Anybody else feel like the election is hanging in the balance tomorrow night.
They're already trying to rig it for Hillary. Giving her a bigger podium so she doesn't look so helpless next to Trump, no kidding, somebody agreed to this...
I read on Drudge that the debate commission agreed to the step stool. I don't think the Trump team would care - furthermore, its a further distance to the ground if she passes out.
I read on Drudge that the debate commission agreed to the step stool. I don't think the Trump team would care - furthermore, its a further distance to the ground if she passes out.
Anybody else feel like the election is hanging in the balance tomorrow night.
They're already trying to rig it for Hillary. Giving her a bigger podium so she doesn't look so helpless next to Trump, no kidding, somebody agreed to this...
My understanding is that the smaller podium is for Hildog so she won't look so short because her request for a step stool was rejected...
Anybody else feel like the election is hanging in the balance tomorrow night.
They're already trying to rig it for Hillary. Giving her a bigger podium so she doesn't look so helpless next to Trump, no kidding, somebody agreed to this...
Has something changed?
I read in the last few days that she wanted the step but got the shorter podium. She's something like 5'4" and Trump is 6'2".
He should mention that hiLIARy is at the children's table!
Hillary will start the debate high as a kite - she'll be pumped full of a little bit of everything in the hope of saving her from passing out. Watch for her to be real giddy at the start, as if she just drank a pot of coffee.
In other news, Hillary hasn't been able to get her fat ass off the pot since the South Carolina results came in.
Political pundits suggest that she'll have to bring a slop jar with her to the debates against Trump.
She'll turn loose with a prolonged fart when he mentions Benghazi, they say...and when he asks about the e-mails,..she'll drop a dense turd 3 feet long right there behind the podium.
From that point on, she'll respond to every comment with a bug eyed grunt as she squats upon the portable, glazed throne.
The headlines next day will read, "HILLARY HAS CHIT!,...details at 11.
Trump gracious, charming, intelligent--just like when he is courting a business deal.
Hillary boring, cold, stiff.
BMT
and harsh and shrill....if only obviously.
You remember those clips of the Seahawk fans the minute the Patriots intercepted the ball on the goal-line a few years back? That will be liberal democrats if Hillary hits the floor.
I guess we don't need to worry about Killary lying.
Before debate, Clinton works refs, asks for special treatment
By BYRON YORK (@BYRONYORK) • 9/25/16 11:48 PM
For several days, Democrats and their supporters in the press have demanded that presidential debate moderator Lester Holt factcheck Donald Trump in Monday night's showdown at Hofstra University. Those demands turned to pleading Sunday when Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, Robby Mook, appearing on ABC's "This Week," asked for special treatment for Clinton in the event that Trump tells lies from the debate stage.
"All that we're asking is that, if Donald Trump lies, that it's pointed out," Mook said. "It's unfair to ask for Hillary both to play traffic cop while with Trump, make sure that his lies are corrected, and also to present her vision for what she wants to do for the American people."
"But isn't that what a debater is supposed to do?" asked host George Stephanopoulos.
"Well, I think Donald Trump's special," Mook said. "We haven't seen anything like this…So we're saying this is a special circumstance, a special debate, and Hillary should be given some time to actually talk about what she wants to do to make a difference in people's lives. She shouldn't have to spend the whole debate correcting the record."
Other Clinton officials made a similar case in the days leading up to the debate. On Friday, Team Clinton held a conference call for reporters, urging Holt to factcheck Trump on the fly. "This is the role of the moderator…to call out those lies, and do it in real time," top campaign official Jennifer Palmieri said. "To not do that is to give Donald Trump a very unfair advantage."
And what kind of lies should Holt factcheck? In its email announcing the conference call, the Clinton campaign provided a handy list of "Trump's Seven Deadly Lies." Number one on the list was the Trump claim that seems to anger Democrats most — that he opposed the war in Iraq.
It would not be a surprise to hear Trump repeat that claim at Hofstra. But a factcheck might not lead to the cathartic, true-false, black-white "You lie!" moment Democrats would like. Sometimes facts yield a murky picture, and that's the story with Trump and Iraq.
