...to answer to The Freedom Caucus members Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan's request for information.

Any bets on whether Deep State Barr answers their request, or ignores and obstructs?

He'll answer the same way Sessions did.


Crickets and a middle finger.

Barr is one of those 5 D chess pieces.

and Trump is still president.

Better make hay while the sun's shining then... Right?

Who appointed and tasked HUBER?
Who appointed and tasked the OIG?
Who was AG?
[zero leaks - none]
Transfer from AG1 to AG2?
Why might that be important?
How do you avoid 'politically motivated/attack - obstruction - attempt to block/obstruct Mueller'?
Optics are important.
When are optics not important?
Think Whitaker.
Define 'stage set'.
Who recently walked 'on stage' to take command?
What 'stage' experience did this person have?
Think Bill Clinton impeachment.
Has the 'stage' been cleaned & cleared for the next performance?
If the 'stage' is clean, can the performance begin?
How might 'transparency' [DECLAS] fit into the dialogue?
Define 'thesis' statement.
What benefit(s) does this provide BARR?

Thanks for clearing it all up for us weak minded non Qbers.

Barr will do nothing... is nothing.

Why do you and the other Q'bers always talk in questions and riddles, and code?

If this is so straight forward, why all the caveats?

Why not just tell it like it is, without the huge margin of error for failure, which can be spun into the next unbelievable narrative?


When I watch the weather forecast, I want to know what temperature it's going to be. I want to know whether it's gonna rain tomorrow or not.

I don't want the damned weather man to stand up there with a gray map and ask ME questions for the entire time...

I would like the next 6 years to look something like the recent hearing with the House and Matt Whitaker. Matt owned that place and had the liberals pissing up their legs. I want to see some more of that.

kwg

Barr cant answer any questions concerning any ongoing investigation,, plain an simple,, If Barr or POTUS or Huber or anybody declasses info,and leaks it, said info will have "tainted" the investigation, and compromising the investigation, and will be disregaurded,,even if its a smoking gun,,,with pics and audio,,, investigations have to come to a close before info is revealed,,as big as this is and the way our .gov works,who can say,,,

Instead of blowing thru or brushing off post's like K22's,, Take an hour or 2 and see if you can truthfully answer those questions, you may see things in a diff light if you do some research

Barry, ten pages of critical posts addresses to K22 are easily washed away by one attaboy from a fellow Qber.

They constantly look for validation of their thinking.

He will do nothing.

'Cause he's got nothing, NOTHING

Barr is at least as bad a mistake as Sessions was.

MM

I for one would be quite good with this^^^^

Another deep state plant.

Looking up something for yourself helps to remember it, makes it worth the time and trouble. We are so use to having every thing handed to us or answered by someone that we continue to help them dumb us down.
First its free money, now its free answers to questions we don't want to take the time to look up.
Maybe Bernie Sanders should be President!

SO WHEN"S IT GONNA END??????????????

In our lifetimes, maybe, maybe not....................looks pretty endless & what incentive does Mueller have to stop now with the Dems in control & willing to go on 'til the next election with whatever non-sense they can dream up.

MM

The corollary to the Worthy Adversary.

Don't remember asking.

You are he one that responded in code. Again.

If this was in the Q thread then i'd agree with you but it's not, posting this stuff that nobody but the ardent Q follower would understand doen't help anyone but you guys.
.

The only thing that the Q'bers know for certain is that if anything is predicted and it doesn't happen, there was a good reason that it didn't happen. Q told 'em so. The rest of us missed it........

Yeah.

Missing it.

I stopped listening to Qber's after they so heavily invested in the narrative that Sessions was gonna save us all... That he was working for Trump. That there's 50,000 indictments handed down and all the crooked commies were going to be lead off in handcuffs to concentration camps.


Holy crap.

Anyone stupid enough to believe anything spoken about by that cult deserves the sign they are handed... "Here's your sign..."

There is no evidence that Huber is or was investigating anything. Those that have testified in front of Congress have said that Huber has not only NOT inquired about their information into the Clinton Foundation and Uranium (1), the written evidence presented to Huber was LOST 3 times. Huber is a non issue as he is not investigating anyone or anything.

Speaking of Whitaker, what ever happened to the Scaramuchi Model, where Witaker the "stealth bomber" was going to come in, fire and bunch and leave. He didn't do any such thing, he came and he left with no fanfare of firings.

Welll, at least you have admited what you truly are..

"Cheers"..

Because he's a Russian troll

Da Comrade.

It then seems that what was intended, No Leaks, has worked quite well. Jobs well done wouldn't you say.

Code? No, those are actually questions. Maybe we can get them to ask simpler ones, ones easy to understand.

Yeah.

Get back to us after all the handcuffing takes place...

