Home
Miserable little Muzzy’s must figure the British ain’t gonna do schitt. They’re probably right about that part.

UK-flagged tanker seized by Iran's Revolutionary Guard in Strait of Hormuz

https://www.foxnews.com/world/uk-fl...-revolutionary-guard-in-strait-of-hormuz

I thot they just did this a couple of weeks ago?
those heathen' ain't gonna be satisfied till they get a super tanker hung-up sideways in the strait.

then it'll be all eyes on the middle east, especially iran and saudi arabia.

better the debil we know than the one we don't?
Originally Posted by jaguartx
I thot they just did this a couple of weeks ago?


They just took this one today.

Think UK will ask Trump for help?
They want to provoke some kind of confrontation. Looks like they think that will further separate the Europeans from the US and they will get sanctions relief.
Fuggin Europeans have undermined our efforts by buying black market oil from Iraq and Isis, whenever it suited them. I hope this bites em in the azz.


Iran will do anything to raise oil prices at this point.
War with Iran is becoming inevitable. I’m against this war but it seems the Mullahs ruling Iran intend to go out in a blaze of glory and take the Iranian people with them. They’re part of a religious order that is waiting on the end of the world and the return of the 12th Imam. They seem to believe that if they pull the trigger they’ll all be going to heaven and breaking in 50 virgins or something.
I hope we stay out of it. We can't afford the wars we have now.

Let the Brit's handle it.
Originally Posted by Coyotejunki
I hope we stay out of it. We can't afford the wars we have now.

Let the Brit's handle it.



Eggsakly.
No war with Iran is needed. Just a couple of big Nukes and glass bead that schitt hole.

We should not waste the life of one American Soldier ! 😡
Hire the Israelites, they will get it back

You would think all tankers would be escorted through there???
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
No war with Iran is needed. Just a couple of big Nukes and glass bead that schitt hole.

We should not waste the life of one American Soldier ! 😡


Let's sink their navy first. Then see if they can behave. I'm all for killing 150 of theirs after this latest bonehead maneuver.
Originally Posted by Coyotejunki
I hope we stay out of it. We can't afford the wars we have now.

Let the Brit's handle it.




russia is on Irans side. The democrats are on Irans and russias side.
Originally Posted by Daveinjax
War with Iran is becoming inevitable. .


Sure, but who is going to be the other party?

Let the Saudi's manage their own dam back yard.
If we get involved we will end up sending them billions of dollars in aid for the rebuilding. We can't afford it. $ 22 Trillion in debt now.
Let us see what the UK does.
THis shows the weakness of 3 presidents.

Carter for allowing the Mullahs to ascend to power.
Bush for invading Iraq when Saddam was fighting the Iranians for 8 years.
Obonghole for returning money to them and agreeing to a bullchitt Treaty.
So the Iran navy with it's little piss pot boats is acting like somali pirates.

The countries using that waterway for their tankers should send along some warship escorts and treat them like somali pirates.


Mike
Originally Posted by Coyotejunki
If we get involved we will end up sending them billions of dollars in aid for the rebuilding. .



Obama might, trump wont
Originally Posted by 6mm250
So the Iran navy with it's little piss pot boats is acting like somali pirates.

The countries using that waterway for their tankers should send along some warship escorts and treat them like somali pirates.


Mike


Just take out their fuel depots and marinas grin
First the straight of hormuz, then the suez and panama canals. Why not let them tell us where we can sail?
If we surrender now, look at the money we can save.
Originally Posted by mtnsnake
Let us see what the UK does.


Couldn't happen to a "nicer" country, [bleep] them. Just like in WWI and WWII they will be happy to defend their interests to the last American.
Gee, sounds so familiar ... directing vessels into an area where they are likely to provoke a response from a nation you're hoping to trigger a war with. Where and when has that happened before??

Oh yeah, the Lusitania.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Gee, sounds so familiar ... directing vessels into an area where they are likely to provoke a response from a nation you're hoping to trigger a war with. Where has that happened before??



you stupid bastard. That has a been a world shipping lane forever grin
The now have seized 4 tankers.
https://fighterjetsworld.com/latest...e-will-close-the-strait-of-hormuz/11910/
I'm ok blasting Iran, as long as we keep all the oil fields for ourselves this time and let the survivors starve.
Originally Posted by bigfish9684
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
No war with Iran is needed. Just a couple of big Nukes and glass bead that schitt hole.

We should not waste the life of one American Soldier ! 😡


Let's sink their navy first. Then see if they can behave. I'm all for killing 150 of theirs after this latest bonehead maneuver.


