Home
Posted By: wabigoon "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
The old song by Peter, Paul, and Mary.
What's it about?
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Ur imagination can wander on that🥴
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_AC-47_Spooky
Posted By: tikkanut Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Come on wabster

Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Don’t he live by the sea
[Linked Image]
Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Posted By: wabigoon Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.
Posted By: Leanwolf Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by wabigoon
The old song by Peter, Paul, and Mary.
What's it about?

Smoking weed. smile

L.W.
Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Wabi yuo evr been hi?
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.
You’re tripping balls, Richard.
Posted By: 5sdad Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
It's about a little boy who grows up and leaves his childhood behind, not realizing how much it hurts those he outgrew.
Richard,

Are you ok? Type 1 for Yes, 2 for No
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Posted By: slumlord Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.

You being a ‘retired’ “staff sgt” figured you’d be referring to Spooky.
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.

You being a ‘retired’ “staff sgt” figured you’d be referring to Spooky.

Spooky was an AC-130.

Puff was an AC-47.

Seeing as how you got all butt hurt about the 4 seat Apache I figured you would want to be set right.

You may thank me later.
Drug induced lyrics.
Posted By: slumlord Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.

You being a ‘retired’ “staff sgt” figured you’d be referring to Spooky.

Spooky was an AC-130.

Puff was an AC-47.

Seeing as how you got all butt hurt about the 4 seat Apache I figured you would want to be set right.

You may thank me later.

I’m sure you’d know it well being the fuel jockey and all.

But thanks for the clarifique!! And thank you for your service.

Xoxoxo
Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Fatfuk shows up LOL
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.

You being a ‘retired’ “staff sgt” figured you’d be referring to Spooky.

Spooky was an AC-130.

Puff was an AC-47.

Seeing as how you got all butt hurt about the 4 seat Apache I figured you would want to be set right.

You may thank me later.

I’m sure you’d know it well being the fuel jockey and all.

But thanks for the clarifique!! And thank you for your service.

Xoxoxo

Thanks for the Thanks.

Don't worry I'll try and keep you straightend out on Military stuff.
Posted By: Alan_C Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Wabi, are you growing magic mushrooms??
Posted By: gunchamp Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by alwaysoutdoors
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
See what happens when you bring that chit out? Burns fat ass appears lol
Posted By: wabigoon Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
[img]
[/img]
I got your Magic Dragon right here.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.

You being a ‘retired’ “staff sgt” figured you’d be referring to Spooky.

Spooky was an AC-130.

Puff was an AC-47.

Seeing as how you got all butt hurt about the 4 seat Apache I figured you would want to be set right.

You may thank me later.

This was "Puff", but many refer to it as "Spooky". Pretty cool plane.
Posted By: RS308MX Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
LSD
The burning question is- - - - -did Paul Peter Mary?
Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Peter might a been puffn Paul 🤔
Posted By: rong Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by RS308MX
LSD

Used to be some blotter with the pic on it
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.

You being a ‘retired’ “staff sgt” figured you’d be referring to Spooky.

Spooky was an AC-130.

Puff was an AC-47.

Seeing as how you got all butt hurt about the 4 seat Apache I figured you would want to be set right.

You may thank me later.

This was "Puff", but many refer to it as "Spooky". Pretty cool plane.

No one who knows calls the AC-47 "Spooky".

Slummy has been corrected so lets not dwell on his mistake. We need some understanding here.
Posted By: RUM7 Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Ever smoked the devil's lettuce Wabi???
Originally Posted by Timbermaster
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Posted By: Dude270 Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
You guys are naive, it's totally about a guy who likes blowing reptiles.
Originally Posted by rong
Originally Posted by RS308MX
LSD

Used to be some blotter with the pic on it
Haven’t tripped acid in thirty years.
Posted By: ERK Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Puff would fly over and put three bullets per square foot the size of a football field. The Green Beret movie with John Wayne had one fly over an overrun outpost. Nothing in the open lives. Bad ass. Edk
Originally Posted by ERK
Puff would fly over and put three bullets per square foot the size of a football field. The Green Beret movie with John Wayne had one fly over an overrun outpost. Nothing in the open lives. Bad ass. Edk

LOL.

That would require 144,000 bullets not counting the endzones.

