Home
Posted By: RockyRaab Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
7.7 magnitude today. FIRST NEWS

New Moon tidal pull strikes again.
Posted By: VarmintGuy Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
RockyRaab: Yikes - that is a big one!
Hopefully injuries/casualties will be at a minimum.
Seems to me a lot of earthquakes have been occurring around the world in the last couple years!
I have only been around for 72 years but again it seems to me that they are more prolific of recent?
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
Posted By: deerstalker Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Hey Mon! That's some kick ass stuff !
Posted By: travelingman1 Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
My nephew and his intended are down there, visiting her family. Hope all are safe.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by VarmintGuy
RockyRaab: Yikes - that is a big one!
Hopefully injuries/casualties will be at a minimum.
Seems to me a lot of earthquakes have been occurring around the world in the last couple years!
I have only been around for 72 years but again it seems to me that they are more prolific of recent?
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy


I think you're on to something there, VG.

https://www.642weather.com/weather/earthquakes-world.php
Posted By: watch4bear Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by travelingman1
My nephew and his intended are down there, visiting her family. Hope all are safe.



7.7 is no joke
Posted By: RockyRaab Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
It is one of my long-standing theories that the stronger tidal pull that happens during the full and new moons can act as the trigger for a fault that's near the breaking point. There seems to be a definite trend that leads to that idea. This one is yet another point of verification.
Posted By: Valsdad Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by VarmintGuy
RockyRaab: Yikes - that is a big one!
Hopefully injuries/casualties will be at a minimum.
Seems to me a lot of earthquakes have been occurring around the world in the last couple years!
I have only been around for 72 years but again it seems to me that they are more prolific of recent?
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy


I think you're on to something there, VG.

https://www.642weather.com/weather/earthquakes-world.php




Geno
Posted By: watch4bear Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
72 miles off the coast (good thing) tsunami warning
Posted By: VarmintGuy Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Jaguartx: Yikes on that list!
It is rather scary perusing it!
I guess I could pose this question (are there more quakes now than there used to be?) to VarmintSon #2 - he is a specialist for the U.S.G.S. and installs seismometers and tsunami detectors from the south end of kalifornicationkopia to the Canadian border and mostly along the west coast in that area.
Not much one can do in this regard - but it would be nice to know if the earths crust is cracking at a higher rate these days than in the past.
Again I hope the Jamaican people are not heavily harmed - I have been there and it is a beautiful country but frankly I did NOT like many of the people I came across there ,while touring, and never intend to go back (I did especially like Ocho Rios and our trip down that river and playing in the falls!).
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
Posted By: Valsdad Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
It is one of my long-standing theories that the stronger tidal pull that happens during the full and new moons can act as the trigger for a fault that's near the breaking point. There seems to be a definite trend that leads to that idea. This one is yet another point of verification.


Rocky,

do you know did it occur during high tide there or low tide?

Less, or even more, water over the area might be a contributing factor? Awful lot of weight in cubic hectares of H2O.

Geno
Posted By: jaguartx Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Let us know what you find out, VG. Be nice to know how things are now compared to 20 or so years ago.

Ask him if he knows how big one on the San Andrea's would have to be to result in Ca sliding off the shelf, please.
Posted By: watch4bear Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
7.7 is the equivalent of 357 Hiroshima bombs


http://earthalabama.com/energy.html#/
Posted By: VarmintGuy Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Jaguartx: I will.
Also, I despise kalifornicationkopia and kalifornicationkopians to the extreme but I do not wish to see them all drown't in the Pacific - the United States of America would more than likely be better off should that happen but to much human carnage would be involved..
But I take it you are being humorous.
I'll get back to you on the frequency thing.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
Posted By: luv2safari Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Originally Posted by travelingman1
My nephew and his intended are down there, visiting her family. Hope all are safe.



7.7 is no joke



It's a BIG one. The Richter Scale isn't proportional; it's a base 10 logarithmic scale. Anything 7 and above is enormous.
Posted By: kaywoodie Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
In the 18th century Port au Prince Haiti was virtually destroyed by an estimated 8.0 earthquake!
Posted By: Valsdad Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by kaywoodie
In the 18th century Port au Prince Haiti was virtually destroyed by an estimated 8.0 earthquake!


There you go with that history stuff again.

PM on the way to you.

Geno

PS, you're over your limit, and I think I know why. I'll catch up with you at a later date.
Posted By: ironbender Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
FWIW, the Richter scale of magnitude is no longer used.

Richter only goes to 10. Seismologists believe a quake of greater than 10 magnitude is possible.