In its email, the Clinton campaign included a passage from a Washington Post factcheck of Trump and Iraq, under the heading "Trump: 'I was totally against the war in Iraq.' // Four Pinocchios":
As our timeline shows, Trump was not "totally" against the Iraq War. Trump expressed lukewarm support the first time he was asked about it on Sept. 11, 2002, and was not clearly against it until he was quoted in the August 2004 Esquire cover story. (We even made a video documenting how this is a bogus claim.) Yet he repeatedly claims he opposed the war from the beginning — and thus, earns Four Pinocchios.
That, apparently, is the case the Clinton campaign would like Lester Holt to make against Trump should Trump say at the debate that he opposed the war.
But look at the Post's conclusion. The sum total of evidence that Trump supported the war before the March 20, 2003 invasion is a few seconds of an episode of the Howard Stern show more than six months earlier, on September 11, 2002. "Are you for invading Iraq?" Stern asked. "Yeah, I guess so," Trump answered haltingly. "I wish the first time it was done correctly."
That's it.
The only other public statement Trump made before the war was an appearance with Fox News' Neil Cavuto on January 28, 2003. "If you look at the polls, a lot of people are getting a little tired," Trump said. "I think the Iraqi situation is a problem. And I think the economy is a much bigger problem as far as the president is concerned."
What did that mean? It certainly didn't explicitly support or oppose the war. Put it down as an inconclusive statement. (That and other quotations in this piece are taken from a FactCheck.org article from February of this year.) From the day of the invasion on, Trump made a series of statements about Iraq, none definitive, and most expressing some sort of misgiving about the conflict.
On the first day of the war, Trump said of Wall Street: 'Even before the fact, they're obviously taking it a little bit for granted that it looks like a tremendous success from a military standpoint." Trump did not characterize that in one way or the other.
The next day, Trump called the war "depressing." Two days after that, he called it "a mess."
A few months later, on July 1, 2003, Trump said, "I would love to see New York City and some of the cities and some of the states get some of the money that's going toward Iraq and other places, because you know, they really need and they need it badly."
On September 11, 2003, one year after his "Yeah, I guess so," remark on Howard Stern, Trump said, "It wasn't a mistake to fight terrorism and fight it hard, and I guess maybe if I had to do it, I would have fought terrorism but not necessarily Iraq."
And on and on. By 2004, with the war an increasingly troubled enterprise, Trump became more openly negative.
Whatever all that adds up to, it is not a record of supporting the Iraq war before, during, and after the invasion.
So back to the Washington Post factcheck. The statement that prompted the factcheck was Trump saying he was "totally" against the war, and the Post proved that Trump was not "totally" against the war. He was somewhat against the war, or partially against the war, or mostly against the war, or mildly against the war, or kinda against the war.
So is that the point the Clinton campaign would like Lester Holt to make? If Trump repeats his claim that he was totally against the war, should Holt remind him that he was only somewhat against the war? It's hard to imagine voters would take such a distinction very seriously.
The most far reaching indictment of Trump's stance on the war came from none other than Hillary Clinton, at NBC's "Commander in Chief Forum" on September 7. "My opponent was for the war in Iraq," Clinton said. "He says he wasn't. You can go back and look at the record. He supported it. He told Howard Stern he supported it. So he supported it before it happened, he supported it as it was happening, and he is on record as supporting it after it happened."
That's not really an accurate reflection of events. It's the kind of thing political candidates can say about their opponents. But it's just not the job of a debate moderator.
I read on Drudge that the debate commission agreed to the step stool. I don't think the Trump team would care - furthermore, its a further distance to the ground if she passes out.
For several days, Democrats and their supporters in the press have demanded that presidential debate moderator Lester Holt factcheck Donald Trump in Monday night's showdown at Hofstra University. Those demands turned to pleading Sunday when Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, Robby Mook, appearing on ABC's "This Week," asked for special treatment for Clinton in the event that Trump tells lies from the debate stage.
