.
So while the FBI didn't explicitly name Glover's organization as a domestic terror group in the image that was posted, it pretty clearly implied the same, based on how it appears to use the term militia network internally.
Would I go to court with this kind of evidence on its own? No, but if I thought that there were internal FBI documents and discussions behind that one image that would show that the use of the "militia network" label is tantamount to designation as a domestic terror organization, I'd definitely go to court to get to discovery and depositions that could confirm the theory and then sue for all sorts of things like defamation, violation of First Amendment rights, etc.
Yes, the same sort of documents have made it public time and time again, which was my original post in this thread. Nobody should be surprised by any of this at this point. Its been going on since the '90s. The real crux of the matter is that if they were to actually call Mike Glover or AC a militia or domestic terror organization, some heads would likely roll as the Federal LE and military have repeatedly hired his company for training.
In the image you posted a link to (https://images.ctfassets.net/syq3sn...79295f5e70a2c5eedd85f91e5/fbi2.jpg?w=800), there are four organizations that are referred to as militia networks that the so-called "MVEs" may self-identify with. Isn't that the FBI calling Glover's organization, which is one of the four identified as militia networks, a militia network, and doesn't the FBI consider militia networks domestic terror organizations? I'm only going off of the Project Megiddo report I linked to, so perhaps they have other labels for Glover's organization, but it sure does look to me like they are engaging in a two step process of labeling the Glover group a domestic terror organizaiton.
From what I've read, there is a distinction of militias and "militia extremists" but they label "terrorists groups" as something altogether different. If you look up on the FBI.gov, the definition of domestic terrorism defined in US code 18 U.S.C. 2331(5):
-involving acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; -Appearing to be intended to: -Intimidate or coerce a civilian population; -Influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion; or -Affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and -Occurring primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States
They came for Forest Anon as well. Suspicion was aroused when he recommended people read The Israel Lobby (excellent book) and Jacque Ellul, and Ted Kaczynski.
If any of this is new to you, you're not only naïve, but you've been living under a rock. This stuff was all over in the 90s, then again around 2009 there was the MIAC leak, and through the end of the Zero administration.
Sorry, dumb schit. But you did not have proof that Mike Glover and his company are deemed domestic terrorists.
Project Veritas found the information and dumped it online.
There's a big difference between having a theory and having the documents in hand.
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
I haven't been following this but the image of the document refers to several organizations as militia networks. To me, the key is what the term "militia network" means within the FBI. If they use that as shorthand for domestic terrorists, then it's clear that they've included Glover's organization as alleged domestic terrorists. It's obviously not the same as when the State Department designates a group as a foreign terrorist organization or when the Treasury Department labels someone or something an SDN, as those designations give rise to a host of government action, like sanctions or criminal charges.
If you go back about 20 years, you'll find a document from the FBI labeled "Project Megiddo" (https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps3578/www.fbi.gov/library/megiddo/megiddo.pdf), where the FBI started to prepare for domestic unrest in connection with Y2K. The title page states that it is an assessment of domestic terror groups and includes, in its listing of such groups, militias.
So while the FBI didn't explicitly name Glover's organization as a domestic terror group in the image that was posted, it pretty clearly implied the same, based on how it appears to use the term militia network internally.
Would I go to court with this kind of evidence on its own? No, but if I thought that there were internal FBI documents and discussions behind that one image that would show that the use of the "militia network" label is tantamount to designation as a domestic terror organization, I'd definitely go to court to get to discovery and depositions that could confirm the theory and then sue for all sorts of things like defamation, violation of First Amendment rights, etc.
Yes, the same sort of documents have made it public time and time again, which was my original post in this thread. Nobody should be surprised by any of this at this point. Its been going on since the '90s. The real crux of the matter is that if they were to actually call Mike Glover or AC a militia or domestic terror organization, some heads would likely roll as the Federal LE and military have repeatedly hired his company for training.