Moment magnitude is similar.
Posted By: hatari Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
14 out of the last 16 years we've been down to Negril about this time of the year. So glad we skipped it this year. Hope the damage is minor.
Posted By: kaywoodie Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by Valsdad
Originally Posted by kaywoodie
In the 18th century Port au Prince Haiti was virtually destroyed by an estimated 8.0 earthquake!


There you go with that history stuff again.

PM on the way to you.

Geno

PS, you're over your limit, and I think I know why. I'll catch up with you at a later date.


Hmm? I’ll check on that PM stuff.

As for Haiti. Archaeololically speaking there was some awesome stuff recovered there. I was acquainted with one archaeologists. 7.7 is a biggie!!!
Posted By: luv2safari Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by ironbender
FWIW, the Richter scale of magnitude is no longer used.

Richter only goes to 10. Seismologists believe a quake of greater than 10 magnitude is possible.

Moment magnitude is similar.



Thanks IB.

After studying a bit I can see where the Moment of Magnitude scale more accurately measures the quakes energy. The scales are similar but different. The MofM scale would more accurately measure Big Ones.
Posted By: Stormin_Norman Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by watch4bear
72 miles off the coast (good thing) tsunami warning



I'm not an expert, but if a wave travels let say 5MPH, that would be on shore in about 15 minute ????????
Posted By: kid0917 Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by Stormin_Norman
Originally Posted by watch4bear
72 miles off the coast (good thing) tsunami warning



I'm not an expert, but if a wave travels let say 5MPH, that would be on shore in about 15 minute ????????

I think the wave can move hundreds of miles per hour in the open ocean.
Posted By: Morewood Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Surf's up, Florida!
Posted By: RockyRaab Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
The tidal effect I refer to is not the movement of water, but movement of the earth's crust. The gravitational pull of the sun and moon (combined at the full and new moons) is strong enough to lift trillions of tons of water, and we know it has an equal pull on the earth's crust. The crust bulges in a wave-like pattern as the globe turns under the aligned sun and moon. How much movement is needed to trigger a 'quake if the fault is already cocked to go? Nor does it have to happen at the moment of full tide. That moment may trigger a very small change, but that change ripples and grows until the fault snaps a day or two (and several more almost equal tides) later.
Posted By: Capt_Craig Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by Morewood
Surf's up, Florida!


When I heard about this I got my baggies on and my surfboard ready. So far my feet are still dry.

In all seriousness, the chance of having any sizable wave action here in Southeast FL is pretty much non-existant. We are blocked from seismic waves from that area by both Cuba and the Continental shelf. Off to our east are the Cay Sal and Bahama Banks, so we are blocked from wrap around waves there too, which is why the surfing here sucks until you get a lot farther up coast.

Hopefully the folks on the Jamaica coast didn’t have any significant damage either.
Posted By: Capt_Craig Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by kid0917
Originally Posted by Stormin_Norman
Originally Posted by watch4bear
72 miles off the coast (good thing) tsunami warning



I'm not an expert, but if a wave travels let say 5MPH, that would be on shore in about 15 minute ????????

I think the wave can move hundreds of miles per hour in the open ocean.


True. Seismic waves can travel close to the speed of sound through open ocean water.

Posted By: Valsdad Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
The tidal effect I refer to is not the movement of water, but movement of the earth's crust. The gravitational pull of the sun and moon (combined at the full and new moons) is strong enough to lift trillions of tons of water, and we know it has an equal pull on the earth's crust. The crust bulges in a wave-like pattern as the globe turns under the aligned sun and moon. How much movement is needed to trigger a 'quake if the fault is already cocked to go? Nor does it have to happen at the moment of full tide. That moment may trigger a very small change, but that change ripples and grows until the fault snaps a day or two (and several more almost equal tides) later.


Interesting points Rocky,

combination of water being moved off the fault, the earth itself being pulled around, and the stressors already in place.

Science is cool.

Geno
Posted By: Mannlicher Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Wow, right between Cuba and Jamaica. What a great opportunity!
Posted By: Hancock27 Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Another opportunity for the Clinton Foundation?
Posted By: watch4bear Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by Hancock27
Another opportunity for the Clinton Foundation?



All those orphans for the sex trade
Posted By: Stormin_Norman Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by Capt_Craig
Originally Posted by kid0917
Originally Posted by Stormin_Norman
Originally Posted by watch4bear
72 miles off the coast (good thing) tsunami warning



I'm not an expert, but if a wave travels let say 5MPH, that would be on shore in about 15 minute ????????

I think the wave can move hundreds of miles per hour in the open ocean.


True. Seismic waves can travel close to the speed of sound through open ocean water.





