Home
Posted By: John_Boy Red Hawk Rifles - 06/18/10
Bought my third Bell & Carlson from Dick Churchley of Red Hawk Rifles. Couldn't find a better person to deal with. Super guy.
Why B&C instead of a McMillan? All of my factory barreled rifles with B&C dropped from 1"+ groups at 100yds to legitimate 1/2" rifles.
Posted By: GregW Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/18/10
A McMillan wouldn't have allowed your rifles to do that somehow?
Posted By: Monashee Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/18/10
Dick is a first class guy to deal with. Monashee
Posted By: DMB Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/18/10
Not much into synthetic stocks, but I have two sporters with these stocks; one a McMillen and the other a B&C. Both shoot 3 shots inside 1/2" at 100 yards. No complaints about either make.
I did have B&C replace a 20+ year old recoil pad that just went the way of many older pads due to ozone, use, etc. They replaced it for the pad cost only, and they picked up labor costs. While there, they repainted it for $45, after calling me on the phone asking me if I wanted them to do it; a great price. It was all black, and now it is snow camo. They get high marks from me on their customer service.
Never had any problems with the McMillen which is 20+ years old also. It's a sporter stock on my 7mm Mag. The B&C is a sporter stock on my 22 BR.
Never used any other make synthetic stocks, and if I wanted a new one today, it would be one of those two that I have now.

Don
Posted By: 8mmwapiti Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/18/10
Originally Posted by GregW
A McMillan wouldn't have allowed your rifles to do that somehow?



John Boy,

You have committed one of the ultimate sins. You said something good about a stock that is not a McMillan. I am going to point out here that you said NOTHING bad about McMillan; you only said something good about some other(obviously inferior) stock. My purpose here is to warn you that with some here on the fire you are in danger of banishment. What ever you do do not at any time soon say something/anything good about a bullet other that Barnes or the bullet and stock snobs may gang up on you at that point you may be beyond saving.
eek grin
8mmwapiti
Posted By: Reloder28 Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/18/10
...And, definitely do not say anything bad about a Kimber in 270 Winchester? Or, at least don't let 'em know where you live.
Posted By: Craigster Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/18/10
And never, ever, compare a fine custom Mauser or Springfield to a 700 with a multi colored synthetic stock.
Posted By: John_Boy Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/27/10
8MMWapiti,
You are so right. I've stepped on some "Nosler" toes real regularly and they act as if I was an Obama clone.
I just don't believe in paying for a name when a quality piece of equipment will work wich is the point of the B&C / McSwirlyy statement.
But you are right, the guns snobs get downright offended if your opinion is not based on the price of your toys, and the more toys the better.
I feel so alone.....
Posted By: Steelhead Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/27/10
Haven't had a McMillan bust on me yet, I have had a B&C take a [bleep] though.

Some think it's 'paying for a name', whatever helps them sleep at night.
Posted By: Oklahomahunter Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/28/10
Dick Churchley is a very stand up guy. He definately know the product he sells.
Posted By: John_Boy Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/28/10
SteelHead,
You are correct. Sometimes it is better to pay for a name. Honda comes to mind. The other side of that coin is "you get what you pay for". (sometimes) Is a McSwirly worth the additional cost over a B&C? Depends on the intended purpose. Accuracy? I doubt I'll improve over .5" to make the extra cost worth it. So in that case, No. I currently hunt out of box blinds so the chances of the stock suffering severe damage are slim to none. Worth it, No. If I am ever blessed enough to get to hunt the mountains where bad things can happen...maybe worth it. But if the rifle stock suffers enough damage to render it unusable what condition will the scope be in. The stock brand and durability is therefore rendered a moot issue. Pride of ownership? Of course. However alot of us non-elite simply can't afford to be elite. I've just now upgraded from Simmons scopes to all Leupold. (24x, 12x and two 6x's). Yes, that's right Virginia only four measly centerfire rifles. You see some of the non-elite don't spend every spare dollar to stuff a gun safe with play pretties that can only be fired one at a time. We have to work our way up the elite food chain. We can't be smug enough to run down someone else's choices. 8MMWapiti was right. You can tell when you've offended the intelligencia on this site. Bottom line is: Dead is dead, whether death by Savage or death by Sako. "Live long and prosper" boys. Signed, Happily Non-Elite
Posted By: Steelhead Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/28/10
Yep, I've seen lots of VA boys in Alaska talking about how good their [bleep] was. That lasted about a week or two.

Course I didn't realize that you don't hunt so you are good with whatever you want to use. Carry on.
Posted By: GregW Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/28/10
Originally Posted by 8mmwapiti
Originally Posted by GregW
A McMillan wouldn't have allowed your rifles to do that somehow?



John Boy,

You have committed one of the ultimate sins. You said something good about a stock that is not a McMillan. I am going to point out here that you said NOTHING bad about McMillan; you only said something good about some other(obviously inferior) stock. My purpose here is to warn you that with some here on the fire you are in danger of banishment. What ever you do do not at any time soon say something/anything good about a bullet other that Barnes or the bullet and stock snobs may gang up on you at that point you may be beyond saving.
eek grin
8mmwapiti


Be careful now...