In the image you posted a link to (https://images.ctfassets.net/syq3sn...79295f5e70a2c5eedd85f91e5/fbi2.jpg?w=800), there are four organizations that are referred to as militia networks that the so-called "MVEs" may self-identify with. Isn't that the FBI calling Glover's organization, which is one of the four identified as militia networks, a militia network, and doesn't the FBI consider militia networks domestic terror organizations? I'm only going off of the Project Megiddo report I linked to, so perhaps they have other labels for Glover's organization, but it sure does look to me like they are engaging in a two step process of labeling the Glover group a domestic terror organizaiton.
From what I've read, there is a distinction of militias and "militia extremists" but they label "terrorists groups" as something altogether different. If you look up on the FBI.gov, the definition of domestic terrorism defined in US code 18 U.S.C. 2331(5):
-involving acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; -Appearing to be intended to: -Intimidate or coerce a civilian population; -Influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion; or -Affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and -Occurring primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States
There's a difference between a statutory designation and an internal designation. My point is that it looks like for internal purposes, the FBI called Glover's group part of a militia network and has previously defined a militia network as a domestic terror threat. So no, I don't think the FBI did whatever it takes under the statute to designate the group domestic terrorists, but it's pretty clear that they treat the group as such.
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
I haven't been following this but the image of the document refers to several organizations as militia networks. To me, the key is what the term "militia network" means within the FBI. If they use that as shorthand for domestic terrorists, then it's clear that they've included Glover's organization as alleged domestic terrorists. It's obviously not the same as when the State Department designates a group as a foreign terrorist organization or when the Treasury Department labels someone or something an SDN, as those designations give rise to a host of government action, like sanctions or criminal charges.
If you go back about 20 years, you'll find a document from the FBI labeled "Project Megiddo" (https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps3578/www.fbi.gov/library/megiddo/megiddo.pdf), where the FBI started to prepare for domestic unrest in connection with Y2K. The title page states that it is an assessment of domestic terror groups and includes, in its listing of such groups, militias.
So while the FBI didn't explicitly name Glover's organization as a domestic terror group in the image that was posted, it pretty clearly implied the same, based on how it appears to use the term militia network internally.
Would I go to court with this kind of evidence on its own? No, but if I thought that there were internal FBI documents and discussions behind that one image that would show that the use of the "militia network" label is tantamount to designation as a domestic terror organization, I'd definitely go to court to get to discovery and depositions that could confirm the theory and then sue for all sorts of things like defamation, violation of First Amendment rights, etc.
Yes, the same sort of documents have made it public time and time again, which was my original post in this thread. Nobody should be surprised by any of this at this point. Its been going on since the '90s. The real crux of the matter is that if they were to actually call Mike Glover or AC a militia or domestic terror organization, some heads would likely roll as the Federal LE and military have repeatedly hired his company for training.
In the image you posted a link to (https://images.ctfassets.net/syq3sn...79295f5e70a2c5eedd85f91e5/fbi2.jpg?w=800), there are four organizations that are referred to as militia networks that the so-called "MVEs" may self-identify with. Isn't that the FBI calling Glover's organization, which is one of the four identified as militia networks, a militia network, and doesn't the FBI consider militia networks domestic terror organizations? I'm only going off of the Project Megiddo report I linked to, so perhaps they have other labels for Glover's organization, but it sure does look to me like they are engaging in a two step process of labeling the Glover group a domestic terror organizaiton.
From what I've read, there is a distinction of militias and "militia extremists" but they label "terrorists groups" as something altogether different. If you look up on the FBI.gov, the definition of domestic terrorism defined in US code 18 U.S.C. 2331(5):
-involving acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; -Appearing to be intended to: -Intimidate or coerce a civilian population; -Influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion; or -Affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and -Occurring primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States
The def.s mean nothing when you apply a sliding scale to meet your "needs". If the fbi/feds actually followed US code we wouldn't be in this mess in the first place .
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
I haven't been following this but the image of the document refers to several organizations as militia networks. To me, the key is what the term "militia network" means within the FBI. If they use that as shorthand for domestic terrorists, then it's clear that they've included Glover's organization as alleged domestic terrorists. It's obviously not the same as when the State Department designates a group as a foreign terrorist organization or when the Treasury Department labels someone or something an SDN, as those designations give rise to a host of government action, like sanctions or criminal charges.