The Donald has the Libtards schittin' their pants!
Trump should say;"I've known Hillary Clinton personally for a long time. She has some good qualities, just like all humans. But she has one flaw that should prevent her from ever serving as C I C..... the more power she is given, the more she abuses it".
Anybody else feel like the election is hanging in the balance tomorrow night.
No, it's the country that's hanging in the balance..
Quote
They're already trying to rig it for Hillary. Giving her a bigger podium so she doesn't look so helpless next to Trump, no kidding, somebody agreed to this...
Well, naturally.
Quote
Don't wanna have her look small, weak and FEMALE......doncha know.
I wanna know why ANYONE would even waste the time?
Anyone undecided at this point? Have lots of time just to waste instead of getting important things done?
Like watching a football game or any other contest? This race is for all the marbles and millions are undecided. Millions do not think very much of either candidate.
I have better things to do than watch two turds in a lying competition. At this point everyone needs to just write in Mickey Mouse. We won't though. Our corrupt government is a reflection of our corrupt electorate.
Y'all take up a collection to send me to Siberia. I'm thinking about a cattle ranch in one of the nicer parts.
I have better things to do than watch two turds in a lying competition. At this point everyone needs to just write in Mickey Mouse. We won't though. Our corrupt government is a reflection of our corrupt electorate.
Y'all take up a collection to send me to Siberia. I'm thinking about a cattle ranch in one of the nicer parts.
No we wont if we are smart, because we know that Johnson/Mouse has only a chance at throwing the election, if that...
We'll all vote Trump, since we have no other option. And since we still care to TRY to save this country.
Enjoy Siberia, we are trying to head north too in a few years, but we'll fund our own way without handouts.
I wanna know why ANYONE would even waste the time?
Anyone undecided at this point? Have lots of time just to waste instead of getting important things done?
Everybody's mind is made up.
We tune in for the same reason anyone tunes in to watch a race at Talladega..
Ah, over my head, won't watch sports or racing either, better things to do.
But point taken, some may be undecided, I figured very few here, I may have been underestimating, if decided I've not a single idea why waste the time when I can be accomplishing much more.
But point taken, some may be undecided, I figured very few here, I may have been underestimating, if decided I've not a single idea why waste the time when I can be accomplishing much more.
Kinda like the moon landing.
There's a small chance Hillary could have an epic meltdown live on National TV. Some of us have been waiting 25+ years for the Clintons to fail. Would be a historic moment, would hate to miss it...
ILLary can blather two minutes about anything, especially since she's been fed the questions in advance.
DT will provide the usual short, to-the-point answer in well under 2 minutes, which will allow the POS moderator to try and screw with DT for the remaining time.
Three New York surgeons were playing golf together and discussing surgeries they had performed.
One of them said, 'I'm the best surgeon in the state. In my favorite case, a concert pianist lost seven fingers in an accident . I re-attached them, and 8 months later he performed a private concert for the Queen of England'.
The second surgeon said. 'That's nothing. A young man lost an arm and both legs in an accident; I re-attached them, and 2 years later he won a gold medal in track and field events in the Olympics.
The third surgeon said, 'You guys are amateurs. Several years ago a woman was high on cocaine and marijuana and she rode a horse head-on into a train, traveling 80 miles an hour. All I had left to work with was the woman's blonde hair and the horse's ass. I was able to put them together and now she's running for president of the USA.
Why is Hitlerys face more magnified than Trumps when they are seen together? Is she closer to the camera? Whats the slirping sound being made when Trump inhales after a sentence?
First lie of the night, Lester Holt on how good the economy has been the last 6 1\2 years.
Yep. You are EXACTLY right, Mike! I caught that right away, too, buddy!
If you don't think that the Questions are designed to give Hillary an edge, you got to be a fricken vegatable. What a Fuggin sham as an excuse for a fair "moderator".
There are so many good pro gun arguments. I hope he can at least come up with one of them. Just discuss the difference in violent crime between heavy gun control places versus pro-gun places.