They quote 500 MPH for Tsunami in the link below, slowing to 20-30 MPH near shore. That's faster than I though ... shocked

https://www.tsunami.gov/?page=tsunamiFAQ
Posted By: kid0917 Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
a lot of earthquakes do not actually generate a tsunami, but better safe than sorry.
Posted By: Beaver10 Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Cascadia Fault Line...When this subsections decides to heavho...Shît gonna get real sporty for those of us on the coast...😎
Posted By: RockyRaab Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Yes it is, Beav. Faults that break with horizontal movement don't generate tsunamis. Those that shift vertically, with either a rise or drop of the sea floor, do. So can underwater landslides with or without a 'quake.
Posted By: slumlord Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by kaywoodie
In the 18th century Port au Prince Haiti was virtually destroyed by an estimated 8.0 earthquake!


The first 2 of the 3 Little Pigs didn’t exercise good building practices.

😃


And PoP has a shallow fault. A 5 something got them pretty good few short years back.
Posted By: TBREW401 Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Shakin in Miami too
Posted By: kid0917 Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
Yes it is, Beav. Faults that break with horizontal movement don't generate tsunamis. Those that shift vertically, with either a rise or drop of the sea floor, do. So can underwater landslides with or without a 'quake.


Yes, search Lituya Bay 1958 for a big one!
Posted By: smokepole Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
Wow, right between Cuba and Jamaica. What a great opportunity!


I don't follow.
Posted By: Stormin_Norman Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Cascadia Fault Line...When this subsections decides to heavho...Shît gonna get real sporty for those of us on the coast...😎



I used to have a place north of Tillamook, they said we had about 5 minutes to get up high when that one goes. Now I live just North of a super volcano .. so there is that laugh
Posted By: Beaver10 Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/28/20
Originally Posted by Stormin_Norman
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Cascadia Fault Line...When this subsections decides to heavho...Shît gonna get real sporty for those of us on the coast...😎



I used to have a place north of Tillamook, they said we had about 5 minutes to get up high when that one goes. Now I live just North of a super volcano .. so there is that laugh


RockyRaab and I discussed this at length on an earlier thread...We both suggested getting the finest bottle of liquor made.

Drinking half now, putting the rest away for the big moment...Something about going out with an excellent glass of high dollar scotch in your hand has an appeal.

😎
Posted By: ironbender Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/29/20
Originally Posted by luv2safari
Originally Posted by ironbender
FWIW, the Richter scale of magnitude is no longer used.

Richter only goes to 10. Seismologists believe a quake of greater than 10 magnitude is possible.

Moment magnitude is similar.



Thanks IB.

After studying a bit I can see where the Moment of Magnitude scale more accurately measures the quakes energy. The scales are similar but different. The MofM scale would more accurately measure Big Ones.

👍😎
Posted By: smokepole Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/29/20
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Originally Posted by Stormin_Norman
Originally Posted by Beaver10
Cascadia Fault Line...When this subsections decides to heavho...Shît gonna get real sporty for those of us on the coast...😎



I used to have a place north of Tillamook, they said we had about 5 minutes to get up high when that one goes. Now I live just North of a super volcano .. so there is that laugh


RockyRaab and I discussed this at length on an earlier thread...We both suggested getting the finest bottle of liquor made.

Drinking half now, putting the rest away for the big moment...Something about going out with an excellent glass of high dollar scotch in your hand has an appeal.

😎



Only one flaw in that scenario. The assumption that half the bottle would be left when the big one cuts loose....
Posted By: DigitalDan Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/29/20
Posted By: add Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/29/20
They beggin' for aide before the first wave hit?
Posted By: Lockhart Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/29/20
And there will be more.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/29/20
Originally Posted by VarmintGuy
Jaguartx: I will.
Also, I despise kalifornicationkopia and kalifornicationkopians to the extreme but I do not wish to see them all drown't in the Pacific - the United States of America would more than likely be better off should that happen but to much human carnage would be involved..
But I take it you are being humorous.
I'll get back to you on the frequency thing.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy

I'm not saying I want that, but with the evidence of the frequency of EQs happening I worry, and I wonder if a 5 or 6 or 7 would instigate calamity.
Posted By: Sitka deer Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/29/20
Originally Posted by Capt_Craig
Originally Posted by kid0917
Originally Posted by Stormin_Norman
Originally Posted by watch4bear
72 miles off the coast (good thing) tsunami warning



I'm not an expert, but if a wave travels let say 5MPH, that would be on shore in about 15 minute ????????

I think the wave can move hundreds of miles per hour in the open ocean.


True. Seismic waves can travel close to the speed of sound through open ocean water.