If you go back about 20 years, you'll find a document from the FBI labeled "Project Megiddo" (https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps3578/www.fbi.gov/library/megiddo/megiddo.pdf), where the FBI started to prepare for domestic unrest in connection with Y2K. The title page states that it is an assessment of domestic terror groups and includes, in its listing of such groups, militias.
So while the FBI didn't explicitly name Glover's organization as a domestic terror group in the image that was posted, it pretty clearly implied the same, based on how it appears to use the term militia network internally.
Would I go to court with this kind of evidence on its own? No, but if I thought that there were internal FBI documents and discussions behind that one image that would show that the use of the "militia network" label is tantamount to designation as a domestic terror organization, I'd definitely go to court to get to discovery and depositions that could confirm the theory and then sue for all sorts of things like defamation, violation of First Amendment rights, etc.
Yes, the same sort of documents have made it public time and time again, which was my original post in this thread. Nobody should be surprised by any of this at this point. Its been going on since the '90s. The real crux of the matter is that if they were to actually call Mike Glover or AC a militia or domestic terror organization, some heads would likely roll as the Federal LE and military have repeatedly hired his company for training.
In the image you posted a link to (https://images.ctfassets.net/syq3sn...79295f5e70a2c5eedd85f91e5/fbi2.jpg?w=800), there are four organizations that are referred to as militia networks that the so-called "MVEs" may self-identify with. Isn't that the FBI calling Glover's organization, which is one of the four identified as militia networks, a militia network, and doesn't the FBI consider militia networks domestic terror organizations? I'm only going off of the Project Megiddo report I linked to, so perhaps they have other labels for Glover's organization, but it sure does look to me like they are engaging in a two step process of labeling the Glover group a domestic terror organizaiton.
From what I've read, there is a distinction of militias and "militia extremists" but they label "terrorists groups" as something altogether different. If you look up on the FBI.gov, the definition of domestic terrorism defined in US code 18 U.S.C. 2331(5):
-involving acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; -Appearing to be intended to: -Intimidate or coerce a civilian population; -Influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion; or -Affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and -Occurring primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States
There's a difference between a statutory designation and an internal designation. My point is that it looks like for internal purposes, the FBI called Glover's group part of a militia network and has previously defined a militia network as a domestic terror threat. So no, I don't think the FBI did whatever it takes under the statute to designate the group domestic terrorists, but it's pretty clear that they treat the group as such.
Listen you Jew (Lawyer)... don't argue with people below your IQ, they'll just bring you down to their level. You're better than that.
Not sure, but I bet your credit score would take a serious hit.
Maybe someone can help me here but there is actually a plan to replace credit score as a means of determining financial eligibility with another rating that includes your environmental score and government score. There is a third element I can't remember. I think it has to do with your social score in some way. They determine your score by monitoring social media posts and purchasing habits among other things. Has anyone else heard of this?
well, of course. All part of the WEF/Oligarch's Great Reset. "Alternative Credit Scoring". The new and improved version of the ChiCom's social credit score.
Thanks, that's it. There is a video: The Grand Plan To Control; What Is ESG?
just throw this next label in there somewhere between old, used up, outta shape, redneck, hillbilly, hick, guntoter, flagwaver, hunter, etc, etc, etc.
ain’t looking to start no fight, but will stand for what is right, I’d like to be left alone, and let to each, be their own, y’all come for me if you must, my tools and training I will trust, at days end ya might get my ass, but I’ll die in a pile of brass.
They've been applying the same labels for decades based on the same imagery and symbols. Go [bleep] yourself.
Uhhh, not the same as finding a file that labels Mike Glover a domestic terrorist.
You dumb fugk.
Dipshit, it doesn't label Mike Glover or his group a domestic terrorist. Did you even [bleep] read it? No, you're illiterate.