If you understand what she's saying in between the lines you hear "communism, loss of rights, govt intrusion, govt. mandates, higher taxes, lower incentives, etc"
Watching the debate on NBC and for some reason Hillary's split screen side looks like it has sharper contrast and is better lit than Trump's side. It's slight but still enough to draw attention to her side of the screen.
The blue color in the background appears to be a little 'bluer' on Hillary's side than it is on Trump's side too.
Goin like it would most always go, when ILLary was fed the questions in advance, and the moderator interrupts her to point out that she missed a statement she was supposed to make.
Watching the debate on NBC and for some reason Hillary's split screen side looks like it has sharper contrast and is better lit than Trump's side. It's slight but still enough to draw attention to her side of the screen.
Well, maybe it has something to with the fact she's wearing a flaming RED dress and he's wearing a black suit. Also his orange make-up is showing up about the same color as Lester.
So why the [bleep] are you whining pussies hyperventilating because a career politician is more polished than a non politician at an exclusively political activity? This entire election is about the rejection of politics as usual.
And besides, the questions were ridiculous. "Mr. Trump...you once ate a puppy on live TV. How do you think Mrs. Clinton feels about that despicable act?
That and cyber security with her personal server and leaked classified information - the two biggest he failed to capitalize on
Plus him not paying taxes - not contributing to schools, military, etc... why not respond with all the jobs he's created contributing? That's putting money in pockets, that's creating taxes being paid. That's contributing more than just one person's income tax could possibly create.
Gentlemen, it's hard to win when the opponent has all the cards before you play the game. Being put of the defensive doesn't help getting your point across either. The powers that be want Clinton to win.
So why the [bleep] are you whining pussies hyperventilating because a career politician is more polished than a non politician at an exclusively political activity? This entire election is about the rejection of politics as usual.
And besides, the questions were ridiculous. "Mr. Trump...you once ate a puppy on live TV. How do you think Mrs. Clinton feels about that despicable act?
Finished all my hyperventilating months ago. This is your show now.
Be interesting to see what happens with the polls.
So why the [bleep] are you whining pussies hyperventilating because a career politician is more polished than a non politician at an exclusively political activity? This entire election is about the rejection of politics as usual.
And besides, the questions were ridiculous. "Mr. Trump...you once ate a puppy on live TV. How do you think Mrs. Clinton feels about that despicable act?
Shoot, I though he did pretty good for his first time debating somebody that wasn't on his team or that he couldn't fire.
So why the [bleep] are you whining pussies hyperventilating because a career politician is more polished than a non politician at an exclusively political activity? This entire election is about the rejection of politics as usual.
And besides, the questions were ridiculous. "Mr. Trump...you once ate a puppy on live TV. How do you think Mrs. Clinton feels about that despicable act?
You make a good point. Brings me off the brink. Keep talking.
From what I see she has proven herself as a career establishment politician. Trump is just a common man. He shouldn't be beating her in a debate, she's been doing this all her life. He's being himself and that's what's gotten him this far. I predict he will gain in the polls.
Gentlemen, it's hard to win when the opponent has all the cards before you play the game. Being put of the defensive doesn't help getting your point across either. The powers that be want Clinton to win.
From what I see she has proven herself as a career establishment politician. Trump is just a common man. He shouldn't be beating her in a debate, she's been doing this all her life. He's being himself and that's what's gotten him this far. I predict he will gain in the polls.
Hope you are correct. I think Clinton will see an upward bounce, but not out of reach by any means.
Of course, he did. He isn't a lawyer. Quit the damned hand wringing. Debates mean nothing. Everyone knows that every word out of a politician's mouth is a lie.
Romney, by general acclamation kicked the schit out of Obama in their first debate. How did that work out?
Trump needs to come into the next debate wearing jeans and a "deplorables" t-shirt. Prove he's one of the people. Throw in a pair of converse all-stars and win over the hipsters, no holds barred attacks on her past and how much worse off we are after her as sec of state and obama.
He loses when he's on defense, due to the MSM. I think Bannon and Conway have their work cut out for them. Attack attack attack on her record!
