Catholic school suspends teen for remainder of year for believing God created 2 genders and protesting transgender students using girls’ bathrooms.


A student has reportedly been suspended by a Catholic high school for the remainder of the school year for believing that God created two genders and protesting against transgender students using girls’ bathrooms.

Since November, Josh Alexander has allegedly been suspended from St. Joseph’s Catholic High School in Renfrew, Ontario. Alexander was allegedly punished by the school for organizing a protest against transgender students using girls’ bathrooms.

Alexander said he launched the demonstration after two girls at his school confided in him that they were uncomfortable sharing bathrooms with biological males. Alexander, an 11th-grade student, was reportedly barred from attending St. Joseph’s Catholic High School for the remainder of the school year.

Alexander informed The Epoch Times that St. Joseph’s Catholic High School told him that his attendance at the school would be “detrimental to the physical and mental well-being” of transgender students. Alexander said the school labeled his beliefs as “offensive” and “bullying” because there was a transgender student in his class.

Alexander insists that he has no plans to be violent in defending his ideology, and doesn’t feel as though he is bullying anyone. “Offense is obviously defined by the offended. I expressed my religious beliefs in class and it spiraled out of control,” Alexander explained.

“Not everybody’s going to like that. That doesn’t make me a bully. It doesn’t mean I’m harassing anybody. They express their beliefs and I express mine. Mine obviously don’t fit the narrative.”

He said, “This whole issue isn’t about identity. It’s about biology and morality.” Alexander told The Post Millennial, “They’re using it as a technicality to say that they’re not disciplining me, and it’s just a form of exclusion to protect the other students.”

However, Alexander is already enrolled at St. Joseph’s Catholic High School, which reportedly bars him from enrolling at any other education programs.


https://endtimeheadlines.org/2023/0...nsgender-students-using-girls-bathrooms/

My son got into trouble at school for telling a teacher that God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve! And that was about 15 years ago! Satan is live and well...

Not really a Catholic school. It's not run by Catholics.
From what I understand, Canada has a weird setup where Catholic schools are run by the government.

Here's a list of their names & salaries - https://www.sunshineliststats.com/Employer/9/2020/?n=renfrewcountycatholicdistrictschoolboard

The trustees are elected - https://www.petawawa.ca/townhall/el...catholic-district-school-board-1416.html

There has been ongoing fights over these clowns.

St. Joseph’s Catholic High School ?

There are many Catholic schools that are run by lay people.

These aren't just lay people. They are non-Catholics.

I'm not doubting your word but how would you know this ?

He got caught up in using the language of the enemy. People aren't correctly described as having a gender to start with. Gender is more correctly applied to linguistics. For people (or any other living thing), we say they have a sex, and that sex is either male or female. But, setting that aside, he's of course spot on.

The idea that a nominally "Catholic" school would side with those seeking to tear down fundamental tenets of Christian thought over a student seeking to uphold them indicates to me that the school is overrun with Satanism to start with.

I've been following these issues for several years. It's been a huge fight up there.

Here's one where a pervert was elected as a trustee and tried to put perverted garbage in the school's code of conduct.
https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/20...-order-to-pay-board-140000-in-costs.html

There are tons of issues with the government running these schools. Canada is exhibit A for why some people are against involving the government for school vouchers.

I don't think the teachers are even Catholic.

Hawk,all Christian religions have been undermined by Satan.

The Catholic Church is the largest,as far as number of members,that is under attack.There have been many Catholic bishops and priests who have vocally supported homosexuality and their usurpation of marriage.

There was a post many years ago,where a Catholic nun was tasked with giving the Sunday sermon.She talked about the danger of homosexuality.Many parents protested her sermon with ridiculous claims that some homos,who were the church,were uncomfortable or felt aggrieved.

If you believe your own scripture , your g0d
created Satan and empowered him.

Uh oh...

LOL!

Perhaps Tyrone can explain where Satan came from
if his g0d is not responsible for such...

You have all the facts, but none of the understanding.

Irony.

Your g0d created and empowered Satan.
But you Xtians bitch about it.

All we have is Xtian fiction and Xtian apologetics.

Tyrone,I don't believe that being a Catholic is any longer a requirement for teaching at a Catholic school.

Well, then I guess God didn't create Satan.

I'd love to know what Starman does for a living. Bet he's a pornographer or something like that.