Yes, but the frequency of those waves is in a very narrow, vary high frequency band. Not the area of damaging waves on land.
Posted By: Sitka deer Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/29/20
Originally Posted by kid0917
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
Yes it is, Beav. Faults that break with horizontal movement don't generate tsunamis. Those that shift vertically, with either a rise or drop of the sea floor, do. So can underwater landslides with or without a 'quake.


Yes, search Lituya Bay 1958 for a big one!

I fished out of Lituya in 1980 which was the "understood" period of the release. Nothing happened and has not happened since.

But the waves flushed the mountainside clear and showed clearly 22 years later. Impressive is an understatement.
Posted By: ironbender Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/29/20
Originally Posted by kid0917
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
Yes it is, Beav. Faults that break with horizontal movement don't generate tsunamis. Those that shift vertically, with either a rise or drop of the sea floor, do. So can underwater landslides with or without a 'quake.

Yes, search Lituya Bay 1958 for a big one!



The 1958 Lituya Bay earthquake occurred at July 9 at 22:15:58 with a moment magnitude of 7.8 and a maximum Mercalli intensity of XI (Extreme). The strike-slip earthquake took place on the Fairweather Fault and triggered a rockslide of 40 million cubic yards (30 million cubic meters and about 90 million tons) into the narrow inlet of Lituya Bay, Alaska. The impact was heard 50 miles (80 km) away,[6] and the sudden displacement of water resulted in a megatsunami that washed out trees to a maximum elevation of 1,720 feet (524 meters) at the entrance of Gilbert Inlet.[7] This is the largest and most significant megatsunami in modern times; it forced a re-evaluation of large-wave events and the recognition of impact events, rockfalls, and landslides as causes of very large waves.

A 2010 model examined the amount of infill on the floor of the bay, which was many times larger than that of the rockfall alone, and also the energy and height of the waves. Scientists concluded that there had been a "dual slide" involving a rockfall which also triggered a release of 5 to 10 times its volume of sediment trapped by the adjacent Lituya Glacier, a ratio comparable with other events where this "dual slide" effect is known to have happened. Lituya Bay has a history of megatsunami events, but the 1958 event was the first for which sufficient data was captured at the time.[8][9]
Posted By: deltakid Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/29/20
Don't you know, Greta has told us and AOC backs it up!! It is climate change(need sarcasm font)
Posted By: ringworm Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/29/20
The Caribbean is a sh1th0le of old slave stops, salt mines and pirate hides.
A good size meteor right in the middle would be nice clean it out up to Hialeah down to Bonaire.
Posted By: Sitka deer Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/30/20
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by kid0917
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
Yes it is, Beav. Faults that break with horizontal movement don't generate tsunamis. Those that shift vertically, with either a rise or drop of the sea floor, do. So can underwater landslides with or without a 'quake.

Yes, search Lituya Bay 1958 for a big one!



The 1958 Lituya Bay earthquake occurred at July 9 at 22:15:58 with a moment magnitude of 7.8 and a maximum Mercalli intensity of XI (Extreme). The strike-slip earthquake took place on the Fairweather Fault and triggered a rockslide of 40 million cubic yards (30 million cubic meters and about 90 million tons) into the narrow inlet of Lituya Bay, Alaska. The impact was heard 50 miles (80 km) away,[6] and the sudden displacement of water resulted in a megatsunami that washed out trees to a maximum elevation of 1,720 feet (524 meters) at the entrance of Gilbert Inlet.[7] This is the largest and most significant megatsunami in modern times; it forced a re-evaluation of large-wave events and the recognition of impact events, rockfalls, and landslides as causes of very large waves.

A 2010 model examined the amount of infill on the floor of the bay, which was many times larger than that of the rockfall alone, and also the energy and height of the waves. Scientists concluded that there had been a "dual slide" involving a rockfall which also triggered a release of 5 to 10 times its volume of sediment trapped by the adjacent Lituya Glacier, a ratio comparable with other events where this "dual slide" effect is known to have happened. Lituya Bay has a history of megatsunami events, but the 1958 event was the first for which sufficient data was captured at the time.[8][9]


The lapmarks from that and prior tsunamis showed clearly in 2010 when I last drove a boat by it. It is impressive.
Posted By: ironbender Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/30/20
No doubt very impressive. I've read accounts of boat survivors of the '58 event.
Posted By: Mannlicher Re: Jamaica Quake - 01/30/20
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
Wow, right between Cuba and Jamaica. What a great opportunity!


I don't follow.

An opportunity to wipe out both pest holes
© 24hourcampfire