However, I don't think the MSM will view this as biased against Clinton like the Commander-in-Chief Forum.
It went down about like I thought it would go down. Clinton wins. I was hoping she'd pass out or for a coughing fit. The media will be 'fact-checking' everything to kingdom come tomorrow. I don't think it's too late to sway most of the independents yet. Trump hasn't started ad campaigns in earnest.
Even the MSM says the polls are close. Be interesting to see the polls in a week, for whatever they're worth (wiping arse)
The dude inherited $220 million dollars. He's not a "common man". I'm sorry, but he needs to stop saying "My Dad gave me a tiny loan." ($14 Million dollars). I'll have to vote for him but that can't go over well with the majority of people.
The dude inherited $220 million dollars. He's not a "common man". I'm sorry, but he needs to stop saying "My Dad gave me a tiny loan." ($14 Million dollars). I'll have to vote for him but that can't go over well with the majority of people.
I guess I watched the wrong debate. Trump didn't blow her out if the water but it wasn't a train wreck for him either. I thought he had a few really good moments. I guess I'm biased as I don't think she deserves to be anywhere near that stage. She is a complete piece of garbage.
The dude inherited $220 million dollars. He's not a "common man". I'm sorry, but he needs to stop saying "My Dad gave me a tiny loan." ($14 Million dollars). I'll have to vote for him but that can't go over well with the majority of people.
The only saving grace is that I don't think the majority of people can stand the evil b-I-t-c-h either.
I guess I watched the wrong debate. Trump didn't blow her out if the water but it wasn't a train wreck for him either. I thought he had a few really good moments. I guess I'm biased as I don't think she deserves to be anywhere near that stage. She is a complete piece of garbage.
The dude inherited $220 million dollars. He's not a "common man". I'm sorry, but he needs to stop saying "My Dad gave me a tiny loan." ($14 Million dollars). I'll have to vote for him but that can't go over well with the majority of people.
The only saving grace is that I don't the the majority of people can stand that evil b-I-t-c-h either.
I predict the next debate will be no holds barred for Trump. He will learn from his mistakes, and roast her ass next go round. The gloves are off, now!
Besides, she came off as an evil bitch as usual, with the looks she kept giving Trump, and her condescending manner.
I guess I watched the wrong debate. Trump didn't blow her out if the water but it wasn't a train wreck for him either.
Agree completely. He made the point that if you want more of the same vote for her.....many times. I can't see how he hurt himself. Some people indeed watched a different debate as far as I am concerned.
Trump got questioned on his tax returns, Rosie Odonnell, and Birthergate to name a few. Not one question about Benghazi, email scandal, DNC scandal, health and on and on.
Trump was Trump. Hillary was a slimey condescending politician. It was more or less a draw.
Maybe I was expecting too much for this first debate from Trump, an outright win. But he didn't win in my opinion. There was a lot he messed up on and many missed opportunities.
I can say that I feel a lot like I did about his performance in the primary debates where he looked outclassed. And to my surprise he kept rising in the polls. It wouldn't shock me if that continued to be the case.
There are also two more debates and I think Hillary will be very confident going into them. I also think Trump will come in much better prepared and focused.
The dude inherited $220 million dollars. He's not a "common man". I'm sorry, but he needs to stop saying "My Dad gave me a tiny loan." ($14 Million dollars). I'll have to vote for him but that can't go over well with the majority of people.
Lt.: I think I've made it pretty clear here on the 'fire (and so have you) that Trump was far from our first choice. But things are getting close, and the battleground states are tightening up. He has a chance at this. I have no idea what he'll do in the white house, but I know damn well what that lying corporate whore will do. If he turns flaming liberal, we can say told you so. If he's the second coming of Reagan I'll admit I [bleep] up. If he was trailing by 30 or 40% I'd still be whining, but he isn't. I think the conservatives would have been doing better at this point, but they're not in it. Just ignore his flaws for now. He's the best it's going to get from here on.
Maybe I was expecting too much for this first debate from Trump, an outright win. But he didn't win in my opinion. There was a lot he messed up on and many missed opportunities.
