Home
Posted By: 79S John Bolton - 01/27/20
The democrats will be crying for witnesses to be called before the senate now..

Former national security advisor John Bolton's team was under fire from conservative commentators Sunday night, after a report in The New York Times revealed a bombshell excerpt from Bolton's forthcoming book that could prove pivotal in President Trump's impeachment trial -- just as the Amazon product page for the book went live.

The drama began earlier Sunday when the Times exclusively reported that Bolton's manuscript included a claim that Trump explicitly linked a hold on Ukraine aid to an investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden. Trump told Bolton in August, according to a transcript of Bolton's forthcoming book reviewed by the Times, "that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/john-bolton-trump-ukraine-aid-ny-times-manuscript
Posted By: Valsdad Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Amazon?

NY Times?

gotta wonder what someone has on Bolton too.

Geno
Posted By: GreatWaputi Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Maybe that explains the month long delay forwarding the articles of impeachment to the Senate.
Posted By: Jim_Conrad Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by Valsdad
Amazon?

NY Times?

gotta wonder what someone has on Bolton too.

Geno



I have it on good authority that John Bolton is a joo.


Check Mate.
Posted By: Craigster Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
And an ass hole as well.
Posted By: Jim_Conrad Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Yeah. I will go along with that.
Posted By: Snyper Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
That's the same story they've told from Day 1.
It's not unusual nor illegal.

It also contradicts what some others said about Trump not really wanting investigations as long as they made the announcements about them.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by Craigster
And an ass hole as well.


This.
Posted By: jdm953 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...pt-leaked-to-new-york-times/#more-181961
Posted By: local_dirt Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Throw Another Log on the dumpster fire. It's the President's duty to investigate corruption, wherever it may lie. That includes a corrupt former vice president and his silver spoon son.

Only the Golden Knee Grow is immune. smile
Posted By: jaguartx Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Fake News drummed up by the Deep State Cabals MSM.

Sarah Tinsley, an adviser to Bolton, said: “The ambassador's manuscript was transmitted to the White House in hard copy several weeks ago for pre-publication review by the NSC. The ambassador has not passed the draft manuscript to anyone else. Period.”


Bolton attorney Charles J. Cooper .....saying in a statement that the pre-publication review process had been “corrupted and that information has been disclosed by persons other than those properly involved in reviewing the manuscript.”
Posted By: gunswizard Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
He with the cookie duster mustache is an azzhole POS, never liked him from the start. Now he's got hurt feelers over Trump firing his azz and he's behaving like a spoiled brat.
Posted By: doubletap Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
All this controversy will double book sales.
Posted By: deflave Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
His music was pretty lame.

Don't know schit about his politics.
Posted By: lightning Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Still not a crime. Withholding aid to get a Country to investigate criminal behavior is not a crime.
Posted By: JamesJr Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by lightning
Still not a crime. Withholding aid to get a Country to investigate criminal behavior is not a crime.



Agreed. Trump's mistake was in thinking that even if Ukraine had handed over dirt on the Biden's, and I'm sure there was dirt, that something would be done about it. Being a crook is a requirement if you want to have presidential aspirations as a Democrat, so it wasn't going to affect Biden at all.

Those of us who believe in right and wrong have no idea how crooked the world of politics is, and both sides are just as guilty as the other. That's why it's just a joke for the Democrats to be acting all high and mighty about wanting to impeach Trump over something that they have done for years.
Posted By: Squidge Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Fake News drummed up by the Deep State Cabals MSM.

Sarah Tinsley, an adviser to Bolton, said: “The ambassador's manuscript was transmitted to the White House in hard copy several weeks ago for pre-publication review by the NSC. The ambassador has not passed the draft manuscript to anyone else. Period.”


Bolton attorney Charles J. Cooper .....saying in a statement that the pre-publication review process had been “corrupted and that information has been disclosed by persons other than those properly involved in reviewing the manuscript.”


Was the leaked manuscript related to this January 19th news?

https://apnews.com/d62eab2291688a96acc7a3bb48a3eec2

Quote
WASHINGTON (AP) — A White House adviser on Europe and Russia issues has been placed on administrative leave pending a security-related investigation, two people with knowledge of his exit said Sunday.

