Thought I saw a thread here about this a few days ago, but cannot find it now. Perhaps it was on another site.
Anyone know where it is?
Thanks,
Ted
Anyone know where it is?
Thanks,
Ted
don't tell that miserable little snarlface swedish twit. she'll blow a fuggen temple vein.
There’s been about 5 ice ages over time, with the last one ending about 12,000 years ago.
What caused the planet to warm up and melt each one - cavemen riding around in SUV's?
What caused the planet to warm up and melt each one - cavemen riding around in SUV's?
Originally Posted by tpcollins
There’s been about 5 ice ages over time, with the last one ending about 12,000 years ago.
What caused the planet to warm up and melt each one - cavemen riding around in SUV's?
What caused the planet to warm up and melt each one - cavemen riding around in SUV's?
Stop being silly. Everyone knows it was pterodactyl farts.
Originally Posted by rem141r
don't tell that miserable little snarlface swedish twit. she'll blow a fuggen temple vein.
You mean Gretta Thornbush?
Bb
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
Quote
Human-caused climate change is settled stupid science.
those native Americans started it all, they torched the fugg out of prairie lands
Definitely man induced. By brown skinned man.
Definitely man induced. By brown skinned man.
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
How irresponsible.
Right
Right
Because the Holocene climatic optimum was caused by people in animal skins wandering around carrying sharp sticks
Right
Because the Holocene climatic optimum was caused by people in animal skins wandering around carrying sharp sticks
Don't believe man made global warming is much of a threat?
Wikipedia call you "fringe conspiracy theory".
Wikipedia is how your children are taught to research their term papers.
Wikipedia call you "fringe conspiracy theory".
Wikipedia is how your children are taught to research their term papers.
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
do you actually know any scientists ? particularly anyone who does research on climate and climate change, who support the entire "theory"?
Well I do know several, and they each claim its one of the biggest political hoaxes ever concocted...
besides the entire concept was created to get Government Funds for study by East Anglia Community College in England..
and even the "scientists" who concocted it admitted it was a hoax...
everyone was listening to them, until they admitted they had fabricated the lie....they were dropped from public attention by the media and the media went on like they were never heard of....
but you're such a genius you know all of that... just like any other liberal Communist DemocRAT, you'd rather keep on lying to the public....because unprove-able scare tactics work so well for you lying SOBs...
N'est Pas GansSchiess?
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA... another kool aid drinker that will not think for himself.
Originally Posted by Seafire
do you actually know any scientists ? particularly anyone who does research on climate and climate change, who support the entire "theory"?
Well I do know several, and they each claim its one of the biggest political hoaxes ever concocted...
besides the entire concept was created to get Government Funds for study by East Anglia Community College in England..
and even the "scientists" who concocted it admitted it was a hoax...
Originally Posted by Sasha_and_Abby
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA... another kool aid drinker that will not think for himself.
You may also be interested in this: https:/
Or, alternatively: https:/
I have seen a lot of "settled" science change over the years.
Originally Posted by tpcollins
There’s been about 5 ice ages over time, with the last one ending about 12,000 years ago.
What caused the planet to warm up and melt each one - cavemen riding around in SUV's?
What caused the planet to warm up and melt each one - cavemen riding around in SUV's?
Exactly. Climate change is the norm. The movement is about acquiring unitary control over, and repression of, the human population from a central, unelected, authority. That's all it's ever been about. Anyone with his eyes open has known this from the start.
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
Some time after Newton and his laws when electricity, magnetism and all was unified it was concluded that science was done. Nothing more to do, it was all well settled. If only that damn fool Einstein had kept his mouth shut.
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
That's a statement of religious dogma. Not only is a statement like that inconsistent with the very concept of science, but it couldn't be further from the truth. Scientists can tell you only that climate changes (and has for hundreds of millions of years), and hypothesize about causes. They don't speak in terms of religious dogmas as you have. The fact that it has changed for hundreds of millions of years (and that it is following a normal, post ice age, pattern now) is overwhelming evidence that industrialized man has little if anything to do with it.
Originally Posted by tpcollins
There’s been about 5 ice ages over time, with the last one ending about 12,000 years ago.
What caused the planet to warm up and melt each one - cavemen riding around in SUV's?
What caused the planet to warm up and melt each one - cavemen riding around in SUV's?
No dude, it was the cave men’s fires. Get with it!
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
....only in the mind of scientists who receive funding from those driving the climate change agenda and the sycophants hoping to acquire relevancy on someone else's dime.
There are sites where posting drivel like is gets appreciation , why not post there Goose?