Take out their navy and their nuclear facilities too.

It would do the world a great favor.

No need for troops just send the Air Force and turn them loose. Let 'em show the world what they can do.

A great attention getter.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by bigfish9684
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
No war with Iran is needed. Just a couple of big Nukes and glass bead that schitt hole.

We should not waste the life of one American Soldier ! 😡


Let's sink their navy first. Then see if they can behave. I'm all for killing 150 of theirs after this latest bonehead maneuver.


Take out their navy and their nuclear facilities too.

It would do the world a great favor.

No need for troops just send the Air Force and turn them loose. Let 'em show the world what they can do.

A great attention getter.




Agreed, no need for boots on the ground, just give the Chinese and Russians a little demonstration of what our AF can do.
What's left in England that's worth salvaging?

Nothing there but Commies and Muslims.
I’m afraid jolly old England isn’t what it used to be. Their navy is really petty small. Remember the Fauklin islands.
I don’t think they have a carrier ready for sea. Only a handful of warships. Hasbeen
It appears that they’ve now seized two Tankers today.
Given recent events, it seems odd that every tanker passing through there doesn’t have an escort of some kind.
Unless, of course, an excuse is needed...
A pale horse is coming.
omg. humans fighting over scarce resources.

there ain't nuthin' changed in near 10,000 years.

it was prophesized back in the '70's of such an event.

nothing new, everyone has known nearly forever of such.

go in there with enough projection of power to keep it open.

or abandon the damn thing, and let the pieces fall where they may.
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
A pale horse is coming.


a pale horse you say?

what does the market for such look like?
Originally Posted by hasbeen1945
I’m afraid jolly old England isn’t what it used to be. Their navy is really petty small. Remember the Fauklin islands.
I don’t think they have a carrier ready for sea. Only a handful of warships. Hasbeen


the descendents of the english kings are gonna have to wakeup, and stop spending all their attention on the royals.

the royals are only good for eating, spending, and consuming.

the english workers are tired of paying too much tax?
What good is a seized tanker? What do you do with it?
Originally Posted by hanco
What good is a seized tanker? What do you do with it?


The crew is collateral, that’s about it.
The crews are mostly muzzies anyway, give em a few goats and they'll be good.
Originally Posted by hanco
What good is a seized tanker? What do you do with it?

Tanker gets seized. Lloyds of London and other maritime insurance brokers announce they are (1) raising rates dramatically for ships transiting the Straits of Hormuz or (2) not offering it at all. Tanker owners determine that they either (1) can't afford the higher rates or (2) can't afford to lose a ship with no compensation, so they refuse to go there. The oil stays in the ME and countries are starved of fuel and prices skyrocket. That's why countries have navies...it is only superficially about fighting wars; it's really about ensuring freedom of the seas. That's why the British used to have the largest navy in the world when they had the empire. Commerce that travels by sea supports the world. They had to protect, not just their possessions, but their merchant ships. People knew back then that if you fuqked with the British, they would come and get you. Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan wrote about it in 1890. It is called "The Influence Of Sea Power Upon History" and it's still the bible taught in naval academies around the world.
Originally Posted by Daveinjax
War with Iran is becoming inevitable. I’m against this war but it seems the Mullahs ruling Iran intend to go out in a blaze of glory and take the Iranian people with them. They’re part of a religious order that is waiting on the end of the world and the return of the 12th Imam. They seem to believe that if they pull the trigger they’ll all be going to heaven and breaking in 50 virgins or something.


Isn't that 12th Inmam supposed to enter the world by climbing out of some holy well?
Well, just nuke that frigging well, end of that story
it's probable the iranians don't like us americans aka the great satan even a little.

on the other hand, if the queen of england in all her glory has to argue for their tanker's release,

then so be it. she's the queen afterall. she should have some responsibility other than standing in the camera.

and all that crowd of hers. all of them so worthy, they start foundations of every kind. but who pays for the stuff, pray tell?

the iranians are pushing buttons left & right, no doubt. the strait of hormuz has been a trouble point since before the seventies.

if it's time for the four horsemen to be loosed, then so be it? amen? that is, progress has to be made, and the straits are in the way.
So why is Tucker blaming John Bolton for Iran?
It’s pretty hard to try and assert that Trump is chomping at the bit to go to war when you consider the patience he’s displayed thus far and the statesmanship he’s utilized. In light of Iran’s recent provocations and multiple blatant acts of piracy it seems like they’re begging for a fight and I do believe they’ll get the response they desire. Hijacking foreign flagged (especially US, Britain, etc) vessels is a great way to gain international attention, just ask the dead skinnies that wound up as shark food. 😉

I don’t want another god damned war in another middle eastern third world chithole where one of ours ain’t worth a thousand of theirs so I hope that whatever we do is decisive, overwhelmingly barbaric to anyone that opposes us and we do it quickly. Kill the old hardliners and let the Iranian youth figure out how to govern their fellow rats.....or kill them all and use Iran as the world’s largest muslim detention center thereby freeing up Guantanamo for the deep state, corrupt politicians and other assorted internal enemies of our country.
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
A pale horse is coming.



