Home
Posted By: 4ager Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Yes, picks. Today, he will announce his first for the vacant seat once held by Scalia.

Within the next four years, he is likely to get at least one more and perhaps three more. Kennedy is 80 and has expressed an interest in retirement. Ginsburg will be 84 in weeks and her health is horrible. Breyer is 78.

Those are the most likely, though Roberts has heart issues and is 62. Thomas is not a picture of health at all and will be 69 in June. Alito is 67.

If Trump is re-elected in 2020, he could quite conceivable replace all seven of those Justices before the end of a second term (that would put Roberts at 69, Alito at 74, Thomas at 76, Breyer at 85, Kennedy at 87, and Ginsburg at 91; assuming each would be replaced the last year of his second term).

Expect the Senate GOPe to do everything possible to prevent Trump's picks from actually being confirmed, if they are strict Constitutionalists.
Posted By: MagMarc Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
I'm looking forward to the announcement tonight. I would love to see a court full of Scalias before Trump is done!
Posted By: 4ager Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
I'd far rather a SCOTUS full of Thomas'. Scalia was just as likely to legislate from the bench as O'Connor, and he was quite happy with a powerful central government. Thomas is a strict Constitutionalist and a solid advocate for small government starting his opinions from the Constitution.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by 4ager
Yes, picks. Today, he will announce his first for the vacant seat once held by Scalia.

Within the next four years, he is likely to get at least one more and perhaps three more. Kennedy is 80 and has expressed an interest in retirement. Ginsburg will be 84 in weeks and her health is horrible. Breyer is 78.

Those are the most likely, though Roberts has heart issues and is 62. Thomas is not a picture of health at all and will be 69 in June. Alito is 67.

If Trump is re-elected in 2020, he could quite conceivable replace all seven of those Justices before the end of a second term (that would put Roberts at 69, Alito at 74, Thomas at 76, Breyer at 85, Kennedy at 87, and Ginsburg at 91; assuming each would be replaced the last year of his second term).

Expect the Senate GOPe to do everything possible to prevent Trump's picks from actually being confirmed, if they are strict Constitutionalists.


This is exactly what I expect.

Many believe that McConnell will get the rules changed and use the Nuclear Option to confirm President Trump's Supreme Court nominee. IMO there is zero chance of this happening.

...but if I am wrong, and he does go Nuclear, I am thoroughly convinced that the so called Republicans in the Senate will not vote to confirm any of Trumps nominees. Hell the (R) are blocking his cabinet picks, who in their right mind thinks they are going to confirm the SC Justice, the most important position facing America today and for decades to come.

The Republicans in the Senate are the TRUE Obstructionists.
Posted By: 30338 Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Suffice to say they will be significantly different than Hitlary's picks.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by 30338
Suffice to say they will be significantly different than Hitlary's picks.


Hillary's picks woukld have sailed through the confirmation process. McConnell would have made sure of that.

President Trump's will go nowhere.
Posted By: jwp475 Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by 30338
Suffice to say they will be significantly different than Hitlary's picks.


Hillary's picks woukld have sailed through the confirmation process. McConnell would have made sure of that.

President Trump's will go nowhere.


There will be opposition, no doubt but make no mistake Trump's pick will go through.
Posted By: rockinbbar Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by 4ager
I'd far rather a SCOTUS full of Thomas'. Scalia was just as likely to legislate from the bench as O'Connor, and he was quite happy with a powerful central government. Thomas is a strict Constitutionalist and a solid advocate for small government starting his opinions from the Constitution.


Agreed.

SC Justices should only have ONE agenda.

The Constitution.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by 30338
Suffice to say they will be significantly different than Hitlary's picks.


Hillary's picks woukld have sailed through the confirmation process. McConnell would have made sure of that.

President Trump's will go nowhere.


There will be opposition, no doubt but make no mistake Trump's pick will go through.


Really?

McConnell won't even get Sessions through, no way a SC Justice will be confirmed anytime soon.
Posted By: hanco Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
We will see
Posted By: PrimeBeef Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by 30338
Suffice to say they will be significantly different than Hitlary's picks.


Hillary's picks woukld have sailed through the confirmation process. McConnell would have made sure of that.

President Trump's will go nowhere.


There will be opposition, no doubt but make no mistake Trump's pick will go through.


Really?

McConnell won't even get Sessions through, no way a SC Justice will be confirmed anytime soon.


You're a real ray of sunshine. Let's hope you're wrong.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by PrimeBeef
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by 30338
Suffice to say they will be significantly different than Hitlary's picks.


Hillary's picks woukld have sailed through the confirmation process. McConnell would have made sure of that.

President Trump's will go nowhere.


There will be opposition, no doubt but make no mistake Trump's pick will go through.


Really?

McConnell won't even get Sessions through, no way a SC Justice will be confirmed anytime soon.


You're a real ray of sunshine. Let's hope you're wrong.


I Pray that I am wrong.
Posted By: dvdegeorge Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Trump aint play'in the same old game...he's kicking azz and taking names...and then letting everyone know who isn't really trying to make America great again
He will get what he wants or someone will pay as we saw yesterday

We have a do'er not a talker as POTUS
Posted By: Calhoun Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Dems appear to have somebody bright enough to realize what a filibuster of all initial Trump nominees would mean. Seems they are looking for a way to back out of their public stance and prevent the nuclear option from going into play.

http://hotair.com/archives/2017/01/31/that-automatic-dem-scotus-filibuster-might-be-cancelled/

Quote
[A]ccording to CNN, Democrats discussed during a private retreat in West Virginia last week that blocking Trump’s Supreme Court nominee — who would replace the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia — is potentially unwise and it would be better if they saved their big battle over the Supreme Court for when the seat of a more left-leaning justice opens up.

