Home
Roberts betrays America again.Justice Roberts Blocks Rand Paul Senate Trial Question on "Origins of the House Impeachment".

Chief Justice John Roberts blocked a question from Sen. Rand Paul from being asked at the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump on Wednesday, according to reports. The question and answer session involves written questions submitted to Roberts, who is presiding over the trial, who then reads the question aloud. The questions posed to the Democrat House Managers and President Trump’s legal team alternate between Republicans and Democrat senators. Paul could be heard arguing on the Senate floor to have his question asked.

Paul’s reported question had to do with the interactions of named persons with Rep. Adam Schiff and members of his staff.

“Per source: Rand Paul is not being allowed to ask his question about the origins of the House impeachment. Unclear what the exact question is and what the issue is with it”

“A senior GOP senate aide tells me that Justice Roberts is screening questions and that’s why Rand Paul’s question — which contained names of people and questions about their interactions with Schiff and his staff — was disallowed. Odd bc Lee’s question was basically same.”

“Per senior Senate GOP staffer, Roberts is “screening the questions” and “the question contains names of people who worked with Schiff and Schiff staff to start this whole mess in the House.”

Paul could be heard by reporters arguing on the floor of the Senate for his question to be asked:

“During a break in the trial, Sen. Rand Paul could be seen on the Senate floor seeking assurances that he will not be blocked from asking a question. The Kentucky Republican appeared less than pleased with Secretary of the Majority Laura Dove. “I don’t want to have to stand up to try and fight for recognition,” Paul said loud enough to be audible from the galleries above the chamber. “If I have to fight for recognition, I will.“

Republican Sens. Mike Lee of Utah, Josh Hawley of Missouri and Ted Cruz of Texas asked the president’s counsel if the White House whistleblower worked at the National Security Council and if the whistleblower coordinated with Schiff’s staff. Trump’s attorney Patrick Philbin couldn’t answer whether the whistleblower coordinated with Schiff’s staff but said learning more about the whistleblower would be “relevant.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ion-on-origins-of-the-house-impeachment/
Id wait to attack him on that one. There maybe specific agreed to rules for this trial regarding questions that Roberts was trying to adhere to.
Rand Paul's question named the whistleblower. But everybody already knows who it is.
Placing his name into the public record would allow further scrutiny of him and his motives.It may also tie Schiff to this person before he became the so-called whistle blower.

The general public,who only tune in to the letter stations,know very little including this persons name,much less his roll in the Russia hoax and this impeachment hoax.

Robert’s just refused to read another on Thursday. What a POS. Somebody should stand up and tell Roberts he should excuse himself.
Roberts did the same thing today to Rand Paul's question. Roberts wouldn't allow it.
Rand Paul's question was submitted to both sets of managers...
I would guess that has as much to do with it being rejected as anything. The questions are supposed to be submitted to one or the other, not both.

Never mind... that thought was just destroyed by a following question asked to both
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Rand Paul's question named the whistleblower. But everybody already knows who it is.


No he didn't..................



https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1222947515387072514
The question I want answered is who has the incriminating photos of Roberts? That weasel never misses an opportunity to stab regular Americans in the neck.
Be interesting to know what Robert's would do if they went to witnesses and the Rs caller the whistle blower.
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Rand Paul's question named the whistleblower. But everybody already knows who it is.


No he didn't..................



https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1222947515387072514


Look closer:

My exact question was:

Are you aware that House intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together
Rand asked the question to demonstrate that Roberts knew the name of the whistleblower and is complicit in keeping his name a secret from the public.

Everybody in D.C. already knows who it is.
I know exactly what Rand was indicating and what you said. But it cannot be proven factually that was what he was intending, it is only what someone believes that Rand was thinking that. That never holds up in court.



https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1222666659892207616

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1222637173889011712
Rte: Hate to see Chief Justice Roberts drowning in the "muck" of the D.C. "swamp"!
Sad state of affairs here in the United States of American in 2,020!
Trying to get a "demonrat" of any classification (politician, judge or governmental employee!) brought to "justice" is virtually impossible these days!
Again, sad.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Rand asked the question to demonstrate that Roberts knew the name of the whistleblower and is complicit in keeping his name a secret from the public.

Everybody in D.C. already knows who it is.

