Home
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/28/opinion/asylum-border-immigrants-trump-.html

Not letting any more asylum seekers/migrants in at the border. Wonder how soon some activist judge rules that’s unconstitutional?

MAGA
We've been full for awhile now. We need to ship some back.
Already facing backlash and cockblocking.

That story is a couple months old.
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
We've been full for awhile now. We need to ship some back.


Oh HELL yeah!!!
It's about time Trump, quit bluffing and shut this border down we are covered up with illegals, they are all over our ranch every day, the U.S.A. can't afford to keep and care for all these people and their kids, we are no longer S. Texas, we are Northern Mexico.Talk about a 3rd world chit hole Welcome to S. Texas U.S.A. Rio7
I think there is a rush before the wall is built. Same as their is a rush to buy arms after every mass murder in case they restrict auto loaders.
Originally Posted by 378Canuck
I think there is a rush before the wall is built. Same as their is a rush to buy arms after every mass murder in case they restrict auto loaders.


It’s a fuggin rush everyday down here. 😡
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
We've been full for awhile now. We need to ship some back bury some.



fixed better
Originally Posted by RedAstrachan
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
We've been full for awhile now. We need to ship some back bury some.



fixed better


I agree!!!
One year from now; there will be hell to pay

https://pjmedia.com/trending/trump-...t-and-gives-mexico-a-one-year-ultimatum/
Now,...I know it's not popular to say so,....and that people are gonna blow a quarter pound booger out of their nose for me saying it,...and that Hillary is a witch-bitch and alla that,...

But Trump ain't gonna do schitt.

Get used to it.
When I was in the military I was sent all over the world to protect other country's borders. We need to start using our military to protect THIS country. And we need to build that f u c king wall!
Quote
But Trump ain't gonna do schitt.



BS!!!

maga,kag, ra,ra,ra, chess,Jesus, winning
There are 100 million we need to ship back.
Originally Posted by watch4bear

We don't have a year! We need to get something done yesterday.
Illegal aliens are enemies that invade our country with drugs, human trafficking, and terrorist causing death and crime to American citizens. Democrats cater to these enemies by voting for and providing them aid and comfort through sanctuary policies funded by US citizen tax dollars, refuses to protect American people by refusing to fund our border wall, and leave our borders open and unsafe. They using tax payer money feed, clothe, educate, house, and free medical care. Plus illegal immigrants are allowed to travel anywhere in the USA freely. Most have no vaccinations against any diseases. They allow possible health problems to spread. Not to mention the laws they break, people they injury, or people they kill. They are changing the demographics of voting by letting as many illegals in as they can. The democrats giving our medic care and social security to illegals are bankrupting something the American people have paid for years. Social Security and Medicare is to be used by Americans when they retire.
When in doubt, watch the instant replay








Quote
We don't have a year! We need to get something done yesterday.



I heard the goal was 100 million; we're only 30% there.
Originally Posted by tpcollins
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/28/opinion/asylum-border-immigrants-trump-.html

Not letting any more asylum seekers/migrants in at the border. Wonder how soon some activist judge rules that’s unconstitutional?

MAGA

Shouldn't matter what a judge says, since national defense isn't one of the powers delegated to our court system, but was delegated to the Chief Executive/Commander In Chief. They are coequal branches within their delegated powers. One coequal branch, therefore, may not nullify the delegated powers of the other. Imagine if the President issued an executive order that said the courts can no longer hear cases on appeal. That would be an equivalent situation to that of the courts ruling that the president may not defend our nation's borders against foreign invasion.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by tpcollins
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/28/opinion/asylum-border-immigrants-trump-.html

Not letting any more asylum seekers/migrants in at the border. Wonder how soon some activist judge rules that’s unconstitutional?

MAGA

Shouldn't matter what a judge says, since national defense isn't one of the powers delegated to our court system, but was delegated to the Chief Executive/Commander In Chief. They are coequal branches within their delegated powers. One coequal branch, therefore, may not nullify the delegated powers of the other. Imagine if the President issued an executive order that said the courts can no longer hear cases on appeal. That would be an equivalent situation to that of the courts ruling that the president may not defend our nation's borders against foreign invasion.



+1
So are you saying trump has all kinds of options?
he's right. its like a lifeboat. too many people and they all sink.
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
We've been full for awhile now. We need to ship some back.

Ship them all back.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Now,...I know it's not popular to say so,....and that people are gonna blow a quarter pound booger out of their nose for me saying it,...and that Hillary is a witch-bitch and alla that,...

