Home
......or maybe it has but I don't see it on the first few pages .

Another nail in the coffin....literally....

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/26/ireland-votes-by-landslide-to-legalise-abortion

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/irelan...-abortion-quiet-revolution-leo-varadkar/
They've just declared a pretty low value on their own lives as humans, haven't they? There will be a price and they will pay it.
Some of the stories are spinning this as a rejection of catholicism
Mark, those we my immediate thoughts also.

Hundreds of years of being oppressed. Now with a little "freedom" they've voted themselves into who knows what.
The results of this vote are pretty close to what would happen if a similar referendum was held in the U.S.
That country started going downhill when they joined the EU. They got more "stuff" and money, but lost their identity.
Yup we Western nations like to think of ourselves as more....”Civilized”

In the end we’re all savages.
I think somebody had prophecies written about this a few thousand years ago. Prolly just a lucky guess.
I wonder if the Pope will announce that abortion is now OK in the Catholic religion, Seems to be his MO.
Anything the pope says is the very word of God, right? I don't see why they don't just go back to selling indulgences though. That must be very lucrative.

Yes, I am joking. Wait, no...I am NOT really.
I saw huge groups of women cheering and dancing around when they heard the vote...

Wow, this world is really fugged up.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
The results of this vote are pretty close to what would happen if a similar referendum was held in the U.S.



Yes, as He said, good will become evil and evil good. Pretty succinctly said and evidently another lucky guess by a bunch of sheep herders.
They also voted to legalize gay marriage too. Liberalism is a destructive virus that spreading across the globe faster than Islam.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
The results of this vote are pretty close to what would happen if a similar referendum was held in the U.S.




I take no delight in the spread of evil.
Fulfilment of the prophecies.
Originally Posted by 45_100
Some of the stories are spinning this as a rejection of catholicism


Church attendance has had a huge decline in Ireland over the last 25 years or so, the youth are mostly agnostic. Ireland used to be more staunchly catholic than other European countries but not any more. Churches are mostly just tourist attractions in Europe now.
Do not worry. The Muslims will not be aborting. They will breed like dogs. Packs of vicious dogs. Everything will be fine.
Opened Satin's door..
The left and the atheists........one and the same........have succeeded in what they set out to do........destroy Christianity. I hate to say it, but in a few generations religion as we have known it, will no longer be. They have indoctrinated our young people into believing that church is a place they don't need to go, and that the Bible is outdated.

That "outdated" Bible prophecied this, by the way. God help us.
Originally Posted by JamesJr


God help us.


Asking for the good Lord's help is probably a good start. Seems like many won't.
Originally Posted by JamesJr
The left and the atheists........one and the same.


Not true.

There are way more atheist on this site than you suspect. I'm just more vocal than most.
So women celebrate the fact that they can now kill the human they created because they were not using readily available birth control or self-control?

Ridiculous.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by JamesJr
The left and the atheists........one and the same.


Not true.

There are way more atheist on this site than you suspect. I'm just more vocal than most.

Exactly right.
DD that's pretty much it.
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer
So women celebrate the fact that they can now kill the human they created because they were not using readily available birth control or self-control?

Ridiculous.



So unwanted kids and single mothers living off the state is a good thing?
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer
So women celebrate the fact that they can now kill the human they created because they were not using readily available birth control or self-control?

Ridiculous.



So unwanted kids and single mothers living off the state is a good thing?


What makes you think that the "single mothers living off the state" don't want their kids? They view them as annuities. There has been plenty of that going on the U.S. since 1973 when Roe passed. If anything, legalized abortion and easily obtainable birth control should be an argument for Uncle Sam getting out of the daddy business.
there's 7.62 billion people populating the earth, give or take one or two.

at some point, total population (human type) and total consumption will force it's way upon the table.

i don't know if birth control in it's various forms is a good thing or bad thing, but maybe it's needed, or not?

when deer, hogs, and other wildlife over=populates it can become a worrisome issue.

humans might not be in that category at all. maybe there's an exemption?
Abortion is a deeply personal <flawed> decision and one that impacts 2 lives, 1 more so than the other. I'm personally against abortion and always have been but I'm also pro-freedom and decisively anti-government, especially as it regards personal choice.

