Home
Posted By: bobinpa 358 WSM - 06/24/18
Gentlemen, I am looking to build a 358 WSM. I am planning to use a Winchester M70, classic stainless that is now a 270 WSM and rebarrel it with a Pac-Nor #4, 1-12 twist. Does anybody know where I can find a reamer? I figure this has been around for a long time so somebody has to have one.... but, I don't know what to ask for. Is it technically called a 358 WSM or 35 WSM or 350-300 WSM or what.

Any info that you guys could give is greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Bob
Posted By: DryPowder Re: 358 WSM - 06/24/18
I'm kind of a 35 caliber nut and first heard about it called a 35 Sambar. Here is the reamer for a 35/300 wsm
Posted By: Rustyzipper Re: 358 WSM - 06/26/18
Was considering one some time back as I like compact powerful rifles. The Remington Model 7 looked good with a custom fullstock and19" barrel.
Posted By: smokepole Re: 358 WSM - 06/26/18
Why not have Pacnor chamber it? They did one for me, I'll check the barrel stamp and see what they called it.

IIRC, they stamped it as "358/300 WSM."

They list the chambering as 350-300 WSM on their website. They also list a 350 WSM, not sure what the difference is.
Posted By: Bugger Re: 358 WSM - 06/26/18
I have considered rechambering a 350 Mag to one of those, quite a while back. Never did. I’d be interested in hearing how it turns out v
Posted By: smokepole Re: 358 WSM - 06/26/18
Mine shot 225 grain partitions accurately at 2950 fps.
Posted By: Gladesman Re: 358 WSM - 06/28/18
Originally Posted by smokepole
Mine shot 225 grain partitions accurately at 2950 fps.


Smokepole, that is moving a 225 grain. First I have heard of a 35 WSM. May have to look into that. I get a little over 2,700 with that bullet out of my 35 Whelens. I could probably get another 100 fps out of them if I really pushed the envelope.
Posted By: smokepole Re: 358 WSM - 06/28/18
THis was pushing the envelope, but nothing others hadn't done. Recoil was fairly sharp. I think Bryce Towsley wrote a few articles on loading for it. I think he called it the 35 Sambar.
Posted By: 458 Lott Re: 358 WSM - 06/28/18
Originally Posted by Bugger
I have considered rechambering a 350 Mag to one of those, quite a while back. Never did. I’d be interested in hearing how it turns out v


I considered it as well, but after shooting it as a 350 I figured 225's at 2700 would kill anything I'd use it for at any range I'd use it for and I really didn't see an upside to the added recoil. The rifle replaced a 350 Rigby that had more oomph, but also more weight.
Posted By: Rug3 Re: 358 WSM - 06/28/18
We have a 'fire member, 358wsm who had Pac Nor put one together. He had a whole lot of fun working up loads for it. Pac Nor built, chambered and screwed in the barrel for him. It was a very accurate gun. I've seen that gun shoot, IMPRESSIVE! I suggest you send him a PM and ask about the particulars or ask him to post here about it. I know it'll sure kill moose.
Posted By: 358wsm Re: 358 WSM - 06/28/18



Yep, It'll kill stuff.

With 65 grains of H 4895 it would clock 2930 fps with 225's.

With about 71-72 gr of RL 17 it would push 250's to the 2800 fps mark.

I believe it was the Aussie's that named it the "Sambar."
Posted By: bobinpa Re: 358 WSM - 07/01/18
Originally Posted by 358wsm



Yep, It'll kill stuff.

With 65 grains of H 4895 it would clock 2930 fps with 225's.

With about 71-72 gr of RL 17 it would push 250's to the 2800 fps mark.

I believe it was the Aussie's that named it the "Sambar."



What freebore would you recommend for the 250's or larger. I don't have any bullets to mock up a round with....
Posted By: DocEd Re: 358 WSM - 07/01/18
I never understood why Winchester never went with it. They decided on the 32 WSM and it's deader than a hammer.
Posted By: smokepole Re: 358 WSM - 07/01/18
I bet a .338 WSM would've done better than the .325.
Posted By: 358wsm Re: 358 WSM - 07/02/18
Originally Posted by bobinpa
Originally Posted by 358wsm



Yep, It'll kill stuff.

With 65 grains of H 4895 it would clock 2930 fps with 225's.

With about 71-72 gr of RL 17 it would push 250's to the 2800 fps mark.

I believe it was the Aussie's that named it the "Sambar."



What freebore would you recommend for the 250's or larger. I don't have any bullets to mock up a round with....



Well Sir,

I built mine in a rifle that had a 2.980" magazine. And how I set up the clambering was like this. I chose the 225gr NPT as my hopeful primary. Then I chambered so that I could kiss the lands just before I exceeded allowable magazine length. This allowed me to also load 250's up and out of the body of the case, at or above shoulder length, if you will.
Posted By: 358wsm Re: 358 WSM - 07/02/18
Originally Posted by smokepole
I bet a .338 WSM would've done better than the .325.



Don't we all.

