.500 S&W vs .50 Alaskan - 01/19/08
I'm wanting to rebarrel a Ruger #1 for one of the 2 cartridges. Mostly for black bear and feral hog but I would like to get a chance at a brown bear hunt sometime also. This is what I am thinking as far as differences.
I've heard that a 50 Alaskan can fire 500 Linebaugh safely sense the only difference is the case is shorter. So that makes it sound like the better option, but it's not something I would want to try without more information. If thats true I'll probably just go that route. I haven't really been able to google up reduced loads and don't really want to subject myself to the pounding of full power, or even starting loads, for something as small as hogs and black bears.
The .500 S&W however would be less recoil and cheaper sense it only uses about 2/3rd's or half the powder charge, and I've even found reduced loads if I want to "plink" with it. But I'm thinking it might be a little anemic for brown bear. I'm doubting I would be gaining a whole lot of velocity from pistol powders out of a rifle barrel.
I've heard that a 50 Alaskan can fire 500 Linebaugh safely sense the only difference is the case is shorter. So that makes it sound like the better option, but it's not something I would want to try without more information. If thats true I'll probably just go that route. I haven't really been able to google up reduced loads and don't really want to subject myself to the pounding of full power, or even starting loads, for something as small as hogs and black bears.
The .500 S&W however would be less recoil and cheaper sense it only uses about 2/3rd's or half the powder charge, and I've even found reduced loads if I want to "plink" with it. But I'm thinking it might be a little anemic for brown bear. I'm doubting I would be gaining a whole lot of velocity from pistol powders out of a rifle barrel.