Is it saddled yet?

Fahq'em. Sounds like a limey problem to me.





Originally Posted by hanco
Hire the Israelites, they will get it back

You would think all tankers would be escorted through there???



When was the last time the Israelis risked any of their own blood and treasure?


A Clean Break anyone?
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Coyotejunki
I hope we stay out of it. We can't afford the wars we have now.

Let the Brit's handle it.



Eggsakly.


I think Trump might handle things a little differently than you folks expect.

Taking them out might be cheaper in the long run than burying and rebuilding NYC.
It's time for the United States to change its ways - when we are driven to war WE CONQUER THAT COUNTRY IT'S OUR NOW lock/stock & barrel .

How nice would it be to fill africa/middle east with nice decent level headed citizens-- it would be nice to do the same here in the States .
So Teheran says we didnt dust one of their drones. I wish Trump would ask if they want another taken out and the video posted on You Tube.
Originally Posted by Bob_H_in_NH

Think UK will ask Trump for help?

Brits drove off the first batch of Iranian attack boat with a warship. Where were their war ships today?

If they had just interceped a hijacking a few days ago, don't ya think they'd have assets at the ready for the next attack?

DF
I just don't give a schit about manufactured drama.

Truly boring.
Originally Posted by ol_mike
It's time for the United States to change its ways - when we are driven to war WE CONQUER THAT COUNTRY IT'S OUR NOW lock/stock & barrel .

How nice would it be to fill africa/middle east with nice decent level headed citizens-- it would be nice to do the same here in the States .

We can't even agree if Texas is nice or a shiitehole and you want to force Americans to move to a real shiitehole?
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by Bob_H_in_NH

Think UK will ask Trump for help?

Brits drove off the first batch of Iranian attack boat with a warship. Where were their war ships today?

If they had just interceped a hijacking a few days ago, don't ya think they'd have assets at the ready for the next attack?

DF

The Royal Navy ain't what it once was.
Originally Posted by UPhiker
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by Bob_H_in_NH

Think UK will ask Trump for help?

Brits drove off the first batch of Iranian attack boat with a warship. Where were their war ships today?

If they had just interceped a hijacking a few days ago, don't ya think they'd have assets at the ready for the next attack?

DF

The Royal Navy ain't what it once was.

Nope.

Small boat attacks look pretty preventable to me.

DF
A couple of Apache choppers in the area could do a lot of damage really fast.

DF
The neoclowns have turned to England to get a war started against Iran.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...8e8d2e_story.html?utm_term=.5ec57d99295c
Yes, and there should be an Apache on the bow of every tanker, along with a five inch turret.
Originally Posted by jaguartx

I think Trump might handle things a little differently than you folks expect.

Taking them out might be cheaper in the long run than burying and rebuilding NYC.


Yep. Surely the cost of a couple of Nukes is much less than the cost of the Twin Towers & 3 Airliners.
Not to mention 3000 American lives lost on 9,1,1 😡
shutting the gulf/strait of hormuz down, and then seeing who calls calf-rope first?

i suspect it'll be the west.

iran can endure.

the saudi's will be unhappy.

and the chinese are building electric cars.

the calculus of the west, the east, and the price of gas.

look at the gas pump and see what's happening.

is the empire in charge, or is there more to it?
Originally Posted by UPhiker
Originally Posted by ol_mike
It's time for the United States to change its ways - when we are driven to war WE CONQUER THAT COUNTRY IT'S OUR NOW lock/stock & barrel .

How nice would it be to fill africa/middle east with nice decent level headed citizens-- it would be nice to do the same here in the States .

We can't even agree if Texas is nice or a shiitehole and you want to force Americans to move to a real shiitehole?

Didn't say anything about force anybody to go - Texas is great lived there when I was fresh out of high school , beautiful women there compared to most places I've been .
Originally Posted by Bristoe
The neoclowns have turned to England to get a war started against Iran.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...8e8d2e_story.html?utm_term=.5ec57d99295c

This^^^^.
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by jaguartx

I think Trump might handle things a little differently than you folks expect.

