Home
Posted By: Sakohunter264 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/20/16
Time for another custom build. This will be the last one for a while.

Hart #2 3/4" Remington Contour Barrel
Remington CM Action
McMillan Edge Stock
PTG bottom metal

On the fence here. Can't decide between a custom 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H. I have both a standard and magnum action. Your opinions are greatly appreciated.

Posted By: elkhunternm Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/20/16
Get the .300 H&H.

Posted By: MarkFed Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/20/16
H&H
Posted By: Sakohunter264 Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/20/16
If choosing the 300 H&H have you found accuracy to be superb?
Posted By: bsa1917hunter Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/20/16
Originally Posted by Sakohunter264
Time for another custom build. This will be the last one for a while.

Hart #2 3/4" Remington Contour Barrel
Remington CM Action
McMillan Edge Stock
PTG bottom metal

On the fence here. Can't decide between a custom 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H. I have both a standard and magnum action. Your opinions are greatly appreciated.



30-06 is boring, the 300H&H is cool retro, but if there was another choice, I'd go 308 Norma mag just to be different... wink. You'd also get better brass life than the H&H with similar performance..
Posted By: handwerk Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/20/16
yep 300 H&H
Posted By: x2mosg Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/20/16
I passed on a pre-64 M70 300 H&H a few years ago. Didn't realize the value at the time, and it would have been a good buy at sticker price. I regret that one. Every day.

H&H
Posted By: Sakohunter264 Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/20/16
Anybody ever rent a reamer from 4H. I like the looks of the 308 Norma as well. Brass is also available. Never really considered this cartridge before.
Posted By: TDN Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/20/16
Bro, the H&H has got panache' - had a M70 PF come through my hands... wish I still had it if only for the cool factor!
Posted By: haverluk Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/20/16
That will be a light rifle in 300 H&H depending on scope choice.

Currently building a 30-06:

PTG Serengeti Reamer
McM Compact Swirly ADL w/ 14.5" LOP
Defiance Rebel LA
Obermeyer blank - Rock #3 dupe @ 23"
.250" lug +.75" shank
Bat SS trigger guard
Timney Trigger
Talley LW
6x42 scope
Posted By: BobinNH Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/20/16
If doing a 300 magnum I would go with Standard fill vs Edge. The 30/06 should be fine with Edge.
Posted By: sidepass Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
300 H&H no doubt. Then again I only own 3.
Posted By: Steelhead Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
30/06

Those that think cartridges are sexy need some serious professional help or a prostate.
Posted By: doubletap Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
300 H&H improved (Weatherby)
Posted By: elkhunternm Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
Originally Posted by Sakohunter264
If choosing the 300 H&H have you found accuracy to be superb?
Don't know what you would consider "superb" but it will be accurate enough for what ever you're gonna hunt with it.
Posted By: tomk Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
smile

you're sitting on two actions and this is going to be the last one for a while?

the only reason for a mag is to flatten trajectory...but it's real easy to load a 300 H&H like a 30-06....
Posted By: Just a Hunter Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
What about a 30-06 A.I.. Nosler is showing 2985 fps with a 180g bullet using RL 22 from a 24" barrel.
Posted By: jorgeI Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
What do you want to do with it? If weight is a concern, then the 06. Basically you are buying about another 200-250 fps with the H&H w 180gr bullets. Both of mine (on 70 actions, sorry) go about 3000-3020 fps with them. The 06 of course is a "gold standard". As to AI, nothing I would ever consider.
Posted By: CRS Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
I was at the same crossroads last year.

I had donors in both bolt faces. I ended up choosing the H&H. I was considering a 300 Win Mag also.

A number of reasons.
1. 30-06 is too practical (boring), and the H&H has some panache.
2. I already own a bunch of 30-06 improved. ie 270's.
3. It would be replacing the last 338-06 I sold. Going to use 180-200gr bullets exclusively.
4. A natural match to my 375 H&H. Both have Echols legend stocks. The 300 should be done shortly and was planning on posting pics of the pair when completed.


With all that being said, go with what you like. There is no wrong choice.
Posted By: InternetGuru Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
I have a 300H&H and my only complaint with it is the cost of factory ammo. Obviously less of a factor if you enjoy reloading.
Posted By: Just a Hunter Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
Originally Posted by jorgeI
As to AI, nothing I would ever consider.