But Trump ain't gonna do schitt.

Get used to it.


Lolol....aside from the fact that by virtue of Trump being POTUS we’ve seen more positive things get done than the last 4 presidents combined......that’s someshit.....some goodshit. 😉. His presidency is at the very least obstructing the NWO and testing each and every avenue that leads to better border security. Having every single presidential order regarding border security bogged down in the courts ain’t the President’s fault but at least he’s moving forward with his promises. I’m sure Ron Paul would’ve had it done by now with a wave of his magic wand. 😂

Trump is trying but for all the Rand Pauls (wasn’t he one of your golden boys Bristoe?) and other liberals in sheep’s clothing obstruction to the detriment of the nation seems to be par for the course.
Originally Posted by IMR4350
When I was in the military I was sent all over the world to protect other country's borders. We need to start using our military to protect THIS country. And we need to build that f u c king wall!
IMR4350 for President in 2024!
A border wall is definitely needed and is definitely effective. I live in El Paso and on Wednesday when I was driving my daughter to school along the Border Hwy., exactly where the border fencing ended, the Border Patrol (with 6 or 7 vehicles) had rounded up 100 + illegal aliens. I'm sure they have been released into the US population by now. That fence/wall needs to be extended along as much of our Southern border as possible. Walls work as evidenced by the wetbacks crossing where the fence ended, not along any part of the border here in EP that has a barrier.
Originally Posted by High_Noon
A border wall is definitely needed and is definitely effective. I live in El Paso and on Wednesday when I was driving my daughter to school along the Border Hwy., exactly where the border fencing ended, the Border Patrol (with 6 or 7 vehicles) had rounded up 100 + illegal aliens. I'm sure they have been released into the US population by now. That fence/wall needs to be extended along as much of our Southern border as possible. Walls work as evidenced by the wetbacks crossing where the fence ended, not along any part of the border here in EP that has a barrier.

Yep, walls work. The wheel works. Bow and arrows work. All of the basic technological discoveries of man that have continued into the modern age still work. Somehow, the left thought they could win the argument by suggesting that one such technology doesn't work.
We are not full.

We have plenty of room for people who can actually pull their weight, and need an immigration system that reflects that.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
We are not full.

We have plenty of room for people who can actually pull their weight, and need an immigration system that reflects that.

Encourage married Americans (who aren't on any sort of welfare program, which should be a disqualifier) to start having kids again by offering massive benefits. No need to bring anyone in.
Quote
Encourage married Americans (who aren't on any sort of welfare program, which should be a disqualifier) to start having kids again by offering massive benefits. No need to bring anyone in.



What about the womans right to choose? grin
Originally Posted by hanco
Originally Posted by RedAstrachan
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
We've been full for awhile now. We need to ship some back bury some.



fixed better


I agree!!!


That is the damn TRUTH!
Posted By: Gus Re: Trump says “We’re full”. - 04/06/19
we are full. no doubt in my military mind.

we have no good economic theory to deal with a static population.

we don't need to import anyone ever, unless it's by due process of existing law.

but that's not where we are and what we're doing. the law is nearly useless at this point.

an out of the box solution with many downsides is to fly the american flag on the far side of the panama canal.

everything north is North America. everything south is South America.

that would create problems and solve problems. but so what is new?

mexico is making a lot of our vehicles. except maybe for toyotas & related?

it's time for a bold new solution. it will cause much gnashing of teeth.

so what else is new?
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by tpcollins
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/28/opinion/asylum-border-immigrants-trump-.html

Not letting any more asylum seekers/migrants in at the border. Wonder how soon some activist judge rules that’s unconstitutional?

MAGA

Shouldn't matter what a judge says, since national defense isn't one of the powers delegated to our court system, but was delegated to the Chief Executive/Commander In Chief. They are coequal branches within their delegated powers. One coequal branch, therefore, may not nullify the delegated powers of the other. Imagine if the President issued an executive order that said the courts can no longer hear cases on appeal. That would be an equivalent situation to that of the courts ruling that the president may not defend our nation's borders against foreign invasion.


Ruling on constitutionality is one of the powers still delegated to our courts.
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER

Ruling on constitutionality is one of the powers still delegated to our courts.

Sure, the Constitutionality of laws. Not the Constitutionality of the plainly delegated powers of the Chief Executive. The latter falls into the category of a nonjusticiable political question, i.e., the Supreme Court has already long ago ruled that when the question goes to the fundamental powers delegated by the plain words of the Constitution to a branch of government, the Supreme Court may not hear the question, as this is a matter, they say, exclusively for the electorate to pass judgment upon via regularly scheduled elections.