Taking them out might be cheaper in the long run than burying and rebuilding NYC.


Yep. Surely the cost of a couple of Nukes is much less than the cost of the Twin Towers & 3 Airliners.
Not to mention 3000 American lives lost on 9,1,1 😡


Letting them spend Zeros 150 billion to put nukes on a few icbms they already have and having one hit NYC would make the Twin Towers deal look like childs play.
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Coyotejunki
I hope we stay out of it. We can't afford the wars we have now.

Let the Brit's handle it.



Eggsakly.


I think Trump might handle things a little differently than you folks expect.

Taking them out might be cheaper in the long run than burying and rebuilding NYC.




Why would we want to rebuild it? I'm all for letting it stay buried.






Originally Posted by Bristoe
The neoclowns have turned to England to get a war started against Iran.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...8e8d2e_story.html?utm_term=.5ec57d99295c





Isn't that the way it always works?
I don't recall hearing anything about the Royal Navy seizing a tanker carrying Iranian oil on the national news. But apparently they did back in early July.

Hannity is on TV right now ranting about Iran seizing a British tanker,..but he's not saying anything about the fact that it's in retaliation for the Royal Navy seizing that tanker carrying Iranian oil.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I don't recall hearing anything about the Royal Navy seizing a tanker carrying Iranian oil on the national news. But apparently they did back in early July.

Hannity is on TV right now ranting about Iran seizing a British tanker,..but he's not saying anything about the fact that it's in retaliation for the Royal Navy seizing that tanker carrying Iranian oil.



So you are for the Obama and Kerry approach? No sanctions necessary, and let em do whatever they want?

Liberals and liberalitarians, no difference at all grin
poor Iranians grin All they want is nuclear weapons

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-iran-sanctions-idUSKCN1UD2QK
Gone are the days when they had plenty of BALLS.....Lady Thatcher is turning over in her grave!!
Why don't we let them and N Korea have em?
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I don't recall hearing anything about the Royal Navy seizing a tanker carrying Iranian oil on the national news. But apparently they did back in early July.

Hannity is on TV right now ranting about Iran seizing a British tanker,..but he's not saying anything about the fact that it's in retaliation for the Royal Navy seizing that tanker carrying Iranian oil.



So you are for the Obama and Kerry approach? No sanctions necessary, and let em do whatever they want?

Liberals and liberalitarians, no difference at all grin


I think Iran and England can fight as long as they want to. But if the Royal Navy starts seizing tankers carrying Iranian oil,..they shouldn't whine when Iran does the same to them.

Just leave America out of it. Enough American money has been pissed away fighting Israel's wars.
Quote
Just leave America out of it





So the world is wrong using sanctions? Just let em be? Should Kerry and you handle this? grin
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Quote
Just leave America out of it





So the world is wrong using sanctions? Just let em be?


Yep. Let everybody be.

The neoclowns have stirred up way too much schitt already.

But I'm all for you jumping into it if you want to. Grab a rifle and jump on a plane. There's a war out there for you somewhere.
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Quote
Just leave America out of it





So the world is wrong using sanctions? Just let em be? Should Kerry and you handle this? grin


And you're Rambo, I suppose?
China is with you grin Your always on the right side


https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/china-calls-us-correct-iran-sanctions-64434064
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by jaguartx

I think Trump might handle things a little differently than you folks expect.

Taking them out might be cheaper in the long run than burying and rebuilding NYC.


Yep. Surely the cost of a couple of Nukes is much less than the cost of the Twin Towers & 3 Airliners.
Not to mention 3000 American lives lost on 9,1,1 😡


Letting them spend Zeros 150 billion to put nukes on a few icbms they already have and having one hit NYC would make the Twin Towers deal look like childs play.


Yep. The Muslim Halfican Obama ought to face Treason charges for aiding and abetting the Enemy over that schitt 😡
Originally Posted by watch4bear


China isn't having its country invaded by illegals while their military is off tilting at Israel's latest windmills.
Your more of Nancy Pelosi type. Trump is just too dominating for your gentle self grin



https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/24/us/politics/iran-sanctions.html


Here's some commie music to calm ya down


Whatever, Rambo.
Originally Posted by Sharpsman
Gone are the days when they had plenty of BALLS.....Lady Thatcher is turning over in her grave!!


You’re correct Sir, at least in my opinion, Lady Thatcher and Winston Churchill are both turning over in their graves. Modern day Britain will privately plead for help while publicly excoriating us for helping them.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Whatever, Rambo.