Andrew Peek was escorted off the White House compound on Friday, according to one of those familiar with his departure.

In response to questions, the National Security Council, the foreign policy unit at the White House, said in a statement that “we do not discuss personnel matters.”

Peek, former deputy assistant secretary of state for Iraq and Iran, has been in the position since November. His two predecessors in that position — Tim Morrison and Fiona Hill — both testified in the House impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump.
Posted By: IZH27 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
I don’t trust any man whose view of diplomacy is deeply rooted in military power and war. Therefore, I don’t trust Bolton. He has been a major influencer in Washington for far too long. My suspicions of the man would be that he likes the power of influence that he has cultivated and would fight to maintain that status after his firing.

At this point the American people need to realize that too many people have rummaged through the circumstances surrounding Ukraine. There is no good way to know what really happened at this point in time. Finding the truth at this point would be like trying to track a deer across a field after a heard of cattle were put out to graze.

If Trump did wrong or close to wrong he will be cautious now. At best this is a cast for a strong reprimand.
Posted By: Pat85 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Fake News drummed up by the Deep State Cabals MSM.

Sarah Tinsley, an adviser to Bolton, said:


An adviser to an adviser?????
Posted By: steve4102 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Fake News drummed up by the Deep State Cabals MSM.

Sarah Tinsley, an adviser to Bolton, said: “The ambassador's manuscript was transmitted to the White House in hard copy several weeks ago for pre-publication review by the NSC. The ambassador has not passed the draft manuscript to anyone else. Period.”


Bolton attorney Charles J. Cooper .....saying in a statement that the pre-publication review process had been “corrupted and that information has been disclosed by persons other than those properly involved in reviewing the manuscript.”


The Mole.

Remember the issue a little more than a week ago when the National Security Council senior director for European and Russian affairs, Andrew Peek, was escorted from the White House grounds and is said to be under a security-related investigation?


On Friday January 17th, 2020, the National Security Council senior director for European and Russian affairs, Andrew Peek, was escorted from the White House grounds and is currently under a security investigation.


There are few details about why Peek was physically removed and is under a very serious investigation; however, some of Andrew Peek’s professional background details tell a story. The connection to Gen. John Allen is a MASSIVE warning flare.

Andrew Peek, the senior director for European and Russian affairs at the National Security Council, has been placed on administrative leave pending a security-related investigation, people familiar with the situation tell Axios.


[…] Andrew Peek came from the State Department. Because the appointment happened in the past two months, it would appear Andrew Peek was recommended by the Dept. of State and accepted for the NSC post by National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien.

Here’s how it looks: Andrew Peek was a mole. A resistance spy sent into the Trump administration as part of the allied deep state resistance effort. Someone caught him attempting to access something,


The House motive here, the forethought within the design, is very important now because it explains why they are vociferously demanding witnesses in the Senate. The House plan was always to work around the ability of the executive branch to go to court. The managers are now attempting to execute that plan, along with a manufactured political talking point, in the Senate trial.

The House crew intended for this to unfold exactly as it is happening.


https://theconservativetreehouse.co...ook-manuscript-leaked-to-new-york-times/
Posted By: jaguartx Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Thanks, steve.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
What say you now?

The Media has taken control of the narrative and the Senate Impeachment Trial with their bombshell accusation from Bolton.

What should the Senate do now?

Should they allow Bolton to testify AND be cross examined, or should the Senate refuse to allow his testimony thus allowing this enormous cloud to hang over President Trump's head for years.

I for one want to hear what he has to say "Under Oath"
Posted By: nealglen37 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Thanks John.................................we get another few weeks of this garbage trial.
Posted By: jdunham Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
The same day his book goes on sale? LOL! You can’t make this garbage up.
Posted By: hasbeen1945 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by steve4102
What say you now?

The Media has taken control of the narrative and the Senate Impeachment Trial with their bombshell accusation from Bolton.

What should the Senate do now?

