If you haven't lived in Nebraska, you can't imagine how much the success of the UN-Lincoln Football Team means to a majority of Nebraskans.
Dude, are you serious? I live in Alabama.
Pederson had to go. It's the nature of the beast. He got his shot at Soloch, and got to fire him. The mistake he made you noted well, he didn't have a replacement lined up. Callahan was his guy, its a failure, he gets the axe, the new guy axes Callahan and gets to hire his guy. The new guy will get that hire, and one more if that one fails, and the cycle will continue or someone will fit and win and stay a while. Simple.
Nebraska is the type school that if you aint winning, the problem is the coach. They are the state school, and really the only big time program in the state. Any good coach should be able to throw up a fence around Nebraska and keep a great majority of the kids at home, and keep TX and OU out. They have a great history and tradition that is not nearly as far removed as say, Alabama's. The only things I don't know about Nebraska is if they have facilities to rival others, or did they do like Alabama and lag behind because they didn't need new facilities because they're Nebraska and Nebraska sells itself without gimmicks? Well, it doesn't...the kids want the facilities...the "bling".
No program can sustain on their name or history alone these days, nor can they sustain on recruiting kids they are promising immediate playing time to in order to get them...you can't win big time football with young players...and the kids you're promising early playing time to are not team players. A team can win a championship with no 5 star players. There are numerous examples of highly talented teams with mediocre records. Phil Fulmer at Tenn and ND are famous for talented underachieving teams. Places like Nebraska, TX, Auburn, Bama, Florida, OSU, USC...they are "programs" not a flash in the pan winning team. Today, the Boise State, So. Floridas, and Rutgers of the world can manage to get some players every once in a blue moon to make a 2-3 season run...but they don't sustain it year in and year out. The keys to having a great program are much more complex than merely having a good season or 2 every decade precisely because the Rugers, Boise's, So Florida of the world are having their day in the sun, and diluting the pool of players. A place like Nebraska is like Bama...or should be...every coach they've fired in the last 15 years had one 10 win season...anybody can do that, or should do that at a school like that.
I'm not defending Callahan, but one thing Nebraska had to do was evolve out of the Osborne/Solich option offense mode...they'd recruted to that system so long that Callahan had nothing to work with in his West Coast system...they needed to give him 5 years to see IF he's capable of building
his program or not. Also, as they do in the SEC...most coaches come in and build a team starting on the D side of the ball as it's easier to find those type athletes and coach D than build an offensive team. And you can a game or 2 on defense alone. I don't know what year he's in now...3 or 4? If it is year 5 then they gave him a fair shot. Still, it appears things are sooooo bad that they think 1 more year wont make any difference...I can't disagree.