OK Kerry Durlin grin


escared of sanctions, what a loser.
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
So why is Tucker blaming John Bolton for Iran?


He would be more happy with John Kerry. So would Bristoe.
While we're at it; lets let the soviets park some missiles in Cuba wink
Originally Posted by Bristoe
The neoclowns have turned to England to get a war started against Iran.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...8e8d2e_story.html?utm_term=.5ec57d99295c


This. The Tribe that rules us has decided they want the US (its personal golem) to take down Iran for reasons having nothing whatever to do with what's good for America or Americans. This is what we are witnessing unfolding, all the operators (MSM, British, Israeli, and US intelligence agencies and military establishments, etc.) moving in perfect synchronicity like a ballet troop performing La Bayadère.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I don't recall hearing anything about the Royal Navy seizing a tanker carrying Iranian oil on the national news. But apparently they did back in early July.

Hannity is on TV right now ranting about Iran seizing a British tanker,..but he's not saying anything about the fact that it's in retaliation for the Royal Navy seizing that tanker carrying Iranian oil.

That's the way opinion is shaped as desired by the controlled MSM. Play up the hostage crisis, but no one knows anything about Operation Ajax.
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Your more of Nancy Pelosi type. Trump is just too dominating for your gentle self grin



How much did we spend in Iraq, and what did we get for it? One thing for sure we got for it was an Iran that didn't have to worry about Iraq any more.


Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I don't recall hearing anything about the Royal Navy seizing a tanker carrying Iranian oil on the national news. But apparently they did back in early July.

Hannity is on TV right now ranting about Iran seizing a British tanker,..but he's not saying anything about the fact that it's in retaliation for the Royal Navy seizing that tanker carrying Iranian oil.

That's the way opinion is shaped as desired by the controlled MSM. Play up the hostage crisis, but no one knows anything about Operation Ajax.


Don’t worry ladies, you two won’t be asked to serve. Someone else will deal with little problems such as these.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Bristoe
The neoclowns have turned to England to get a war started against Iran.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...8e8d2e_story.html?utm_term=.5ec57d99295c


This. The Tribe that rules us has decided they want the US (its personal golem) to take down Iran for reasons having nothing whatever to do with what's good for America or Americans. This is what we are witnessing unfolding, all the operators (MSM, British, Israeli, and US intelligence agencies and military establishments, etc.) moving in perfect synchronicity like a ballet troop performing La Bayadère.



John Kerry would be so proud of you.
Quote
One thing for sure we got for it was an Iran that didn't have to worry about Iraq any more.




The soviet union has backed Iran since Jimmy Carter; they would have whooped Iraq if not for the US. The democrats and the soviets are on the same side.
[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Stan V


Don’t worry ladies, you two won’t be asked to serve. Someone else will deal with little problems such as these.


Will that someone be you?
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Bristoe
The neoclowns have turned to England to get a war started against Iran.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...8e8d2e_story.html?utm_term=.5ec57d99295c


This. The Tribe that rules us has decided they want the US (its personal golem) to take down Iran for reasons having nothing whatever to do with what's good for America or Americans. This is what we are witnessing unfolding, all the operators (MSM, British, Israeli, and US intelligence agencies and military establishments, etc.) moving in perfect synchronicity like a ballet troop performing La Bayadère.



John Kerry would be so proud of you.



TRH is feeling the heat from crisco in the battle for KOTY. The "tribe" ,to which they constantly refer, is the voices in their pointy little heads.


mike r


Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by Stan V


Don’t worry ladies, you two won’t be asked to serve. Someone else will deal with little problems such as these.


Will that someone be you?


I had my turn, 50 yrs ago. You two goobs can just complain and bite your pillows. Someone else will take care of this little dust up.
Originally Posted by Stan V


Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by Stan V


Don’t worry ladies, you two won’t be asked to serve. Someone else will deal with little problems such as these.


Will that someone be you?


I had my turn, 50 yrs ago. You two goobs can just complain and bite your pillows. Someone else will take care of this little dust up.


just complain and bite your pillows grin crazy grin
Old American men slobbering up pablum and encouraging the government to send its young people to war in the Middle East,....for almost two consecutive decades.

No wonder the military can't reach its enlistment quotas these days.

But they're working on it. 16 year olds will soon be allowed to enlist.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jul/18/military-recruiting-woes-spur-debate-over-enlistme/
Let Israel and Saudi Arabia fight their own wars. We've sold them plenty of expensive toys over the years; let them use them.
Originally Posted by UPhiker
Let Israel and Saudi Arabia fight their own wars. We've sold them plenty of expensive toys over the years; let them use them.