If I could ask Trump one question at a Q&A, it would be
“Why after two years of your administration, do the American people still do not know who signed off on Fast & Furious?”.
Whose Idea was it to put this operation into effect, and why hasn’t the Trump administration been forthcoming with that information?

I would say that Victoria Toensing, the attorney for the FBI informant wist-blower that has all the good on everybody involved in Uranium One has it correct.

She has publicly stated many times that her client has yet to be interviewed by anyone from the FBI, the DOJ and especially Huber.

She has said many times publicly that if the Huber team was "real" and interested in the truth, they would have contacted her and her client months ago, yet still nothing. She has stated along with her husband Joe DeGenova that there is NO Huber investigation as if there were, her client would be FIRST on the list to interview. Yet, nothing.

We will have to wait and see what happens

The answer to that is quite obvious.

Just think Sessions, Rosenstien, Wray, Preibus, Spicer, Barr, Mattis, Kelly, all members of his cabinet and all Deep State operatives strategically placed to undermine his Presidency, protect the swamp, and keep the truth from being exposed.

I think Matt is warming up to get Charles Grassley's spot in the Senate when Chuck decides to retire.

kwg

So..... The one thing all those guys have in common is that Trump hired them.

I thought you were one of his admirers.

Don't you have a wood chipper that you can go stick your hand in or something?

yes please just tell me the answers to your questions as I would rather not look them up

The 15th has come and gone.

Did Barr answer their request, or did he do as Rosenstein has been doing and tell them to f*ck-off?

Only the Qbers know, but they won’t tell us ‘cause we’ve been mean to them.

What's a Qber?

Trump is a larp stringing us along.

Barr is on record that except for classified information the entire report will be made public.
Asked if the White House could make any changes in the report; “That will not happen.”

You guys are really something. Asking questions to provoke critical thinking...it's not new...called the socratic method. Those of us in the "Q cult" have benefited from embracing this basic communication method and, as the cult leader Q has told us time and again, done our own research, thought for ourselves, and drawn our own conclusions. Wait...is it still a cult when the leader tells you to think for yourselves?

The keyboard slams you direct our way are very telling as to your thought processes...or lack thereof. Bunch of glass is half empty kinda guys and, with regards to the DC swamp, your lack of faith is completely understandable given the .gov track record. I'd like to think that it will all go down as I imagine it might based on my in depth research done over the last 20+ years, but I've been proven wrong more often than not. My decoder ring must have a virus/glitch or some such. Nevertheless, I do believe we all will be extremely happy as things unfold over the next months, no matter what camp you're in regarding Q. And we cult members, being used to existing in a world of brain dead by design sheeple, will do our best to not say "we told you so."

Did none of you see Hannity last week? Multiple times he referenced a "cascade of declass" coming. John Solomon and Sarah Carter are chomping at the bit to share everything that they know, as is Hannity. They are playing their part in the show as the slow red pilling takes place for the American public. The storm is here guys. Enjoy the show.

Interesting read. Draw your own conclusions.
https://quodverum.com/2019/03/75/endgame-potus-trump-s-vindication-nears.html

And then there's this:


Have a little faith and try to remain optimistic.

I don't have a problem with your socratic method. Please continue.

Personally, I just refuse to give any credibility to anything that talks in riddles, questions and code.

Perhaps you could enlighten us all about that secret "Q" signal Trump was supposed to be giving us all the time?

You guys said it was a sign about "Q" and all the prophecy therein. Right?

So the NZ shooter does the same thing, and is photographed doing it. Supposedly it's now a White Power hand signal. Been tied to Trump as well now.

Using your best socratic method, perhaps you could explain or question us into the light of day about what narrative is factual? I'll wait...


In show business there is a technique used by entertainers that sell themselves as "Mentalists"... They take bits and pieces, make assumptions and educated guesses based on facts and what they DO know through other sources.


Then the audience it all awed when part of what the mentalist says is revealed to be true. They are accurate enough to keep people paying to come see the smoke and light show, but not accurate enough to make more money playing the stock market or lottery...

That's the "Q" religion. Just a couple of guys in the internet paying attention to current and past events and filling everyone full of BS.... Then when something doesn't come to pass, they change the question or narrative to match more current events, and blame the incorrectness on the audience because they "weren't paying attention"...

The Mueller Report is separate from what members of congress have requested from Barr.

Same schit that they requested from Rosenstein and were told to f*ck off.

They also call their failures "Misdirection", "we said this was going to happen at this time on this particular day, but we can't let the Bad Guys know what we are up to so we put out false info, just to fool them". Happens just about every time a prediction is made.

"Hold Offenders accountable", as in approving of the indictment of Donald Trump's family?

There you go... Asking silly questions and getting silly answers...

My question is much like yours.

"Which Offenders?"

There is no wrong answer.

3-18-2019

Oh please.