Anyone that has an abortion or aids in abortion will answer to God after the final curtain call and they alone will suffer the consequences of their "choice". While I detest the murder of innocent babies I'm not sure that the alternative is much better, for the individual and for society in general. The statistics and facts about abortion indicate that a large percentage of those making that dreadful choice are already a drain on our welfare system and blacks are more inclined to abort their babies than whites. The poor are more inclined to abort than are the middle or upper class.

While abortion is detestable and unarguably a sin I can't help but wonder what impact millions of unwanted and poor children would have on this nation? Abuse and neglect are no way for a child to grow up and the legacy of a lifetime of abuse and neglect is likely to have far reaching consequences long after that unwanted child is incarcerated.
Just another sign of the collapse of Roman Catholic values. It took longer in strongly Catholic societies, i.e., you had to wait till the pre-Vatican II Catholics mostly died off. Vatican II constituted the official surrender of the Catholic Church to the coup that had been seeking its overthrow for a few centuries.

Something else replaced it, calling itself by the same name, but it was in fact a changeling institution, which essentially promoted the opposite of what the Catholic Church promoted. But many Catholics themselves simply ignored the values that the changeling Church was promoting. Since the newer generations were receiving their values from the changeling institution, however, they eventually became the majority of Catholics, and the changeling values became the values within what had been strongly Catholic nations. That's where we are, at this time in history, in Ireland. It was only a matter of time.
Originally Posted by RJY66
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer
So women celebrate the fact that they can now kill the human they created because they were not using readily available birth control or self-control?

Ridiculous.



So unwanted kids and single mothers living off the state is a good thing?


What makes you think that the "single mothers living off the state" don't want their kids? They view them as annuities. There has been plenty of that going on the U.S. since 1973 when Roe passed. If anything, legalized abortion and easily obtainable birth control should be an argument for Uncle Sam getting out of the daddy business.


Exactly. The kids of single mothers living off the state aren't unwanted and aren't the ones gettting aborted, they bring in too much money. The ones getting aborted are the kids of the middle class that would be too much of an inconvenience to the mother's busy life. Kids are paycheck generators to the lower classes, that's the reason you'll see a welfare mother with seven kids like stair steps but are hard pressed to find a professional woman in her 30's that has more than one kid.
Folks want to do as they please, no surprise
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer
So women celebrate the fact that they can now kill the human they created because they were not using readily available birth control or self-control?

Ridiculous.



So unwanted kids and single mothers living off the state is a good thing?


Of course not. Red herring. You're better than that.

I mean, we could just sanction murder of anyone we don't want/like/find value in. Maybe put them to good use too, like dog food or lamp shades, a la Swift.
Originally Posted by RJY66
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer
So women celebrate the fact that they can now kill the human they created because they were not using readily available birth control or self-control?

Ridiculous.



So unwanted kids and single mothers living off the state is a good thing?


What makes you think that the "single mothers living off the state" don't want their kids? They view them as annuities. There has been plenty of that going on the U.S. since 1973 when Roe passed. If anything, legalized abortion and easily obtainable birth control should be an argument for Uncle Sam getting out of the daddy business.


If an abortion is performed, it's a pretty clear sign the pregnancy was undesired. As for your argument against government subsidies, well, I'm almost always for a decent argument against more government.
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer
So women celebrate the fact that they can now kill the human they created because they were not using readily available birth control or self-control?

Ridiculous.



So unwanted kids and single mothers living off the state is a good thing?


Of course not. Red herring. You're better than that.

I mean, we could just sanction murder of anyone we don't want/like/find value in. Maybe put them to good use too, like dog food or lamp shades, a la Swift.



I'm suggestion you spend sometime time educating yourself of the consequences of what you propose.

This experiment's already been run, and the results were not good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgZJ-IV8Et0

I didn't read either link, but I often wonder if there were no abortions at all, could we really afford that many more welfare mouths to feed, that many more jails to build etc....