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
Do you mean the Scientists that get paid (through re-search grants) to produce results that support the lefts agenda?
Knowledge, and wisdom are not always the same. Bein' smart, and doin' smart.
i would agree that climate change is settled science. and maybe even agree that a bit of it is man made. but it ain't what the hollywood crowd are clutching their pearls over. it will be fine for hundreds if not thousands of years. and then there will be some kind of major changes over a longggg time. driving a prius and wearing cardboard underwear ain't making a schit bit of difference. but some people need to be upset or they ain't happy. seems to be in fashion these days.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
That's a statement of religious dogma. Not only is a statement like that inconsistent with the very concept of science, but it couldn't be further from the truth. Scientists can tell you only that climate changes (and has for hundreds of millions of years), and hypothesize about causes. They don't speak in terms of religious dogmas as you have. The fact that it has changed for hundreds of millions of years (and that it is following a normal, post ice age, pattern now) is overwhelming evidence that industrialized man has little if anything to do with it.
Very well said.
Nobody who truly understands the epistemology of science would use the term settled science. There is always a debate among scientists. That is how science works. When liberals, who tend to be educated in verbal fields such as law and journalism, talk about science, it is comical. Come to think about it, the same applies to their understanding of guns and gun culture. But, hey, they are smarter than the rest of us and it is their duty to educate us deplorables.
Paul
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
The reason there is no debate among scientists is that their existence depends on grant money. Climate scientists know that if they don't produce results that align with liberal extremists, their funding will dry up. Most climate scientist would sell their mothers for the right grant.
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
How irresponsible.
Flat Earth was settle science.Short thinking idiots have always believed stupid [bleep].
The only thing climate scientists agree on is that the climate changes. Less than half of them think (NOT know) that some small part of that change may be (NOT is) human-caused.
All the shouting and wailing by liberal whacknuts can't change that or make the human aspect true. Not one of the dire predictions (now well over 40 of them) the alarmists have made has ever come true. Not a single one. LINK
Climate is real. All the hype about it is a hoax.
All the shouting and wailing by liberal whacknuts can't change that or make the human aspect true. Not one of the dire predictions (now well over 40 of them) the alarmists have made has ever come true. Not a single one. LINK
Climate is real. All the hype about it is a hoax.
Originally Posted by Paul39
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
That's a statement of religious dogma. Not only is a statement like that inconsistent with the very concept of science, but it couldn't be further from the truth. Scientists can tell you only that climate changes (and has for hundreds of millions of years), and hypothesize about causes. They don't speak in terms of religious dogmas as you have. The fact that it has changed for hundreds of millions of years (and that it is following a normal, post ice age, pattern now) is overwhelming evidence that industrialized man has little if anything to do with it.
Very well said.
Nobody who truly understands the epistemology of science would use the term settled science. There is always a debate among scientists. That is how science works. When liberals, who tend to be educated in verbal fields such as law and journalism, talk about science, it is comical. Come to think about it, the same applies to their understanding of guns and gun culture. But, hey, they are smarter than the rest of us and it is their duty to educate us deplorables.
Paul
Excellent post, Paul.
Okay then, I wanna know what human caused it to be -5 here today so I can punch them in the face.
How convenient that the "settled science" supports policies that tax the fugg out of developed countries, especially the US of A, and hobble our economy, while studiously ignoring the world's largest polluters, hand huge chunks of wealth to Schiffhole countries in the form of carbon credits that can be sold back to industrialized countries who can continue to spew their filth unabated, and btw let the rich fuggers who dreamed all this up get even richer as the brokers of those credits. Al Gore got all his ducks in a row to become a broker before he began his crusade.
Bernie Madoff is a small-time grifter by comparison.
Bernie Madoff is a small-time grifter by comparison.
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled POLITICAL science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
It has little to do with NATURAL SCIENCE.
Originally Posted by slumlord
Right
Right
Because the Holocene climatic optimum was caused by people in animal skins wandering around carrying sharp sticks
Right
Because the Holocene climatic optimum was caused by people in animal skins wandering around carrying sharp sticks
And making fires and farting. Don't forget that.
Well, yes. Climate change is so called settled science - it has the requisite evidence behind it.. Man-caused or even influenced cc is not, and does not to honest science people not pandering for funds (as pointed out in above posts).
Just 20,000 years ago we had continental glaciers a mile thick over much of NA. Sea levels were over 300 feet lower. Alaska was part of Asia, sometimes cut off from the rest of NA by glacial tongues, sometimes with partial or completely open corridors to the south. The Bering Land "Bridge"', a vast fertile, ice-free plain, was 65 -90 miles long and 600 wide, allowing animal and human travel between Alaska and Asia in both directions. Horses and camels both originated in the Americas, later going extinct there for unknown reasons. Not the only ones, either - likely most of which left no or as yet not found fossils behind.