Should they allow Bolton to testify AND be cross examined, or should the Senate refuse to allow his testimony thus allowing this enormous cloud to hang over President Trump's head for years.

I for one want to hear what he has to say "Under Oath"

Doesn’t matter. The media and democrats are after Trump. If not this there will be something else next week. I say let them stew. Trump needs to keep the American voters informed on what he is doing for the country. Hasbeen
Posted By: flintlocke Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by jdunham
The same day his book goes on sale? LOL! You can’t make this garbage up.

You nailed it.
Posted By: oldtrapper Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Hey, what ever happened to the all knowing Lev Parnas? Guess it was time for something new. Doesn't pass the smell test, again.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by Squidge
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Fake News drummed up by the Deep State Cabals MSM.

Sarah Tinsley, an adviser to Bolton, said: “The ambassador's manuscript was transmitted to the White House in hard copy several weeks ago for pre-publication review by the NSC. The ambassador has not passed the draft manuscript to anyone else. Period.”


Bolton attorney Charles J. Cooper .....saying in a statement that the pre-publication review process had been “corrupted and that information has been disclosed by persons other than those properly involved in reviewing the manuscript.”


Was the leaked manuscript related to this January 19th news?

https://apnews.com/d62eab2291688a96acc7a3bb48a3eec2

Quote
WASHINGTON (AP) — A White House adviser on Europe and Russia issues has been placed on administrative leave pending a security-related investigation, two people with knowledge of his exit said Sunday.

Andrew Peek was escorted off the White House compound on Friday, according to one of those familiar with his departure.

In response to questions, the National Security Council, the foreign policy unit at the White House, said in a statement that “we do not discuss personnel matters.”

Peek, former deputy assistant secretary of state for Iraq and Iran, has been in the position since November. His two predecessors in that position — Tim Morrison and Fiona Hill — both testified in the House impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump.




I expect so, Squidge.
Posted By: slumlord Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Wasn’t he in that movie Office Space?
Posted By: centershot Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Throw Another Log on the dumpster fire. It's the President's duty to investigate corruption, wherever it may lie. That includes a corrupt former vice president and his silver spoon son.

Only the Golden Knee Grow is immune. smile


Speaking of corruption, did you see the interview with Peter Schwizer on Mark Levin? He tells how the Bidens, Warren and Bernie have all become rich by snaking government moneys.
Posted By: smokepole Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Does anybody really think anything Bolton has to say will change the outcome?
Posted By: jaguartx Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
I think Trump may be setting another trap for the dims with this Bolton BS and may have used Bolton to catch Andrew Peek. .
Posted By: hatari Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
My take opn Bolton:

- he has his own agenda
- he wants to sell books
- he won't sell out Trump. Has no reason to, even after getting fired. He was hired for his expertise and opinion, he gave his opinion, and was told "thank you for your service".
Posted By: mtnsnake Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
He is a liar. He does whatever he can to get kickbacks. Deep state trash.
Posted By: ironbender Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by smokepole
Does anybody really think anything Bolton has to say will change the outcome?

It’s about the election. That’s the outcome the left is focused on.
Posted By: 79S Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by deflave
His music was pretty lame.

Don't know schit about his politics.


[Linked Image from ]
Posted By: Valsdad Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by Valsdad
Amazon?

NY Times?

gotta wonder what someone has on Bolton too.

Geno



I have it on good authority that John Bolton is a joo.


Check Mate.


Dang,

another Irish one? Or is Bolton a Brit name?

One thing is for sure........................the stakes in this game are .................................




HUGE.


Geno
Posted By: Magnumdood Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Bolton is yet another disgruntled employee that President Trump fired. I don't give Bolton's accusation any serious consideration.
Posted By: Magnumdood Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by smokepole
Does anybody really think anything Bolton has to say will change the outcome?

Absolutely not.
Posted By: kenjs1 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Throw Another Log on the dumpster fire. It's the President's duty to investigate corruption, wherever it may lie. That includes a corrupt former vice president and his silver spoon son.