Movies are not real life.
Posted By: Rock63 Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
C-130 Gunships were also called “Puff the Magic Dragon” as well as having the “Spooky” name. They replaced the AC-47’s.
Originally Posted by alwaysoutdoors
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


Mmmmmmmm!!!!! Da Baptist Booze!
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Peter might a been puffn Paul 🤔
Dude, you just ruined my childhood.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by ERK
Puff would fly over and put three bullets per square foot the size of a football field. The Green Beret movie with John Wayne had one fly over an overrun outpost. Nothing in the open lives. Bad ass. Edk

LOL.

That would require 144,000 bullets not counting the endzones.

Movies are not real life.

Well, googler says they could carry 55,000 on average, so the man isn’t all that far off. Call it an antler.
Originally Posted by Rock63
C-130 Gunships were also called “Puff the Magic Dragon” as well as having the “Spooky” name. They replaced the AC-47’s.

LOL.

I am not saying in the past some has not mistakenly used the the term "Puff" for the AC-130 just like Slummster mistakenly refered to the AC-47 as "Spooky".

Just because a few get thing wrong does not mean the rest of us should not correct them so they too can be correct going forward.

Thanks to all for their attention in the matter of correctly refering to US Air Force Gunships.
Fat fugg Burns- - - -is not old enough to have ever worked on Puff. Just another stolen valor liar!
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by ERK
Puff would fly over and put three bullets per square foot the size of a football field. The Green Beret movie with John Wayne had one fly over an overrun outpost. Nothing in the open lives. Bad ass. Edk

LOL.

That would require 144,000 bullets not counting the endzones.

Movies are not real life.

Well, googler says they could carry 55,000 on average, so the man isn’t all that far off. Call it an antler.

Well I suppose someone of your limited mental ability would score 38% as not that far off.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Peter might a been puffn Paul 🤔


You seem to have a fixation on homosexuality


With 54 posts yesterday, you might want to get out of the house and get some fresh air

It may help
Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Peter might a been puffn Paul 🤔


You seem to have a fixation on homosexuality


With 54 posts yesterday, you might want to get out of the house and get some fresh air

It may help
Only a phaag would count my posts congrats
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Peter might a been puffn Paul 🤔


You seem to have a fixation on homosexuality


With 54 posts yesterday, you might want to get out of the house and get some fresh air

It may help
Only a phaag would count my posts congrats



Its mind boggling

You have a problem
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Peter might a been puffn Paul 🤔


You seem to have a fixation on homosexuality


With 54 posts yesterday, you might want to get out of the house and get some fresh air

It may help

Technically one can't be the EarlyDrunk if they don't start early.

Her keyboard is slurring.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Peter might a been puffn Paul 🤔


You seem to have a fixation on homosexuality


With 54 posts yesterday, you might want to get out of the house and get some fresh air

It may help

Technically one can't be the EarlyDrunk if they don't start early.

Her keyboard is slurring.


I’m not sure she can blame it on that

I’m positive she’s an illiterate dumbfuck
Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Peter might a been puffn Paul 🤔


You seem to have a fixation on homosexuality


With 54 posts yesterday, you might want to get out of the house and get some fresh air

It may help

Technically one can't be the EarlyDrunk if they don't start early.

Her keyboard is slurring.
Fatfuck Jonny and his boi frind cumligia LOL
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Peter might a been puffn Paul 🤔


You seem to have a fixation on homosexuality


With 54 posts yesterday, you might want to get out of the house and get some fresh air

It may help

Technically one can't be the EarlyDrunk if they don't start early.

Her keyboard is slurring.
Fatfuck Jonny and his boi frind cumligia LOL
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


And now more homoerotic fixation

Confirmed
So that’s what happened to the New Testament Saints when Jesus died?
Originally Posted by kaywoodie
Originally Posted by alwaysoutdoors
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


Mmmmmmmm!!!!! Da Baptist Booze!


John the Baptist[note 1] (c. 1st century BC – c. AD 30) was a Jewish preacher active in the area of the Jordan River in the early 1st century AD.[19][20] He is also known as Saint John the Forerunner in Eastern Orthodoxy, John the Immerser in some Baptist Christian traditions,[21] Saint John by certain Catholic churches, and Prophet Yahya in Islam. He is sometimes alternatively referred to as John the Baptiser.[22][23][24]
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by ERK
Puff would fly over and put three bullets per square foot the size of a football field. The Green Beret movie with John Wayne had one fly over an overrun outpost. Nothing in the open lives. Bad ass. Edk

LOL.