Makes me lol when these yahoos start hyperventilating over a few millimeters sea rise annually.
They obsess the potential and observable negative effects, while totally ignoring the positive. Something wins, something loses.
Fugg 'em all - earth will abide, tho we may not. And who says that would be a bad thing?
Just 20,000 years ago we had continental glaciers a mile thick over much of NA. Sea levels were over 300 feet lower. Alaska was part of Asia, sometimes cut off from the rest of NA by glacial tongues, sometimes with partial or completely open corridors to the south. The Bering Land "Bridge"', a vast fertile, ice-free plain, was 65 -90 miles long and 600 wide, allowing animal and human travel between Alaska and Asia in both directions. Horses and camels both originated in the Americas, later going extinct there for unknown reasons. Not the only ones, either - likely most of which left no or as yet not found fossils behind.
Makes me lol when these yahoos start hyperventilating over a few millimeters sea rise annually.
They obsess the potential and observable negative effects, while totally ignoring the positive. Something wins, something loses.
Fugg 'em all - earth will abide, tho we may not. And who says that would be a bad thing?
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
You're employing the fallacy of appeal to authority. As Einstein once remarked (when Hitler had trotted out 50 of his best scientists to claim Einstein was wrong), "it only takes one to prove me wrong." In other words, truth isn't established by consensus opinion, but rather, on the basis of whether or not the theory is supported by the evidence. In the case of global warming, the theory does not fit the evidence, no matter how many "scientists" driven by ideology opine otherwise.
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
Let’s see earth is over 3 billion years old, that’s over 3 billion orbits around the sun with earth traveling at 67K mph on elliptical orbits that very in path by a large degree according to Newton’s studies and placed in his Mathematica Principia. Now let’s take into account solar flare, solar storms and the varying distances the earth is in its elliptical orbits to the sun. Now you push/ agree that climate change is appropriated by man and an agreed upon settled science. Nothing could be further from the truth. You have to be intellectually void to see it as settled science. Only 50 million years ago carbon dioxide was 5 times what it is today on the planet (2,000 ppm then vs 380 ppm today) as Canada was a jungle with fauna and climate similar to Florida. Laughing hard at the stupidity that is bought into by the likes of you. Man has no ability to change the earth’s temperatures in any way, shape or form unless man can reshape the makeup of the sun, and the celestial orbits of the solar system the earth resides in. Such hubris is laughable. Man’s a newcomer to the planet, he’ll have to deal with what the planet dishes out just like all that came before and are now gone.
The effects of volcanic events are difficult to dispute, geology, ice coring etc etc. I can't begin to understand it all, but it's indisputable that huge volcanic events create volcanic winters, ice ages if you will. What does that mean to us, arguing about climate change? Well, it appears to be a near perfect modeling laboratory that compresses the train of cause and effect of huge releases of particulates and sulfur dioxide that are thrust into the atmosphere during these events. It compresses time into geologic mini history books so that we can study and comprehend these events instantly instead of over several lifetimes of scientists. That information thus gathered, appears to suggest the earth heals itself after these events by...wait for it..the formation of excess co2 in the atmosphere, the slowing of co2 absorption in by the oceans, to create a "greenhouse" effect to recover us from the volcanic winter. Eventually the co2 levels diminish and the temperatures stabilize. Read Rossimp's post above, the earth can handle the pittance man produces. Total opinion from this point on: We can take our time, slowly wean ourselves from fossil fuels if we think we have to....THERE IS NO URGENCY. The doomsayers are tv hucksters, "hurry act now, the next 5 callers get a federal grant".
Getting settled science from the DNC that affects taxes and regulations and like getting settled science from the man boy love assoc.
When I saw how wrong peer reviewed published studies by fisheries proffesors got "threshold of extinction", I realized that science by grants in publicly funded universities it trash.
When I saw how wrong peer reviewed published studies by fisheries proffesors got "threshold of extinction", I realized that science by grants in publicly funded universities it trash.
Man needs to quit farting. He's destroying the OZONE Layer. Yeah Right. Gve me another bowl of beans.
NASA was changed by your Hero Barry Sotero. Their thing is honoring Muslim Scholars now. Not sure I would trust them anymore for any science.