Why? A friend has a 30-06 AI and loves it. I, for one, have the 300 H&H and love it.
Posted By: jorgeI Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
I just don't think they bring anything to the table that another standard cartridge can't match or best, not to mention their weirdness makes it tough if one is on a hunt in BFE and needs ammo.
Posted By: pacecars Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
I like the H&H myself but it would have to be in a Model 70 or Mauser action.
Posted By: Oheremicus Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
If it's going to be a heavier rifle, say 8.5-9.5 lbs. w/ a 24-26 barrel, I'd do a 300 H&H. If you want a 7.5-8 lb. rifle with a 22-24 inch barrel, I'd do an '06'. E
Posted By: CRS Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
Mine is on a Model 70 classic action with a clean pac-nor #2 at 24", cerakoted midnite blue. Dropped in an Echols's Edge fill legend stock.

Topped with dual dovetails and a Leupy 2.5-8.

Should be done shortly and am currently trying to find some of the new Hornady 180gr GMX's.

Heading to Africa in June for a PG hunt and plan on using the 300 as a primary.
Posted By: Boogaloo Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
I appreciate the nostalgia connected with the 300 H&H, but if the goal is to eventually shoot it, I like the 300 Win as the more useful round. I don't have much patience to locate rare or seasonal brass.

Any of my 300 Win rifles can easily become a 30-06, but if you are going to use the rifle, with the exception of extreme long range, there isn't anything the others do that the 30-06 won't do as well with today's bullets and powders.
Posted By: Orion2000 Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
Originally Posted by Sakohunter264
If choosing the 300 H&H have you found accuracy to be superb?


The first (and only) practice load that I worked up for my .300H&H.

[Linked Image]

Posted By: Sakohunter264 Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/21/16
Well it looks like the 300 H&H has the commanding lead. I handload all of my own ammo, so this is not a consideration. How do you guys feel about the recoil in a 7lb rifle? I own a 416 Taylor, and it's not horrible to shoot.
Posted By: 30Gibbs Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/22/16
[quote=jorgeI]I just don't think they bring anything to the table that another standard cartridge can't match or best, not to mention their weirdness makes it tough if one is on a hunt in BFE and needs ammo.


Part of the utility of a properly chambered AI rifle is that you can use factory ammo in a pinch, but I know that you already knew that Jorge .........
Posted By: geedubya Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/23/16
Jason,

You've often heard me say, "I'm a short range meat hunter.

just fer schitz n' giggles, an oldie,but a goody IMHO.

http://reloadersnest.com/article_300hh_oct2803.asp


[Linked Image]


Best,


GWB
Posted By: STS45 Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/23/16
300 H&H! I've always had a thing for that round.
Posted By: WyoCoyoteHunter Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/23/16
Have an H & H in a number one.. Cool round great game rifle..
Once you get a supply of brass you are set.. 06's are common as dirt, the H & H has CLASS!!!
Posted By: MontanaMan Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/23/16
300 H&H for sure........nothing else has it's cool factor.

It's actual ballistics might fool you & will almost surely bring a smile to your face.

MM
Posted By: bsa1917hunter Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/23/16
Originally Posted by CRS
Mine is on a Model 70 classic action with a clean pac-nor #2 at 24", cerakoted midnite blue. Dropped in an Echols's Edge fill legend stock.

Topped with dual dovetails and a Leupy 2.5-8.

Should be done shortly and am currently trying to find some of the new Hornady 180gr GMX's.

Heading to Africa in June for a PG hunt and plan on using the 300 as a primary.



That sounds pretty sweet right there...
Posted By: 458Win Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/24/16
If you are serious about "retro" then it would be the 30-06
If you want the original retro 300 H&H ballistics then get the 30-06
If you want easy to find ammo and components then get the 30-06

Posted By: Dirtfarmer Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/24/16
Originally Posted by 458Win
If you are serious about "retro" then it would be the 30-06
If you want the original retro 300 H&H ballistics then get the 30-06
If you want easy to find ammo and components then get the 30-06


Could be a "bottom line" here, somewhere... smile

DF
Posted By: Hammerdown Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/24/16
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by 458Win
If you are serious about "retro" then it would be the 30-06
If you want the original retro 300 H&H ballistics then get the 30-06
If you want easy to find ammo and components then get the 30-06


Could be a "bottom line" here, somewhere... smile

DF


I'm thinking,------30-06

Posted By: Dirtfarmer Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/24/16
Originally Posted by Hammerdown
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by 458Win
If you are serious about "retro" then it would be the 30-06
If you want the original retro 300 H&H ballistics then get the 30-06
If you want easy to find ammo and components then get the 30-06


Could be a "bottom line" here, somewhere... smile

DF


I'm thinking,------30-06


laugh

Ya think Phil may know something... shocked

DF
Posted By: 30338 Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/24/16
Between those two, it would be 30-06 for me as well.
Posted By: WyoCoyoteHunter Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/24/16
If I only used the .30-06, I would have given up shooting and hunting 20 years ago..
Posted By: DakotaDeer Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/24/16
If I only used 30-06 for the past 20 years, I would have been able to afford a number of hunts around the continent, instead of a cabinet full of unused rifles.
Posted By: WyoCoyoteHunter Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/24/16
I have a cabinet full of rifles and they are used... I have also made a number of hunts around the country and out of it..
Posted By: geedubya Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/24/16
Originally Posted by WyoCoyoteHunter
I have a cabinet full of rifles and they are used...