Nonjusticiable Defined
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
We are not full.

We have plenty of room for people who can actually pull their weight, and need an immigration system that reflects that.

Encourage married Americans (who aren't on any sort of welfare program, which should be a disqualifier) to start having kids again by offering massive benefits. No need to bring anyone in.



That's basically what the Hungarians are doing.
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
We are not full.

We have plenty of room for people who can actually pull their weight, and need an immigration system that reflects that.

Encourage married Americans (who aren't on any sort of welfare program, which should be a disqualifier) to start having kids again by offering massive benefits. No need to bring anyone in.



That's basically what the Hungarians are doing.

Yep.
In 1980 population of US was 226 million. Now we have 330 Million.
The entire premise that western nations need a larger population is pure spoon fed B.S..
Even more foolish is the notion that Americans should get into a breeding contest.


Posted By: sse Re: Trump says “We’re full”. - 04/06/19
no vacancy
Time for TX to schitt some wetbacks.
There are patriotic Americans--and then there are democrats. Just sayin'.
Originally Posted by sharpsguy
There are patriotic Americans--and then there are Commie Lying America Hating democrats. Just sayin'.


Fixed it for ya 😜
We have been "full" for a number of years. Not only is it time to stop letting them in, but it's time to send a bunch of them back.

The only exception I would make would be blonde women from Scandinavia.
ttt
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
We are not full.

We have plenty of room for people who can actually pull their weight, and need an immigration system that reflects that.

Encourage married Americans (who aren't on any sort of welfare program, which should be a disqualifier) to start having kids again by offering massive benefits. No need to bring anyone in.


I simply can not imagine any kind of benefits which would encourage folks to make more babies. I mean thinking working folks actually paying their way folks.

Everyone I know pretty much knew how many kids they wanted to raise, and did something to stop the process when they got that many.

And then there are those less logical who think it is their duty to introduce as many souls into the world as is physically possible.

I have never met a professional welfare mother. I understand lots of them are out there propagating for profit.

I understand your concept Hawk' but do not think it would encourage a single additional baby in the demographic you wish to target. And civil rights lawyers would have an absolute field day with it if you attempted to limit it to that demographic..
Originally Posted by night_owl
In 1980 population of US was 226 million. Now we have 330 Million.
The entire premise that western nations need a larger population is pure spoon fed B.S..
Even more foolish is the notion that Americans should get into a breeding contest.



While the numbers you quote are, I am sure, factual. It is also factual that the USA reached zero population growth sometime in the '70s. That 100 million plus increase over forty years is due solely to immigration.

This nation would be much stronger today, and many problems would never have come to exist if our population was stagnant still at 226 million.
The left, democrats, liberals, communist, socialist, and islamites they want power and control of the people. They hate Americans, the Constitution, and the USA. They are enemies and traitors. Their agendas do not allow the Constitution to exist. There is no place in the Constitution or the USA for sharia law. They believe in the normalization of unethical and immoral behavior. We do not need any one in the government who is not supporting Americans, state and federal government. The left, democrats, liberals, communist, and socialist are morally wrong. Their ideas for life are immoral. They do not care about women, children, and minorities. They do not represent the people from their states which elected them. They want overthrow the rights given to the American people by the constitution by changing, rewriting, or the destruction of the Constitution. Democrats cater to our enemies by voting for and providing them aid and comfort through sanctuary policies funded by US citizen tax dollars, refuses to protect American people by refusing to fund our border wall, and leave our borders open and unsafe. They using tax payer money feed, clothe, educate, house, and free medical care. Plus illegal immigrants are allowed to travel anywhere in the USA freely. Most have no vaccinations against any diseases. They allow possible health problems to spread. Not to mention the laws they break, people they injury, or people they kill.
Pres. Trump just increased the H2-B visa caps by 30,000?? As if there aren't enough WHITE Americans to fill those jobs??
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
Pres. Trump just increased the H2-B visa caps by 30,000?? As if there aren't enough WHITE Americans to fill those jobs??

I know. Disgusting. Lowers every American's wages in those fields and causes many Americans to be let go to make room for folks who will work for much less. Total betrayal.
Can not say that I disagree. But the position is hard to defend with today's unemployment stats.

What we really need to do is let some of the welfare rats starve a little, just until they start signing on for job searches. But, hell, who would want them on the payroll?
© 24hourcampfire