Only the Golden Knee Grow is immune. smile

EXACTLY. Not DJT' s fault the Ukrainians threw a net that snagged Biden - hell he was the biggest fish in the cess pool. What was he supposed to say- investigate everyone but not Hunter Biden ??????
Posted By: doctor_Encore Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
John Bolten new book had to go through a NSC review for security reasons. Guess who also works at the NSC, LT COL Vindmans twin brother, now the source of the leak to the New York Times seems rather obvious...doesn't it!
Posted By: Remington6MM Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
I'm guessing that Bolton's book should be on the "fiction" shelf.
Posted By: hatari Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by doctor_Encore
John Bolten new book had to go through a NSC review for security reasons. Guess who also works at the NSC, LT COL Vindmans twin brother, now the source of the leak to the New York Times seems rather obvious...doesn't it!



You're kidding?
Posted By: jaguartx Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Nope. Vindemann and his bro are both big wheel deep state commies appointed to power in the Zero admin to help take America down.
Posted By: 79S Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Nope. Vindemann and his bro are both big wheel deep state commies appointed to power in the Zero admin to help take America down.


[Linked Image from ]
Posted By: steve4102 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by hatari
Originally Posted by doctor_Encore
John Bolten new book had to go through a NSC review for security reasons. Guess who also works at the NSC, LT COL Vindmans twin brother, now the source of the leak to the New York Times seems rather obvious...doesn't it!



You're kidding?

Nope Rush is talking about it right now.
Posted By: Badgerloader Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
This NYT leak is gonna sell a lot of books for Bolton. Of course, the NYT is known for accuracy & honesty in what they print. :-)
Posted By: doctor_Encore Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by hatari
Originally Posted by doctor_Encore
John Bolten new book had to go through a NSC review for security reasons. Guess who also works at the NSC, LT COL Vindmans twin brother, now the source of the leak to the New York Times seems rather obvious...doesn't it!



You're kidding?



NOPE... NOT KIDDING.....IT'S TRUE.
Posted By: simonkenton7 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Yes, the NY Times is "The paper of record." You can believe anything they say.
Posted By: local_dirt Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by hatari
Originally Posted by doctor_Encore
John Bolten new book had to go through a NSC review for security reasons. Guess who also works at the NSC, LT COL Vindmans twin brother, now the source of the leak to the New York Times seems rather obvious...doesn't it!



You're kidding?

Nope Rush is talking about it right now.




Closing a lot of circles.
Posted By: smokepole Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by smokepole
Does anybody really think anything Bolton has to say will change the outcome?

It’s about the election. That’s the outcome the left is focused on.



Fair enough. How many people do you think will change their votes based on anything said/done during this three-ring circus?
Posted By: watch4bear Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by hatari
My take opn Bolton:

- he has his own agenda
- he wants to sell books
- he won't sell out Trump. Has no reason to, even after getting fired. He was hired for his expertise and opinion, he gave his opinion, and was told "thank you for your service".




Ah yes; the enemy John Bolton grin

https://therightscoop.com/bolton-sm...t-would-impact-gun-ownership-in-america/
Posted By: nealglen37 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
So, how long before I see Bolton on CNN, MSNBC, and the view calling him "a true patriot".
Posted By: nealglen37 Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Make your own meme

https://politizoom.com/2020/01/27/t...laughing-at-trump-photo-washington-post/
Posted By: local_dirt Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Originally Posted by nealglen37
So, how long before I see Bolton on CNN, MSNBC, and the view calling him "a true patriot".





They'll seamlessly slide that in after dinner tonight. They can't have folks pondering Trump's attorneys totally gutting their arguments and putting the fool's gold to bed.
Posted By: Switch Re: John Bolton - 01/27/20
Does John Bolton have any actual PROOF? Executive Privilege will prevail, no Bolton will not testify, Dems will scream, but didn't when other Presidents have used it. Remember FAST AND FURIOUS? Holder and Obama? Soooooo tried of this crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The left hated Bolton before this, now he's not a lair or a war monger, but a hero and and honest statesman and of course respected and trusted. Only thought that comes to mind is I'm really sorry for voting for Mitt and Ryan. Only choice, but now that we've now witnessed what snakes they both are............
© 24hourcampfire