That would require 144,000 bullets not counting the endzones.

Movies are not real life.

Well, googler says they could carry 55,000 on average, so the man isn’t all that far off. Call it an antler.

Well I suppose someone of your limited mental ability would score 38% as not that far off.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]

I see you are feeling frisky with numbers tonight. What’s the approximate percentage off of kill zone to strike an antler?
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by ERK
Puff would fly over and put three bullets per square foot the size of a football field. The Green Beret movie with John Wayne had one fly over an overrun outpost. Nothing in the open lives. Bad ass. Edk

LOL.

That would require 144,000 bullets not counting the endzones.

Movies are not real life.

Well, googler says they could carry 55,000 on average, so the man isn’t all that far off. Call it an antler.

Well I suppose someone of your limited mental ability would score 38% as not that far off.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
I see you are feeling frisky with numbers tonight. What’s the approximate percentage off of kill zone to strike an antler?

This video answers all your questions, young Padowan, but I suspect you will score in the low 30th precentile for reading trace. laugh

Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.

You being a ‘retired’ “staff sgt” figured you’d be referring to Spooky.

Stinger was an AC-130.

Puff was an AC-47.

Seeing as how you got all butt hurt about the 4 seat Apache I figured you would want to be set right.

You may thank me later.

This was "Puff", but many refer to it as "Spooky". Pretty cool plane.

No one who knows calls the AC-47 "Spooky".

Slummy has been corrected so lets not dwell on his mistake. We need some understanding here.

The AC-130 was tagged with several names, depending upon model.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_AC-47_Spooky
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by ERK
Puff would fly over and put three bullets per square foot the size of a football field. The Green Beret movie with John Wayne had one fly over an overrun outpost. Nothing in the open lives. Bad ass. Edk

LOL.

That would require 144,000 bullets not counting the endzones.

Movies are not real life.

Well, googler says they could carry 55,000 on average, so the man isn’t all that far off. Call it an antler.

Well I suppose someone of your limited mental ability would score 38% as not that far off.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
I see you are feeling frisky with numbers tonight. What’s the approximate percentage off of kill zone to strike an antler?

This video answers all your questions, young Padowan, but I suspect you will score in the low 30th precentile for reading trace. laugh




Cataract surgery is in his immediate future
Posted By: tndrbstr Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
So once again johnnys full o’ schit?
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by ERK
Puff would fly over and put three bullets per square foot the size of a football field. The Green Beret movie with John Wayne had one fly over an overrun outpost. Nothing in the open lives. Bad ass. Edk

LOL.

That would require 144,000 bullets not counting the endzones.

Movies are not real life.

Well, googler says they could carry 55,000 on average, so the man isn’t all that far off. Call it an antler.

Well I suppose someone of your limited mental ability would score 38% as not that far off.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
I see you are feeling frisky with numbers tonight. What’s the approximate percentage off of kill zone to strike an antler?

This video answers all your questions, young Padowan, but I suspect you will score in the low 30th precentile for reading trace. laugh




Cataract surgery is in his immediate future

Beats rectal prolapse repair.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by ERK
Puff would fly over and put three bullets per square foot the size of a football field. The Green Beret movie with John Wayne had one fly over an overrun outpost. Nothing in the open lives. Bad ass. Edk

LOL.

That would require 144,000 bullets not counting the endzones.

Movies are not real life.

Well, googler says they could carry 55,000 on average, so the man isn’t all that far off. Call it an antler.

Well I suppose someone of your limited mental ability would score 38% as not that far off.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
I see you are feeling frisky with numbers tonight. What’s the approximate percentage off of kill zone to strike an antler?
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
This video answers all your questions, young Padowan, but I suspect you will score in the low 30th precentile for reading trace. laugh



Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Cataract surgery is in his immediate future

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

It more of a Sand Packed VeeJay issue than shitty eyeballs. But she probably has shitty eyeballs in addition to the Sand Packed VeeJay.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by ERK
Puff would fly over and put three bullets per square foot the size of a football field. The Green Beret movie with John Wayne had one fly over an overrun outpost. Nothing in the open lives. Bad ass. Edk

LOL.

That would require 144,000 bullets not counting the endzones.

Movies are not real life.

Well, googler says they could carry 55,000 on average, so the man isn’t all that far off. Call it an antler.

Well I suppose someone of your limited mental ability would score 38% as not that far off.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
I see you are feeling frisky with numbers tonight. What’s the approximate percentage off of kill zone to strike an antler?