And send them billions of dollars of US tax payer, hard earned, money every year. Many Americans have to tighten their belts because our government sends a big chunk of their pay check to Israel. And that's not even counting the billions we spend every year fighting the wars they have us fight for them, via the control they possess over our politicians.
I remember during Desert Storm, Carl Levin, US Senator from Michigan and member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, was extremely dovish until a few Scuds hit Israel. Then it was "go get em".
OH my the world is going to explode and there is nothing we can do.

We all going to die!!!!!!!!!!!! whistle
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
So why is Tucker blaming John Bolton for Iran?


Probably because Bolton has 'snot' in his mustache!!
Neo isolationists have to blame somebody.
Neo-isolationist: Someone who doesn't think it helpful for America to scour the Middle East seeking wars we could possibly trigger under the direction, and for the benefit, of Israel.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by UPhiker
Let Israel and Saudi Arabia fight their own wars. We've sold them plenty of expensive toys over the years; let them use them.

And send them billions of dollars of US tax payer, hard earned, money every year. Many Americans have to tighten their belts because our government sends a big chunk of their pay check to Israel. And that's not even counting the billions we spend every year fighting the wars they have us fight for them, via the control they possess over our politicians.



Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Your more of Nancy Pelosi type. Trump is just too dominating for your gentle self grin



How much did we spend in Iraq, and what did we get for it? One thing for sure we got for it was an Iran that didn't have to worry about Iraq any more.


You're far from done. Countries like Pakistan and Turkey need to be looked at in the future. The Shadow Warriors are willing to protect their interests to the last American. There are plenty of "Keyboard Generals" on this board who will have no problems going along with that plan.
Originally Posted by plainsman456
OH my the world is going to explode and there is nothing we can do.

We all going to die!!!!!!!!!!!! whistle



The sad thing is it could happen in the not-too-distant future. The proliferation of nuclear know how is the genie out of the bottle.
Another reason to retire early and enjoy life.
Neo-isolationist - Somebody who sees no virtue in opposing evil unless he gets something material out of it.

I do believe that's how Hitler got ownership of Europe.
Originally Posted by nighthawk
Neo-isolationist - Somebody who sees no virtue in opposing evil unless he gets something material out of it.

I do believe that's how Hitler got ownership of Europe.

No, one who knows that if you replace one "evil" in the Middle East, you're liable to get a worse evil.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Neo-isolationist: Someone who doesn't think it helpful for America to scour the Middle East seeking wars we could possibly trigger under the direction, and for the benefit, of Israel.



TRH won't reads this, but he is Stupid for blaming so-called Neo-conservatives for seeking wars when strength is needed to prevent wars from getting bigger.
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Neo-isolationist: Someone who doesn't think it helpful for America to scour the Middle East seeking wars we could possibly trigger under the direction, and for the benefit, of Israel.



TRH won't reads this, but he is Stupid for blaming so-called Neo-conservatives for seeking wars when strength is needed to prevent wars from getting bigger.
There are wars that are in the national interest and wars that we have no business getting involved in.
It makes me smile and shake my head to read somebody talking about some foreign country America needs to go to war with.

America could go to war against any country you care to mention,...it might even defeat them.

But when it's all said and done America would still have the problems it has.

America doesn't have a foreign problem,...it has a domestic problem.
Originally Posted by UPhiker
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Neo-isolationist: Someone who doesn't think it helpful for America to scour the Middle East seeking wars we could possibly trigger under the direction, and for the benefit, of Israel.



TRH won't reads this, but he is Stupid for blaming so-called Neo-conservatives for seeking wars when strength is needed to prevent wars from getting bigger.
There are wars that are in the national interest and wars that we have no business getting involved in.


TRH has never found a war we need to get involved in. Even WWII.
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by UPhiker
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Neo-isolationist: Someone who doesn't think it helpful for America to scour the Middle East seeking wars we could possibly trigger under the direction, and for the benefit, of Israel.



TRH won't reads this, but he is Stupid for blaming so-called Neo-conservatives for seeking wars when strength is needed to prevent wars from getting bigger.
There are wars that are in the national interest and wars that we have no business getting involved in.


TRH has never found a war we need to get involved in. Even WWII.


,...and people like you have never found a war America didn't belong in.
Originally Posted by Bristoe


,...and people like you have never found a war America didn't belong in.


Just as long as we start one with someone who can't hit us in our back yard. The family still wants to go to Longhorn on Saturday nights.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
It makes me smile and shake my head to read somebody talking about some foreign country America needs to go to war with.

America could go to war against any country you care to mention,...it might even defeat them.