This whole thing with keeping the "whistleblower's" name secret is an emperor's new clothes event. Everyone knows who he is but refuses to say. And there is no statutory requirement to do so. It's just a way for the Left to protect itself. Even Fox is in on this.
I think Roberts is a swamp creature.
So Schiff's daughter is the whistleblower's blower!
Now every Republican Senator needs to submit the same question. That would really out Roberts as a swamp critter.
Jerry
Roberts has two adopted daughters from Ireland. It is illegal for anyone other than Irish citizens to adopt children from Ireland. He broke the law.
Originally Posted by Crash_Pad
Roberts has two adopted daughters from Ireland. It is illegal for anyone other than Irish citizens to adopt children from Ireland. He broke the law.


That is as good an explanation as any
Originally Posted by Hotrod_Lincoln
Now every Republican Senator needs to submit the same question. That would really out Roberts as a swamp critter.
Jerry

Great idea.
Originally Posted by Hotrod_Lincoln
Now every Republican Senator needs to submit the same question. That would really out Roberts as a swamp critter.
Jerry



I agree 100%
Originally Posted by Hotrod_Lincoln
Now every Republican Senator needs to submit the same question. That would really out Roberts as a swamp critter.
Jerry



I think it just happened.
Why doesn’t someone just start dancin a hillbilly jig on the carpet and say “Charamellow”a dozen fuggin times??

Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by Hotrod_Lincoln
Now every Republican Senator needs to submit the same question. That would really out Roberts as a swamp critter.
Jerry



I think it just happened.


I think you’re right. Maybe Roberts got lectured during the break.
Ain’t no one in there got balls to lecture him.

They’re all limp dicks deep down
Originally Posted by Oldelkhunter
Originally Posted by Crash_Pad
Roberts has two adopted daughters from Ireland. It is illegal for anyone other than Irish citizens to adopt children from Ireland. He broke the law.


That is as good an explanation as any

How is a known infraction of Irish Law an issue thousands of miles away from Ireland and long after any statute of limitations?
This "thread" below probably has more to do with what we are seeing ...................

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1222955689762529280.html
Do not forget--- Roberts gave us Obama care!
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by Oldelkhunter
Originally Posted by Crash_Pad
Roberts has two adopted daughters from Ireland. It is illegal for anyone other than Irish citizens to adopt children from Ireland. He broke the law.


That is as good an explanation as any

How is a known infraction of Irish Law an issue thousands of miles away from Ireland and long after any statute of limitations?


No idea, I have heard that he was held up by Obama because he illegally adopted these kids. I do not even know if there is any truth to it.
All anybody needs to know about the entire thing is that Schiff and Nadler were selected to make it happen.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
So Schiff's daughter is the whistleblower's blower!

Had to go to the googler.

Ya can’t make this s’hit up.
Eric Ciaramella
This says Schiff’s daughter was married to Soro’s son . . . (I realize it’s Snopes)


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/adam-schiffs-sister-was-married-to-george-soros-son/
Originally Posted by tpcollins
This says Schiff’s daughter was married to Soro’s son . . . (I realize it’s Snopes)


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/adam-schiffs-sister-was-married-to-george-soros-son/


,...probably third cousins too,.....which probably explains why Schiff has a 9" neck and and wears a size 9 hat.
Originally Posted by tpcollins
This says Schiff’s daughter was married to Soro’s son . . . (I realize it’s Snopes)


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/adam-schiffs-sister-was-married-to-george-soros-son/

Reading comprehension is a gift... Adam's sister is in that link, not his daughter.
Forgot to add a smiley face there... wink
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
So Schiff's daughter is the whistleblower's blower!

Had to go to the googler.

Ya can’t make this s’hit up.


My thought exactly.
Originally Posted by jfruser
The question I want answered is who has the incriminating photos of Roberts? That weasel never misses an opportunity to stab regular Americans in the neck.


I had read, previously, that Roberts and his wife adopted a child via illegal means, and that may be the blackmailable information hanging over his head.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by tpcollins
This says Schiff’s daughter was married to Soro’s son . . . (I realize it’s Snopes)


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/adam-schiffs-sister-was-married-to-george-soros-son/

Reading comprehension is a gift... Adam's sister is in that link, not his daughter.


My bad - got the two mixed up. Sorry that you were offended.
Originally Posted by tpcollins
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by tpcollins
This says Schiff’s daughter was married to Soro’s son . . . (I realize it’s Snopes)


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/adam-schiffs-sister-was-married-to-george-soros-son/

Reading comprehension is a gift... Adam's sister is in that link, not his daughter.


My bad - got the two mixed up. Sorry that you were offended.