And no I'm not really for it, but IMHO its like any other "sin". Its between you and god
Originally Posted by Crow hunter
Originally Posted by RJY66
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer
So women celebrate the fact that they can now kill the human they created because they were not using readily available birth control or self-control?

Ridiculous.



So unwanted kids and single mothers living off the state is a good thing?


What makes you think that the "single mothers living off the state" don't want their kids? They view them as annuities. There has been plenty of that going on the U.S. since 1973 when Roe passed. If anything, legalized abortion and easily obtainable birth control should be an argument for Uncle Sam getting out of the daddy business.


Exactly. The kids of single mothers living off the state aren't unwanted and aren't the ones gettting aborted, they bring in too much money. The ones getting aborted are the kids of the middle class that would be too much of an inconvenience to the mother's busy life. Kids are paycheck generators to the lower classes, that's the reason you'll see a welfare mother with seven kids like stair steps but are hard pressed to find a professional woman in her 30's that has more than one kid.


Actually, the evidence doesn't support your assertion. A disproportionate number of abortions occur within the deep under class, those least able, even with government assistance to care for a new born.

Within the middle class, it's concentrated among those still in school, adding to the potential human capital and productive potential. As recently discussed in another thread, the 3 significant factors for remaining out of poverty is finishing school, getting a job, and not having kids prior to marriage. What DD doesn't understand is his preference for laws condemning women to the underclass. In reality, he's not advocating for the protection of the vulnerable, but an expansion of permanent under class.
Originally Posted by rost495
I didn't read either link, but I often wonder if there were no abortions at all, could we really afford that many more welfare mouths to feed, that many more jails to build etc....

And no I'm not really for it, but IMHO its like any other "sin". Its between you and god


This^^^. Could we survive 6 million more dhimmicrap votes?

A patient asked me to remember in the Bible about people raised unchristian nations and considered unsalvagable where the Lord directed His people to kill ALL the inhabitants. Was it the only way the babies and kids had a path to Heaven?
Originally Posted by rost495
I didn't read either link, but I often wonder if there were no abortions at all, could we really afford that many more welfare mouths to feed, that many more jails to build etc....

And no I'm not really for it, but IMHO its like any other "sin". Its between you and god


Just the prison expenses alone would break this nation. Steven Levitt, and economist from the University of Chicago (the school of Hayek and Friedman) did a study on the effects of abortion of murder rate. After Roe v. Wade, a significant portion of the reduction in murder, and other associated crimes, experienced in this country can be attributed to this decision. Unwanted, underclass males are tailor made for gangs, crime, and terrorism.
Let's just go and kill all those kids in orphanages and children's homes, what's the difference? One big difference is many, many, many of these unborn kids would be placed in loving, and caring homes if put up for adoption, not the same for those in orphanages, etc. I'm failing to find a moral difference in the baby killing argument and the orphan argument. While we're at it, let's just "eliminate" all those homeless, unwanted adults wandering around our cities.Where is the line, and who decides? Either life is precious and worth saving or not.

Unabashedly pro-life and Christian.

bludog
Originally Posted by bludog
Let's just go and kill all those kids in orphanages and children's homes, what's the difference? One big difference is many, many, many of these unborn kids would be placed in loving, and caring homes if put up for adoption, not the same for those in orphanages, etc. I'm failing to find a moral difference in the baby killing argument and the orphan argument. While we're at it, let's just "eliminate" all those homeless, unwanted adults wandering around our cities.Where is the line, and who decides? Either life is precious and worth saving or not.

Unabashedly pro-life and Christian.

bludog


BD, seldom does a black and white interpretation such as your serve well in the real world. As an example if we take the "all life is scared" to the extreme you arrive at the conclusion that KFC is equivalent to The Holocaust.