This video answers all your questions, young Padowan, but I suspect you will score in the low 30th precentile for reading trace. laugh




Cataract surgery is in his immediate future

Beats rectal prolapse repair.


JC, you too with the homoerotic fantasies?
Posted By: Rock63 Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
I guess that the people that modified some of the gunships (Vietnam bound) in Greenville, TX obviously didn’t know as much as you.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by ERK
Puff would fly over and put three bullets per square foot the size of a football field. The Green Beret movie with John Wayne had one fly over an overrun outpost. Nothing in the open lives. Bad ass. Edk

LOL.

That would require 144,000 bullets not counting the endzones.

Movies are not real life.

Well, googler says they could carry 55,000 on average, so the man isn’t all that far off. Call it an antler.

Well I suppose someone of your limited mental ability would score 38% as not that far off.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
I see you are feeling frisky with numbers tonight. What’s the approximate percentage off of kill zone to strike an antler?
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
This video answers all your questions, young Padowan, but I suspect you will score in the low 30th precentile for reading trace. laugh



Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Cataract surgery is in his immediate future

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

It more of a Sand Packed VeeJay issue than shitty eyeballs. But she probably has shitty eyeballs in addition to the Sand Packed VeeJay.

[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]


🎯
Posted By: 45_100 Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Rush Limbaugh played a song very similar to that.
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Cataract surgery is in his immediate future
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Beats rectal prolapse repair.

Well at least you're now speaking to your experiences.

That's a good start.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Cataract surgery is in his immediate future
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Beats rectal prolapse repair.

Well at least you're now speaking to your experiences.

That's a good start.


LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
it’s OK Rick. You only have to use the doughnut for a few weeks.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
Cataract surgery is in his immediate future
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Beats rectal prolapse repair.

Well at least you're now speaking to your experiences.

That's a good start.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

If she gets that lil hinny issue fixed up, has a sand flushing of the VeeJay, and the clouds removed from her eyeballs she will be right as rain.

It's all up side from here.
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Peter might a been puffn Paul 🤔
Nope.
Peter liked little girls and democrats.

From Wikipedia:
Criminal conviction and pardon[edit]
In 1970, Yarrow was convicted and served three months in prison for taking "improper liberties" with 14-year-old Barbara Winter, who went with her 17-year-old sister to Yarrow's hotel room in Washington, DC seeking an autograph. Winter stated that Yarrow answered the door naked and made her masturbate him until he ejaculated. Yarrow served three months of a 1–3 year prison sentence.[47][48][49][50][51] He apologized for the incident, saying that "it was an era of real indiscretion and mistakes by categorically male performers. I was one of them. I got nailed. I was wrong. I'm sorry for it."[48]
Yarrow was granted a presidential pardon by Jimmy Carter on January 19, 1981, the day before Carter's presidency ended.[47][48][52] For decades, Yarrow avoided mention of the assault, but by the early 2000s, it became a campaign issue for politicians he supports.[50][53][54] In 2004, U.S. Representative Martin Frost of Texas, a Democrat, canceled a fundraising appearance with Yarrow after his opponent ran a radio advertisement about Yarrow's offense;[50] in 2013, Republican politicians in New York called on Democratic congressional candidate Martha Robertson to cancel a scheduled fundraiser with Yarrow.[53][55] In 2019, he was uninvited from a folk music festival when the organizers were informed of his conviction.[56]
In May 2021, The Washington Post wrote that "[Yarrow's] pardon by Carter — perhaps the only one in U.S. history wiping away a conviction for a sexual offense against a child — escaped scrutiny when it happened. It was granted just hours before the American hostages in Iran were freed, which captured headlines for weeks." The same article details other allegations of sexual assault of minors made against Yarrow.[47]
Sounds like Pedo Joe would have welcomed his support- - - - -"birds of a feather- - - -etc."
Interesting history.


Spooky, Puff, and Spectre
Originally Posted by wabigoon
The old song by Peter, Paul, and Mary.
What's it about?
They never said. It's been debated for 50 years and no one knows even now. Those who say it's about smoking grass are just guessing but It's as good a guess as any, I guess.
Posted By: slumlord Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.

You being a ‘retired’ “staff sgt” figured you’d be referring to Spooky.

Spooky was an AC-130.

Puff was an AC-47.

