Home
Posted By: jimy Lets get real, whos got a chance? - 09/08/19
Does anyone really believe that any part of the clown show, that is the democratic primary field today has any chance of winning or this all a slight of hand trick to keep the real candidate under the radar until far closer to the election?

Much like how all of Obama's school records and personal life was cleaned up or disappeared, no one remembers him in class, or records of rent or even residency. I don't believe any one that has declared as a candidate, as of today has a snowball's chance in h~ll of winning!
If R's get complacent and stay home, they will win.
Maybe they're planning on a Oprah/Michelle Trojan horse move at the DNC convention!
Doesn't matter what kind a brain damaged, insane, idiot they choose.

Democrats will line up around the block to vote for him/her.

They will be so popular that the dead will rise up out of their graves to cast a democrat ballot...
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
- - - - - the dead will rise up out of their graves to cast a democrat ballot...


That's been happening for decades, especially in places like Chitcago, Detroit, Baltimore, San Francisco, Atlanta, etc., and all of Florida!
Originally Posted by rockinbbar


They will be so popular that the dead will rise up out of their graves to cast a democrat ballot...


Catch up Barry! Dems invented a new scam called ballot harvesting that lets the dead rest while they are voting for commies.
smile
Originally Posted by Hotrod_Lincoln
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
- - - - - the dead will rise up out of their graves to cast a democrat ballot...


That's been happening for decades, especially in places like Chitcago, Detroit, Baltimore, San Francisco, Atlanta, etc., and all of Florida!


Fortunately, a lot of that happens in places that are already in the blue column.

Whoever they pick will have to sidle back towards the center after the nomination. Right now, it's mostly about raising money, just as with the impeachment blather.
Against the worst candidate in modern history, Trump won by razor thin margins in key states and lost the popular vote. That in a year that saw conservative leaning voters anxious to put 8 years of Obama behind them.

Kamala, Bernie, and other hardcore loonies don’t worry me as much as someone like Gabbard.
If the democrats win the republicans will be putting them back into their graves.
Originally Posted by MadMooner
Against the worst candidate in modern history, Trump won by razor thin margins in key states and lost the popular vote. That in a year that saw conservative leaning voters anxious to put 8 years of Obama behind them.

Kamala, Bernie, and other hardcore loonies don’t worry me as much as someone like Gabbard.


Tulsi Gabbard would beat Trump but the machine won't allow her the nomination because she's anti war,....and the machine runs on war.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Doesn't matter what kind a brain damaged, insane, idiot they choose.

Democrats will line up around the block to vote for him/her.

They will be so popular that the dead will rise up out of their graves to cast a democrat ballot...


Especially if they choose a bleck corksucker. Oh, they already did that.
Climate change, anti gun, anti American the banning of the basic American way of life in my world, I just don't see any legal way any of them win.
Hows come none of the front runners are trying to get Hillery's backing?
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by MadMooner
Against the worst candidate in modern history, Trump won by razor thin margins in key states and lost the popular vote. That in a year that saw conservative leaning voters anxious to put 8 years of Obama behind them.

Kamala, Bernie, and other hardcore loonies don’t worry me as much as someone like Gabbard.


Tulsi Gabbard would beat Trump but the machine won't allow her the nomination because she's anti war,....and the machine runs on war.


BwaaaaaHaaaAAAAAAA!!!!! Tulsi WOULD BEAT TRUMP? Maybe in your mind. Give me a break!
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by MadMooner
Against the worst candidate in modern history, Trump won by razor thin margins in key states and lost the popular vote. That in a year that saw conservative leaning voters anxious to put 8 years of Obama behind them.

Kamala, Bernie, and other hardcore loonies don’t worry me as much as someone like Gabbard.


Tulsi Gabbard would beat Trump but the machine won't allow her the nomination because she's anti war,....and the machine runs on war.


Gabbard missed the September debate cut but could still qualify for October debate, I wouldn't count her out yet.

The wild card is economy, a recession before the next election would give any one of them a real chance.
Buttplug is the Trojan. Lmao
100% of the media was not only supportive and protective of Hillary but also 100% against Donald Trump, and had all but called the election in her favior months before the election was even held.