Winchester said something to the effect that it wouldn't compete with 338 Win Mag velocities. So what.? Who would have cared.? It would have been a bout the most perfect 338 out there, sans the 338-06 which is neigh unto impossible to find factory ammo for...if that matters.

Speaking of velocities. I never pushed my Whelen hard, 225's about 2630fps out of my 22" Ruger K1A, that was a full 300 fps behind my 358 WSM. Something to think about.

Posted By: gruvco2 Re: 358 WSM - 07/03/18
I've wanted to build one of these for years, I'd be willing to join you in building one. reamers should be available from manson, clymer, or ptg. let me know if you want to split the cost of one. I will probably use a schneider or kreiger barrel and a 700 action. what dies does everyone use? jim
Posted By: 358wsm Re: 358 WSM - 07/03/18
I drew up a barrel contour that I liked, kinda heavy, 24" long and sent the drawings into Pac Nor and they did the entire build according to my specs, custom throating and all. Pretty easy.

I went with Redding dies. I no longer have the rifle, it was stolen. So if someone wants to do the build, I'd be willing to sell the dies to someone who needs them.

Edited to add:
I don't believe a long barrel is needed. As a matter of fact, I was going to have Pac Nor re-contour my barrel and chop 4" off it making it 20".
I'd say that 20" to 22" would perform just fine.



Posted By: bobinpa Re: 358 WSM - 07/04/18
Originally Posted by 358wsm
I drew up a barrel contour that I liked, kinda heavy, 24" long and sent the drawings into Pac Nor and they did the entire build according to my specs, custom throating and all. Pretty easy.

I went with Redding dies. I no longer have the rifle, it was stolen. So if someone wants to do the build, I'd be willing to sell the dies to someone who needs them.

Edited to add:
I don't believe a long barrel is needed. As a matter of fact, I was going to have Pac Nor re-contour my barrel and chop 4" off it making it 20".
I'd say that 20" to 22" would perform just fine.


I'm definitely interested in the dies..... What are they? Full length or neck or bushing dies or ???
Posted By: 22WRF Re: 358 WSM - 07/04/18
wouldn't it be better to use .325 brass instead of .300 brass?
Posted By: 358wsm Re: 358 WSM - 07/04/18


Bob,

I received a PM from another member earlier concerning those dies, if for some reason He backs out, you are next on the list
They are Redding custom list dies. Full length and seat 2 die set. I found that both 300 WSM and 325 WSM brass works.

I am not sure, but I "might" have some brass, I'll check. I thinned a lot of stuff out when I made the move North.
Posted By: bobinpa Re: 358 WSM - 07/04/18
Originally Posted by 358wsm


Bob,

I received a PM from another member earlier concerning those dies, if for some reason He backs out, you are next on the list
They are Redding custom list dies. Full length and seat 2 die set. I found that both 300 WSM and 325 WSM brass works.

I am not sure, but I "might" have some brass, I'll check. I thinned a lot of stuff out when I made the move North.


Thanks for letting me know. I am interested in whatever the brass you have and maybe you have some bullets too.?.?.? I'm going to order a reamer. I talked to PT&G and according to the girl I talked to, they don't have a reamer or a print for a reamer. JGS has a print for one that they sent me. Their print is showing zero free bore and I'm not sure that is what I want, which is why I asked you about free bore the other day. I'm going with a Pac Nor barrel, probably a #4. I know I can get them to do it but I would have more confidence in it if my smith does it. He's done a lot of work for me. I appreciate your input....it's nice to get info from someone that's actually been there.
Posted By: bobinpa Re: 358 WSM - 07/04/18
Originally Posted by 22WRF
wouldn't it be better to use .325 brass instead of .300 brass?


Sure....it just makes sense. But going from 30 to 35 shouldn't be bad. I've gone from .223 to .308. It just adds a step and I annealed along the way.
Posted By: 358wsm Re: 358 WSM - 07/05/18


I was able to use both. Never did a neck split.
Posted By: Bugger Re: 358 WSM - 07/05/18
I've made 375 Whelen AI brass out of 30-06 brass with zero loss. Just stepped it one at a time. I think it was 30 - 323 323-338. 338-358, 358-375.
Posted By: Tejano Re: 358 WSM - 07/13/18
I think for the Rem. short action the SAUM might be a better fit but if lengthening the magazine anyway then a none issue. Seems pretty close to the 358 Norma which I have always thought was an under appreciated round. Close to the 35 Newton which saw some use in Africa for game up to Elephants. One of the Smithsonian expeditions outfitted the hunters with 35 Newtons. Reports were it served well except the magazines were prone to coming open occasionally which could be unnerving if surrounded by Pachyderms.
Posted By: gunner500 Re: 358 WSM - 07/15/18
That'll be a fine, fun and effective rifle once you get it laid out the way you want and built, I've thought often about a 358 WSM build, but, for the life of me can't get by my ugly little Ruger Hawkeye S/S in 358 Winchester, the 200 gr TTSX's at 2700 fps are too damn accurate and decisive on game for me too look elsewhere, plus, I have an old 98 Mauser custom in the romp em stomp em 358 Norma Mag.

The 358 WSM does still hold appeal though.
© 24hourcampfire