Seeing as how you got all butt hurt about the 4 seat Apache I figured you would want to be set right.

You may thank me later.

This was "Puff", but many refer to it as "Spooky". Pretty cool plane.

No one who knows calls the AC-47 "Spooky".

Slummy has been corrected so lets not dwell on his mistake. We need some understanding here.

RE: “slummy being corrected”

AC 130 would began to assume the Specter moniker

Puff and Spooky seem to harbor interchangeable with AC 47 affectionate naming conventions.

Ho hum, 4 passenger Apache gunship would be pretty cool though


[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.

You being a ‘retired’ “staff sgt” figured you’d be referring to Spooky.

Spooky was an AC-130.

Puff was an AC-47.

Seeing as how you got all butt hurt about the 4 seat Apache I figured you would want to be set right.

You may thank me later.

This was "Puff", but many refer to it as "Spooky". Pretty cool plane.

No one who knows calls the AC-47 "Spooky".

Slummy has been corrected so lets not dwell on his mistake. We need some understanding here.

RE: “slummy being corrected”

AC 130 would began to assume the Specter moniker

Puff and Spooky seem to harbor interchangeable with AC 47 affectionate naming conventions.

Ho hum, 4 passenger Apache gunship would be pretty cool though


[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

LOL.

I had a pretty good run and you folded like a cheap suit.
Posted By: slumlord Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Uhh naw



LOL




[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Posted By: DaveR Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by slumlord
Uhh naw
LOL




[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

LOL.

I made you my bitch for funnsies.

Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.

You being a ‘retired’ “staff sgt” figured you’d be referring to Spooky.

Spooky was an AC-130.

Puff was an AC-47.

Seeing as how you got all butt hurt about the 4 seat Apache I figured you would want to be set right.

You may thank me later.
Originally Posted by slumlord
I’m sure you’d know it well being the fuel jockey and all.

But thanks for the clarifique!! And thank you for your service.

Xoxoxo
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Thanks for the Thanks.

Don't worry I'll try and keep you straightend out on Military stuff.
Posted By: BFaucett Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by wabigoon
The old song by Peter, Paul, and Mary.
What's it about?
They never said. It's been debated for 50 years and no one knows even now. Those who say it's about smoking grass are just guessing but It's as good a guess as any, I guess.


It's about a little boy growing up and leaving behind his imaginary friend (a stuffed toy dragon named Puff).


The lyrics tell a story of the ageless dragon, Puff, and his playmate, Jackie Paper, a little boy who grows up and moves on from the imaginary adventures of childhood, leaving a disheartened Puff on his own. The song's story takes place "by the sea" in the fictional land of "Honah Lee".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puff,_the_Magic_Dragon


Speculation about drug references

After the song's initial success, speculation arose—as early as a 1964 article in Newsweek—that the song contained veiled references to smoking marijuana. The word "paper" in the name of Puff's human friend Jackie Paper was said to be a reference to rolling papers, the words "by the sea" were interpreted as "by the C" (as in cannabis), the word "mist" stood for "smoke", the land of "Honahlee" stood for hashish, and "dragon" was interpreted as "draggin'" (i.e., inhaling smoke). Similarly, the name "Puff" was alleged to be a reference to taking a "puff" on a joint. The supposition was claimed to be common knowledge in a letter by a member of the public to The New York Times in 1984.

The authors of the song have repeatedly rejected this interpretation and have strongly and consistently denied that they intended any references to drug use. Both Lipton and Yarrow have stated, "'Puff, the Magic Dragon' is not about drugs." Yarrow has frequently explained that the song is about the hardships of growing older and has no relationship to drug-taking. He has also said that the song has "never had any meaning other than the obvious one" and is about the "loss of innocence in children." He has dismissed the suggestion of it being associated with drugs as "sloppy research".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puff,_the_Magic_Dragon


Posted By: 5sdad Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by ironbender
Interesting history.


Spooky, Puff, and Spectre

Very interesting - thanks for posting.
Posted By: BFaucett Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by 5sdad
Originally Posted by ironbender
Interesting history.


Spooky, Puff, and Spectre

Very interesting - thanks for posting.


Good article but it didn't include any photos of the AC-119.


[Linked Image from media.defense.gov]

Posted By: WAM Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Call them what you will but the AC-130 gunships hammered the NVA trucks and armor on the Trail for a couple of years towards the end of the SE Asia Unpleasantness until the war dogs called them off.
Posted By: RJY66 Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by 45_100
Rush Limbaugh played a song very similar to that.