They don't have any new dirt, or Russia collusion to bring up, bimbos, who knows but it didn't work last time, because every one of you would have been hitting too given the chance!.

The only concern I have, is a war with Iran, and that's a real possibility !
Originally Posted by jimy
Hows come none of the front runners are trying to get Hillery's backing?

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...g-to-elizabeth-warren-behind-the-scenes/
Originally Posted by jimy
100% of the media was not only supportive and protective of Hillary but also 100% against Donald Trump, and had all but called the election in her favior months before the election was even held.

They don't have any new dirt, or Russia collusion to bring up, bimbos, who knows but it didn't work last time, because every one of you would have been hitting too given the chance!.

The only concern I have, is a war with Iran, and that's a real possibility !

This, though the war with Iran is a big stretch IMO.

Incumbents almost always win.
Originally Posted by jimy


I don't believe any one that has declared as a candidate, as of today has a snowball's chance in h~ll of winning!


That's exactly what we all said about Obama.
Originally Posted by Timbermaster
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by MadMooner
Against the worst candidate in modern history, Trump won by razor thin margins in key states and lost the popular vote. That in a year that saw conservative leaning voters anxious to put 8 years of Obama behind them.

Kamala, Bernie, and other hardcore loonies don’t worry me as much as someone like Gabbard.


Tulsi Gabbard would beat Trump but the machine won't allow her the nomination because she's anti war,....and the machine runs on war.


BwaaaaaHaaaAAAAAAA!!!!! Tulsi WOULD BEAT TRUMP? Maybe in your mind. Give me a break!



She would look very rational to many voters and has a good "presence". Gabbard would be the very face of reason and moderation.

Originally Posted by Timbermaster
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by MadMooner
Against the worst candidate in modern history, Trump won by razor thin margins in key states and lost the popular vote. That in a year that saw conservative leaning voters anxious to put 8 years of Obama behind them.

Kamala, Bernie, and other hardcore loonies don’t worry me as much as someone like Gabbard.


Tulsi Gabbard would beat Trump but the machine won't allow her the nomination because she's anti war,....and the machine runs on war.


BwaaaaaHaaaAAAAAAA!!!!! Tulsi WOULD BEAT TRUMP? Maybe in your mind. Give me a break!


The anti war stance is very popular with the American people but hardly any candidates will run on it because it will get them black balled from the proceedings.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-candidate-democratic-debate/1887209001/

WASHINGTON – Rep. Tulsi Gabbard was the most searched candidate on Google after her night on the Democratic debate stage in Miami last month, and she took that honor again after the primary debate in Detroit on Wednesday.

Before Wednesday night's showdown between 10 of the 25 Democrats running for president, former Vice President Joe Biden was the most searched candidate in all but seven states. Gabbard was next, followed by Sen. Kamala Harris of California and Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey.

But during the debate, the congresswoman from Hawaii stood alone as the most Googled candidate in all 50 states.


Then this happened.

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/454746-tulsi-gabbard-sues-google-over-censorship-claims

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), a 2020 presidential contender, is suing Google over claims that the tech behemoth violated her right to "free speech."

In a federal complaint filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Gabbard alleged Google censored her presidential campaign when it suspended their advertising account for several hours last month.
It doesn't matter who they run, there's a bunch voting against Trump. Trump for 4 more is far from a sure thing.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Doesn't matter what kind a brain damaged, insane, idiot they choose.

Democrats will line up around the block to vote for him/her.

They will be so popular that the dead will rise up out of their graves to cast a democrat ballot...



And the oceans will part. smile

LMAO.
I am with you guys I don't see how on earth any one of them could win..but please don't underestimate those libtards...they have elected some real doozies in the past...and they hate trump and want him gone....they would elect a monkey if they thought he would win....oh wait".........
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
It doesn't matter who they run, there's a bunch voting against Trump. Trump for 4 more is far from a sure thing.