But when it's all said and done America would still have the problems it has.

America doesn't have a foreign problem,...it has a domestic problem.

+1
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by UPhiker
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Neo-isolationist: Someone who doesn't think it helpful for America to scour the Middle East seeking wars we could possibly trigger under the direction, and for the benefit, of Israel.



TRH won't reads this, but he is Stupid for blaming so-called Neo-conservatives for seeking wars when strength is needed to prevent wars from getting bigger.
There are wars that are in the national interest and wars that we have no business getting involved in.


TRH has never found a war we need to get involved in. Even WWII.


,...and people like you have never found a war America didn't belong in.


The only wars we need to fight are wars where they want to destroy US.

At least Lucky Lindy didn’t have a history of aggressors to ponder although he should have been able to look at what Germany and Japan were in the process of doing.

What is your excuse? Ask TRH.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by UPhiker
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Neo-isolationist: Someone who doesn't think it helpful for America to scour the Middle East seeking wars we could possibly trigger under the direction, and for the benefit, of Israel.



TRH won't reads this, but he is Stupid for blaming so-called Neo-conservatives for seeking wars when strength is needed to prevent wars from getting bigger.
There are wars that are in the national interest and wars that we have no business getting involved in.


TRH has never found a war we need to get involved in. Even WWII.


,...and people like you have never found a war America didn't belong in.

Really, Bowsie?? How many times have I said that we should consider ourselves at war with Mexico based on an ongoing invasion of our southern border? But that would actually be in our national interest, so it will never happen.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Old American men slobbering up pablum and encouraging the government to send its young people to war in the Middle East,....for almost two consecutive decades.

No wonder the military can't reach its enlistment quotas these days.

But they're working on it. 16 year olds will soon be allowed to enlist.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jul/18/military-recruiting-woes-spur-debate-over-enlistme/



What a hand wringer. No one is pushing anything. What’s your fear? You're not gonna have to contribute, change your panties.
Originally Posted by Stan V
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Old American men slobbering up pablum and encouraging the government to send its young people to war in the Middle East,....for almost two consecutive decades.

No wonder the military can't reach its enlistment quotas these days.

But they're working on it. 16 year olds will soon be allowed to enlist.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jul/18/military-recruiting-woes-spur-debate-over-enlistme/



What a hand wringer. No one is pushing anything. What’s your fear? You're not gonna have to contribute, change your panties.


The only time you show up here any more is when it's time to show everybody what an idiot you are.

The young people of America are tired of going to war to entertain your ignorant old warmongering ass.

There's a lot of things you could do. You're not doing any of them. So get some dignity and shut your old ass up.

It's not your world any longer.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye

Really, Bowsie?? How many times have I said that we should consider ourselves at war with Mexico based on an ongoing invasion of our southern border? But that would actually be in our national interest, so it will never happen.


What cracks me up is the war cries when a muzzie cuts someones head off but not a single word when the cartels line them up on a fence row.
Stick it Nancy
,....fuggin' old warmongering idiots, anyway.

They're an embarrassment to my entire generation.

,..ain't no wonder that everybody under age 50 wants to euthanize the whole fuggin' boomer generation. They see people like Stan V as being representative of it.
Originally Posted by Stan V
Stick it Nancy

That was really intelligent and thought provoking...
Originally Posted by UPhiker
Originally Posted by nighthawk
Neo-isolationist - Somebody who sees no virtue in opposing evil unless he gets something material out of it.

I do believe that's how Hitler got ownership of Europe.

No, one who knows that if you replace one "evil" in the Middle East, you're liable to get a worse evil.


Correct, how is all the overthrows of secular dictators working out??
Israel Foreign Policy - "Let's You (USA) and him fight"
Originally Posted by Daveinjax
. . . They seem to believe that if they pull the trigger they’ll all be going to heaven and breaking in 50 virgins or something.



[Linked Image]
Their reward is a 70 something virgin.
Originally Posted by add
Israel Foreign Policy - "Let's You (USA) and him fight"

Their national anthem should be Onward Christian Soldiers.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by add
Israel Foreign Policy - "Let's You (USA) and him fight"

Their national anthem should be Onward Christian Soldiers.


So you hate Christians AND Jews ?
20-30% of the world's oil market goes through that Strait.

If, for whatever reason, there be a shooting war occur in the Strait and ships no longer safely passing through the Strait or up to Iran setting of a nuclear weapon in the middle of it as a last gasp middle finger to the world as it goes down rendering the Strait no longer safe to traverse that oil through that Strait could make everyone's life across the globe sporty.