I can say that I feel a lot like I did about his performance in the primary debates where he looked outclassed. And to my surprise he kept rising in the polls. It wouldn't shock me if that continued to be the case.
There are also two more debates and I think Hillary will be very confident going into them. I also think Trump will come in much better prepared and focused.
We will see, but it ain't over by a long shot.
You may be right. This is the first time he's ever disagreed with the other side, so we don't know what's gonna happen.
I guess I watched the wrong debate. Trump didn't blow her out if the water but it wasn't a train wreck for him either.
Agree completely. He made the point that if you want more of the same vote for her.....many times. I can't see how he hurt himself. Some people indeed watched a different debate as far as I am concerned.
You know I agree with this, my negative comments about the debate have not so much to do with content as the image, and unfortunately many vote on appearance rather than content!!!!
The most disappointing part of the debate was when Trump didn't totally hammer her as she was talking about cyber security.
"America would have much less problems with its cyber security if the Secretary of State wouldn't have kept an illegal, insecure server which contained top secret material at her home."
That's all it would have taken. He should have hit that out of the park.
Trump is beating Hillary in a Bing poll and tied with her in a Time poll as to who won the debate. Those aren't exactly Breitbart.
There were no bombs dropped tonight. No huge gotcha moments. Every dart Hillary has on Trump, she threw at him with the help of Lester Holt and she didn't knock him out.
The most disappointing part of the debate was when Trump didn't totally hammer her as she was talking about cyber security.
"America would have much less problems with its cyber security if the Secretary of State wouldn't have kept an illegal, insecure server which contained top secret material at her home."
That's all it would have taken. He should have hit that out of the park.
He was too far gone by then, which is his biggest fault.
He can't let go with any of last 3 or 4 things that pizzed him off and move onto the current topic.
Yikes. I got home in time to see the last 5 minutes. I expected the post media coverage to skewer Trump, but when the best the Campfire can say is, "he didn't hurt himself"' and "he did fine", it had to be bad.
I blame Bob. The fugger could ruin a wet dream if he bet on it. Lol.
Trump didn't do as bad as I feared or as well as I hoped.
He needs gains among college educated white males and women across the board. Can't see that this debate was likely to persuade either group, but just showing up as the "Change Candidate" will keep him from tanking in the polls I think.
Maybe the college educated are at least as smart as me and understand that NYC businessmen don't talk like regular people so you can't expect complete sentences.
Trump is beating Hillary in a Bing poll and tied with her in a Time poll as to who won the debate. Those aren't exactly Breitbart.
There were no bombs dropped tonight. No huge gotcha moments. Every dart Hillary has on Trump, she threw at him with the help of Lester Holt and she didn't knock him out.
Any online poll means squat, or Ron Paul would have won the last 15 elections by 95% each time.
Gotta wait to see what happens to the polls over the next couple of weeks, and even then the polls this time around may not mean squat.
Trump is beating Hillary in a Bing poll and tied with her in a Time poll as to who won the debate. Those aren't exactly Breitbart.
There were no bombs dropped tonight. No huge gotcha moments. Every dart Hillary has on Trump, she threw at him with the help of Lester Holt and she didn't knock him out.
Any online poll means squat, or Ron Paul would have won the last 15 elections by 95% each time.
Gotta wait to see what happens to the polls over the next couple of weeks, and even then the polls this time around may not mean squat.
42 days until we find out what happens.
And exactly how much have you been right about this election cycle?
In all fairness to Trump, he had to debate the Witch AND Lester! Plus almost every question was directed at Trump's past. So much for a Fair & Balanced Debate. He could have done a lot worse, IMO.
I predict that the next two debates will have much different outcomes. Time will tell, but I still think he has a good shot at beating the bitch.
Her facial expressions, plus her eyes blinking 90 miles per hour speak volumes. Any idiot can see that she is on the ropes. Bet Trump gets a surge in the polls tomorrow just from her asinine facial expressions, and condescending manner, alone!
No egg I'd go mustard. With a fried egg likely mayo.