Any more than in the past ? I think he picks up 8-15 % of the black vote, not every democrat union member hates guns, and I think there are plenty of college age voters that are sick of the hand outs to every one but them, yea, I'm talking "white guys" .

I just hope they keep the "squad" out front and center, no one wants to give up hotdogs and cheese burgers!
I thought for sure somebody would try to shoot the black bastid!
Originally Posted by jimy
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
It doesn't matter who they run, there's a bunch voting against Trump. Trump for 4 more is far from a sure thing.


Any more than in the past ? I think he picks up 8-15 % of the black vote, not every democrat union member hates guns, and I think there are plenty of college age voters that are sick of the hand outs to every one but them, yea, I'm talking "white guys" .

I just hope they keep the "squad" out front and center, no one wants to give up hotdogs and cheese burgers!

I don't know. There's a lot of libtards. I hate to think about what they'll do with a majority. I personally rather not have a civil war.
Maybe that injun chick??

Laffin
I think Warren is the real threat.
Originally Posted by Bwana_1
I think Warren is the real threat.


Nah. Pocahontas is a joke. Not a threat.
The DemoRats learned after the last election they can’t beat Trump with and old white hag.

If they nominate a woman this time, it’ll be Harris.
Biden and Gabbard are the only moderates and the Dems will select a far left whacko for sure so they're out.
Originally Posted by rainierrifleco
I am with you guys I don't see how on earth any one of them could win..but please don't underestimate those libtards...they have elected some real doozies in the past...and they hate trump and want him gone....they would elect a monkey if they thought he would win....oh wait".........



They said the same about Trump. No way that a NY film flam reality show guy would win. It was a running joke.....until it wasn’t.

While Hillary was a lazy and easily disliked candidate, Trump is way more divisive. The opposition will be motivated.

If Trump is effective with a message of voting on platform instead of personality, I like his chances. But folks LOVE the cult of personality.
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
I thought for sure somebody would try to shoot the black bastid!





Why do you think he chose Biden as his VP? He did it because no one would be stupid enough to shoot him and leave Biden in charge. I thought that was the smartest thing he did in his whole campaign. He couldn't choose HRC, or she WOULD have had him shot, so she could ease into the slot. He wasn't THAT stupid.
Originally Posted by ratsmacker
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
I thought for sure somebody would try to shoot the black bastid!





Why do you think he chose Biden as his VP? He did it because no one would be stupid enough to shoot him and leave Biden in charge. I thought that was the smartest thing he did in his whole campaign. He couldn't choose HRC, or she WOULD have had him shot, so she could ease into the slot. He wasn't THAT stupid.


PREZACTLY
Originally Posted by moosemike
Biden and Gabbard are the only moderates and the Dems will select a far left whacko for sure so they're out.


I disagree. They are measuring Biden, seeing how folks respond to him. I think he is the DNC choice at this time. If his numbers look schitty, they’ll move to a younger more popular candidate that is equally “moderate”. Last thing the DNC wants is a Sanders or AIC loon fuggin up the program.
Man I hope some of the optimism is well founded. My biggest fear comes from seeing so very few women willing to vote for Trump. His tweets certainly don't help (even thought I love them normally) but the non-stop media campaign against him is working from what I see.
I don't think Biden is physically or mentally capable of even going through the motions of a campaign,...and I think the DNC knows it.
Did you believe Obama could win? Twice???

I wouldn’t take anything for granted.
This country desperately needs voter ID.

The depths of Democrat corruption knows no bounds. Look what they did to Kavanaugh.
They're harvesting illegal votes bigtime and "losing" boxes of ballots in the trunks of rental cars.
If one of the socialist candidates happen to cheat their way into the White House we're fugged.
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Did you believe Obama could win? Twice???

I wouldn’t take anything for granted.

Indeed, nothing for granted.
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by Bwana_1
I think Warren is the real threat.


Nah. Pocahontas is a joke. Not a threat.
The DemoRats learned after the last election they can’t beat Trump with and old white hag.

If they nominate a woman this time, it’ll be Harris.


