User talk:Edtior-in-chief
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
April 2016[edit]
Information icon Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Webster Hubbell has been undone because it did not appear constructive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Edtior-in-chief

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Webster_Hubbell&action=history

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Webster_Hubbell&action=edit&editintro=Template:BLP_editintro

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webster_Hubbell

Scrubbed clean.
Looking at Chelsea Clinton's wiki page, of course there is no trace of Webb.

But google "Chelsea Webb Hubble" and get a zillion hits
https://www.google.com/search?q=web...&ie=UTF-8#q=webster+hubbell++chelsea

What does it all mean?

Wikipedia is not in the tank for Bernie.

Great stuff!

Too bad they can't get DNA samples to compare. That would end all speculation.

The idea that anybody could work up a spray of DNA in Cankles' presence is troubling.

They have Bill's DNA already on file at the FBI.

I think Chelsea is Bill's. When did he ever turn down a piece?

I wouldn't claim anything with an AKC registration as mine, either.

Light switches, drugs, and paper bags...