Only the greatest political parody EVER.......Barack the Magic Negro.......featuring white comedian Paul Shanklin as "reverend" Al Sharpton!
Posted By: ERK Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
My numbers on Puffs firepower came from a military film from around 1970 when I was 17 years old. It’s possible the military might have exaggerated a little.
On a different note I believe my draft number that year was 312 so no Vietnam for me. I had two older brothers who had already been there for the fun and games.
One was a door gunner in a Huey. They took out the 30 caliber guns and installed 50 cal for [bleep] and giggles. Edk
Posted By: lvmiker Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by wabigoon
It might be it's about what you want it to be?.

You being a ‘retired’ “staff sgt” figured you’d be referring to Spooky.

Spooky was an AC-130.

Puff was an AC-47.

Seeing as how you got all butt hurt about the 4 seat Apache I figured you would want to be set right.

You may thank me later.

This was "Puff", but many refer to it as "Spooky". Pretty cool plane.

No one who knows calls the AC-47 "Spooky".

Slummy has been corrected so lets not dwell on his mistake. We need some understanding here.


Holster sniffing wing wiper dreams of being perceived as a warrior again, and again, ad nauseum.



mike r
Posted By: gunchamp Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by wabigoon
The old song by Peter, Paul, and Mary.
What's it about?
Im so glad youre here to start these stupid ass trolling threads. What would we do without you
Posted By: jaguartx Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by Rock63
C-130 Gunships were also called “Puff the Magic Dragon” as well as having the “Spooky” name. They replaced the AC-47’s.

LOL.

I am not saying in the past some has not mistakenly used the the term "Puff" for the AC-130 just like Slummster mistakenly refered to the AC-47 as "Spooky".

Just because a few get thing wrong does not mean the rest of us should not correct them so they too can be correct going forward.

Thanks to all for their attention in the matter of correctly refering to US Air Force Gunships.

Since we are being so correct, "referred" is properly spelt wid 2 of these, "R"
Wabigoon: Drugs and addled brains.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
Posted By: jaguartx Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by WAM
Call them what you will but the AC-130 gunships hammered the NVA trucks and armor on the Trail for a couple of years towards the end of the SE Asia Unpleasantness until the war dogs called them off.

All while the POS Dimocommie, Walter Cronkite, chortled nightly the US could never stop the influx of the VC (and North Vietnamese) because of the Genius of the myriad of avenues of advancement afforded them by the Ho Chi MinhTrail.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by ERK
My numbers on Puffs firepower came from a military film from around 1970 when I was 17 years old. It’s possible the military might have exaggerated a little.
On a different note I believe my draft number that year was 312 so no Vietnam for me. I had two older brothers who had already been there for the fun and games.
One was a door gunner in a Huey. They took out the 30 caliber guns and installed 50 cal for [bleep] and giggles. Edk

JB is right about everything.

Putin has no chance against the quueerr Zelensky.
Posted By: beretzs Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by Rock63
C-130 Gunships were also called “Puff the Magic Dragon” as well as having the “Spooky” name. They replaced the AC-47’s.

LOL.

I am not saying in the past some has not mistakenly used the the term "Puff" for the AC-130 just like Slummster mistakenly refered to the AC-47 as "Spooky".

Just because a few get thing wrong does not mean the rest of us should not correct them so they too can be correct going forward.

Thanks to all for their attention in the matter of correctly refering to US Air Force Gunships.

Either way, no team ever hated hearing one above running racetracks in support of a ground movement. They are one of the AF's best piece of kit..

Well, they had excellent chow halls as well grin
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Posted By: Huntz Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by tndrbstr
So once again johnnys full o’ schit?

Ah yes Wikipedophile .The bastion of all modern knowledge that anyone can edit and change content at anytime . For sure the place to go to get honest information.
Posted By: efw Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Majac?
Originally Posted by efw
Majac?

It’s part of the shtick.
Couple of things. We have at least one guy on the 'Fire who flew in AC-47s. Flyboy Flem, I think. That "cover a football field" line came from a PR film and has no relation to real life. These are not area weapons. It would have much more accurate to say they can put 1,000 rounds of 30-cal into a truck in five seconds.

We still fly and use AC-130s. They're smoking (no reference to Puff) bad guys in the sandbox today.