I own more B&C's than I do McMillans.

My point was obviously lost or ignored with your witty reply. I highly doubt the groups was shot solely because the handle was a B&C and not a McMillan but you knew that already.
Posted By: John_Boy Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/28/10
Steelhead, are you aware of the definition of "boorish".
I guess that hunting in Alaska or 40,000+ posts allows such snobery. No life besides the campfire huh? P.S. The "Virginia" reference is a play on words from a very famous letter; "Yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus". But I would't expect you to know such menial things.
Posted By: John_Boy Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/28/10
Greg,
I understood you point. And I appreciate your input. My point was that while McMillans are without a doubt a better stock, the B&C's suffice for my needs now until I can afford to upgrade. 8MMWapiti's point is well taken however as evidenced by the boorish reply of steelhead who thinks that stand hunting isn't hunting. Actually it's more like sniping. But, in our part of the country we are very limited. So, makeshift hunting is better than none at all. Here in the south (Texas) we do have enough manners to respect one anothers opinions (even if they're wrong :-) I guess when I'm elite enough I'll go "HUNT" in ALASKA! Or I may have to stoop to hunting Africa...cheaper don'tcha know.
Posted By: KDK Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
Originally Posted by John_Boy
No life besides the campfire huh?


Wow. I dunno if that's funny or just sad. I would say that Steelie probably enjoys life as much or more than anybody on this site. At least it looks that way from the pictures.
Posted By: Steelhead Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
I wiped my ass with two ply [bleep] paper tonight, guessing that really makes me elite from your perspective.

Course it's tough becoming elite spending an entire adult life as an enlisted man, but I still manage.
Posted By: Steelhead Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
P.S. You might also want to investigate paragraph breaks, if that isn't too elitist for you.
Posted By: toltecgriz Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
Originally Posted by John_Boy
Bought my third Bell & Carlson from Dick Churchley of Red Hawk Rifles. Couldn't find a better person to deal with. Super guy.
Why B&C instead of a McMillan? All of my factory barreled rifles with B&C dropped from 1"+ groups at 100yds to legitimate 1/2" rifles.

If that's all it took you probably could have rebedded the factory stock and gotten the same result. Then you could tell us all about the great factory stock.
Posted By: Tom264 Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
Careful Toltec, youve got over 11 k posts......you might be setting yourself up as a target.
Posted By: toltecgriz Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
I would have been at 13,540 but I'm running out of original ideas. grin
Posted By: Tom264 Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
Lol.... grin
Posted By: Steelhead Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
In that case it should have stopped at 37.............
Posted By: 8mmwapiti Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
My job here is done. grin

Deep breath time guys?????


8mmwapiti
Posted By: toltecgriz Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
Originally Posted by Steelhead
In that case it should have stopped at 37.............


Too funny not to say FU, pal....laffin

You'd be dead in the water at 6 if it weren't for the bumblebee.
Posted By: John_Boy Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
It is truely

amazing how a

simple post intended to brag on

a reputable businessman can

go so baaaad soooo fast. (ooops baaaad spelling!!!)

How is this for

paragraph

breaks:-)

Posted By: GregW Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
For the record, I'm pretty sure you need multiple paragraphs for a paragraph break, not a single sentence with 4 words on each line...grin...
Posted By: Steelhead Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
Considering the source I'd say PERFECT.
Posted By: toltecgriz Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
I'm still trying to figure out the relationship between accuracy and a guy who sells a stock made by someone else.

Not disputing that Dick, whoever he is, is a great guy, just looking for the connection.
Posted By: Jim in Idaho Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
Originally Posted by toltecgriz
I'm still trying to figure out the relationship between accuracy and a guy who sells a stock made by someone else.

Not disputing that Dick, whoever he is, is a great guy, just looking for the connection.


Maybe because he�s a �straight shooter�?
Posted By: John_Boy Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
Thank you steelhead, I'll take that as a compliment. I'm not normal. I appreciate Jim's and Greg's sense of humor.
No connection needed for the other issue. I just thought a compliment was due. I guess the accuracy statement should've been segregated. But that wouldn't have been diverse.....
I love this forum!!!!
Posted By: Steelhead Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/29/10
At least you are almost there on the paragraph breaks.
Posted By: John_Boy Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 06/30/10
I just need time....
This two finger typing is really tough:-)
Posted By: MajProvo Re: Red Hawk Rifles - 03/11/12
Guys:
Thanks for the recommendation on Red Hawk Rifles. I've been getting little or no customer service from some of the stock retailers. Today is a Sunday; I emailed Red Hawk to make certain a stock was really in inventory (nobody else has one) and they emailed me back in 5 mins ON A SUNDAY and answered all three of my questions. If I actually receive it when they say, they've earned a dedicated customer. Heck, they can miss the mark by a week and still beat the competition.
© 24hourcampfire