THIS is interesting!!!

The U.S. Justice Department is weighing a request by two government inspectors general to open a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email account for her work as secretary of state, the New York Times reported on Thursday.
The inspectors general, who were not clearly identified in the Times's report, have asked the Justice Department to decide whether Clinton, the leading Democratic contender for the 2016 presidential election, mishandled classified information while she was the nation's most senior diplomat.
The Justice Department has not decided whether it will pursue a criminal inquiry, the Times said in its report published online late Thursday night, which cited unnamed government officials.
Clinton has repeatedly said she broke no laws or rules by eschewing a standard government email account for her State Department work in favor of a private account linked to a computer server in her New York home. She has also said she sent no classified information through email.

Clinton addresses the email scandal:

PHOTO GALLERY | 1 of 11 IMAGES
⟨⟩
NEW YORK - MARCH 10: Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks to the media after keynoting a Women's Empowerment Event at the United Nations March 10, 2015 in New York City. Clinton answered questions about recent allegations of an improperly used email account during her tenure as secretary of state. (Photo by Yana Paskova/Getty Images)
Her exclusive use of a private email account first came to public attention in March, opening her to a volley of criticism from political opponents as she began her presidential campaign that she was sidestepping transparency and record-keeping laws.
She says she last year gave the State Department all the work-related emails she had, amounting to some 55,000 printed pages covering her four-year tenure beginning in 2009, although her staff have recently acknowledged there are gaps in the records she retained.
The State Department is now obliging her request to make public as many of the emails public as disclosure laws allow, and is regularly releasing them in batches through to next January.
Some of the emails have been retroactively marked as classified or containing some sort of sensitive information, according to the State Department, although the department says this does not mean the information was classified at the time an email was sent.
The inspectors general behind the complaint sent a memorandum to the State Department last week saying that at least one email already made public contains classified information that was apparently not properly redacted, the Times reported. Which email they had in mind is unclear.

Hillary Clinton Presidential Candidate Profile | InsideGov


The Justice Department and spokesmen for Clinton did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday night.
While Clinton is the clear frontrunner for the Democratic Party's nomination, several recent polls have found a majority of voters find her untrustworthy, a feeling likely to be exacerbated by a criminal investigation by the federal government.
(This version of the story corrects paragraph 9 to show memo was sent last week, not last month, and was sent to State, not Justice, Department)
(Additional reporting by Luciana Lopez; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)

One can only hope the Marxist in the White House hatred for the Clintons is what drives this. Otherwise...

This doesn't mean the Justice Department will actually find the request has weight. Nothing to see here.

Steve.

is this politicalese for "we're redacting the harmful schit" ?

I ain't gonna hold my breath.

For as long as it takes Obama to reach the phone to call it off.

Hopefully the indictment comes down in October 2016

funny ain't it, how the enemies of the kenyan wind up on the DOJ radar? That said, I don't think many DC folks could really stand up to serious scrutiny.

They'll still be weighing it come November 2016, too.

MM

I'm telling you guys.

She ain't human.

She's a mechanical society wrecking ball.

Louis Lerner is still on the loose, I doubt much will happen with this Old Goat.

I sincerely hope that the desire for equal justice is what drives this forward. Lynch has not been on the job too long and has already shown that she may very well have more balls then her predecessor.
When the race baiting "regulars" were conspicuously absent from the SC church killings, it was obvious to me that someone called off the dogs. I doubt it was her boss or his buddy eric given their history.

I can only hope.

Lois just hasn't had her "accident" yet...

Not a damn thing gonna happen.

Yep.

To any of the Criminals of Change.

The Teflon Donna

Hank

They could video of her killing somebody and nothing would be done.

Unless maybe that person was black....and she was wearing a confederate flag T-shirt.....


Then only maybe.....

Nah, it would be claimed some guy in a mask did it.

It would just be one more body in a long list of dead people she has left in her wake....

True and she ain't done yet!

It appears that the VERY lefty NY Times has requested the probe. THAT by itself is an indicator that her (usually) dependable lefty media outlets are turning on her. This is NOT small potatoes guys.

"The U.S. Justice Department is weighing a request by two government inspectors general........."


The operative word there is 'weighing'.. We'll see - maybe pigs CAN fly..

Reports that of the first 30 documents reviewed four contained classified information. All from Hillery's home server.

The NYT hasn't liked her for a LONG time. They have spilled a lot of the beans on her. This is just another one.

what he said



we quit being a nation of laws for the "privileged" some time ago.


laws are for you common people, where ignorance of the law is not an excuse

Fox reported today that of the first 40 emails examined, 4 of them contained classified information.

Here's what the Kraut has to say about it: