I see these can be had for around $450.00.Are they any good.Thought it might make a nice truck gun.How are their trigger pulls?Thanks ahead ,Huntz

They are great for the money. I bought one a couple years ago and love it. Trigger pull is acceptable.

love that gun. I have an octagon, stainless barrelled one. shoots 38 spls great.

kids love shooting it, in particular. My boy has taken several pigs, deer, with ours.

I don't know how they are...but I am about to find out. I have just been putting it off...but gunbroker is calling.

What part of GA are you in? I know where a round barrel carbine is for $499 I think.

Mike

Huntz,

The youngest boy and I got one apiece last summer. Both of them have been great. Suprisingly good trigger pulls. Not as smooth as a real 92 but they are smoothing up. The sights seem a little crude though I haven't had much trouble hitting with them out to 100 yards. He does better. They are 20 inch carbines.

They feed all our usual handloads in .38 Special and .357 Mag without issues including semi-wadcutters. The point of impact does not change as much as it seems to do in a revolver FWIW. The are mild to shoot even with near book max 158 grain loads. They remind me of the .32-20 I had when I was a wee one when loaded with the High Velocity loads.

I am sending mine into a guy to have rear peeps put on and an action job. No real need but I paid for it when I got the rifle. After that it will get the scout rail and a scout scope in QR rings for some occasions.

They do have a quirk I'm not sure if i can get fixed. They don't like to feed tipped over on their side. I do not remember my .32-20 doing that but I don't remember a lot of things.

Gary

Never shot a Rossi,but I will soon.I have a 20" .357 Stainless 92 on hold.Hope to pick it up in a few weeks.Heard many pros and cons on these.Rough action seems the most common complaint.

Thanks for the info guys.I had one years ago in 44 Mag.I think they called it a Puma then.It had a tang sight that was kind of nice.I would have bought a Marlin,but they have gotten kind of pricy and I do not know if their quality control has improved yet.I figured at the price Rossi`s go for I can live with a less than perfect Rifle.Huntz

I always thought that if Winchester had adapted the Model 65 to .357 and maybe the 92 carbine likewise, that we might have had these right up to 1963.

Look how well the Rossi's are doing in 2016 .........

I bought a 16" blued 357 recently and am darned impressed with how accurate it is. I can hit water bottles at 60 yds offhand. One of my buddies has been wearing out the big hogs with it. I am going to be adding another one of these to my stable soon in 44 mag or 45 colt. Mine survived the Argo sinking with it in the gun rack the other day.. only a little split in the stock that i can fix.

Just got a 20 inch blued .357. I just hope I can restrain myself from running down and buying a 45 or .44 mag for a week or two more at least.

All you have to do to smooth one up is replace the ejector spring and cut two or thee coils off the hammer spring. That's it. The ejector spring is Mongo stiff and is the main cause of the stiffness in the action as that it causes resistance to closing the bolt. It also can cause some failures to feed. I replaced mine with a spring out of a Harbor Freight spring kit and that sucker is as smooth as glass now.

Can you put an aperture sight on one? Is there an aperture built to mount on one?

good strong & accurate lever guns.......

Rossi C/S sucks big time........

Yes. It has this funky safety right on top of the bolt. There is a guy who sells what is basically a modified Skinner aperture that fits there once you remove the safety. You don't even have to dissassemble the gun. Open the bolt, drift out a pin, remove the safety, replace with the sight, and drift the pin back to its original position. For schits and giggles it doesn't even disable the safety. You can still turn the sight just like the safety did if you wanted to for some unknown reason.

The best guy to work on the '92 is Steve Young. He can do magic on those guns, specializing in the Rossi.

http://stevesgunz.com/

Steve is all the CS you'll ever need.

DF

been there..done that with Steve....about $300 for tune/remove safety

Still have a $500 Rossi.......still not a Marlin...

You don't need to pay some $300 to work on a $400 gun. All that is wrong with a Rossi can be fixed in an hour by anyone who can turn a screwdriver.

Maybe.

But, bet your's won't be as slick as his...

A good way to buy a Rossi, is to get one already slicked up by Steve. It's a lot better deal than buying one, then getting it fixed up.

DF

Slicking one up isn't rocket science. The are only so many moving parts. And it isn't the surfaces rubbing that causes them to be rough, it is mainly the ejector spring. Fix that and you fix most of the so-called roughness and the feeding issues. I think the spring I used cost me $4.86 as part of a spring kit from Hatbor Freight.

Have to admit its purty slick...accurate too...45 Colt

20" oct/case hardened...he removed safety...slicked up...

added saddle ring.....after shipping added two ways...

I was $300 in to it....not one of my best rifle investments

Live & learn.......my last Rossi.....

Like you, I try to do all I can myself.

But, everyone isn't so inclined.

I don't have a Rossi, not looking for one.

DF

I cleaned up the action in both a 44 mag and .357 Rossi.They were the earlier ones. Not big job. Can't see buying one and paying some one to do it. A fellow ought to just find an earlier Marlin 94 and pay the extra money that way

I have a 20" round barrel stainless. Won't shoot some of my .357 ammo but that might be the bullet type, not the gun. Won mine in a big buck contest a few years ago. She's a keeper.

Joebob is right about the rossi being dead simple to slick up.
It took me about an hour including learning the action/ take down.
How many of you change something about each and every rifle you get.
No different here.

A great rifle. Lots of fun.

They smooth out a lot over the first few hundred rounds, but I never found the action objectionable, even out of the box.