If the earth warms up some and the sea levels rise a little why is that necessarily a catastrophe? Being able to raise crops farther north might help feed people. Galveston Island over 100 years ago put up a rock wall and pumped enough sand over the wall to raise and protect the city. Flying over this country I am much impressed with how much unused rocks and for that matter water we have. In our state Red River was straightened and lined with rocks and I am positive our "threatened" coasts could be lined also. My decades of experience at my own place tells me that applying rocks to wet and eroding places lasts probably forever. Solutions aren't being sought by climate alarmists. Their intentions are evil.
This is the best I've heard on the subject of global warming.
Two Scientists Debunk the Global Warming FRAUD
Two Scientists Debunk the Global Warming FRAUD
Climate change is a natural phenomenon. The climate has been changing from day one and will continue to change throughout time. it's nobodies fault it's just nature.
Originally Posted by doubletap
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
The reason there is no debate among scientists is that their existence depends on grant money. Climate scientists know that if they don't produce results that align with liberal extremists, their funding will dry up. Most climate scientist would sell their mothers for the right grant.
You get it, same applies to alligator research, wolf research, coyote research et al.
Originally Posted by Grumulkin
This is the best I've heard on the subject of global warming.
Two Scientists Debunk the Global Warming FRAUD
Two Scientists Debunk the Global Warming FRAUD
I am a big fan of the guy in the blue shirt, Tony Heller. He makes a youtube video a couple times a week.
https:/
Originally Posted by Grumulkin
This is the best I've heard on the subject of global warming.
Two Scientists Debunk the Global Warming FRAUD
Two Scientists Debunk the Global Warming FRAUD
"Amazing Word Ministries"
Very reputable. "There's another one born every minute."
https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
or even
https:/
Originally Posted by Goosey
You may also be interested in this: https:/
Or, alternatively: https:/
There is no consensus in science-only in politics.
Cycles of solar minimum and maximums.
Ice cores going back 1000,s of years prove the cycles.
Mans influence has been minimal compared to the overall influence from the big heat tab in the sky called the fugging Sun.......
Next.......
Ice cores going back 1000,s of years prove the cycles.
Mans influence has been minimal compared to the overall influence from the big heat tab in the sky called the fugging Sun.......
Next.......
Ohhh dont even go into earths axial tilt changing regularly over 1000,s of year either.
Gawd forbid ......
If all this schitt about global warming and eventual cooling in cycles
were attributed to the one constant in the universe that controls everything from the sun to a paper clip
Gravity.............
Gawd forbid ......
If all this schitt about global warming and eventual cooling in cycles
were attributed to the one constant in the universe that controls everything from the sun to a paper clip
Gravity.............
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
Dumbass, It's only settled science to those who are attempting to bilk more money out of gullible people.
The "scientific" methods that were used to build this bullscitt claim, wouldn't survive my 9th grade science teacher's examination. It would be sent back as incomplete and needing much more non-massaged data.
Modeling as they call it can create anything they want it to say, it just depends on how they manipulate the data.
JUst remember that these are the same people that believe there are more than two sexes. The X and Y chromosomes are joined by some 20 other ones that create whatever sex you wish to be. That should establish the level of their scientific knowledge.
Yes, somehow they know that biology and DNA makeup is purely fungible and also know everything about the 3 billion+ year old orb they live on. Sounds like God, again the hubris is laughable. Feel sorry for the sheep who follow these pontificating losers into hell on earth.
Originally Posted by Rossimp
Yes, somehow they know that biology and DNA makeup is purely fungible and also know everything about the 3 billion+ year old orb they live on. Sounds like God, again the hubris is laughable. Feel sorry for the sheep who follow these pontificating losers into hell on earth.
These guys are taking a field trip to Portland?
Originally Posted by Rossimp
Yes, somehow they know that biology and DNA makeup is purely fungible and also know everything about the 3 billion+ year old orb they live on. Sounds like God, again the hubris is laughable. Feel sorry for the sheep who follow these pontificating losers into hell on earth.
IF, IF you are right (?) you won't live long enuff.
Originally Posted by rem141r
don't tell that miserable little snarlface swedish twit. she'll blow a fuggen temple vein.
please tell her !
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by Goosey
Human-caused climate change is settled science.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
There is not a debate among scientists.
End.
How irresponsible.
Source ? Does that surprise you ?
Originally Posted by Yukoner
Thought I saw a thread here about this a few days ago, but cannot find it now. Perhaps it was on another site.
Anyone know where it is?
Thanks,
Ted
Anyone know where it is?
Thanks,
Ted
I don't think anyone knows where it is.
Thanks for all the thoughts on this, Guys. When I find it, I will post it.
Best,
Ted
Best,
Ted