Remington also noted that the flag was "undignified" atop the crane and it wasn't being taken down at night. He also noted it had been blown away several times, in Colorado's famous winds.
Y'all missed this part. Technically, the tribal council member is correct. And, if the rez, as he describes it is THAT patriotic, the undignified and unceremonious display is likely far more correct than flying it on the crane.
Be too quick to judge, and often be a judged a fool...
That said, I still want more proof, one way or the other.
Maybe, but to me, it just looks like a little "justification" after the fact, trying to give a "legitimate" reason to their "personal" demands.
If it was just that the flag blew off, how about an offer to let it fly if reinforced? Or set up a spotlight at night? Didn't see that part...
"Tribal member Sage Remington, who was knowledgeable of the tribal council decision, said it included the recognition of the tribe as a sovereign nation, and its ability to choose whether it wants a flag to be flown."
"It is a sovereign nation," Remington told the Herald. "There really is no precedent for flying an American flag unless it's requested by the tribal constituency."
"But he said tribal members apparently expressed discontent about the flag both to the tribal council and the construction company."
"I think they heard from other people that this was not the right thing to do," Remington said."
Nope, this one is about flexing their muscles, cause they feel protected on their piece of land. It's nothing more than a "We'll show you who's boss around here" attitude, as they continue to suck tax dollars.
Sorry, I'm not into special rights, and reservations are nothing but.