Definitely soft white bread. In the South it would be Bunny Bread.
Either way Dukes mayo for sure!!
BTW there's a deli here in town that serves up a to die for 20 layer non-fried bologna sandwich. Bores Head Bologna sliced wafer thin on white bread. LTM. Dang good sandwich.
The most disappointing part of the debate was when Trump didn't totally hammer her as she was talking about cyber security.
"America would have much less problems with its cyber security if the Secretary of State wouldn't have kept an illegal, insecure server which contained top secret material at her home."
That's all it would have taken. He should have hit that out of the park.
He was too far gone by then, which is his biggest fault.
He can't let go with any of last 3 or 4 things that pizzed him off and move onto the current topic.
Fair to say that Trump has under preformed tonight? Maybe a little prep might have helped him look more informed and somewhat interested in international issues.
Don't worry guys he can't do any worse .....can he?😂
In all fairness to Trump, he had to debate the Witch AND Lester! Plus almost every question was directed at Trump's past. So much for a Fair & Balanced Debate. He could have done a lot worse, IMO.
I predict that the next two debates will have much different outcomes. Time will tell, but I still think he has a good shot at beating the bitch.
Her facial expressions, plus her eyes blinking 90 miles per hour speak volumes. Any idiot can see that she is on the ropes. Bet Trump gets a surge in the polls tomorrow just from her asinine facial expressions, and condescending manner, alone!
True,he debated both of them ! Apparently Fester either got Threatened or paid off or both. The Clintons have deep pockets and are feared as well.
No egg I'd go mustard. With a fried egg likely mayo.
Definitely soft white bread. In the South it would be Bunny Bread.
Either way Dukes mayo for sure!!
BTW there's a deli here in town that serves up a to die for 20 layer non-fried bologna sandwich. Bores Head Bologna sliced wafer thin on white bread. LTM. Dang good sandwich.
Fair to say that Trump has under preformed tonight? Maybe a little prep might have helped him look more informed and somewhat interested in international issues.
Don't worry guys he can't do any worse .....can he?😂
You read the Alaska hunting Regs for unit 26?? As usual we're putting out some bogus information again like a good democrat
You read the Alaska hunting Regs for unit 26?? As usual we're putting out some bogus information again like a good democrat
Unit 26? I could look it up for you but off the top of my head I don't know....I work out of unit 23 and 25A. GMU 23 is by draw only with 5 sub-units and 25 is over the counter for 4 brown tines-50 + inches.Does that help any?
The most disappointing part of the debate was when Trump didn't totally hammer her as she was talking about cyber security.
"America would have much less problems with its cyber security if the Secretary of State wouldn't have kept an illegal, insecure server which contained top secret material at her home."
That's all it would have taken. He should have hit that out of the park.
Watching the debate on NBC and for some reason Hillary's split screen side looks like it has sharper contrast and is better lit than Trump's side. It's slight but still enough to draw attention to her side of the screen.
The blue color in the background appears to be a little 'bluer' on Hillary's side than it is on Trump's side too.
Looking back at some YouTube videos of last night's debate it still looks to me like Hillary's side of the split screen in NBC's broadcast was 'tweeked' in her favor.
Looking back at some YouTube videos of last night's debate it still looks to me like Hillary's side of the split screen in NBC's broadcast was 'tweeked' in her favor.
Trump would do better to hold his own in the debates and start encouraging people who support him to get out and actually vote. With excitement lower on her side and the fact that most have made up their mind it goingbto be about turn out. Since most of the independents who would support Trump probably actually work they arent lookng forward to standing in line for two hours to vote. Like most of you I would like to see him wipe the floor with her azz but Im not sure that would win him any new vote. This one is about who shows up. I will be filling out my ballot today and voting early.
Trump got questioned on his tax returns, Rosie Odonnell, and Birthergate to name a few. Not one question about Benghazi, email scandal, DNC scandal, health and on and on.
Trump was Trump. Hillary was a slimey condescending politician. It was more or less a draw.
Trump should have brushed those questions aside with a couple of dismissive words, then used his time to make a point of his choice against Hillary or in favor of himself.