Not saying we should bend over and let Iran take control of the Strait nor saying we should come in with guns ablaze, but what I am saying is this situation is complex and matters need to be thought through. The implications are tremendous. That's all.
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by add
Israel Foreign Policy - "Let's You (USA) and him fight"

Their national anthem should be Onward Christian Soldiers.


So you hate Christians A
AND Jews ?


Uh no.

He is saying (correctly) unaware Christians are being used.
Originally Posted by add
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by add
Israel Foreign Policy - "Let's You (USA) and him fight"

Their national anthem should be Onward Christian Soldiers.


So you hate Christians A
AND Jews ?


Uh no.

He is saying (correctly) unaware Christians are being used.


Damn we need a sarcasm emoji
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by add
Israel Foreign Policy - "Let's You (USA) and him fight"

Their national anthem should be Onward Christian Soldiers.


Okay.....that made me literally lol. Good one Hawkeye. 👍
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by UPhiker
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
[quote=The_Real_Hawkeye]Neo-isolationist: Someone who doesn't think it helpful for America to scour the Middle East seeking wars we could possibly trigger under the direction, and for the benefit, of Israel.



TRH won't reads this, but he is Stupid for blaming so-called Neo-conservatives for seeking wars when strength is needed to prevent wars from getting bigger.
There are wars that are in the national interest and wars that we have no business getting involved in.


TRH has never found a war we need to get involved in. Even WWII.

Really, Bowsie?? How many times have I said that we should consider ourselves at war with Mexico based on an ongoing invasion of our southern border? But that would actually be in our national interest, so it will never happen.



No Mexican army has invaded our border. That would be a invasion and a real war.

The illegal invasion is not in our national interest and Trump is doing something about that. Mexico is learning that it is not in their national interest either.
Numbers are finally beginning to move down. Trump is even getting a small start on the Wall.
I reckon some of the girls managed to get their estrogen levels straightened out. Or, did I miss the war?
I heard that the British war ship that prevented the first Iranian hijacking attempt of a tanker was an hour away from the latest hijacking.

UK needs to get more of their Navy involved if they want to keep Iran from hijacking their ships.

These things can be prevented as the UK has demonstrated. Just gotta be where the action is, not an hour away.

How about a couple more war ships in the area, like a ship carrying choppers or Harriers?. An hour away by boat would be just a few minutes away by air.

I would assume they have more than one war ship... blush

DF
Say our government took a leadership role in developing clean energy as it did for nukes or space travel, and made the tech affordable to the world. How long would these middle eastern countries have any ability to be a nuisance?

The last time the west made them irrelevant and was freed having to battle them it was the Industrial Revolution.
Originally Posted by Pat85
Originally Posted by UPhiker
Originally Posted by nighthawk
Neo-isolationist - Somebody who sees no virtue in opposing evil unless he gets something material out of it.

I do believe that's how Hitler got ownership of Europe.

No, one who knows that if you replace one "evil" in the Middle East, you're liable to get a worse evil.


Correct, how is all the overthrows of secular dictators working out??



Some countries and cultures need dictators to keep order. It's not right for all, and democracy isn't the answer for all or even many. The neocons see these dictators as "morality" targets in their propaganda blitzes to rally public support for spending our national treasure and spilling our national treasure on the battlefields to further their interests.



If the tanker isn’t waving an American flag it isn’t our problem. End of story.
Originally Posted by Snowwolfe
If the tanker isn’t waving an American flag it isn’t our problem. End of story.



MANY of the American owned ships fly Panamanian or Liberian flags. They don't wave American flags. They have flags of convenience.


https://frontpageafricaonline.com/b...hipping-registry-remains-second-largest/
Then they can suffer the results of their “convenience”. If a USA tanker wants to register out of the country to screw the US out of fees tough sh*t for them. The Brits have a military, so does UAE.
We need to keep our nose out of it until one of our tankers waving our flag is hit.
Notice the fool is not stupid enough to mess with a Russian tanker. Putin would rip them a new one if they did.
Originally Posted by Snowwolfe
Then they can suffer the results of their “convenience”. The Brits have a military, so does UAE.
We need to keep our nose out of it until one of our tankers are hit.
Notice the fool is not stupid enough to mess with a Russian tanker. Putin would rip them a new one if they did.



Who do you think supplies them with arms? Yup...Putin.

I can easily see where defense and support of American merchant vessels is in our direct national interest. BUT, we don't need to jump into any more middle eastern conflicts if they can be avoided and fought other ways than military action. If that's not possible, then use overwhelming force and end things fast.
© 24hourcampfire