If you were going to put glass on a Sako 85, .260 Remington, used on deer/feral hog anywhere from 50 yards (over feeders for the pigs) to unlimited (deer along gas line right-of-way), what would it be?
Let's assume we're using the Sako Optilocks unless you have a different suggestion.
FWIW,
Many times I will preface posts such as this with the prelude, Opinions are like noses, everyone has one and most of them smell. So this is just one man�s opinion.
The pix below is of three Sakos.
The top is a 7wsm in a model 75 hunter. I mounted a 3 x 10 x 50 illuminated. I�m more of a fan of 44mm and smaller objectives, but this one was handy at the time.
The middle rifle is an AIII hunter (IIRC) with a 3 x 9 Luepold in 220 swift.
The bottom is a Model 75 Varmint chambered for the 260 Remington. It is topped with a 3 x 9 x 36. This is not a light rifle so I was not going for weight reduction.
This l61r Varmint in 7mag is topped with an old (new at the time ) leupold Vari X-III 4.5 x 14 x 40.
And this Model 85 Bavarian carbine with a 4 x 12 x 50.
Finally for varmints and turkey to say 150 yds., this Riihimaki in 222 Rem with a 2.5 x 8 x 36 Leupold.
Don�t know if there is such a thing as �the ideal scope�. Especially if you�re trying to use one rifle to do it all.
So here goes. I�ve gone through my high magnification days. I like the rule of thumb of 6x per 100 yds for varmints and 4x per hundred yards for big game. Now hogs are not necessarily big game, but you get the picture.
You referenced the type of hunting that you will be doing. What you describe is pretty much the same as I. I�ve set up on right of ways that you could see for a mile. Other times I�ve set up say 120 to 160 yds away from a clearing about 20� in diameter.
I don�t use my scope for locating game. I use a good pair of binocs and a spotting scope. I have found that over the years the �wobble� of a high magnification scope is a distraction. Also, the time it takes to regain your sight picture if your rifle has significant recoil and get back on game when you�ve a limited field of view is a negative to me.
I do very little killing at 300 yards plus. In fact most of my killing is from 30 yards to say 170 yards. I'd be willing to bet that would also be the case with you. I know that long range hunting is the "in" thing, but I classify myself as a short range meat hunter. Not much bumms me out more than letting a bullet fly and not recovering game.
I find that where the brush is thick, or on a right of way where you may not be able to pinpoint the point of impact, if you can�t find blood within 10� of the point of impact, unless your quarry is DRT, many times one will not find his animal. At 200 yds. plus unless you have distinct landmarks, flags or reference points it can be tricky finding blood, especially at dark-thirty.
I think if I were to try to limit myself to one rifle and one scope on a 260 Rem, I�d do something like a 4.5 x 14 x 40 up to a 50 mm objective. With the 260 Rem @ +/- 2,800 fps. MV, and a high BC bullet of say 130 grains, one can zero 1 to 2 inches high at 100 yds and hold on fur over 200 yds. With today scopes and reticles it is relatively simple to be good to 400 yards with practice. Leupold has their Boone and Crockett and CDS. Both Zeiss and Swarovski have a ranging system. Almost all have reticles featuring mil-dots.
JMHO
Best,
GWB