Sitka is uber sensitive. wink
Isnt it illegal to file a false report as a member of govt?

Why shouldn't Eric C be held accountable? A

And now John Robert's is helping the Ds to cover up a crime?
They already read the question now in an alternate form that does not directly name the whistleblower.

Shifty did not deny that he or his staff had contact with the whistleblower (indeed his ambiguous answer citing the need to protect the personal name of the whistleblower sure makes it sound like he knows exactly who it is).

Shifty is in hot water. Real hot. And getting hotter.

Democrats are dumb, and dumber. Get your guy off the stage before he destroys your party completely.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
All anybody needs to know about the entire thing is that Schiff and Nadler were selected to make it happen.

I cannot imagine them getting a damn thing accomplished for America besides helping to implode the Democratic Party . Keep it up boys.,
Anyone trust Roberts if he is the tie breaker on witnesses? I sure do not considering ObamaCare!!
Originally Posted by Bristoe
All anybody needs to know about the entire thing is that Schiff and Nadler were selected to make it happen.



Precisely...

They're two BLUE state swamp dwellers who have no fear of losing an election.
Originally Posted by tpcollins
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by tpcollins
This says Schiff’s daughter was married to Soro’s son . . . (I realize it’s Snopes)


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/adam-schiffs-sister-was-married-to-george-soros-son/

Reading comprehension is a gift... Adam's sister is in that link, not his daughter.


My bad - got the two mixed up. Sorry that you were offended.

No offense what so ever... that is why I appended the smiley face when I realized one should be there.
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by tpcollins
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by tpcollins
This says Schiff’s daughter was married to Soro’s son . . . (I realize it’s Snopes)


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/adam-schiffs-sister-was-married-to-george-soros-son/

Reading comprehension is a gift... Adam's sister is in that link, not his daughter.


My bad - got the two mixed up. Sorry that you were offended.

Sitka is uber sensitive. wink

Only when you do the touching! wink
Here's is a very good reason they want/must protect the whistleblower.

https://twitter.com/GregRubini/status/1223001808827797516?s=19


Originally Posted by tpcollins
This says Schiff’s daughter was married to Soro’s son . . . (I realize it’s Snopes)


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/adam-schiffs-sister-was-married-to-george-soros-son/

You say daughter and your link says sister.
Originally Posted by 1bigdude
Anyone trust Roberts if he is the tie breaker on witnesses? I sure do not considering ObamaCare!!

He won't be a tiebreaker.
If there's not a majority asking for witnesses the motion simply fails
Originally Posted by K22
Here's is a very good reason they want/must protect the whistleblower.

https://twitter.com/GregRubini/status/1223001808827797516?s=19

If true, how could they possibly decide to use EC as the whistleblower? If that is not the most ridiculous person in the world to use please name another.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by ironbender
Originally Posted by tpcollins
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by tpcollins
This says Schiff’s daughter was married to Soro’s son . . . (I realize it’s Snopes)


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/adam-schiffs-sister-was-married-to-george-soros-son/

Reading comprehension is a gift... Adam's sister is in that link, not his daughter.


My bad - got the two mixed up. Sorry that you were offended.

Sitka is uber sensitive. wink

Only when you do the touching! wink

Eeeww
Get touched by 26 year olds. wink
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Rand Paul's question named the whistleblower. But everybody already knows who it is.

Except Schiff, per him. Of course it's a lie, like everything else out of that cretins mouth.
Originally Posted by RickyD
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Rand Paul's question named the whistleblower. But everybody already knows who it is.

Except Schiff, per him. Of course it's a lie, like everything else out of that cretins mouth.



Funny how Schiff seemed to recognize the name when it was dropped in the House hearings. If the name meant nothing to him, why did he have a hissy fit about it being mentioned.
Originally Posted by Sitka deer
Originally Posted by K22
Here's is a very good reason they want/must protect the whistleblower.

https://twitter.com/GregRubini/status/1223001808827797516?s=19

If true, how could they possibly decide to use EC as the whistleblower? If that is not the most ridiculous person in the world to use please name another.


They have certainly gotten away with it in the past so why change???? But I don't think Rand Paul is going to let them get away with this one. And he's going to have a whole lot of help from Gen. Flynn's Digital Soldiers.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political...berts-shuts-down-rand-paul-whistleblower

https://twitter.com/40_head/status/1223237310617022470
Be nice if this could somehow result in Robert's leaving the court.
© 24hourcampfire