What it actually says, "Symbols..SOME MVE's may self-identify with: American Contingency: mainstream militia, nationwide; mostly online activity with a low history of violence".
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suite, numbnuts. Words mean things. Glover nor his organization was called a terrorist. It said some MVEs may identify with the group.
I haven't been following this but the image of the document refers to several organizations as militia networks. To me, the key is what the term "militia network" means within the FBI. If they use that as shorthand for domestic terrorists, then it's clear that they've included Glover's organization as alleged domestic terrorists. It's obviously not the same as when the State Department designates a group as a foreign terrorist organization or when the Treasury Department labels someone or something an SDN, as those designations give rise to a host of government action, like sanctions or criminal charges.
If you go back about 20 years, you'll find a document from the FBI labeled "Project Megiddo" (https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps3578/www.fbi.gov/library/megiddo/megiddo.pdf), where the FBI started to prepare for domestic unrest in connection with Y2K. The title page states that it is an assessment of domestic terror groups and includes, in its listing of such groups, militias.
So while the FBI didn't explicitly name Glover's organization as a domestic terror group in the image that was posted, it pretty clearly implied the same, based on how it appears to use the term militia network internally.
Would I go to court with this kind of evidence on its own? No, but if I thought that there were internal FBI documents and discussions behind that one image that would show that the use of the "militia network" label is tantamount to designation as a domestic terror organization, I'd definitely go to court to get to discovery and depositions that could confirm the theory and then sue for all sorts of things like defamation, violation of First Amendment rights, etc.
Yes, the same sort of documents have made it public time and time again, which was my original post in this thread. Nobody should be surprised by any of this at this point. Its been going on since the '90s. The real crux of the matter is that if they were to actually call Mike Glover or AC a militia or domestic terror organization, some heads would likely roll as the Federal LE and military have repeatedly hired his company for training.
In the image you posted a link to (https://images.ctfassets.net/syq3sn...79295f5e70a2c5eedd85f91e5/fbi2.jpg?w=800), there are four organizations that are referred to as militia networks that the so-called "MVEs" may self-identify with. Isn't that the FBI calling Glover's organization, which is one of the four identified as militia networks, a militia network, and doesn't the FBI consider militia networks domestic terror organizations? I'm only going off of the Project Megiddo report I linked to, so perhaps they have other labels for Glover's organization, but it sure does look to me like they are engaging in a two step process of labeling the Glover group a domestic terror organizaiton.
From what I've read, there is a distinction of militias and "militia extremists" but they label "terrorists groups" as something altogether different. If you look up on the FBI.gov, the definition of domestic terrorism defined in US code 18 U.S.C. 2331(5):
-involving acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; -Appearing to be intended to: -Intimidate or coerce a civilian population; -Influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion; or -Affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and -Occurring primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States
There's a difference between a statutory designation and an internal designation. My point is that it looks like for internal purposes, the FBI called Glover's group part of a militia network and has previously defined a militia network as a domestic terror threat. So no, I don't think the FBI did whatever it takes under the statute to designate the group domestic terrorists, but it's pretty clear that they treat the group as such.
Lots of word games. They literally stated its a group these new "VMEs" may associate with. You'd be a fool to think you could join AC without being "listed". The FBI does what it wants to and they don't have to justify anything--because they have and will get away with it. They've been doing it forever and it needs to be stopped.
The real crux of the matter is that if they were to actually call Mike Glover or AC a militia or domestic terror organization, some heads would likely roll as the Federal LE and military have repeatedly hired his company for training.