And your g0d don't exist.

Then you can butt out of this since it's all imaginary.

That is not what I learned in school and in the books I used during my studies.

Gender has always been either the male or female division of a species.

So now you doubt your own g0d.

I think you are imaginary. Just an Artificial (un)Intelligence bot posting up crap for clicks. There's no proof you exist.

That would help your logic.

Catholics and Protestants both kicked God to the curb years ago

Starman, it's called faith and belief. What I hold to be true in my heart, obviously, isn't the same truth in your heart. God also created free will...

The catholic religion has been hijacked by extremists. The pope is an evil prick and can drop dead. Religion has been under attack for 1000s of years, but the attackers have become pretty damn successful as of late

I said it was more properly referred to as the sex of the individual, not that people don't commonly use gender as a substitute for sex. Prior to the 1970s, however, no one asked what gender the baby was, or what gender an animal was. They asked its sex. I mean literally no one.

Gender is more properly applied to linguistics.

Gender is a social construct.
Sex is biological - chromosomal.

Evnin, look at all the natives they converted!!! Oops I mean buried!!! All in the name of religion. Always believe in God, just not religion! Another money grab!!! They just found another 400 graves at a school for natives. Imagine that. There no better than ocults. Embarasing to be a Canadian & human some days. GWP. 🐾👣🐾👣🇨🇦

Can you or Google translate this into standard english?

Scripture shows absence of free will.

God hardened Pharaoh's heart against Moses
and Jesus followed his father's will ,not his own.

That's fairly modern. Prior to the 1970s, the word sex was used for both, almost exclusively. At some point, the word sex got "sexualized," to where people started associating it with the act of intercourse, and thus felt uncomfortable using it to refer to the division between male and female, so people started substituting the word gender (borrowed from language studies) for sex, unless they were using sex to refer specifically to intercourse.

Well, at least he can regurgitate the talking points of his dark master. Hey Starman at least know if it ever comes to it you will be shown no quarter. Fugg off and die.

English?

I would say scripture affirms free will...

But you are gonna pissoff a lot of christians with this reasoning.

Ymmv

The examples I cited don't support that.

We all have examples...

In your life, do you have agency?

He's going to plead that he wasn't in control.

Do you consider Obedience to an outside authority
as free will?

No.

Eta...not the way you are putting it.

Do you have agency?

PS remember the last thread

Well then, both Pharaoh and Jesus were denied free will.

I dint see where this is going.

Take your blinkers off.

"Go and sin no more" can only make sense in the context of free will.

I'm reading...

Explain.

Free will is often used as an excuse, an ideological dodge.

We think and make decisions based on a number of factors and reasons.

How we think and why we think as we do is the point.

That's called free will...

Scriptural examples I cited are contra
to the free will claim..perhaps you can
address those.

The End Times Picayune?

It is....the trouble is that free will has nothing to do with the process of decision making. Which is why the free will debate, like theism, has spanned centuries.

No.

Agency is debated amongst atheists all the time...

What? This?

"Scripture shows absence of free will.

God hardened Pharaoh's heart against Moses
and Jesus followed his father's will, not his own."

God hardening Pharaoh's heart doesn't provide a proof against the general freedom of human will. Pharaoh first chose to operate against God, and only after this did God choose to harden his heart.

Jesus followed his father's will because it is his nature to do so, but he isn't an example of an ordinary man. He's a man, but also divine, and his human will is in perfect alignment with his divine will.

Jesus was never internally tempted to sin, since the devil's temptations had no effect on him, as they may have had on an ordinary man.


Even in the Garden of Gethsemane, where it appeared that there was a division between his will and that of the Father, he (even in his human nature) ultimately chose God's will as his own.

"Not my will, but thine be done."

Lol.

Jesus wasn't tempted?

Go on...

He was tempted, in that the devil tempted him. He was not tempted in that he was ever at risk of throwing in with the devil.

Why not?

Was he not man?

Both man and God, but the two natures were joined as one. So, while being tempted by the Devil, he experienced what being tempted felt like. Internally, however, he was not actually tempted to do evil in place of God's will.

So pharaohs heart was hardened through divine intervention...free will you say?


Actually Jesus sounds very ordinary , his personal expressed desire
was to avoid crucifixion like most rational mere mortals would.


