well its out.. shortly after a photo that shows Vijayjay fuming whilvElon talks to twitter employees at the HQ cafe..

University level medical disease control specialists, Charlie Kirk, Dan Bongino, just to name a few, are examples of people whose profiles were on the blacklist and do-not-amplify lists....

From Andy Ngo (the who wrote the book about Antifa's history training and tactics)

twitter files epsode to excerpt:

https://mobile.twitter.com/bariweiss/status/1601007575633305600


1. A new #TwitterFiles investigation reveals that teams of Twitter employees build blacklists, prevent disfavored tweets from trending, and actively limit the visibility of entire accounts or even trending topics—all in secret, without informing users.
Bari Weiss
@bariweiss
·
10h
2. Twitter once had a mission “to give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers.” Along the way, barriers nevertheless were erected.
Bari Weiss
@bariweiss
·
9h
3. Take, for example, Stanford’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (
@DrJBhattacharya
) who argued that Covid lockdowns would harm children. Twitter secretly placed him on a “Trends Blacklist,” which prevented his tweets from trending.

6. Twitter denied that it does such things. In 2018, Twitter's Vijaya Gadde (then Head of Legal Policy and Trust) and Kayvon Beykpour (Head of Product) said: “We do not shadow ban.” They added: “And we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology.”
Bari Weiss
@bariweiss
·
9h
7. What many people call “shadow banning,” Twitter executives and employees call “Visibility Filtering” or “VF.” Multiple high-level sources confirmed its meaning.
Bari Weiss
@bariweiss
·
9h
8. “Think about visibility filtering as being a way for us to suppress what people see to different levels. It’s a very powerful tool,” one senior Twitter employee told us.
Bari Weiss
@bariweiss
·
9h
9. “VF” refers to Twitter’s control over user visibility. It used VF to block searches of individual users; to limit the scope of a particular tweet’s discoverability; to block select users’ posts from ever appearing on the “trending” page; and from inclusion in hashtag searches.

Censorship at it's finest!
Supporters of the First!

Yeah, right.

I'm loving Elon's shake-up.

The replies clearly show the fear and denial from the retarded left.

Exactly...

That whole 1A thing... messy but DAMN HEALTHY!

Episode three
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601352083617505281?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1601352083617505281%7Ctwgr%5E40520ca60f363195f9589f8d358eb934bae43340%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgreatawakening.win%2Fp%2F16ZXM1c80p%2Fthe-removal-of-trump-from-twiite%2Fc%2F

1. THREAD: The Twitter Files
THE REMOVAL OF DONALD TRUMP
Part One: October 2020-January 6th

2. The world knows much of the story of what happened between riots at the Capitol on January 6th, and the removal of President Donald Trump from Twitter on January 8th...

3. We’ll show you what hasn’t been revealed: the erosion of standards within the company in months before J6, decisions by high-ranking executives to violate their own policies, and more, against the backdrop of ongoing, documented interaction with federal agencies.

4. This first installment covers the period before the election through January 6th. Tomorrow, @Shellenbergermd will detail the chaos inside Twitter on January 7th. On Sunday, @BariWeiss will reveal the secret internal communications from the key date of January 8th.

5. Whatever your opinion on the decision to remove Trump that day, the internal communications at Twitter between January 6th-January 8th have clear historical import. Even Twitter’s employees understood in the moment it was a landmark moment in the annals of speech.


6. As soon as they finished banning Trump, Twitter execs started processing new power. They prepared to ban future presidents and White Houses – perhaps even Joe Biden. The “new administration,” says one exec, “will not be suspended by Twitter unless absolutely necessary.”

7. Twitter executives removed Trump in part over what one executive called the “context surrounding”: actions by Trump and supporters “over the course of the election and frankly last 4+ years.” In the end, they looked at a broad picture. But that approach can cut both ways.

8. The bulk of the internal debate leading to Trump’s ban took place in those three January days. However, the intellectual framework was laid in the months preceding the Capitol riots.

9. Before J6, Twitter was a unique mix of automated, rules-based enforcement, and more subjective moderation by senior executives. As @BariWeiss reported, the firm had a vast array of tools for manipulating visibility, most all of which were thrown at Trump (and others) pre-J6.....


10. As the election approached, senior executives – perhaps under pressure from federal agencies, with whom they met more as time progressed – increasingly struggled with rules, and began to speak of “vios” as pretexts to do what they’d likely have done anyway.

More:
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601352083617505281?s=19

While I think it's great that all this is coming out, the fact of the matter is that most people DO NOT CARE. Most probably don't even understand any of it anyway. There will be no public outcry. There will be nothing done. Sad, but true.

gubermint involvement??!

24. Here, the FBI sends reports about a pair of tweets, the second of which involves a former Tippecanoe County, Indiana Councilor and Republican named @JohnBasham claiming “Between 2% and 25% of Ballots by Mail are Being Rejected for Errors.”

Elon is trying his damnedest to change the course of journalism. He is a visionary and he knows that for a healthy America our information should be a balance he is hoping for that 10/80/10

Social media, and the entire media, should lose all First Amendment protections from this point forward. They've been infiltrated by the government and are for all purposes government actors, so they should have to comply with the First Amendment rather than avail themselves of those protections. I.e., no viewpoint discrimination, period.

Personally, I think this is such a massive breach of trust and violation of the Constitution that the only way to fix things is to destroy all of those who were involved, from entities to individuals.

I don’t see a viable alternative to your opinion Remsen.

Jack Dorsey lied before congress when asked about shadow banning.

Twitter also promoted Democrat candidates, this is all illegal

I think by now we all know that…

I knew that guy was a genius. He successfully deleted his LinkIN?


That thing comes back and resubscribed me every time some Geospatial analyst nerd in Hyderabad headhunts me.

Yes. Look what happened to his native South Africa. The black radicals now own it and it's becoming the world's newest $hithole.

kwg

...what will be telling is when Jack, vijayjay et all never seeing a day behind bars, much less a fine, for election interference. The End