This statement or “crux of the matter” I would totally respectfully disagree with. I think you are giving the government FAR too much credit by assuming that “heads would roll” because the government paid for services from those they’re now “going after”. One of the biggest and most recent examples of the government taking full advantage of the services of a company, services in many cases that the government could NOT legally execute, and then viciously turning on the company is Blackwater. Erik Prince was the owner and founder of Blackwater as well as a former SEAL and officer. The story of how the government, under Obama, was one massive weapon that they unleashed on him when they were ostensibly done needing him or Blackwater anymore. If you’re not familiar with the story it’s worth checking out but I’ll warn you that it’s really infuriating to know how evil our government has become. Obama even had the department of agriculture fining him an ungodly amount for the dog food that he shipped to New Orleans in the days immediately after Katrina. He paid for that flight and cargo and the government specifically appealed to him to help them because the number of pets displaced was extraordinary. He got pallets upon pallets to the shelters on his “own dime” because it was an emergency and because the federal government begged him to help. He is a prime example of why the statement I responded to is incorrect…..the federal does not care one iota about what they do, they only care what we do. They don’t answer to anyone, just ask Lois Lerner. 😉
Bump for those that understand the English language.
Weird, when you you say it says something it doesn't. Weird when it upset you so badly when I said this is nothing new. Show me on the doll where it hurt you? What's that? Right in your pussy?
The real crux of the matter is that if they were to actually call Mike Glover or AC a militia or domestic terror organization, some heads would likely roll as the Federal LE and military have repeatedly hired his company for training.
This statement or “crux of the matter” I would totally respectfully disagree with. I think you are giving the government FAR too much credit by assuming that “heads would roll” because the government paid for services from those they’re now “going after”. One of the biggest and most recent examples of the government taking full advantage of the services of a company, services in many cases that the government could NOT legally execute, and then viciously turning on the company is Blackwater. Erik Prince was the owner and founder of Blackwater as well as a former SEAL and officer. The story of how the government, under Obama, was one massive weapon that they unleashed on him when they were ostensibly done needing him or Blackwater anymore. If you’re not familiar with the story it’s worth checking out but I’ll warn you that it’s really infuriating to know how evil our government has become. Obama even had the department of agriculture fining him an ungodly amount for the dog food that he shipped to New Orleans in the days immediately after Katrina. He paid for that flight and cargo and the government specifically appealed to him to help them because the number of pets displaced was extraordinary. He got pallets upon pallets to the shelters on his “own dime” because it was an emergency and because the federal government begged him to help. He is a prime example of why the statement I responded to is incorrect…..the federal does not care one iota about what they do, they only care what we do. They don’t answer to anyone, just ask Lois Lerner. 😉
You mean the government has gotten more evil than murdering women and children over a fraction of an inch in barrel length, or burning buildings full of 80+ women and children because they would rather have a chance to use their toys, rather than pick up one guy on his routine trip to town? Or intentionally giving "test subjects" aka human beings deadly viruses as an experiment? We could go on all day...My whole life, I've seen government do evil [bleep].
One thing we can all agree on is that our government is evil to the core. And we are forced to pay for it, at the barrel of a gun.
The small percentage that calls out the gaslighting... requires further gaslighting and terrorist designation until they are contained or they capitulate.
Fear or no fear is always in the hands of the individual.
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/rsrVcz6v/Screenshot-20220806-072419-Chrome.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/1XnT4YKd/Screenshot-20220806-072549-Chrome.jpg)
![[Linked Image from media.giphy.com]](https://media.giphy.com/media/9J7iw8XgFUmeYf1IY9/giphy.gif)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/m2Z71YDB/5ap6or.jpg)
![[Linked Image from media.giphy.com]](https://media.giphy.com/media/2mG3TDbUTFY5UznyjS/giphy.gif)
![[Linked Image from media.giphy.com]](https://media.giphy.com/media/wRScb5l770zBSO9x1W/giphy.gif)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/T1m1fKjd/i-dont-always-wanna-read-estrogen-filled-drivel-here-but-when-i-do-i-seek-twirler-posts.jpg)
![[Linked Image from media.giphy.com]](https://media.giphy.com/media/3YudN6OaNSKI0/giphy.gif)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/xCqyPbYZ/Screenshot-20220806-074106-Chrome.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/fWCSbbNt/Screenshot-20220806-080215-Chrome.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/MGysgBjr/Screenshot-20220806-080249-Chrome.jpg)
![[Linked Image from westernrifleshooters.us]](https://westernrifleshooters.us/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/534ca9e2ff2751dc.jpg)