Harris is waaay too far left, Warren at "least" has a plan for everything under the sun. The progressive left will be booted from the stage soon...Biden, Warren, Sanders will be the last 3 standing....and Joe is senile.
I think what's going on is,..many people who would run for the Democrat nomination has chosen to sit this one out because they know Trump is going to be hard to beat and they don't want to run and lose,......so they're waiting for 2024.

Consequently, the Democrat primary is filled with has beens and koo-koo birds.
Originally Posted by gregintenn
Did you believe Obama could win? Twice???

I wouldn’t take anything for granted.


I bet the halfrican would win a third term in a landslide if he ran.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I think what's going on is,..many people who would run for the Democrat nomination has chosen to sit this one out because they know Trump is going to be hard to beat and they don't want to run and lose,......so they're waiting for 2024.

Consequently, the Democrat primary is filled with has beens and koo-koo birds.

Like who is sitting out ? Thats a honest question not a dig.
about the only one that i know that hasn't made a ridiculous claim is gabbard. maybe she has and i haven't heard it. but the rest of them seem to be trying to out-retard each other. fuggen warren comes out and says she'll sign exec orders on day one to ban fracking. that melon head black guy from new jersey and the pencil neck fake mezzican from el paso say they'll confiscate all ars and ak's. fuggen bernie, fuggen bernie just keeps promising more and more free schit. this crop of schitheads are comical to watch. i'm just hoping the old buzzard in the black robes goes tango uniform so we'll at least have the supremes on our side somewhat. i'm kinda likin' yango tango though. i could use an extra grand a month.
Originally Posted by rem141r
about the only one that i know that hasn't made a ridiculous claim is gabbard. maybe she has and i haven't heard it. but the rest of them seem to be trying to out-retard each other. fuggen warren comes out and says she'll sign exec orders on day one to ban fracking. that melon head black guy from new jersey and the pencil neck fake mezzican from el paso say they'll confiscate all ars and ak's. fuggen bernie, fuggen bernie just keeps promising more and more free schit. this crop of schitheads are comical to watch. i'm just hoping the old buzzard in the black robes goes tango uniform so we'll at least have the supremes on our side somewhat. i'm kinda like wango tango though. i could use an extra grand a month.

Gabbard is the one who scares me the most of that crowd.
Originally Posted by Boarmaster123
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I think what's going on is,..many people who would run for the Democrat nomination has chosen to sit this one out because they know Trump is going to be hard to beat and they don't want to run and lose,......so they're waiting for 2024.

Consequently, the Democrat primary is filled with has beens and koo-koo birds.

Like who is sitting out ? Thats a honest question not a dig.


Oh,...I'd have to think about it. I think Ruben Gallego may have ideas about running for President. There's a few others.
Originally Posted by Squidge


Gabbard missed the September debate cut but could still qualify for October debate, I wouldn't count her out yet.




No,.....she won't be allowed to participate in the nomination process.
The Lib/commies will get fully behind who the candidate is-- they always do--
The Right MUST get behind Trump--
Like him or not, he is our only hope--
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I think what's going on is,..many people who would run for the Democrat nomination has chosen to sit this one out because they know Trump is going to be hard to beat and they don't want to run and lose,......so they're waiting for 2024.

Consequently, the Democrat primary is filled with has beens and koo-koo birds.


Yep. I believe that too.

They’ve given up on 2020 and thrown Uncle Joe to the wolves.
Originally Posted by Boarmaster123
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I think what's going on is,..many people who would run for the Democrat nomination has chosen to sit this one out because they know Trump is going to be hard to beat and they don't want to run and lose,......so they're waiting for 2024.

Consequently, the Democrat primary is filled with has beens and koo-koo birds.

Like who is sitting out ? Thats a honest question not a dig.


Gavin Newsom. CA Governor.
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by Boarmaster123
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I think what's going on is,..many people who would run for the Democrat nomination has chosen to sit this one out because they know Trump is going to be hard to beat and they don't want to run and lose,......so they're waiting for 2024.

Consequently, the Democrat primary is filled with has beens and koo-koo birds.

Like who is sitting out ? Thats a honest question not a dig.