Hannity has been touting "Breaking News" and "Tic-Toc" for over a year and a half.

The "my sources say" and his failure to come up with anything new, with the same old, same old, "Bought and paid for", "unverified", "Bleachbit", "if Sean Hannity destroyed subpoenaed evidence...", "Breaking news", "my sources say", Bought and paid for", FISA Abuse", "Bought and paid for", "unverified and salacious", "bought and paid for", "my sources say", "tic-toc", is way beyond getting old.

The fact that you don't like riddles or codes is your problem, not mine. Heard of plausible deniability? Q doesn't state facts or leak intel due to nat sec directives. It's why he asks questions. Let's you make connections/relationships that he only infers.

As I stated above, I've often been wrong about what might happen or timing and these were my opinions. I'm the first to admit to being wrong. The little [bleep], like Q signs or other unimportant stuff matters not to me. Can't tell you what narrative is factual either, hell, there's too damn many to even keep track of much less pick one that's right. Bottom line, for me, is that [bleep] is getting done and Trump is doing what he said he was going to do. YMMV.

Perhaps in time you'll be able to reframe your idea that Q is a religion, or cult, or just a few guys on the internet. There are millions worldwide now following this great awakening and we share more than just an interest in some entity called Q...things like hope, unity, freedom and liberty. You got a problem with that? I'm thinking not...

As for me, since this isn't a Q thread, I'll just take my leave and let you guys figure it all out. Just wanted to maybe share my optimism with those that aren't. It's an exciting time to be alive and we'll be telling stories of how we saved our country from the brink of disaster to our grandchildren. Nothing can stop what is coming...at least that's how I see it.

How's it feel living like a walking talking human eeyore? I know you suffer with non stop chronic pain and that messes with a guys head. I feel sorry for you man. Also, in case you missed it, the Trump kids indictment was fake news. Try to keep up.

Back to the original question.

Did William Barr respond to a Congressional request or did he do what Rosenstein and Session have done and tell Congress to f*ck off?

As was Barr and Huber's tweet that "Offenders will be held accountable". Unless of course the "offenders" are members of Trump's team or family.

Do you know what fake news means? or what it is?

No one is arrested and in jail.

Spreading false truths disguised as fact.

Actions speak louder than riddles.

Yes, what is a Qber?

Never mind. It looks like I have some reading to do when I get a spare year or two.

Anyone have a summary?

No summary even needed.

It's just a cult religion that makes predictions about political prosecution of democrats criminal activity that never happens. That's all it is.

In simpler terms, it's a harmful distraction from the truth.

Q Thread

Barr was responding to Graham and Feinstein.

And there is this from his record;
RESPONSE: As I stated in my June 8, 2018 memorandum and explained in my January 14, 2019 letter to Chairman Graham and my January 10, 2019 letter to Ranking Member Feinstein, my memorandum was narrow in scope. It was premised on an assumption based on public accounts – which the memorandum acknowledged may be incorrect – that the Special Counsel’s basis for questioning the President was that the firing of former FBI Director Comey constituted obstruction under a specific statute – namely, 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c). In other words, the memorandum assumed, for purposes of analysis, that the Special Counsel’s sole predicate for interviewing the President was the single obstruction theory that it was addressing.

The memorandum did not address whether the President could be questioned under any of the other possible obstruction theories that have been publicly discussed in connection with the Special Counsel’s investigation, or any other theories of liability the Special Counsel may be pursuing. After drafting the memorandum, I provided copies to several officials at the Department of Justice who I thought would be in a position to assess whether it was actually relevant to the Special Counsel’s work, including Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, who by law at the time was charged with overseeing the Special Counsel.

In addition to sharing my views with the Department, I thought they also might be of interest to other lawyers working on the matter. As I have stated, I sent a copy to the President’s lawyers and spoke with them to explain my views. I do not know what impressions they had regarding my views or what, if anything, they did with my memorandum after receiving it. As I stated during my hearing before the Committee, I remain in the dark regarding the specific facts and legal theories currently at issue in the Special Counsel’s investigation.

If confirmed, I will approach the investigation with an open mind as to all issues and will make any decisions based on the relevant law and the facts at the time.

What part was proven to be "fake"?
The part that Mueller indicted them, or the part that Barr agreed with Mueller?

What does this have to do with the Freedom Caucus member of Congress requesting information from now confirmed AG William Bar.

What an incredible replacement for the irreplaceable Chuck Grassley!

What it has to do with is; Barr answering all the questions tossed at him. He is just getting started.

The same Chuck Grassley that didn't do jack shixt about Fast and Furious? The whole investigation of F&F read like some Q release. Basically a bunch of fantasy that is always just out of reach in the future and the future never arrives.

The Q'bers call it the "phouc 'em and feed 'em fish heads" approach to religious reality.