Lastly, Cronkite was right about that. The Ho Chi Minh Trail wasn't like an interstate highway. It was more like your circulatory system, with ever- smaller branches of "arteries" fanning out everywhere from the "heart" in North Vietnam through Laos and Cambodia to destinations in the South. Trust me, I know. And we never stopped them. Hurt them a lot, slowed down the deliveries, but never ever stopped them.
Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
It’s been 35 yrs since I’ve heard that thx😪
Watched them at work on more than a few occasions , . Very impressive
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
You seem to have a fixation on homosexuality

Originally Posted by rcamuglia
And now more homoerotic fixation

Originally Posted by rcamuglia
JC, you too with the homoerotic fantasies?


The lady doth protest too much, methinks.


🧚🏽‍♀️
Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/12/24
Originally Posted by Tide_Change
Originally Posted by rcamuglia
You seem to have a fixation on homosexuality

Originally Posted by rcamuglia
And now more homoerotic fixation

Originally Posted by rcamuglia
JC, you too with the homoerotic fantasies?


The lady doth protest too much, methinks.


🧚🏽‍♀️
😂😂
Posted By: acy Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/13/24
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
Couple of things. We have at least one guy on the 'Fire who flew in AC-47s. Flyboy Flem, I think. That "cover a football field" line came from a PR film and has no relation to real life. These are not area weapons. It would have much more accurate to say they can put 1,000 rounds of 30-cal into a truck in five seconds.

We still fly and use AC-130s. They're smoking (no reference to Puff) bad guys in the sandbox today.

Lastly, Cronkite was right about that. The Ho Chi Minh Trail wasn't like an interstate highway. It was more like your circulatory system, with ever- smaller branches of "arteries" fanning out everywhere from the "heart" in North Vietnam through Laos and Cambodia to destinations in the South. Trust me, I know. And we never stopped them. Hurt them a lot, slowed down the deliveries, but never ever stopped them.

You're correct regarding Flyboy Flem. He flew in support of another Campfire member, EvilTwin, one night. There is a great thread on that from years ago.
Posted By: Fubarski Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/13/24
Lol, tater head gets his head handed ta him, again, by slummy.

tater, maybe ya better stick ta deducin rocket ID from craters.

No, that won't work.

Maybe try analyzin the Constitution as it applies ta bump stocks.

No, that won't work.

Ya could try hittin the vitals of a elk, steada the antler or guts.

No, that won't work.

Your special purpose could be predictin whether Russia can take cities in cuckraine?

No, that won't work.

pears your only actual talent is gettin other qwertys ta follow ya around on threads.
Posted By: earlybrd Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/13/24
Jonboi must be puffn peter this evenin 🥴😂
It’s about a magic dragon named Puff. It says so right in the title.
Always thought Puff was not the right name. Should’a been Burrrrrrrt.
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
Always thought Puff was not the right name. Should’a been Burrrrrrrt.
🤣🤣🤣
Or Burrrnnnnt
Posted By: WAM Re: "Puff, the Majac Dragon"? - 04/25/24
As for the HCM Trail, there were places where most wouldn’t think you could drive a truck, yet the next morning after a rain there would be multiple deep tire tracks from heavy loaded trucks. And detecting tank or truck movements on unattended ground sensors was an immediate call for an arc light strike or a gunship run.
[Linked Image from 4.bp.blogspot.com]
^ killer of Puff for little Jackie Paper.
Originally Posted by acy
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
Couple of things. We have at least one guy on the 'Fire who flew in AC-47s. Flyboy Flem, I think. That "cover a football field" line came from a PR film and has no relation to real life. These are not area weapons. It would have much more accurate to say they can put 1,000 rounds of 30-cal into a truck in five seconds.

We still fly and use AC-130s. They're smoking (no reference to Puff) bad guys in the sandbox today.

Lastly, Cronkite was right about that. The Ho Chi Minh Trail wasn't like an interstate highway. It was more like your circulatory system, with ever- smaller branches of "arteries" fanning out everywhere from the "heart" in North Vietnam through Laos and Cambodia to destinations in the South. Trust me, I know. And we never stopped them. Hurt them a lot, slowed down the deliveries, but never ever stopped them.

You're correct regarding Flyboy Flem. He flew in support of another Campfire member, EvilTwin, one night. There is a great thread on that from years ago.

Link to that story: https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/12579839/1
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
© 24hourcampfire