So, let's assume for the sake of argument that Kavanaugh did this one (drunken frat prank where he exposes himself---but no corroborating witnesses, not one, and the female allegedly involved doesn't even remember the alleged incident). Can someone please tell me what in hell this has to do with his qualifications to be on the Supreme Court? Has he, in any of his legal opinions, shown some manifest legal or moral deficiency that we might plausibly trace to some character flaw he had when he was a 19 year old drunk college student? Secondly, given that bacchanalian revelry and rampant sexuality is what the Left is all about anyway (certainly in college at least), why the sudden moral outrage? When did the Left become morally pure on men and women and matters of sexuality? Was was that just after Chappaquidick?
That’s the Left’s hypocrisy on the whole thing. To answer your question, “no.” Not only has he not shown that in the short year on the SC but not in the record of his preceding judgments leading up to it.
But this moral fiasco underlies a point: that in this postmodern age, there are no limits to what the Left will do in regard to the SC and it’s nominees or the coming election in 2020. None!
From my reading though, regarding Kavanaugh, they are not so intent on impeaching him as they are labeling him as a women-abuser now to hopefully deter him from a “vote against women” should revisiting the Roe vs Wade decision come before the SC again. Abortion is the Dem’s sacrament.
This character assassination is a wake-up call though and is going to be in the back of any future R or Libertarian candidate who goes counter to the Dem’s or Left’s ideology. Unprovable claims that cannot be proven didn’t happen either that permanently stain and ruin somebody politically, or economically is a relatively new D MO.