Gavin Newsom. CA Governor.


they can't afford to sacrifice unrefined gold.

2024 will likely be a barn burner.
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
[

Like who is sitting out ? Thats a honest question not a dig.


Gavin Newsom. CA Governor. [/quote]


Yes, indeed. Very dangerous, too.
Originally Posted by ratsmacker
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
I thought for sure somebody would try to shoot the black bastid!





Why do you think he chose Biden as his VP? He did it because no one would be stupid enough to shoot him and leave Biden in charge. I thought that was the smartest thing he did in his whole campaign. He couldn't choose HRC, or she WOULD have had him shot, so she could ease into the slot. He wasn't THAT stupid.



Biden brought along a lot of blue-collar union vote. Without him on the ticket Trump could well have won the popular vote.
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by Boarmaster123
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I think what's going on is,..many people who would run for the Democrat nomination has chosen to sit this one out because they know Trump is going to be hard to beat and they don't want to run and lose,......so they're waiting for 2024.

Consequently, the Democrat primary is filled with has beens and koo-koo birds.

Like who is sitting out ? Thats a honest question not a dig.


Gavin Newsom. CA Governor.



Actually, he brings nothing with him that's any advantage for the Dems. He would carry only the bluest of the blue States that would never vote Rep. Granted, however, he doesn't look at the 2024 run that way; his ego blinds him.
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by Boarmaster123
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I think what's going on is,..many people who would run for the Democrat nomination has chosen to sit this one out because they know Trump is going to be hard to beat and they don't want to run and lose,......so they're waiting for 2024.

Consequently, the Democrat primary is filled with has beens and koo-koo birds.

Like who is sitting out ? Thats a honest question not a dig.


Gavin Newsom. CA Governor.


Newsom is a [bleep] of monumental stupidity !
If he were not told to eat, he would starve to death.
Originally Posted by jimy
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by Boarmaster123
Originally Posted by Bristoe
I think what's going on is,..many people who would run for the Democrat nomination has chosen to sit this one out because they know Trump is going to be hard to beat and they don't want to run and lose,......so they're waiting for 2024.

Consequently, the Democrat primary is filled with has beens and koo-koo birds.

Like who is sitting out ? Thats a honest question not a dig.


Gavin Newsom. CA Governor.


Newsom is a [bleep] of monumental stupidity !
If he were not told to eat, he would starve to death.


Women will come out in DROVES to vote for that stupid fuqker. Just like they did for Slick Willie and the Halfican.
[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by jimy
I just don't see any legal way any of them win.


And there it is. A few states have changed their electoral college voting laws so even if a candidate gets the most votes the elected members to vote in the electoral college can vote for the other candidate. I went to bed thinking the broom rider would be elected. I got a nice surprise during my breakfast.
Angry people vote, the last time more’n a few Democrat voters likely sat it out, complacent that Hillary would win, now they’re all PO’d.

It too believe that Tulsi Gabbard could beat Trump but I think it unlikely that the witches cabal that is the DNC would ever nominate her.
You can not find a smarmier politician than Gavin Newsom. Just ask Kimberly Guilfoyle.

Jim Jordan 2024
I would almost bet that none of those now fiddling around will be the demonrat candidate that the Republicans, libertarians and independents had better vote against in November
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
It doesn't matter who they run, there's a bunch voting against Trump. Trump for 4 more is far from a sure thing.



I disagree. Democrats carried Trump last time and (those) Democrats are happy with him.
The liberals are freakin idiots, but the communist who actually own the DNC are not.
I could be wrong, but I still think we're gonna see a centrist hero step in at the last minute to save the party.
Oprah, maybe, I don't rule out the Mooch. The Obama's greed and hatred for all things American may overcome their laziness. Neither of them have reached the point "where they have enough money"! grin
Keep in mind the media is 100% behind whoever they choose. By next November half the country will be convinced we're in a massive recession.
2020 is anything but a sure thing. One thing I am certain of is that if the bad guys win, we'll never have another fair election.
I'm very disappointed that Trump and the republicans did not investigate the election process and insure honesty in voting. The only reason HiLIARy won the popular vote was through illegal voting and fraud. She was a lousy candidate, but with a good turnout and conservative complacency, I'm sure the commies can rig an upset.
7mm
Originally Posted by ltppowell
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
It doesn't matter who they run, there's a bunch voting against Trump. Trump for 4 more is far from a sure thing.