Jesus became subordinate to the will of the Father.
If he really had free will, Big Daddy would have cut
him loose from crucifixion when Jesus asked that
cup be passed on from him.

This will go badly...

"Not mine, but thy will be done." His choice is always for the will of the Father. Even with the start of the prayer, i.e., "Father, if it be thy will."

Matthew 26:39 NASB
And He went a little beyond them, and fell on His face and prayed, saying,
“My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from Me; yet not as I will,
but as You will.”

It's clear Jesus wanted out of the crucifixion.
but he submitted to the will of higher authority.

You left out "if it be possible." In other words, Jesus chose to adopt his Father's will as his own, regardless of what his human nature might have been pushing him towards. It's human nature to prefer not to suffer. Nevertheless, even crucified, he could have asked his Father, and he would have commanded more than twelve legions of angels to destroy the Empire and bring him off the cross. Their wills were, however, as one on the matter of the Crucifixion. This was why he came into the world.

No, he did not want out of the crucifixion. His human nature merely repulsed against it. His will was completely with that of his Father's, as he made clear with "if it be possible." Not being possible to accomplish the task otherwise, his will was united with that of his Father.

He asked for the chance to escape crucifixion
if Big Daddy would permit such.
So another case of divine intervention
when he indicated 'no dice' son.


So it was all divinely pre-determined.

Your conclusion is contradicted by the following statement by Christ, which he said to Peter after the prayer you cite; "Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?" That totally belies your assertion that his Father refused his prayer to be spared the crucifixion. In other words, the Father would answer Jesus's prayer for twelve legions of angels to destroy the Temple guards, if only Jesus were to ask it of him. But he didn't ask it. Sounds like his will was to permit the guards to take him, and to suffer all that was to follow from that. Why? Because that was his Father's will, and his will was united with that of his Father.

It was the plan, in accordance with what God knew from the beginning would be the sinful choices made by men.

Go on...

I believe I was the last to deliver the ball into the opposing court.

PS Prescience in no way contradicts free will, if that's what you're suggesting.

And theists tend to avoid questioning the tennants of their faith.

Decisions are not willed, they are undertaken by the neural architecture of a brain, information processsing, not free will enables our ability to think and act.

Jesus asked if it's 'possible' he be permitted
to not drink from the cup...Why bother asking
such if the outcome is already predetermined?

It's also kinda odd that someone who is allegedly
fully g0d, would need to pray to g0d for direction.


So Adam /Eve were set up and fugged from day one.

He wasn't actually asking, but rather giving words to the impulse of his flesh to avoid suffering. We know what Jesus's will was by what he chose to do. The Father didn't say no to a request by Christ to avoid The Passion. We know this because, after the prayer you cite, Jesus says to Peter (who was ready to use force to protect him from the guards), "Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?" That statement by Christ contradicts your assertion that Christ's will was to avoid The Passion. Had that been his will, he would have prayed for and received the twelve legions of angels.

Nope. They exercised their free will to do what they did. There was no set up. God achieved his will despite, and through, the sinful choices made by human beings, known by him from the beginning.

Sure he was , asking on the 'possibility'
means hes looking for a chance of getting
out of it...daddy permitting.

We disagree. I believe I proved it above.

g0d clearly sent the wisest craftiest creature
to trick the most naive folks in the world.
but you don't think it's a set Up?

Except scripture (26:39) says he was looking for
the possibility/chance of escaping crucifixion,
daddy permitting.

That's not a proper citation, since it's missing the book.

Assuming Matthew, we've been through it.

My interpretation is supported by what Christ said to Peter with regard to twelve legions of angels.

LoL.. it refers to the 'Matthew 26:39 NASB' I cited
earlier you fool...Are you really that thick?

You've proven you're incapable of a civil discussion, so goodnight.

Isn't it funny how atheists believe they are the greatest Bible scholars of all time.

Act like a petty fool. And I will treat you like one.
Simple.
You quoted half-ass scripture giving no citation at all.

Given Omniscience, with the full knowledge of what will happen.

If the divine plan was for Jesus to be sacrificed,
I doubt Big Daddy would send 12 legions of Angels
to assist Jesus to screw up his divine plan.

Back to the subject at hand...

The kid got arrested yesterday for going back to school.

https://news.yahoo.com/catholic-high-school-student-arrested-184504903.html

Wow!

Lol, every time without fail.