Democrats may be looking at others on the court like liberal justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 83, or Stephen Breyer, 78, when it comes to their next fight. Additionally, Justice Anthony Kennedy, often the swing vote on the court, is 80. If Republicans do away with the filibuster and one of the older justices’ seats become available, it could change the makeup of the court for a long time.

Joe Manchin, Bill Nelson, Chris Coons and some other Democrats only speaking off the record were unwilling to back a filibuster. They might vote against the nominee, but they weren’t backing Jeff Merkley’s play. And let’s keep in mind that these aren’t even the vulnerable, red state Democratic Senators who will be feeling the most heat. As Allahpundit mentioned, those are the folks who are already drawing some heat (and probably opposition fundraising) before they’ve even been coaxed out of their corners to take a position.

As I write this, the Senate Leadership Fund is beaming out one press release after another wondering if red-state Democrats whose seats are up in 2018 — Manchin, Heitkamp, Donnelly, etc — are onnboard with Merkley. I sure hope so! I’ve always thought Gorsuch would be preferable to Hardiman because he’s more of a known quantity ideologically. Put him on the bench and you know you’re getting a conservative; put Hardiman on the bench and you’re probably getting a conservative. If Trump was about to bypass Gorsuch for fear that he’d be filibustered, well, there’s no reason to fear that now. Pull the trigger.

The cooler heads among the Democrats seem to be viewing this in a way which best serves their caucus. There’s nothing stopping them from having a long, drawn out confirmation hearing for Trump’s pick and raise all sorts of complaints and then allow it to proceed to a vote where they can all mark down a “No” on their resume. Keep in mind, the person being replaced by Trump’s nominee was one of the biggest conservative lightning rods in the modern history of the court. No matter who takes that seat, it’s not going to push the court any further to the Right than it already was.

On the other hand, should one of the liberal seats (or Kennedy’s) come open in the next four years it would be a massive change in the game. If they’re going to try for a filibuster then, at least they’d have the proper approval of this pick to point to as an example of being “reasonable” and showing some respect to the Oval Office. If they go to the wall on this one and the GOP pulls the trigger on the nuclear option, Trump could nominate Sarah Palin for a potential second opening and they’d have nothing left in the tool kit to stop him.
Posted By: Tracks Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Votes have a dollar value, and most are for sale right now.
Posted By: DakotaDeer Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
The 2018 midterms tip the Senate past the "balancing" point, or else much of this is about nothing. The leftist Dems and RINOs in the Senate can play around ad nauseum for as long as they want currently.

That needs to change in 2018. It would be nice if the RINOs got voted out.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer
The 2018 midterms tip the Senate past the "balancing" point, or else much of this is about nothing. The leftist Dems and RINOs in the Senate can play around ad nauseum for as long as they want currently.

That needs to change in 2018. It would be nice if the RINOs got voted out.


Voted out and replaced with what?

They will all survive and "primary" election challenge, Think RINO Ryan, their replacement will be a democrat and certainly not a Conservative.

We are stuck with them until they retire or are replaced with Democrats.
Posted By: DakotaDeer Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Replaced with real conservatives who love America and its Constitution.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer
Replaced with real conservatives who love America and its Constitution.


Nice thought, but how ya gunna do it?

These RINO's are well funded and will never lose a primary, the only election they will lose is the general, and that would be much worse.

Like I said, Think Paul Ryan.

His budget deal and his climbing into bed with Obama should have a sure loser for him in the WI primary, yet he came out with over 60% of the primary vote.

Posted By: byc Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Regardless of who it is the process will likely not be complete for 2-3 months.
Posted By: byc Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by byc
Neil Gorsuch


Bet you my last cold beer!!!
Posted By: jwp475 Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by 30338
Suffice to say they will be significantly different than Hitlary's picks.


Hillary's picks woukld have sailed through the confirmation process. McConnell would have made sure of that.

President Trump's will go nowhere.


There will be opposition, no doubt but make no mistake Trump's pick will go through.


Really?

McConnell won't even get Sessions through, no way a SC Justice will be confirmed anytime soon.


Sessions will be confirmed.
Posted By: byc Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
I agree but when??

GOP cannot hold THEIR vote without having at least 1 Dem in the room and right now they are boycotting the vote.
Posted By: MtnBoomer Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Supposed to go live at 8 Eastern. Maybe elsewhere too. Got email from the really WhiteHouse today.

https://www.facebook.com/WhiteHouse...882/1210633479024383/?type=3&theater
Posted By: Muffin Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/31/politics/gorsuch-supreme-court-hardiman/

'...The two judges who have been considered the top finalists to be President Donald Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court -- Neil Gorsuch and Thomas Hardiman -- are being brought to Washington ahead of tonight's White House announcement, sources tell CNN...'

Is he creating suspense, or....

Can he nominate two and make Congress choose???

If he did we wouldn't be talking about the Immigration EO anymore...........
Posted By: byc Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
That's SCOTUS. Pick at 8PM but that process will take at least 2-3 months. FBI, DOJ, the BAR and all sorts of interviews for that one. Oh yeah and then there's Congress and their games!!

Too bad he cannot appoint all of his top 3 picks.

Sessions vote is delayed because dems are boycotting the vote.
Posted By: chlinstructor Re: Trump's SCOTUS picks - 01/31/17
Originally Posted by dvdegeorge
Trump aint play'in the same old game...he's kicking azz and taking names...and then letting everyone know who isn't really trying to make America great again
He will get what he wants or someone will pay as we saw yesterday

We have a do'er not a talker as POTUS


Yep! Ain't it great! And Libertard heads are exploding every where!!! President Trump will get it done one way or another.
© 24hourcampfire