I disagree. Democrats carried Trump last time and (those) Democrats are happy with him.



REALLY? Where do you come up with these alternative facts?
In our corrupt government anything is possible. It will never change until some heads roll. No consequences, no change.
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by ltppowell
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
It doesn't matter who they run, there's a bunch voting against Trump. Trump for 4 more is far from a sure thing.



I disagree. Democrats carried Trump last time and (those) Democrats are happy with him.



REALLY? Where do you come up with these alternative facts?


Well, you can look at the map of hundreds of blue counties across the country that flipped to red to vote for Trump, or listen to the people right here that day they did.
Originally Posted by ltppowell
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by ltppowell
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
It doesn't matter who they run, there's a bunch voting against Trump. Trump for 4 more is far from a sure thing.



I disagree. Democrats carried Trump last time and (those) Democrats are happy with him.



REALLY? Where do you come up with these alternative facts?


Well, you can look at the map of hundreds of blue counties across the country that flipped to red to vote for Trump, or listen to the people right here that day they did.


I sure hear a lot of them whining about their choice. I don't think they go that way again and it won't take many. Not many at all.

Of course, trumpers will fix that in the backroom where the counting gets done, but he's going to have to work at it to make it look good.
Ok, here's a question for you. Since traditional Democrats AND Republicans rejected the communist ideologies of Obama/Hillary, how do you intend to win an election by doubling down on radical leftism?
Originally Posted by LeroyBeans
Originally Posted by ltppowell
Originally Posted by MtnBoomer
It doesn't matter who they run, there's a bunch voting against Trump. Trump for 4 more is far from a sure thing.



I disagree. Democrats carried Trump last time and (those) Democrats are happy with him.



REALLY? Where do you come up with these alternative facts?


Facts can exist without being come up with. If you had any brains you would see it's TRUE.

Zero and Hillary were the driving force behind Trumps election. They drove Democrats away in droves. If you weren't a commie, you would have been driven away too.
Do the Dems have a chance? I suppose a slim one. The Trump Campaign has more than enough footage and quotes and clips of the fools who are running acting like fools to pound them into oblivion. People have to turn out, make sure the election isn't stolen, just generally play their part and do their jobs, but I'd sure rather play the R hand in this election.
Originally Posted by ltppowell
Ok, here's a question for you. Since traditional Democrats AND Republicans rejected the communist ideologies of Obama/Hillary, how do you intend to win an election by doubling down on radical leftism?


I don't. I'm not running. I'm not even campaigning for someone, and I do not think the Democrats will be successful if they nominate their most radical candidate. But that is probably what they will do - why? Because it is now or never. Because it worked for Trump as a strategy.

I agree that Hillary drove people away. No doubt about it, but she still won the popular vote, but couldn't quite stand up to the rigging of the electoral college.

In the meantime, that has not a damn thing to do with 2020. Hill's not in. None of the candidates they offer are worth vote, and neither is Trump, but he controls all the the dials now, so we will be listening to his station for a while longer.

I don't think Trump will get the most votes but he will be close enough (because the Democrats truly suck (again)) that he can easily rig a winner.
How are all the other gals in the office today?
I am not going to bet on it until February 2021.
Originally Posted by Birdwatcher
Angry people vote, the last time more’n a few Democrat voters likely sat it out, complacent that Hillary would win, now they’re all PO’d.

It too believe that Tulsi Gabbard could beat Trump but I think it unlikely that the witches cabal that is the DNC would ever nominate her.



Of course Tulsi Gabbard *COULD* beat Trump. I noticed that Bristoe stated that if she was nominated, Gabbard *WOULD* beat Trump. Which is laughable.

Why wouldn’t they nominate her if she would beat Trump? Doesn’t make sense.
© 24hourcampfire