That map can't be accurate. 100% of the counties in Oklahoma voted for Trump. What is the source of this fake news Syc?

I think that map refers to people of voting age, or registered voters that didn't vote, but it doesn't work that way.

McCain, Cruz Rubio, Jesus nor Bush would have won.

How did it feel supporting and losing with someone worse than nobody?

http://philip-kearney.com/blog/2018/04/20/apathetic-states-of-america/

I believe it compares votes for hillary, votes for donald, and voting age residents who did not vote. In most counties, those who did not vote outnumbered votes for either major party candidate.

Yes, and both parties work very hard to keep "none of the above" off the ballot. They know they stink, they don't want us to rub their noses in it.

I know there are millions of idiot Repukes and Indies that didn’t vote here in KOMMIEFORNIA that why there was such a huge margin for the Bitch.

So what would be the purpose for a map such as this (as far as Oklahoma is concerned) when Mr. Trump won every county in Oklahoma. This appears to be some sort of misinformation to support the Russian collusion argument being used by the fake media and democrats against a duly elected President.

I'd be interested in seeing a similar map for other presidential election to compare. I suspect you'd see huge amounts of black in almost all of them.

There is nothing new about voter apathy, I hear way to much "My vote doesn't matter."

Either: a) most Americans are too lazy to get off their asses and vote, or b) neither party has the integrity or the vision to attract a majority of eligible voters in most counties in America. I don't think the russians had much to do with these numbers. these numbers are pretty consistent across the country. "Nobody" would have got 445 electoral votes. Probably not a very big inauguration crowd though.

Low information (potential) voters are in the majority.

Take a good look at Cali and NY

How many of the non-voters were obsolete registrations that hadn't been purged from the voter roles?

I get it. Makes sense. I don’t think that it’s a fair assessment to say, however, that staying home is just apathy. I think it’s laziness & ignorance, but the point I take away is that the two party system has deflated any kind of enthusiasm for our system of (supposedly) government of the people for the people & by the people.

I’d love to see a space on the ballot that reads “nuke DC & start over” personally.

I suppose that is there was a “none of the above” or “no one” option and obstaining implies that’s where you were, at least we wouldn’t have an executive branch overstepping it’s power every time the legislature failed to act.

Although I’m sure those evil bastards would figure out a way to screw us anyway, hence my desire in the first option.

On another note, I would love to have a 'none of the above' choice on every ballot. There are so many times that I have to hold my nose when I vote. I think we'd be having a lot of special elections if we went to that. I don't know what it would have done in the '16 presidential election. I doubt that 'none' would have pulled any EC votes. 'None' would never win but if it did in a few states, it might throw the election into the house where conservative states would have a large advantage.

More fake news.

What, in California hillary got 5 Million more votes than Trump, including 114% of LA County. This map must be wrong.

You need to holler for mom syc, easy to see you were up all night drunk again, crying, sitting stuck to the floor in a full diaper with chit leaking down both legs, how, how, how did Hillary lose??????? waaaaahhhhhhh! must really suck roaming the www all night in search of possible reasons why.

what is voter turnout in your state, Ricky?

???

Not sure where you get that ?

look at the map. non voters are the majority in almost every state, whether blue or red.

I think most will agree when they vote it is for the lesser of two evils, no matter who they vote for. and a bunch more think it's not even worth it.

Hows that 2 party system working out for ya?

the map says that even more people didn't vote at all.

Some comments in bold for you. If we ever get to a third (or more) party electorate, it will truly be the end of this country as we know it. Hell, we're halfway there.. The good thing about most people not voting is most are unqualified to exercise that responsibility anyway. Own property, pay taxes and pass a simple civics test, then vote, otherwise...

Or could this map be called a "Complacency Map"? As I recall, Hillary supporters thought they had it in the bag. Many were just too busy to actually go out and vote. I remember the joke that Hillary was so far in the lead early on that many Dems just started partying. Then the Repubs got home from work and went to vote.

I would think it is not too different than previous presidential elections.

Hell Jorge, you just like the single party countries!

Then why make it as news?

The cream of the corksuckers crop, but dont leave out the barrios of Houston, El Paso, Santa Fe, etc.

Gutless lying lieberals would call Trump Satan if he walked on water.

Rush was a turd because he hoped Zero would fail in his effort to remake America, but they become apoplectic over their fear Trump will MAGA.

No, it's not much different from previous elections.

But it doesn't mean what it's been cited to mean.

What it really is, is a depiction of the degree of success of demonrat voter fraud.

There is a large percentage of citizens that don;t vote, although it's nowhere as large as it's reported to be.

People respondin to the poll part of the equation, who said they didn't vote, would be surprised to find out that they *did*.

And, they voted demonrat.

People in the politics game, call it the "ground game", or the ability to "get out the vote".

But what it is, is voter fraud. Soros and socialist minions have focused Soros' money on S/S elections for years.

Because the S/S controls the election process, including special elections procedure, and when a particular issue appears on a ballot.

In states where the S/S is a demonrat, voter fraud is a given, and those states are pretty closely reflected in the BS map in the OP.

Here in MOtown, the "ground game" goes like this:

- Workers are paid to collect signatures/addresses of people likely to vote d, statistic-wise.

- "Pollsters" visit those who give the information, with the stated purpose of "polling", but the real purposes are:

To determine if the person is likely to vote; and to obtain a utility bill or other "satisfactory" ID for voting purposes.

Then, the person who isn't going to vote, according to their answers to the "pollster", *is* going to vote.

Buses take certain segments of society, who are given alcohol, cigarettes and cash cards, from poll to poll, where they are handed the utility bills to go in and vote for the people who won't, and vote d.

There are screwups occasionally, and 101% of eligible voters vote, because some who said they wouldn't vote, decided to vote after all.

But nothin's ever done about that anyway.

That's why the fight against voter ID is a fight to the death, for the ds.

Exactly...stupidest thread since PP addled's last.

I don't think too many people realize how many don't vote. So it's new information. (news)