The most disappointing part of the debate was when Trump didn't totally hammer her as she was talking about cyber security.
"America would have much less problems with its cyber security if the Secretary of State wouldn't have kept an illegal, insecure server which contained top secret material at her home."
That's all it would have taken. He should have hit that out of the park.
It is a knee-jerk reaction to blame Trump for not slamming Clinton on e mails, Benghazi, sniper fire in Bosnia, etc.... .
For the few but important voters who might be swayed by debates, and to use an NFL analogy, this is the preseason. You don't play your starters and show your best plays when it doesn't count.
And.... Trump is rising in the polls by running against Obama, so why change a winning strategy?
Many sites are calling it a draw. Trump is in new territory again. He will do well in the next debate. On the other side of the coin, Clinton should have been able to put him away and she couldn't. For everybody who posts about all Trump's missed opportunities; suit up, you try it. It ain't easy going against the machine
And.... Trump is rising in the polls by running against Obama, so why change a winning strategy?
Obama described Hillary as a continuation of his legacy. That means Trumps tactic of running against Obama gains legitimacy, since Hillary never distanced herself from that comment.
You read the Alaska hunting Regs for unit 26?? As usual we're putting out some bogus information again like a good democrat
Unit 26? I could look it up for you but off the top of my head I don't know....I work out of unit 23 and 25A. GMU 23 is by draw only with 5 sub-units and 25 is over the counter for 4 brown tines-50 + inches.Does that help any?
Look Hillary doesn't have the blue print to beat Trump. Hillary was more prepared and more polished. But true to form she was robotic, condescending, and smug. Exactly all the reasons people hate her. Her camp has to be amazingly frustrated in that they can't land a knockout punch on the guy.
The only way Hillary can beat Trump is to become a different person. If that had been the exact same debate with the exact same responses but with Obama or Bill against Romney, they would be shoveling dirt on the Republican's grave this morning. But it wasn't.
Hillary is a caricature of everything everyone hates about politicians. She is what you would get if an evil space alien watched forty years of American politics with no real understanding of people and then came out and tried to imitate what it had seen. Against that Trump is the perfect foil because whatever you think about him, he comes across as genuine.
"I have 8 groups going out this week and next into the Eastern Brooks Range with Bushwacker Air. This is out first year working out there after 17 years working in unit 23. Fingers are crossed for these guys. I am always nervous for my groups when we expand into a new area. Whats nice is Unit 26 allows 2 bulls and an over the counter moose-50+ or 4 brow tines.
I heard today on one of the news stations, the talking heads were giving credence to the Clinton team's rumor that Trump might not show up to the next 2 debates.
We know all know that's false and he'll show up, but I admire the Hutzpah ol' Bill has for being a weasel, he's a master at stirring things up...
Can you imagine Trump flipping on the news this morning and being informed he might not attend the next debates because he got whooped.. He might have dropped a cuss word or two..
"I have 8 groups going out this week and next into the Eastern Brooks Range with Bushwacker Air. This is out first year working out there after 17 years working in unit 23. Fingers are crossed for these guys. I am always nervous for my groups when we expand into a new area. Whats nice is Unit 26 allows 2 bulls and an over the counter moose-50+ or 4 brow tines.
Did you see any moose?
Walt"
Of course he doesn't he's now singing a different tune saying he's in unit 25A now.
You read the Alaska hunting Regs for unit 26?? As usual we're putting out some bogus information again like a good democrat
Unit 26? I could look it up for you but off the top of my head I don't know....I work out of unit 23 and 25A. GMU 23 is by draw only with 5 sub-units and 25 is over the counter for 4 brown tines-50 + inches.Does that help any?
"I have 8 groups going out this week and next into the Eastern Brooks Range with Bushwacker Air. This is out first year working out there after 17 years working in unit 23. Fingers are crossed for these guys. I am always nervous for my groups when we expand into a new area. Whats nice is Unit 26 allows 2 bulls and an over the counter moose-50+ or 4 brow tines.