As for your question as to "who decides", for the most part, I'd begin with "Not the government".
"BD, seldom does a black and white interpretation such as your serve well in the real world. As an example if we take the "all life is scared" to the extreme you arrive at the conclusion that KFC is equivalent to The Holocaust. "


There is a fair bit of logically naughty equivocation here, BUT I am not scared of it. ;-{>8
Originally Posted by oldtrapper
"BD, seldom does a black and white interpretation such as your serve well in the real world. As an example if we take the "all life is scared" to the extreme you arrive at the conclusion that KFC is equivalent to The Holocaust. "


There is a fair bit of logically naughty equivocation here, BUT I am not scared of it. ;-{>8


Actually, it's slippery slope, not equivocation. The point is, we can have a rational conversation about pre-birth states without the use of black and white fallacies.
Originally Posted by JamesJr
The left and the atheists........one and the same........have succeeded in what they set out to do........destroy Christianity. I hate to say it, but in a few generations religion as we have known it, will no longer be. They have indoctrinated our young people into believing that church is a place they don't need to go, and that the Bible is outdated.

That "outdated" Bible prophecied this, by the way. God help us.


Yes - God help us.
Whatever happened to "You play - you pay."
Resulting in self control.

Society shouldn't be involved in one's "indiscretions" - monetarily.
Originally Posted by mark shubert
Originally Posted by JamesJr
The left and the atheists........one and the same........have succeeded in what they set out to do........destroy Christianity. I hate to say it, but in a few generations religion as we have known it, will no longer be. They have indoctrinated our young people into believing that church is a place they don't need to go, and that the Bible is outdated.

That "outdated" Bible prophecied this, by the way. God help us.


Yes - God help us.
Whatever happened to "You play - you pay."
Resulting in self control.

Society shouldn't be involved in one's "indiscretions" - monetarily.



Has it ever really resulted in self control, or just a whole bunch of shotgun/crossbow/shortbow/spear/club, marriages throughout the millennium?
Originally Posted by JamesJr
The left and the atheists........one and the same........have succeeded in what they set out to do........destroy Christianity. I hate to say it, but in a few generations religion as we have known it, will no longer be. They have indoctrinated our young people into believing that church is a place they don't need to go, and that the Bible is outdated.

That "outdated" Bible prophecied this, by the way. God help us.
They haven't destroyed Christianity. Not by a long shot. Throughout history, the church has seen it's greatest growth during times of persecution when believers had to rely more on Christ and not on themselves. It might have to go underground, though. That's nothing new. It's happened before. The chasm between Christ and the world will get a lot bigger but he will win in the end. Right now some of the church's greatest growth is in Muslim countries where simply having a Bible is a death sentence. Muslims are converting in huge numbers.
Originally Posted by Owl
Mark, those we my immediate thoughts also.

Hundreds of years of being oppressed. Now with a little "freedom" they've voted themselves into who knows what.


Rather obvious, they have voted that their women should have mastery of their own bodies.

Added; I find it odd that those most enamoured of personal freedom choose to not allow women the same right...and before any point out that there is a fetus involved, yes there is, and it required the effort of a man to put it there.
Originally Posted by Ghostinthemachine
I saw huge groups of women cheering and dancing around when they heard the vote...

Wow, this world is really fugged up.


Western Civilization started down the road to ruin when women got the right to vote. They want the right to murder their offspring AND they want to run the world. That doesn't seem to paint a very bright picture of our future.
Originally Posted by JSTUART
Originally Posted by Owl
Mark, those we my immediate thoughts also.

Hundreds of years of being oppressed. Now with a little "freedom" they've voted themselves into who knows what.


Rather obvious, they have voted that their women should have mastery of their own bodies.

Added; I find it odd that those most enamoured of personal freedom choose to not allow women the same right...and before any point out that there is a fetus involved, yes there is, and it required the effort of a man to put it there.

What about the right of the child?
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by JSTUART
Originally Posted by Owl
Mark, those we my immediate thoughts also.

Hundreds of years of being oppressed. Now with a little "freedom" they've voted themselves into who knows what.


Rather obvious, they have voted that their women should have mastery of their own bodies.

Added; I find it odd that those most enamoured of personal freedom choose to not allow women the same right...and before any point out that there is a fetus involved, yes there is, and it required the effort of a man to put it there.

What about the right of the child?


What about it.

And before you get upright and preachy about how human life is sacred...how about saving the lives of the children/people that die around the world after birth before forcing women to do something they do not want.
That's a self-evidently specious argument.
© 24hourcampfire