Ya'


[Linked Image]

never had a problem with the effectiveness of the '06

[Linked Image]

when used.



JAPPFT,


GWB
Posted By: Dirtfarmer Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/24/16
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer
If I only used 30-06 for the past 20 years, I would have been able to afford a number of hunts around the continent, instead of a cabinet full of unused rifles.

True, no doubt.

Practical, no doubt.

But, so un-Loony... shocked

And, I didn't say boring. One can do a lot of creative stuff with the '06.

But, that compulsive Loony disorder afflicting so many here just won't allow such practical, sensible solutions.

DF
Posted By: Savage_99 Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/24/16
Originally Posted by Sakohunter264
Time for another custom build. This will be the last one for a while.

Hart #2 3/4" Remington Contour Barrel
Remington CM Action
McMillan Edge Stock
PTG bottom metal

On the fence here. Can't decide between a custom 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H. I have both a standard and magnum action. Your opinions are greatly appreciated.



Start with an upscale action with features such as a M70 type safety, CRF etc and put that Rem aside for a target rifle.

As to the 30-06 vrs the 300 H&H. Well I got a 300 HH in a pre 64 many years ago. I shot it and loaded for it and put it aside and never hunted with it.

Meanwhile I hunt with lighter, handier 30-06's.

So get a 300 if you can afford it but have a featherweight 06 ready and sighted in.

That old M70 300 H&H weighs 9 pounds 2 ounces with it's 3.5-10X Leupold, sling and 26" barrel.

Posted By: 222Rem Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/25/16
Originally Posted by 458Win
If you are serious about "retro" then it would be the 30-06
If you want the original retro 300 H&H ballistics then get the 30-06
If you want easy to find ammo and components then get the 30-06



Well said Phil.

I'm as guilty as the next gun geek of thinking the '06 is passe' at times, but it's actually the rifle, more than the cartridge that sets the "tone." A 1940's M70 would warm my heart in ways that a rack full of new warning on the barrel rifles never could...........while ALL chambered for the same old .30 Gov't.

With today's bullet and powder selections, there's nothing that a .30-06 won't do, and do well. Of course the same can be said for other old classics like the 7x57 and 6.5x55. The Super-Thirty is a great round too though, and it'd be my first choice for a long action build...........just because I could. smile
Posted By: John_Gregori Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/25/16
Originally Posted by CRS
Mine is on a Model 70 classic action with a clean pac-nor #2 at 24", cerakoted midnite blue. Dropped in an Echols's Edge fill legend stock.

Topped with dual dovetails and a Leupy 2.5-8.

Should be done shortly and am currently trying to find some of the new Hornady 180gr GMX's.

Heading to Africa in June for a PG hunt and plan on using the 300 as a primary.
What will it weigh?
Posted By: geedubya Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/26/16
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by Hammerdown
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by 458Win
If you are serious about "retro" then it would be the 30-06
If you want the original retro 300 H&H ballistics then get the 30-06
If you want easy to find ammo and components then get the 30-06


Could be a "bottom line" here, somewhere... smile

DF


I'm thinking,------30-06


laugh

Ya think Phil may know something... shocked

DF



Some live where its a skosh intemperate(as in colder than a witch's tit)............




[Linked Image]
May, in the shade. LOL


some live where one can get a little hot under the collar

Quien Sabe?

GWB
Posted By: sactoller Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/26/16
Originally Posted by geedubya
Originally Posted by WyoCoyoteHunter
I have a cabinet full of rifles and they are used...



Ya'


[Linked Image]

never had a problem with the effectiveness of the '06

[Linked Image]

when used.



JAPPFT,


GWB


How much for the Scout
Posted By: CRS Re: 30-06 Vs. 300 H&H - 01/26/16
Originally Posted by John_Gregori
Originally Posted by CRS
Mine is on a Model 70 classic action with a clean pac-nor #2 at 24", cerakoted midnite blue. Dropped in an Echols's Edge fill legend stock.

Topped with dual dovetails and a Leupy 2.5-8.

Should be done shortly and am currently trying to find some of the new Hornady 180gr GMX's.

Heading to Africa in June for a PG hunt and plan on using the 300 as a primary.
What will it weigh?


I do not know, will weigh it when I get it. Was going to do a post on it after load work up.

I did get to handle it before the cerakoting and it feels fantastic in the hands. Hoping to have it by the end of the week.

© 24hourcampfire